Acoat of arms is aheraldicvisual design[1] on anescutcheon (i.e.,shield),surcoat, ortabard (the last two being outer garments), originating inEurope. The coat of arms on an escutcheon forms the central element of the fullheraldic achievement, which in its whole consists of a shield,supporters, acrest, and amotto. A coat of arms is traditionally unique to thearmiger (e.g. anindividual person,family, state,organization,school orcorporation). The term "coat of arms" itself, describing in modern times just the heraldic design, originates from the description of the entire medieval chainmail "surcoat" garment used in combat or preparation for the latter.
Rolls of arms are collections of many coats of arms, and since theearly Modern Age centuries, they have been a source of information for public showing and tracing the membership of anoble family, and therefore itsgenealogy acrosstime.
Heraldic designs came into general use among European nobility in the 12th century. Systematic, heritable heraldry had developed by the beginning of the 13th century.Exactly who had a right to use arms, by law orsocial convention, varied to some degree between countries. Early heraldic designs were personal, used by individual noblemen (who might also alter their chosen design over time).Arms became hereditary by the end of the 12th century, in England by the time of KingRichard I during theThird Crusade (1189–1192).[2][3]
Burgher arms were used in Northern Italy in the second half of the 14th century, and in theHoly Roman Empireby the mid 14th century.In the late medieval period, use of arms spread to the clergy, to towns as civic identifiers, and to royally chartered organizations such as universities and trading companies. The arts ofvexillology and heraldry are closely related.
The termcoat of arms itself in origin refers to thesurcoat with heraldic designs worn by combatants, especially in theknightly tournament, in Old Frenchcote a armer. The sense is transferred to the heraldic design itself in Middle English, in the mid-14th century.[4]
Despite no common, enforceable widespread regulation,[citation needed] heraldry has remained consistent across Europe, where tradition alone has governed the design and use of arms.[5][citation needed] Some nations, such asEngland andScotland, still maintain the sameheraldic authorities which have traditionally granted and regulated arms for centuries and continue to do so in the present day. In England, for example, the granting of arms is and has been controlled by theCollege of Arms. Unlikeseals and other generalemblems, heraldic "achievements" have a formal description called ablazon, which uses vocabulary that allows for consistency in heraldic depictions. In the present day, coats of arms are still in use by a variety of institutions and individuals: for example, many European cities and universities have guidelines on how their coats of arms may be used, and protect their use astrademarks as any other unique identifier might be.[6][7] Many[citation needed] societies exist that also aid in the design and registration of personal arms.
The French system of heraldry greatly influenced the British andWestern European systems. Much of the terminology and classifications are taken from it. However, with the fall of the French monarchy (and later Empire) there is not currently aFons Honorum (power to dispense and control honors) to strictly enforce heraldic law. The French Republics that followed have either merely affirmed pre-existing titles and honors or vigorously opposed noble privilege. Coats of arms are considered an intellectual property of a family or municipal body. Assumed arms (arms invented and used by the holder rather than granted by an authority) are considered valid unless they can be proved in court to copy that of an earlier holder.
In the heraldic traditions ofEngland andScotland, an individual, rather than a family, had a coat of arms. In those traditions coats of arms are legal property transmitted from father to son;wives and daughters could also bear arms modified to indicate their relation to the current holder of the arms.Undifferenced arms are used only by one person at any given time. Other descendants of the original bearer could bear the ancestral arms only with somedifference: usually a colour change or the addition of a distinguishingcharge. One such charge is thelabel, which in British usage (outside theRoyal Family) is now always the mark of anheir apparent or (in Scotland) anheir presumptive. Because of their importance in identification, particularly in seals on legal documents, the use of arms was strictly regulated; few countries continue in this today. This has been carried out byheralds and the study of coats of arms is therefore called "heraldry". In time, the use of arms spread from military entities to educational institutes, and other establishments.[6]
In reference to a dispute over the exercise of authority over the Officers of Arms in England,Arthur Annesley, 1st Earl of Anglesey,Lord Privy Seal, declared on 16 June 1673 that the powers of theEarl Marshal were "to order, judge, and determine all matters touching arms, ensigns of nobility, honour, and chivalry; to make laws, ordinances, and statutes for the good government of the Officers of Arms; to nominate Officers to fill vacancies in the College of Arms; to punish and correct Officers of Arms for misbehaviour in the execution of their places". It was further declared that no patents of arms or any ensigns of nobility should be granted and no augmentation, alteration, or addition should be made to arms without the consent of the Earl Marshal.
InIreland the usage and granting of coats of arms was strictly regulated by theUlster King of Arms from the office's creation in 1552. After Irish independence in 1922 the office was still functioning and working out ofDublin Castle. The last Ulster King of Arms wasSir Nevile Rodwell Wilkinson [Ulster King of Arms 1908–1940], who held it until his death in 1940. At the Irish government's request, no new King of Arms was appointed.Thomas Ulick Sadleir, the Deputy Ulster King of Arms, then became the Acting Ulster King of Arms. He served until the office was merged with that ofNorroy King of Arms in 1943 and stayed on until 1944 to clear up the backlog.
Coat of arms of Sir Edward Stanley, 3rd Earl of Derby, KG
The heraldic tradition andstyle of modern and historic Germany and theHoly Roman Empire – including national and civic arms, noble andburgher arms, ecclesiastical heraldry, heraldic displays, and heraldic descriptions – stand in contrast to Gallo-British, Latin and Eastern heraldry, and strongly influenced the styles and customs of heraldry in theNordic countries, which developed comparatively late.[9]
In theNordic countries, provinces, regions, cities, and municipalities have coats of arms. These are posted at the borders and on buildings containing official offices, as well as used in official documents and on the uniforms of municipal officers. Arms may also be used on souvenirs or other effects, given that an application has been granted by the municipal council.
At a national level, "coats of arms" were generally retained by European states with constitutional continuity of more than a few centuries, including constitutional monarchies likeDenmark as well as old republics likeSan Marino andSwitzerland.
InItaly the use of coats of arms was only loosely regulated by the states existing before theunification of 1861. Since theConsulta Araldica, thecollege of arms of theKingdom of Italy, was abolished in 1948, personal coats of arms and titles of nobility, though not outlawed, are not recognised.
Coats of arms inSpain were generally left up to the owner themselves, but the design was based on military service and the heritage of their grandparents. InFrance, the coat of arms is based on theFleur-de-lys and theRule of Tinctures used in English heraldry as well.
TheGreat Seal of the United States uses on the obverse as its central motif a heraldic achievement described as being the arms of the nation.[12] The seal, and the armorial bearings, were adopted by theContinental Congress on 20 June 1782, and is a shield divided palewise into thirteen pieces, with a blue chief, which is displayed upon the breast of an American bald eagle. The crest is thirteen stars breaking through a glory and clouds, displayed with no helm, torse, or mantling (unlike most European precedents at the time). Many of the American states have adoptedtheir own coats of arms, which usually designed as part of therespective state's seal.[citation needed]Vermont has both astate seal and astate coat of arms that are independent of one another (though both contain a pine tree, a cow and sheaves of grain); the seal is used to authenticate documents, whilst the heraldic device represents the state itself.
TheVatican City State and theHoly See each have their owncoat of arms. As the papacy is not hereditary, its occupants display their personal arms combined with those of their office. Somepopes came fromarmigerous (noble) families; others adopted coats of arms during their career in the Church. The latter typically allude to their ideal of life, or to specific pontifical programmes.[13] A well-known and widely displayed example in recent times wasPope John Paul II's arms. His selection of a large letter M (for theVirgin Mary) was intended to express the message of his strongMariandevotion.[14]Roman Catholicdioceses are also each assigned a coat of arms, as arebasilicas or papal churches, the latter usually displaying these on the building. These may be used in countries which otherwise do not use heraldic devices. In countries like Scotland with a strong statutory heraldic authority, arms will need to be officially granted and recorded.
Flags are used to identify ships (where they are calledensigns), embassies and such, and they use the samecolors and designs found in heraldry, but they are not usually considered to be heraldic. A country may have both anational flag and a national coat of arms, and the two may not look alike at all. For example, theflag of Scotland (St Andrew's Cross) has a whitesaltire on a bluefield, but theroyal arms of Scotland has a red lion within a doubletressure on agold (or) field.
Egyptian coats of arms from the late monarchical, and early republican periods showing common Near and Middle Eastern motifs, namely the crescent and stars which are symbols of the region's predominant religion,Islam, and theEagle of Saladin
Among the states ruled by communist regimes, emblemsresembling those of the Soviet states were adopted in all theWarsaw Pact states exceptCzechoslovakia andPoland. Since 1986–1989, some of the ex-Communist states, such asRussia, have reused their original pre-communist heraldry, often with only the symbols of monarchy removed. Other countries such asBelarus have retained their communist coats of arms or at least kept some of the old heraldry.
In the coat of arms ofEswatini, alion and anelephant serve as supporters. They are each intended to represent the king and the queen mother respectively, the nation's joint heads of state.
Japanese emblems, calledkamon (often abbreviated "mon"), are family badges which often date back to the 7th century, and are used in Japan today. The Japanese tradition is independent of the European, but many abstract and floral elements are used.
^Employee Identification with the Corporate Identity International Studies of Management and Organization, Volume 32, Number 3, 2002"Group Identity Formation in the German Renaissance". 20 August 2002. Archived fromthe original on 20 January 2013. Retrieved26 August 2015.
^Volborth, Carl-Alexander von (1981).Heraldry: Customs, Rules and Styles. Poole, England: Blandford Press.ISBN0-7137-0940-5.ISBN0-7137-0940-5 p. 129.
College of Arms – Repository of the coats of arms and pedigrees of English, Welsh, Northern Irish and Commonwealth families and their descendants together with, and in principle under the control of, the legal body theCourt of Chivalry, both medieval in origin.
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
