 | |
 | |
| Abbreviation | CEI |
|---|---|
| Formation | 1984; 41 years ago (1984) |
| Founder | Fred L. Smith Jr. |
| Type | Public policy think tank |
| 52-1351785 | |
| Headquarters | 1310 L Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 |
President and CEO | Kent Lassman |
| Revenue | $10.1 million[1] (2023) |
| Expenses | $8.43 million[1] (2023) |
| Website | www |
TheCompetitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) is anon-profitlibertarianthink tank founded by the political writerFred L. Smith Jr. on March 9, 1984, inWashington, D.C., to advance principles of limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty. CEI focuses on a number of regulatory policy issues, including business and finance, labor, technology and telecommunications, transportation, food and drug regulation, and energy and environment in which they have promotedclimate change denial. Kent Lassman is the current president and CEO.
According to the2017 Global Go ToThink Tank Index Report (Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program,University of Pennsylvania), CEI was number 59 (of 90) in the "Top Think Tanks in the United States".[2]
Academic research has identified CEI as one of the think tanks funded to overturn theenvironmentalism of the 1960s, central to promotingclimate change denial. It was involved in assisting the anti-environmentalclimate change policy of the George W. Bush administration.[3] CEI promotes environmental policies based on limited government regulation and property rights, rejects what it calls "global warming alarmism",[4] and denies thescience of climate change.[5][6]
CEI is an opponent of government action by theEnvironmental Protection Agency that would require limits ongreenhouse gas emissions. It favorsfree-market environmentalism and supports the idea that market institutions are more effective in protecting the environment than is government. In 2016, CEI president Kent Lassman wrote on the organization's blog that, "there is no debate about whether the Earth's climate is warming", that "human activities very likely contribute to that warming", and that "this has long been the CEI's position".[7] In March 1992, CEI's founder Fred Smith said ofglobal warming: "Most of the indications right now are it looks pretty good. Warmer winters, warmer nights, no effects during the day because of clouding, sounds to me like we're moving to a more benign planet, more rain, richer, easier productivity to agriculture."[8]
In May 2006, CEI's global warming policy activities attracted attention as it embarked upon an ad campaign with two television commercials.[9] These ads promotecarbon dioxide as a positive factor in the environment and argue thatglobal warming is not a concern. One ad focuses on the message thatCO2 is misrepresented as apollutant, stating that "it's essential to life. We breathe it out. Plants breathe it in... They call it pollution. We call it life."[10] The other states that the world's glaciers are "growing, not melting... getting thicker, not thinner."[10] It citesScience articles to support its claims. However, the editor ofScience stated that the ad "misrepresents the conclusions of the two citedScience papers... by selective referencing". The author of the articles, Curt Davis, director of the Center for Geospatial Intelligence at theUniversity of Missouri, said CEI was misrepresenting his previous research to inflate their claims. "These television ads are a deliberate effort to confuse and mislead the public about the global warming debate," Davis said.[11]
In 2009, CEI's director of energy and global warming policy toldThe Washington Post, "The only thing that's been demonstrated to reduce emissions is economic collapse".[12] In 2014, CEI sued the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy over a video that linked thepolar vortex toclimate change.[13]
CEI advocates for regulatory reform on a range of policy issues, including energy, environment, business and finance, labor, technology and telecommunications, transportation, and food and drug regulation.[14]
Its annual survey of the federal regulatory state "Ten Thousand Commandments: An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State," documents the size, scope, and cost of federal regulations, and how the U.S. regulatory burden affects American consumers, businesses, and the economy.[15] CEI's Clyde Wayne Crews Jr. coined the phrase "regulatory dark matter," referencing astrophysics to distinguish between ordinary government regulations or "visible matter," and "regulatory dark matter," which consists of "thousands of executive branch and federal agency proclamations and issuances, including memos, guidance documents, bulletins, circulars and announcements with practical regulatory effect."[15]
In 2015, CEI filed anamicus brief in support of the petitioners inU.S. Telecom v. FCC. The brief argued that "Congress did not authorize the FCC to regulate the Internet when it enacted Section 706 of theTelecommunications Act [of 1996] and, in fact, placed it outside the scope of the FCC's rulemaking authority."[16]
CEI has argued against using antitrust regulation to break up big technology companies such as Facebook and Google.[17][18]
CEI has a longstanding project to recapture what they term "the moral legitimacy of capitalism" through research, writing, events, and other outreach activities.[19][20][21] In 2019, CEI's vice president for Strategy Iain Murray argued, in an op-ed for TheWall Street Journal, that advocates of capitalism and free markets had taken the support of social conservatives for granted.[22]
CEI was a member of the advisory board ofProject 2025, a collection ofconservative andright-wing policy proposals fromthe Heritage Foundation to reshape theUnited States federal government and consolidateexecutive power should theRepublican nominee win the2024 presidential election, from June 2022 through March 2024.[23][24]
The Competitive Enterprise Institute "is one of a small number of think tanks that have a litigation arm to their organization, according to an editorial in theWall Street Journal."[25]
From 2015 to 2019, theCenter for Class Action Fairness (CCAF) was part of CEI. It has since spun off as part of the new Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, a free-market nonprofit public-interest law founded by former CEI attorneysTed Frank andMelissa Holyoak.[26] CCAF represents class members against what it calls, "unfair class action procedures and settlements."[27]
CEI and Frank arguedFrank v. Gaos before the U.S. Supreme Court on October 31, 2018, opposing a proposed class action settlement involving Google, who paid out an $8.5 million settlement including $6 million incy-près funds and more than $2 million for class-action lawyers. Class members were not awarded any part of the settlement.[28]
In 2015, CEI and Frank successfully appealed a class action settlement in a case about the length ofSubway's "footlong" sandwiches. CEI argued that the proposed settlement benefited only nine people in the class but awarded more than half a million dollars to the class attorneys. JudgeDiane Sykes's ruling rejected the settlement in the Subway case that would have paid plaintiffs' attorneys $525,000 and left the class with nothing. The court's decision included the statement that "[a] class settlement that results in fees for class counsel but yields no meaningful relief for the class is no better than a racket."[29]
CEI funded and coordinatedKing v. Burwell andHalbig v. Burwell, two lawsuits that challenged theInternal Revenue Service's implementation of theAffordable Care Act.[30] The strategy of bringing such lawsuits was pioneered by Michael S. Greve, former chairman of CEI's board of directors, who stated: "This bastard [the act] has to be killed as a matter of political hygiene. I do not care how this is done, whether it's dismembered, whether we drive a stake through its heart, whether we tar and feather it, and drive it out of town, whether we strangle it."[31][32] TheKing v. Burwell suit alleged that the IRS's implementation violated the statute and sought to block "a major portion of Obamacare: the subsidies that more than 6 million middle-income people, across more than 30 states, now receive to buy health insurance."[30] CEI general counsel Sam Kazman argued in aUSA Today op-ed that the disputed IRS rule "raises a basic issue that goes far beyond Obamacare: Do agencies have to follow the laws enacted by Congress, or can they rewrite them?"[33] The case made its way to theSupreme Court, which is a 6–3 decision rejected the challenge and upheld the ACA subsidies.[30]
In 2012, the CEI, along with the conservative activist group60 Plus Association, filed a lawsuit against theConsumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CEI's suit alleges that theDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's creation of the CFPB violates theconstitutional separation of powers.[25][34] The CEI also contends that President Obama'srecess appointment ofRichard Cordray as CFPB director was unconstitutional[25][35] and that the powers of theFinancial Stability Oversight Council, created by Dodd-Frank, are unconstitutional.[25] In 2016, a federal judge rejected the challenge to Cordray's appointment.[34] The CEI's challenge to the constitutionality of CFPB remains pending in thefederal courts.[34]
In 1991, CEI established theWarren T. Brookes Journalism Fellowship to identify and train journalists who wish to improve their knowledge of environmental issues and free-market economics. In this manner, the program sought to perpetuate the legacy of Warren Brookes, who was a longtime journalist with theBoston Herald and theDetroit News and a nationally syndicated columnist. The fellowship ended in 2015. Former fellows include:[36]
| 1993–1994 | Ronald Bailey |
| 1994–1995 | Michael Fumento |
| 1995–1996 | Michelle Malkin |
| 1996–1997 | James Bovard |
| 1997–1998 | Jesse Walker |
| 1999–2000 | Brian Doherty |
| 2000–2001 | Sean Paige |
| 2001–2002 | Eileen Ciesla-Norcross |
| 2002–2003 | Hugo Gurdon |
| 2003–2004 | Neil Hrab |
| 2004–2005 | John Berlau |
| 2005–2006 | Timothy P. Carney |
| 2006–2007 | Jeremy Lott |
| 2007–2008 | Lene Johansen |
| 2008–2009 | Silvia Santacruz |
| 2009–2010 | Ryan Young |
| 2010–2011 | Kathryn Ciano |
| 2011–2012 | Matt Patterson |
| 2012–2013 | Matthew Melchiorre |
| 2013–2014 | Bill Frezza |
| 2014–2015 | Carrie Sheffield |
Bureaucrash was a special outreach and activist project of CEI described as an international network of pro-freedom activists working to promote a political ideology based on personal and economic freedom. It conducted political activism using new media, creative marketing, and education campaigns. The project maintained a website (bureaucrash.com), which as of November 2023 is now only a web redirect to CEI's main website.
CEI is funded by donations from individuals, foundations and corporations.[37] Donors to CEI include a number of companies in the energy, technology, automotive, and alcohol and tobacco industries.[38]
CEI's revenues for thefiscal year ending on September 30, 2015, were $7.5 million against expenses of $7.4 million.[39]ExxonMobil Corporation was a donor to CEI, giving the group about $2 million over seven years.[40] In 2006, the company announced that it had ended its funding for the group.[41]
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)38°54′14″N77°02′35″W / 38.9040°N 77.0431°W /38.9040; -77.0431