Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Classification of discontinuities

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematical analysis of discontinuous points
"Jump point" redirects here. For the science-fiction concept, seeHyperspace.

Continuous functions are of utmost importance inmathematics, functions and applications. However, not allfunctions are continuous. If a function is not continuous at alimit point (also called "accumulation point" or "cluster point") of itsdomain, one says that it has adiscontinuity there. Theset of all points of discontinuity of a function may be adiscrete set, adense set, or even the entire domain of the function.

Theoscillation of a function at a point quantifies these discontinuities as follows:

  • in aremovable discontinuity, the distance that the value of the function is off by is the oscillation;
  • in ajump discontinuity, the size of the jump is the oscillation (assuming that the valueat the point lies between these limits of the two sides);
  • in anessential discontinuity (a.k.a. infinite discontinuity), oscillation measures the failure of alimit to exist.

A special case is if the function diverges toinfinity or minusinfinity, in which case theoscillation is not defined (in theextended real numbers, this is a removable discontinuity).

Classification

[edit]

For each of the following, consider areal valued functionf{\displaystyle f} of a real variablex,{\displaystyle x,} defined in a neighborhood of the pointx0{\displaystyle x_{0}} at whichf{\displaystyle f} is discontinuous.

Removable discontinuity

[edit]
The function in example 1, a removable discontinuity

Consider thepiecewise functionf(x)={x2 for x<10 for x=12x for x>1{\displaystyle f(x)={\begin{cases}x^{2}&{\text{ for }}x<1\\0&{\text{ for }}x=1\\2-x&{\text{ for }}x>1\end{cases}}}

The pointx0=1{\displaystyle x_{0}=1} is aremovablediscontinuity. For this kind of discontinuity:

Theone-sided limit from the negative direction:L=limxx0f(x){\displaystyle L^{-}=\lim _{x\to x_{0}^{-}}f(x)}and the one-sided limit from the positive direction:L+=limxx0+f(x){\displaystyle L^{+}=\lim _{x\to x_{0}^{+}}f(x)}atx0{\displaystyle x_{0}}both exist, are finite, and are equal toL=L=L+.{\displaystyle L=L^{-}=L^{+}.} In other words, since the two one-sided limits exist and are equal, the limitL{\displaystyle L} off(x){\displaystyle f(x)} asx{\displaystyle x} approachesx0{\displaystyle x_{0}} exists and is equal to this same value. If the actual value off(x0){\displaystyle f\left(x_{0}\right)} isnot equal toL,{\displaystyle L,} thenx0{\displaystyle x_{0}} is called aremovable discontinuity. This discontinuity can be removed to makef{\displaystyle f} continuous atx0,{\displaystyle x_{0},} or more precisely, the functiong(x)={f(x)xx0Lx=x0{\displaystyle g(x)={\begin{cases}f(x)&x\neq x_{0}\\L&x=x_{0}\end{cases}}}is continuous atx=x0.{\displaystyle x=x_{0}.}

The termremovable discontinuity is sometimes broadened to include aremovable singularity, in which the limits in both directions exist and are equal, while the function isundefined at the pointx0.{\displaystyle x_{0}.}[a] This use is anabuse of terminology becausecontinuity and discontinuity of a function are concepts defined only for points in the function's domain.

Jump discontinuity

[edit]
The function in example 2, a jump discontinuity

Consider the functionf(x)={x2 for x<10 for x=12(x1)2 for x>1{\displaystyle f(x)={\begin{cases}x^{2}&{\mbox{ for }}x<1\\0&{\mbox{ for }}x=1\\2-(x-1)^{2}&{\mbox{ for }}x>1\end{cases}}}

Then, the pointx0=1{\displaystyle x_{0}=1} is ajump discontinuity.

In this case, a single limit does not exist because the one-sided limits,L{\displaystyle L^{-}} andL+{\displaystyle L^{+}} exist and are finite, but arenot equal: since,LL+,{\displaystyle L^{-}\neq L^{+},} the limitL{\displaystyle L} does not exist. Then,x0{\displaystyle x_{0}} is called ajump discontinuity,step discontinuity, ordiscontinuity of the first kind. For this type of discontinuity, the functionf{\displaystyle f} may have any value atx0.{\displaystyle x_{0}.}

Essential discontinuity

[edit]
The function in example 3, an essential discontinuity

For an essential discontinuity, at least one of the two one-sided limits does not exist inR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }. (Notice that one or both one-sided limits can be±{\displaystyle \pm \infty }).

Consider the functionf(x)={sin5x1 for x<10 for x=11x1 for x>1.{\displaystyle f(x)={\begin{cases}\sin {\frac {5}{x-1}}&{\text{ for }}x<1\\0&{\text{ for }}x=1\\{\frac {1}{x-1}}&{\text{ for }}x>1.\end{cases}}}

Then, the pointx0=1{\displaystyle x_{0}=1} is anessential discontinuity.

In this example, bothL{\displaystyle L^{-}} andL+{\displaystyle L^{+}} do not exist inR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }, thus satisfying the condition of essential discontinuity. Sox0{\displaystyle x_{0}} is an essential discontinuity, infinite discontinuity, or discontinuity of the second kind. (This is distinct from anessential singularity, which is often used when studyingfunctions of complex variables).

Counting discontinuities of a function

[edit]

Supposing thatf{\displaystyle f} is a function defined on an intervalIR,{\displaystyle I\subseteq \mathbb {R} ,} we will denote byD{\displaystyle D} the set of all discontinuities off{\displaystyle f} onI.{\displaystyle I.} ByR{\displaystyle R} we will mean the set of allx0I{\displaystyle x_{0}\in I} such thatf{\displaystyle f} has aremovable discontinuity atx0.{\displaystyle x_{0}.} Analogously byJ{\displaystyle J} we denote the set constituted by allx0I{\displaystyle x_{0}\in I} such thatf{\displaystyle f} has ajump discontinuity atx0.{\displaystyle x_{0}.} The set of allx0I{\displaystyle x_{0}\in I} such thatf{\displaystyle f} has anessential discontinuity atx0{\displaystyle x_{0}} will be denoted byE.{\displaystyle E.} Of course thenD=RJE.{\displaystyle D=R\cup J\cup E.}

The two following properties of the setD{\displaystyle D} are relevant in the literature.

Tom Apostol[3] follows partially the classification above by considering only removable and jump discontinuities. His objective is to study the discontinuities of monotone functions, mainly to prove Froda’s theorem. With the same purpose, Walter Rudin[4] and Karl R. Stromberg[5] study also removable and jump discontinuities by using different terminologies. However, furtherly, both authors state thatRJ{\displaystyle R\cup J} is always a countable set (see[6][7]).

The termessential discontinuity has evidence of use in mathematical context as early as 1889.[8] However, the earliest use of the term alongside a mathematical definition seems to have been given in the work by John Klippert.[9] Therein, Klippert also classified essential discontinuities themselves by subdividing the setE{\displaystyle E} into the three following sets:

E1={x0I:limxx0f(x) and limxx0+f(x) do not exist in R},{\displaystyle E_{1}=\left\{x_{0}\in I:\lim _{x\to x_{0}^{-}}f(x){\text{ and }}\lim _{x\to x_{0}^{+}}f(x){\text{ do not exist in }}\mathbb {R} \right\},}E2={x0I: limxx0f(x) exists in R and limxx0+f(x) does not exist in R},{\displaystyle E_{2}=\left\{x_{0}\in I:\ \lim _{x\to x_{0}^{-}}f(x){\text{ exists in }}\mathbb {R} {\text{ and }}\lim _{x\to x_{0}^{+}}f(x){\text{ does not exist in }}\mathbb {R} \right\},}E3={x0I: limxx0f(x) does not exist in R and limxx0+f(x) exists in R}.{\displaystyle E_{3}=\left\{x_{0}\in I:\ \lim _{x\to x_{0}^{-}}f(x){\text{ does not exist in }}\mathbb {R} {\text{ and }}\lim _{x\to x_{0}^{+}}f(x){\text{ exists in }}\mathbb {R} \right\}.}

