Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Clonal anergy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lack of response by the immune system to foreign substances
"Anergy" redirects here. For the use of the term in thermodynamics, seeExergy.
icon
This articlemay incorporate text from alarge language model. It may includehallucinated information,copyright violations, claims notverified in cited sources,original research, orfictitious references. Any such material should beremoved, and content with anunencyclopedic tone should be rewritten.(September 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Inimmunology,anergy characterizes the absence of a response from the body'sdefense mechanisms when confronted withforeign substances. This phenomenon involves the direct induction ofperipheral lymphocyte tolerance. When an individual is in a state of anergy, it signifies that their immune system is incapable of mounting a typical response against a specificantigen, typically a self-antigen. The term anergy specifically refers tolymphocytes that exhibit an inability to react to their designated antigen. Notably, anergy constitutes one of the essential processes fosteringtolerance within the immune system, alongsideclonal deletion andimmunoregulation.[1] These processes collectively act to modify the immune response, preventing the inadvertent self-destruction that could result from an overactive immune system.

Mechanism

[edit]

This phenomenon was first described in B lymphocytes byGustav Nossal and termed "clonal anergy." The clones of B lymphocytes in this case can still be found alive in the circulation, but are ineffective at mounting immune responses. LaterRonald Schwartz andMarc Jenkins described a similar process operating in the T lymphocyte. Manyviruses (HIV being the most extreme example) seem to exploit the immune system's use of tolerance induction to evade the immune system, though the suppression of specific antigens is done by fewer pathogens (notablyMycobacterium leprae).[2]

At the cellular level, "anergy" is the inability of animmune cell to mount a complete response against its target. In the immune system, circulating cells called lymphocytes form a primary army that defends the body against pathogenicviruses,bacteria andparasites. There are two major kinds of lymphocytes – theT lymphocyte and theB lymphocyte. Among the millions of lymphocytes in the human body, only a few actually are specific for any particular infectious agent. At the time of infection, these few cells must be recruited and allowed to multiply rapidly. This process – called "clonal expansion" – allows the body to quickly mobilise an army of clones, as and when required. Such immune response is anticipatory and its specificity is assured by pre-existing clones of lymphocytes, which expand in response to specificantigen (process called "clonal selection"). This specific clonal army then combats thepathogen until the body is free of the infection. Following clearance of the infection, the clones that are no longer needed die away naturally.

However, a small number of the body's army of lymphocytes are able to react with proteins that are normally present in a healthy body. The clonal expansion of those cells can lead toautoimmune diseases, wherein the body attacks itself. In order to prevent this process, lymphocytes possess an intrinsic quality-control mechanism. This machinery shuts down the lymphocytes' ability to expand, if the trigger for the expansion turns out to be the body's own protein. T-cell anergy can arise when the T-cell does not receive appropriate co-stimulation in the presence of specific antigen recognition.[2] B-cell anergy can be induced by exposure to soluble circulating antigen, and is often marked by a downregulation of surfaceIgM expression and partial blockade ofintracellularsignaling pathways.[2]

Molecular mechanism of anergy induction in T lymphocytes

[edit]

Understanding the molecular mechanism of anergy induction inT lymphocytes unveils the intricate interplay of signaling pathways governing immune responses. Upon stimulation, theT cell receptor (TCR) in conjunction with co-stimulatory receptors orchestrates a comprehensive activation of all theT-cell’s signaling pathways, collectively termed full T-cell stimulation. Among these pathways, the calcium-dependent arm of lymphocyte signaling is particularly pivotal, triggered byTCR engagement. This initiates a cascade culminating in an elevation of intracellularCa+II concentration,[3] a critical event in T cell activation. Under such conditions, the calcium-dependent phosphatasecalcineurin acts on thetranscription factorNFAT, facilitating its translocation to the nucleus, where it regulates gene expression.

Expanding upon this complexity, during fullT-cell stimulation theco-stimulatory receptorCD28 activatesPI3K and other pathways, augmenting the nuclear levels of key transcription factors such asrel,NF-κB andAP-1 beyond those induced by TCR activation alone.[3] The formation ofAP-1,fos/jun heterodimer, further complexes withNFAT, creating a transcriptional complex crucial for the expression of genes[4] associated withT-cell productive responses, includingIL-2 and itsreceptor.[4]

In contrast,TCR signaling in the absence of co-stimulatory receptors predominantly activates the calcium arm of the signaling pathway, leading toNFAT activation alone. However, without the concurrent induction ofAP-1 by other pathways,NFAT fails to form the transcriptional complex necessary for a productiveT-cell response. Instead,NFAT homodimerizes, functioning as a transcriptional factor that induces anergy in the lymphocyte.[5]

NFAT homodimers play a direct role in the expression of anergy-associated genes, such as the ubiquitin ligaseGRAIL and the proteasecaspase 3.[5] Furthermore, anergized cells exhibit decreased expression levels ofIL-2,TNFα, andIFNγ, characteristic of a productive response, while favoring the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokineIL-10.[3] Although threeNFAT proteins - NFAT1, NFAT2 and NFAT4 - are preset in T-cells, they demonstrate redundancy to some extent.[5]

In the context of antigen presentation byantigen-presenting cells (APC),T lymphocytes undergo a productive response when the antigen is appropriately presented, activating T cell co-stimulatory receptors. However, encountering antigens not presented by theAPCs or weakly presented antigens induces anergic responses in T cells.[5] Notably, strong stimulation throughIL-2 orTCR/co-stimulatory receptors can overcome anergy, highlighting the dynamic nature of immune regulation.[3][4]

Moreover, recent research has illuminated the role of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in modulating T cell responses and maintaining immune tolerance. Tregs, characterized by the expression of the transcription factor Foxp3, exert immunosuppressive effects by inhibiting the activation and function of effector T cells.[5] Importantly, Tregs can directly interact with anergic T cells, further reinforcing their state of unresponsiveness and promoting peripheral tolerance. This interaction involves various mechanisms, including the secretion of inhibitory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β, as well as cell-contact-dependent suppression mediated by molecules like CTLA-4.[3] Understanding the intricate crosstalk between Tregs and anergic T cells provides valuable insights into the maintenance of immune homeostasis and has implications for therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating immune responses in autoimmune diseases and transplantation.[4][5]

Clinical significance

[edit]

Anergy may be taken advantage of for therapeutic uses. The immune response to grafting of transplanted organs and tissues could be minimized without weakening the entire immune system— a side effect of immunosuppressive drugs likecyclosporine. Anergy may also be used to induce activated lymphocytes to become unresponsive with autoimmune diseases likediabetes mellitus,multiple sclerosis andrheumatoid arthritis.[1] Likewise, preventing anergy in response to a tumoral growth may help in anti-tumor responses.[6] It might also be used for immunotherapeutic treatment of allergies.[7]

Dominant tolerance

[edit]

Dominant and recessive tolerance are forms of aperipheral tolerance (the other tolerance beside peripheral is acentral tolerance). Where so called recessive tolerance is associated with anergized lymphocytes as described above, in the dominant form of tolerance, specializedT-reg cells which actively ablate the immune response are developed from the naiveT lymphocyte. Similarly to recessive tolerance, unopposedNFAT signalling is also important forT-reg induction. In this case, theNFAT pathway activates another transcription factor –FOXP3[8] that is a marker ofT-regs and participates in their genetic program.[4][9]

Testing

[edit]

The "Multitest Mérieux" or "CMI Multitest" system (Multitest IMC, Istituto Merieux Italia, Rome, Italy) has been used as a general test of the level ofcellular immunity. It is anintradermal test ofskin reactivity (similar totuberculin tests) in which a control (glycerol) is used with seven antigens of bacterial or fungal origin (tetanus toxoid,tuberculin,diphtheria,streptococcus,candida,trichophyton, andproteus). In this test reactions are categorized according to the number of antigens provoking a response and the summed extent of the skin response to all seven antigens. Hereanergy is defined as a region of skin reactivity of 0–1 mm,hypoergy as a reaction of 2–9 mm in response to fewer than three antigens,normergic as a reaction of 10–39 mm or to three or more antigens, andhyperergy for a reaction of 40 mm or more.[10][11][12]

Experimental approaches to study anergy

[edit]

Various chemicals inducing/inhibiting described T cell signalling pathways can be used to study the anergy. The anergy inT cells can be induced byIonomycin, the ionophore capable of raising intracellular concentration ofcalcium ions artificially.[citation needed]

Conversely,Ca+II chelators such asEGTA can sequestercalcium ions making them unable to cause the anergy. Blocking of the pathway leading to the anergy can be also done bycyclosporin A, which is capable of inhibitingcalcineurin – the phosphatase responsible for dephosphorylating ofNFAT priming its activation.

PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, along withionomycin is used to induce fullT cells activation by mimicking signals provided naturally byTCR/costimulatory receptors activation.[3]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abSchwartz RH (August 1993). "T cell anergy".Scientific American.269 (2):61–71.Bibcode:1993SciAm.269b..62S.doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0893-62.PMID 8351512.
  2. ^abcJaneway Jr CA, Travers P, Walport M, Shlomchik M (2001).Immunobiology (Fifth ed.). New York and London: Garland Science.ISBN 0-8153-4101-6.
  3. ^abcdefMacián F, García-Cózar F, Im SH, Horton HF, Byrne MC, Rao A (June 2002)."Transcriptional mechanisms underlying lymphocyte tolerance".Cell.109 (6):719–731.doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00767-5.PMID 12086671.
  4. ^abcdeRudensky AY, Gavin M, Zheng Y (July 2006)."FOXP3 and NFAT: partners in tolerance".Cell.126 (2):253–256.doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.005.PMID 16873058.
  5. ^abcdefSoto-Nieves N, Puga I, Abe BT, Bandyopadhyay S, Baine I, Rao A, Macian F (April 2009)."Transcriptional complexes formed by NFAT dimers regulate the induction of T cell tolerance".The Journal of Experimental Medicine.206 (4):867–876.doi:10.1084/jem.20082731.PMC 2715123.PMID 19307325.
  6. ^Saibil SD, Deenick EK, Ohashi PS (December 2007). "The sound of silence: modulating anergy in T lymphocytes".Current Opinion in Immunology.19 (6):658–664.doi:10.1016/j.coi.2007.08.005.PMID 17949964.
  7. ^Rolland J, O'Hehir R (December 1998). "Immunotherapy of allergy: anergy, deletion, and immune deviation".Current Opinion in Immunology.10 (6):640–645.doi:10.1016/s0952-7915(98)80082-4.PMID 9914222.
  8. ^Tone Y, Furuuchi K, Kojima Y, Tykocinski ML, Greene MI, Tone M (February 2008). "Smad3 and NFAT cooperate to induce Foxp3 expression through its enhancer".Nature Immunology.9 (2):194–202.doi:10.1038/ni1549.PMID 18157133.S2CID 7005085.
  9. ^Hermann-Kleiter N, Baier G (April 2010)."NFAT pulls the strings during CD4+ T helper cell effector functions".Blood.115 (15):2989–2997.doi:10.1182/blood-2009-10-233585.PMID 20103781.
  10. ^Müller N, Schneider T, Zeitz M, Marth T (2001)."Whipple's disease: new aspects in pathogenesis and diagnoses"(PDF).Acta Endoscopica.31:243–253.doi:10.1007/BF03020891.S2CID 30195122.
  11. ^Spornraft P, Fröschl M, Ring J, Meurer M, Goebel FD, Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, et al. (July 1988)."T4/T8 ratio and absolute T4 cell numbers in different clinical stages of Kaposi's sarcoma in AIDS"(PDF).The British Journal of Dermatology.119 (1):1–9.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1988.tb07095.x.PMID 3261596.S2CID 29214452. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2011-06-11.
  12. ^De Flora S, Grassi C, Carati L (July 1997)."Attenuation of influenza-like symptomatology and improvement of cell-mediated immunity with long-term N-acetylcysteine treatment".The European Respiratory Journal.10 (7):1535–1541.doi:10.1183/09031936.97.10071535.PMID 9230243.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Lymphoid
Antigens
Antibodies
Immunity vs.
tolerance
Immunogenetics
Lymphocytes
Substances
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clonal_anergy&oldid=1315909504"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp