The group has opposed government action to curbgreenhouse gas emissions and called on President Trump to exit the Paris Climate Agreement.[8]
The Club for Growth PAC endorses and raises money for candidates who meet its standards for fiscal conservatism. According toPolitico, "The Club for Growth is the pre-eminent institution promoting Republican adherence to a free-market, free-trade, anti-regulation agenda."[9]
The Club for Growth was founded in 1999 byStephen Moore,Thomas L. Rhodes, andRichard Gilder.[10] Moore served as the first president of the Club from 1999 until December 2004, when board members voted to remove Moore as president.[11] In 2003 through 2004, the Club for Growth was the largest single fundraiser forRepublicanHouse andSenate candidates, outside of theRepublican Party itself, raising nearly $22 million.[7]
FuturePennsylvaniaUnited States SenatorPat Toomey served as president from 2005 until his resignation in April 2009. Former Indiana CongressmanChris Chocola succeeded Toomey. Chocola served as president through December 2014. He remains a member of the Club's board. Former Indiana CongressmanDavid McIntosh was named president in January 2015.[12]
On September 19, 2005, theFederal Election Commission (FEC) filed suit against the Club for Growth alleging violations of theFederal Election Campaign Act for failing to register as a political action committee in the2000,2002, and2004 congressional elections.[13] In September 2007, the Citizens Club for Growth (the Club for Growth changed its name) and the FEC agreed to settle the lawsuit.[14] According to their joint filing, Citizens Club for Growth said "that it operated under the good faith belief that it had not triggered political committee status ... [and] [f]or the purposes of this settlement, and in order to avoid protracted litigation costs, without admitting or denying each specific basis for the [FEC's] conclusions," Citizens Club for Growth no longer contested the alleged violations and agreed to pay $350,000 in civil penalties.[15][non-primary source needed]
According to the Associated Press, the settlement was one of "a series of actions by the FEC to penalize independent political groups that spent money to influence elections but did not register as political committees. The groups, called 527 organizations for the section of the IRS code ... , played a significant role in the 2004 congressional and presidential elections by raising unlimited amounts of money from labor groups, corporations and wealthy individuals."[14] On June 25, 2012, U.S. District Court JudgeRobert L. Wilkins issued an order stating that the FEC "is FORMALLY REPRIMANDED as a sanction for violating explicitly clear orders" (emphasis in original text) regarding confidentiality in the 2007 settlement agreement."[16][non-primary source needed]
In 2010, the Club's political arms spent about $8.6 million directly on candidates and bundled another $6 million from Club members, directing those funds to candidates.[17] In 2012, according toOpenSecrets, Club members donated at least $4 million, and the Club's political arms spent nearly $18 million on elections.[18]
The Club for Growth's super PAC, which historically has been most active in Republican primary elections, spent more in general elections in the 2018 cycle than it ever had before. This trend was expected to continue into 2020.[20] Club for Growth president David McIntosh described the Club's evolution, saying "We want to be the political arm of the conservative movement—inside the Republican Party."[21]
In June 2020,The Hill wrote that the Club was "flexing its financial muscle this year, doling out millions of dollars to conservative congressional candidates and outspending most other outside groups as it looks to help the GOP keep control of the Senate and improve Republican chances in the House." The Club for Growth raised $55 million in 2020, "making 2020 its most lucrative cycle yet." The Club, which said it planned to spend at least $35 million in the 2020 election cycle, outspent most other groups not affiliated with presidential candidates.[22] According to a Guardian analysis, the organization was one of the biggest backers of the Republican lawmakers who tried to overturn the 2020 US election results. It spent $20m to support its campaigns in 2018 and 2020. One of the largest donors wasJeffrey Yass who in 2020 donated $20.7m to the Club.[23]
Founder Stephen Moore has said, "We want to be seen as the tax cut enforcer in the [Republican] party."[24] Unlike many other political action committees, the Club for Growth's PAC regularly participates in funding candidates for primary elections.[17] The Club focuses more on open seats than on challenging sitting Republicans, but it has helped to unseat a number of incumbent Republicans.[11][25] The Club for Growth has established a vetting process for potential candidates that involves one or more interviews, research on the race and the candidate's record, and a poll conducted to establish whether the candidate has a viable chance for victory.[26] Each election cycle, the Club's PAC endorses candidates and encourages donors to support the endorsed candidates.[11] Promoting a more conservative agenda, the Club is known for targeting "establishment" Republican candidates.[17]
In 2003, the original Club for Growth strongly opposed theMedicare prescription drug benefit proposal.[27] The Club for Growth strongly supported the Bush tax cuts of 2003 and ran television ads against two Republicans who voiced opposition to the tax cuts. According toThe New York Times, "Last spring, [Club for Growth president Steve] Moore attacked two Republican Senators who were resisting the latest tax cut:George Voinovich of Ohio andOlympia Snowe of Maine. He ran ads in each of their states in which he compared them with the French president,Jacques Chirac.Karl Rove, President Bush's political advisor, stated that the ads were "stupid" and "counterproductive".[28]
In 2005, Pat Toomey became president and the Club for Growth created a congressional scorecard. The Club's first key vote alert was an amendment sponsored by a Democrat. RepresentativeEarl Blumenauer offered an amendment to an agricultural appropriations bill that would have reduced the sugar program by 6 percent. The Club for Growth supported the amendment, which failed, 146–280.[29][30]
The Club fought to support theDominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2005, running print advertisements in local Beltway publications in the Washington, DC area. According toRoll Call, "Former Rep. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), president of the Club for Growth, a CAFTA supporter, said his group continued running advertisements before the Congressional vote."[31]
The Club opposed the 2005 highway bill.[32] President Bush threatened to veto the bill but did sign it. TheChristian Science Monitor quoted David Keating saying, "For fiscal conservatives, it's frustrating to watch ... He's beginning to lose all credibility with these veto threats."[33] According toThe Washington Post, "The Club for Growth, a conservative group that funds like-minded candidates for Congress, has turned the highway legislation into a bumper sticker for the GOP's fiscal failings.[34]
"This is a defining moment. The Republican Party came to power in 1995 by advocating limited government. But in the last four to five years, there has been no evidence that the Republican officials in the federal government have any remaining commitment to this vital principle."[36]
During the debate on the highway bill, the Club supported an amendment byTom Coburn that would defund the notedGravina Island Bridge, from Ketchikan to the island in Southeast Alaska.
Following the Supreme Court'sKelo v. City of New London decision, the Club gained an appropriations amendment byScott Garrett to prohibit funds in the bill from being used to enforce the Court's decision. The amendment passed, 231–189.[37] The Club for Growth PAC highlighted this vote when it targetedJoe Schwarz, a House Republican who it helped defeat in 2006, claiming he was too liberal.[38]
In the spring of 2006, the Club opposed the 527 Reform Act, which curtailed spending by such political organizations. It led a coalition of center-right groups in sending letters to Congress to support its position.[39] The House passed the 527 Reform Act by a margin of 218–209, but the Senate did not consider the legislation.[40]
The Club for Growth supported various amendments to cut earmarks in the budget, such as "dairy education" and a "wine initiative."[41] The Club included assessment of sponsorship of thecard check bill in its scorecard. If lawmakers co-sponsored the bill, they were docked points in the rating system.[42]
The Club for Growth issued a new scorecard in 2007 that highlighted how House members voted on several amendments that defunded earmarks. Sixteen congressmen scored a perfect 100% on the so-called "RePORK Card", voting for all 50 anti-pork amendments. They were all Republicans. Conversely, 105 congressmen (81 Democrats and 24 Republicans) scored a 0%, voting against every single amendment. In 2007, the Club also scored against House bills that increased the minimum wage, implemented card check, and sought caps on CEO pay.[43] In the Senate, the Club scored against bills that increased the minimum wage, passage of the farm bill, and theSCHIP healthcare plan.[44]
In 2007, the Club for Growth opposed protectionist policies against China. SenatorsChuck Schumer of New York andLindsey Graham of South Carolina had proposed a bill to apply large tariffs on Chinese imports if that country did not increase the value of its currency. In response, the Club sponsored a petition of 1,028 economists who stated their opposition to protectionist policies against China. The list of economists included Nobel LaureatesFinn Kydland,Edward Prescott,Thomas Schelling, andVernon Smith. The petition played off a similar petition that was also signed by 1,028 economists in 1930 that opposed theSmoot-Hawley Tariff Act.[45]
After Barack Obama was elected president in November 2008, Club President Pat Toomey penned an op-ed that included the results of a poll commissioned by the Club: "A poll commissioned by the Club for Growth in 12 swing congressional districts over the past weekend shows that the voters who made the difference in this election still prefer less government—lower taxes, less spending and less regulation—to Obama's economic liberalism. Turns out, Americans didn't vote for Dems because they support their redistributionist agenda, but because they are fed up with the GOPers in office. This was a classic 'throw the bums out' election, rather than an embrace of the policy views of those who will replace them."[47]
In 2009, the Club produced another "RePORK Card". This time there were 22 House members with a 100% score: 1 Democrat and 21 Republicans. At the bottom, 211 House members received a 0% score: 202 Democrats and 9 Republicans.[48]
The Club for Growth launched its Repeal It! campaign in 2010 in an attempt to help build public support for undoing the Affordable Care Act. In 2010, more than 400 federal lawmakers and candidates signed the Repeal It! pledge, including more than 40 of the incoming freshman class of congressmen and senators.[49]
The Club for Growth advocated the discharge petition, a proposal that would have forced a House vote on repealing the Affordable Care Act. At the time,Keith Olbermann said: "The petition, which would need 218 signatures to force House Speaker Pelosi to put the repeal bill up for a vote, went largely ignored. AsTalking Points Memo reports, on Monday it had only 30 signatures. That is until the right wing group Club For Growth e-mailed its members, explaining Mr. [Steve] King's discharge petition will be considered as a key vote on the club's annual Congressional scorecard. That scorecard is considered one of the gold standards of conservative rankings. That and the Spanish Inquisition. So by Tuesday, the petition had 22 more signatures."[50]
The Club was involved in thedebate over the debt ceiling that took place in August 2011. The Club endorsed and strongly supported "Cut Cap and Balance" and ran issue ads urging Republicans to "show some spine" on maintaining the debt ceiling.[51]
The Club opposed the re-authorization of theExport-Import Bank.[52] The Club also took a strong position against Republicans voting for tax increases during the debate over the so-called "fiscal cliff". The Club opposed the "Plan B" tax increase proposed byJohn Boehner and also opposed thefinal deal.[53]
In September 2013, Club for Growth made voting on theContinuing Appropriations Resolution a key vote, announcing it track how representatives voted on the bill and make that part of their congressional scorecard.[54] The group urged representatives to vote yes, particularly with defunding ObamaCare in mind.[54]
The Club for Growth opposed the Ryan-Murray Budget deal.[55] It also opposed the 2013 farm bill, which failed for the first time in the bill's 40-year history.[56][57][58]
From April through June 2015, the Club for Growth spent $1 million on television ads in nine congressional districts, urging the members of Congress in those districts to oppose re-authorization of theExport-Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank). Additional advertisements were announced in two districts in Utah, but were cancelled when the members declared their opposition to the Ex-Im Bank.[59] In addition, the Club for Growth announced a key vote against re-authorization of the Ex-Im Bank.[60]
The Club for Growth produced a series of policy papers on the positions taken by major Republican presidential candidates on the government's role in economic growth. The eleven papers examined the records and remarks of the candidates on issues such as tax reform, government spending, entitlement reform, and free trade.[61] The Club concluded that SenatorsTed Cruz,Rand Paul, andMarco Rubio were the most likely candidates to enact pro-growth policies if elected president.[62]
In October 2015, the Club for Growth announced a key vote against the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, saying that it would include a $1.5 trillion in the debt ceiling and a $112 billion increase in federal spending.[63]
The Club for Growth has opposed government action to curbgreenhouse gas emissions. In 2009, the Club for Growth pressured Republican politicians not to support acap-and-trade bill, which the group viewed as being "extremely harmful to the economy."[64] In 2011, the group issued a white paper criticizing presidential candidateMitt Romney's regulatory record as Massachusetts governor, including his support ofglobal warming policies.[65] In 2017, the group called on President Trump to exit theParis Agreement.[8]
The Club for Growth opposes efforts to fund the Internal Revenue Service. In 2021, the Club for Growth claimed that efforts to fund the IRS were intended to aggressively pursue conservatives and that it was one of the "vicious tactics of the radical socialist left".[66]
Since 2005, the Club for Growth has produced an annual congressional scorecard. Each member of Congress receives a score on a scale of 0 to 100. The Club for Growth awards aDefender of Economic Freedom award to members of Congress who receive a 90% above on the annual scorecard and have a lifetime score of at least 90%.[67]The New York Times described the Club's release of its annual scorecard as "set upon by Republicans like the Oscar nominations list by Hollywood, with everyone dying to know who ranks where, especially in election years".[68]
The Club's 2015 congressional scorecard was based on 29 House votes and 25 Senate votes.Mike Lee was the only U.S. Senator to receive a perfect score.Ben Sasse was ranked second among U.S. Senators, followed byMarco Rubio andTed Cruz. On the U.S. House side,John Ratcliffe,Tim Huelskamp, andScott DesJarlais received perfect scores.[69]
The Club for Growth Foundation's 2017 Congressional Scorecard was released in February 2018.Andy Biggs, a Republican from Arizona, was the only member of the U.S. House to receive a 100% rating. A total of 29 members of the U.S. House received a score of at least 90%. In the U.S. Senate,Jeff Flake,Pat Toomey, andJames Lankford scored 100%, while four other senators scored at least 90%.[70]
In 2004, the Club for Growth's PAC endorsed and supportedU.S. RepresentativePat Toomey, who challenged incumbentSenatorArlen Specter in the Republicanprimary inPennsylvania. The PAC was reported to have collected contributions totaling over$934,000 for Toomey. It also spent $1 million on its own independent television advertising campaign on Toomey's behalf.[72] Specter, who had the support of President Bush, the RNC, and Sen.Rick Santorum, defeated Toomey by a narrow margin of 51–49%. Afterward Toomey accepted the position as President of the Club for Growth, where he served until April 2009.
The original Club's PAC supported the electoral bids of freshmen U.S. CongressmanAdrian Smith (R-NE),Doug Lamborn[73] (R-CO),Bill Sali[74] (R-ID), andTim Walberg[75] (R-MI), who all were elected.Congressional Quarterly wrote that Smith's views did not differ greatly from those of his primary election rivals, but the endorsement of the Club for Growth's PAC "gave him the imprimatur of the most fiscally conservative candidate, and it helped boost him to the top of the campaign fundraising competition."[76]
In the 2006 primaries, the Club's PAC recommended to its donors that they support incumbent Democratic CongressmanHenry Cuellar (D-TX), the first time the Club's PAC recommended support for aDemocrat. Cuellar won the primary race against former CongressmanCiro Rodriguez.[11] The Club's PAC endorsed four candidates for U.S. Senate, includingMike Bouchard in Michigan,Mike McGavick in Washington,Michael Steele in Maryland, andStephen Laffey in Rhode Island, who did not win.[11]
Support by the Club's PAC was not a guarantee of success: its candidateSharron Angle was defeated in the Republican primary inNevada's 2nd congressional district, although it spent more than $1 million on her campaign.[77] The Club's PAC also supported primary campaigns of Phil Krinkie in Minnesota and Kevin Calvey in Oklahoma, who lost, as did incumbent congressmanChris Chocola in Indiana,[17]John Gard in Wisconsin, and Rick O'Donnell in Colorado.[78]
The Club's PAC supported the reelection ofSteve Chabot in Ohio.
The Club's PAC endorsed state senatorSteve Buehrer in the special election for Ohio's 5th congressional district to replace the deceased Rep.Paul Gillmor.[99] Buehrer however was defeated byBob Latta, the son of former Rep.Del Latta, in the Republican primary in November 2007 by a 44% to 40% margin.
The Club's PAC endorsed Paul Jost, the chairman of the Virginia chapter of the Club for Growth, in the contest to replace deceased Rep.Jo Ann Davis in Virginia's 1st congressional district.[100] In the nominating convention, Jost was defeated by state delegateRob Wittman.
In Maryland's 1st congressional district, the Club's PAC endorsed state senatorAndrew P. Harris against nine term incumbentWayne Gilchrest. In the February 12 primary, Harris surged to a strong 44% to 32% victory. Gilchrest became the second incumbent Republican to be defeated by a candidate supported by the Club. The first was Rep.Joe Schwarz in Michigan in 2006.[25] Harris was, however, unable to win the general election.
In Georgia's 10th congressional district, the Club's PAC endorsed incumbentPaul Broun who defeated state representative Barry Fleming 71% to 29% in the July 15, 2008, primary election. Broun's victory surprised many political observers.[101]
In Arizona's 5th congressional district, the Club's PAC endorsed formerMaricopa County TreasurerDavid Schweikert, who narrowly defeated former candidate Susan Bitter-Smith by a margin of 30% to 28%; there were three other candidates.[102] He did not win the general election.
During the 2008 Republican presidential primaries, the Club's PAC was critical ofMike Huckabee, attacking him as the "tax-increasing liberal governor of Arkansas".[103] Huckabee, in turn, referred to the Club for Growth as the "Club for Greed".[104]
The Club's PAC endorsed in thespecial election inNew York's 23rd congressional district theConservative Party of New York candidate,Doug Hoffman instead of Republican candidateDede Scozzafava. With the Club pouring money into Hoffman's campaign, Scozzafava realized that she could not win and withdrew from the race the Sunday before the November 3 special election, endorsing the Democratic candidateBill Owens.[109] Owens won the election in a district where portions had not had a Democratic congressman since the 19th century.[110]
Of the 26 general election candidates endorsed by Club for Growth in 2010, 20 won election.[111] The following chart lists candidates endorsed by the Club:[112]
In August 2015, the Club for Growth PAC announced it would formally support presidential candidates for the first time, saying the group wouldbundle donations for Cruz, Rubio, Walker, Bush, and Paul. Club for Growth President David McIntosh said "Five candidates are at the forefront of the Republican presidential field on issues of economic freedom, and the Club for Growth PAC is standing with them to help them stand out from the rest."[162] In October 2015, McIntosh said Cruz and Rubio were "the gold standard" of Republican presidential candidates.[163]
The Club for Growth's Super PAC,Club for Growth Action, was particularly critical of Trump's candidacy, announcing a $1 million Iowa advertising buy against his campaign in September 2015. The Club for Growth Action was the first third-party group to spend significant sums againstDonald Trump.[164] The Club for Growth announced a $1.5 million advertising buy in Florida in March 2016. The group's advertisements highlighted Trump's support for liberal policies, such as a single-payer health insurance system and tax increases.[165][166][167][168]
In March 2016,Politico reported that the Club for Growth PAC planned to deny congressional endorsements to any candidates who endorsed Donald Trump's presidential bid before the nomination was actually clinched. The Club's PAC noted that the warning did not apply to those who endorsed Trump after the May 3, 2016, Indiana primary.[169][170] Also in March 2016, the Club for Growth PAC endorsedTed Cruz for president. The Club for Growth PAC had never previously endorsed in a presidential race. According to Club for Growth headDavid McIntosh, "This year is different because there is a vast gulf between the two leading Republican candidates on matters of economic liberty. Their records make clear that Ted Cruz is a consistent conservative who will fight to shrink the federal footprint, while Donald Trump would seek to remake government in his desired image."[171]
The Club for Growth endorsed Bob Gray to representTom Price's district after he left to lead theUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. The group reportedly also bought $250,000 of airtime on Atlanta cable against early Republican front-runnerKaren Handel.[192][193] The special election took place on April 18, 2017, with RepublicanKaren Handel defeating Gray and winning a runoff election on June 20, 2017, against DemocratJon Ossoff.
On April 9,Donald Trump welcomedDavid McIntosh onstage during a rally in North Carolina. Trump praised McIntosh, stating, "He’s a winner. He’s a fighter. We are undefeated when we work together." McIntosh responded, "You are a great man. … I am so proud to partner with you."[225]
On April 15, Donald Trump officially endorsedJD Vance for the2022 United States Senate election in Ohio.[226] After this endorsement, Club for Growth continued their negative ad campaign against Vance, and doubled down on April 27 with an ad attacking Vance for negative statements he made about Trump in 2016.[226][227] According toThe New York Times'Maggie Haberman, Trump reacted to this advertisement by having an assistant send a three word message to McIntosh, "Go f*** yourself."[228]
David McIntosh, the organization's president, has endorsed Trump for president. The organization has favorably commented about Trump's campaign. Note that not all these races were inswing seats, meaning those in safe seats were highly likely to have won after winning the nomination.
^Gould Sheinin, Aaron; Hallerman, Tamar (May 24, 2016). "Crane, Ferguson head into GOP runoff to fill Lynn Westmoreland's seat". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