Of courseE=E1E2E3.{\displaystyle E=E_{1}\cup E_{2}\cup E_{3}.} Wheneverx0E1,{\displaystyle x_{0}\in E_{1},}x0{\displaystyle x_{0}} is called anessential discontinuity of first kind. Anyx0E2E3{\displaystyle x_{0}\in E_{2}\cup E_{3}} is said anessential discontinuity of second kind. Hence he enlarges the setRJ{\displaystyle R\cup J} without losing its characteristic of being countable, by stating the following:

Rewriting Lebesgue's theorem

[edit]

WhenI=[a,b]{\displaystyle I=[a,b]} andf{\displaystyle f} is abounded function, it is well-known of the importance of the setD{\displaystyle D} in the regard of the Riemannintegrability off.{\displaystyle f.} In fact,Lebesgue's theorem (also named Lebesgue-Vitali) theorem) states thatf{\displaystyle f} is Riemann integrable onI=[a,b]{\displaystyle I=[a,b]} if and only ifD{\displaystyle D} is a set with Lebesgue's measure zero.

In this theorem seems that all type of discontinuities have the same weight on the obstruction that a bounded functionf{\displaystyle f} be Riemann integrable on[a,b].{\displaystyle [a,b].} Since countable sets are sets of Lebesgue's measure zero and a countable union of sets with Lebesgue's measure zero is still a set of Lebesgue's mesure zero, we are seeing now that this is not the case. In fact, the discontinuities in the setRJE2E3{\displaystyle R\cup J\cup E_{2}\cup E_{3}} are absolutely neutral in the regard of the Riemann integrability off.{\displaystyle f.} The main discontinuities for that purpose are the essential discontinuities of first kind and consequently the Lebesgue-Vitali theorem can be rewritten as follows:

The case whereE1={\displaystyle E_{1}=\varnothing } correspond to the following well-known classical complementary situations of Riemann integrability of a bounded functionf:[a,b]R{\displaystyle f:[a,b]\to \mathbb {R} }:

Examples

[edit]

Thomae's function is discontinuous at every non-zerorational point, but continuous at everyirrational point. One easily sees that those discontinuities are all removable. By the first paragraph, there does not exist a function that is continuous at everyrational point, but discontinuous at every irrational point.

Theindicator function of the rationals, also known as theDirichlet function, isdiscontinuous everywhere. These discontinuities are all essential of the first kind too.

Consider now the ternaryCantor setC[0,1]{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}\subset [0,1]} and its indicator (or characteristic) function1C(x)={1xC0x[0,1]C.{\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}(x)={\begin{cases}1&x\in {\mathcal {C}}\\0&x\in [0,1]\setminus {\mathcal {C}}.\end{cases}}}One way to construct the Cantor setC{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}} is given byC:=n=0Cn{\textstyle {\mathcal {C}}:=\bigcap _{n=0}^{\infty }C_{n}} where the setsCn{\displaystyle C_{n}} are obtained by recurrence according toCn=Cn13(23+Cn13) for n1, and C0=[0,1].{\displaystyle C_{n}={\frac {C_{n-1}}{3}}\cup \left({\frac {2}{3}}+{\frac {C_{n-1}}{3}}\right){\text{ for }}n\geq 1,{\text{ and }}C_{0}=[0,1].}

In view of the discontinuities of the function1C(x),{\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}(x),} let's assume a pointx0C.{\displaystyle x_{0}\not \in {\mathcal {C}}.}

Therefore there exists a setCn,{\displaystyle C_{n},} used in theformulation ofC{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}, which does not containx0.{\displaystyle x_{0}.} That is,x0{\displaystyle x_{0}} belongs to one of the open intervals which were removed in the construction ofCn.{\displaystyle C_{n}.} This way,x0{\displaystyle x_{0}} has a neighbourhood with no points ofC.{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}.} (In another way, the same conclusion follows taking into account thatC{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}} is aclosed set and so its complementary with respect to[0,1]{\displaystyle [0,1]} is open). Therefore1C{\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}} only assumes the value zero in some neighbourhood ofx0.{\displaystyle x_{0}.} Hence1C{\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}} is continuous atx0.{\displaystyle x_{0}.}

This means that the setD{\displaystyle D} of all discontinuities of1C{\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}} on the interval[0,1]{\displaystyle [0,1]} is a subset ofC.{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}.} SinceC{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}} is anuncountable set with null Lebesgue measure, alsoD{\displaystyle D} is a null Lebesgue measure set and so in the regard ofLebesgue-Vitali theorem1C{\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}} is a Riemann integrable function.

More precisely one hasD=C.{\displaystyle D={\mathcal {C}}.} In fact, sinceC{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}} is a nonwhere dense set, ifx0C{\displaystyle x_{0}\in {\mathcal {C}}} then noneighbourhood(x0ε,x0+ε){\displaystyle \left(x_{0}-\varepsilon ,x_{0}+\varepsilon \right)} ofx0,{\displaystyle x_{0},} can be contained inC.{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}.} This way, any neighbourhood ofx0C{\displaystyle x_{0}\in {\mathcal {C}}} contains points ofC{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}} and points which are not ofC.{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}.} In terms of the function1C{\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}} this means that bothlimxx01C(x){\textstyle \lim _{x\to x_{0}^{-}}\mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}(x)} andlimxx0+1C(x){\textstyle \lim _{x\to x_{0}^{+}}1_{\mathcal {C}}(x)} do not exist. That is,D=E1,{\displaystyle D=E_{1},} where byE1,{\displaystyle E_{1},} as before, we denote the set of all essential discontinuities of first kind of the function1C.{\displaystyle \mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}.} Clearly011C(x)dx=0.{\textstyle \int _{0}^{1}\mathbf {1} _{\mathcal {C}}(x)dx=0.}

Discontinuities of derivatives

[edit]

LetIR{\displaystyle I\subseteq \mathbb {R} } an open interval, letF:IR{\displaystyle F:I\to \mathbb {R} } be differentiable onI,{\displaystyle I,} and letf:IR{\displaystyle f:I\to \mathbb {R} } be the derivative ofF.{\displaystyle F.} That is,F(x)=f(x){\displaystyle F'(x)=f(x)} for everyxI{\displaystyle x\in I}.According toDarboux's theorem, the derivative functionf:IR{\displaystyle f:I\to \mathbb {R} } satisfies the intermediate value property.The functionf{\displaystyle f} can, of course, be continuous on the intervalI,{\displaystyle I,} in which caseBolzano's theorem also applies. Recall that Bolzano's theorem asserts that every continuous function satisfies the intermediate value property.On the other hand, the converse is false: Darboux's theorem does not assumef{\displaystyle f} to be continuous and the intermediate value property does not implyf{\displaystyle f} is continuous onI.{\displaystyle I.}

Darboux's theorem does, however, have an immediate consequence on the type of discontinuities thatf{\displaystyle f} can have. In fact, ifx0I{\displaystyle x_{0}\in I} is a point of discontinuity off{\displaystyle f}, then necessarilyx0{\displaystyle x_{0}} is an essential discontinuity off{\displaystyle f}.[11]This means in particular that the following two situationscannot occur:

  1. x0{\displaystyle x_{0}} is a removable discontinuity off{\displaystyle f}.
  2. x0{\displaystyle x_{0}} is a jump discontinuity off{\displaystyle f}.

Furthermore, two other situations have to beexcluded (see John Klippert[12]):

  1. limxx0f(x)=±.{\displaystyle \lim _{x\to x_{0}^{-}}f(x)=\pm \infty .}
  2. limxx0+f(x)=±.{\displaystyle \lim _{x\to x_{0}^{+}}f(x)=\pm \infty .}

Observe that whenever one of the conditions (i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) is fulfilled for somex0I{\displaystyle x_{0}\in I} one can conclude thatf{\displaystyle f} fails to possess anantiderivative,F{\displaystyle F}, on the intervalI{\displaystyle I}.

On the other hand, a new type of discontinuity with respect to any functionf:IR{\displaystyle f:I\to \mathbb {R} } can be introduced: an essential discontinuity,x0I{\displaystyle x_{0}\in I}, of the functionf{\displaystyle f}, is said to be afundamental essential discontinuity off{\displaystyle f} if

limxx0f(x)±{\displaystyle \lim _{x\to x_{0}^{-}}f(x)\neq \pm \infty } andlimxx0+f(x)±.{\displaystyle \lim _{x\to x_{0}^{+}}f(x)\neq \pm \infty .}

Therefore ifx0I{\displaystyle x_{0}\in I} is a discontinuity of a derivative functionf:IR{\displaystyle f:I\to \mathbb {R} }, then necessarilyx0{\displaystyle x_{0}} is a fundamental essential discontinuity off{\displaystyle f}.

Notice also that whenI=[a,b]{\displaystyle I=[a,b]} andf:IR{\displaystyle f:I\to \mathbb {R} } is a bounded function, as in the assumptions of Lebesgue's theorem, we have for allx0(a,b){\displaystyle x_{0}\in (a,b)}:limxx0±f(x)±,{\displaystyle \lim _{x\to x_{0}^{\pm }}f(x)\neq \pm \infty ,}limxa+f(x)±,{\displaystyle \lim _{x\to a^{+}}f(x)\neq \pm \infty ,} andlimxbf(x)±.{\displaystyle \lim _{x\to b^{-}}f(x)\neq \pm \infty .}Therefore any essential discontinuity off{\displaystyle f} is a fundamental one.

See also

[edit]
  • Removable singularity – Undefined point on a holomorphic function which can be made regular
  • Mathematical singularity – Point where a mathematical object behaves irregularlyPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
  • Extension by continuity – Property of topological space
  • Smoothness – Number of derivatives of a function (mathematics)
    • Geometric continuity – Number of derivatives of a function (mathematics)Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
    • Parametric continuity – Number of derivatives of a function (mathematics)Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^See, for example, the last sentence in the definition given at Mathwords.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Mathwords: Removable Discontinuity".
  2. ^Stromberg, Karl R. (2015).An Introduction to Classical Real Analysis. American Mathematical Society. p. 120. Ex. 3 (c).ISBN 978-1-4704-2544-9.
  3. ^Apostol, Tom (1974).Mathematical Analysis (2nd ed.). Addison and Wesley. p. 92, sec. 4.22, sec. 4.23 and Ex. 4.63.ISBN 0-201-00288-4.
  4. ^Walter, Rudin (1976).Principles of Mathematical Analysis (third ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 94, Def. 4.26, Thms. 4.29 and 4.30.ISBN 0-07-085613-3.
  5. ^Stromberg, Karl R.Op. cit. p. 128, Def. 3.87, Thm. 3.90.
  6. ^Walter, Rudin.Op. cit. p. 100, Ex. 17.
  7. ^Stromberg, Karl R.Op. cit. p. 131, Ex. 3.
  8. ^Whitney, William Dwight (1889).The Century Dictionary: An Encyclopedic Lexicon of the English Language. Vol. 2. London and New York: T. Fisher Unwin and The Century Company. p. 1652.ISBN 9781334153952. Archived fromthe original on 2008-12-16.An essential discontinuity is a discontinuity in which the value of the function becomes entirely indeterminable.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  9. ^Klippert, John (February 1989)."Advanced Advanced Calculus: Counting the Discontinuities of a Real-Valued Function with Interval Domain".Mathematics Magazine.62:43–48.doi:10.1080/0025570X.1989.11977410.
  10. ^Metzler, R. C. (1971)."On Riemann Integrability".American Mathematical Monthly.78 (10):1129–1131.doi:10.1080/00029890.1971.11992961.
  11. ^Rudin, Walter.Op.cit. pp. 109, Corollary.
  12. ^Klippert, John (2000)."On a discontinuity of a derivative".International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 31:S2:282–287.Bibcode:2000IJMES..31..282K.doi:10.1080/00207390050032252.

Sources

[edit]
  • Malik, S.C.; Arora, Savita (1992).Mathematical Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.ISBN 0-470-21858-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Classification_of_discontinuities&oldid=1321978961"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp