TheCippi of Melqart are a pair ofPhoenicianmarblecippi that were unearthed inMalta under undocumented circumstances and dated to the 2nd century BC. These arevotive offerings to the godMelqart, and are inscribed in two languages,Ancient Greek andPhoenician, and in the two corresponding scripts, theGreek and thePhoenician alphabet. They were discovered in the late 17th century, and the identification of their inscription in a letter dated 1694 made them the first Phoenician writing to be identified and published in modern times.[1] Because they present essentially the same text (with some minor differences), the cippi provided the key to the modern understanding of the Phoenician language. In 1758, theFrench scholarJean-Jacques Barthélémy relied on their inscription, which used 17[n 1] of the 22 letters of the Phoenician alphabet, to decipher the unknown language.
The importance of the cippi to Maltese archaeology is inestimable.[4] On an international level, they already played a significant role in the deciphering and study of the Phoenician language in the 18th and 19th centuries.[4][6] Such was their importance to Phoenician and Punic philology, that the inscriptions on the cippi became known as theInscriptio melitensis prima bilinguis (Latin forFirst bilingual Maltese inscription), or theMelitensis prima (First Maltese).[7]
A cippus (pluralcippi) is a small column. Cippi serve asmilestones,funerary monuments, markers, orvotive offerings.[8] The earliest cippi had a cubic shape and were carved from sandstone. By the late fifth century BC, these became gabled delicatestelae in theGreek fashion.[9] The Maltese marble cippus is about 96.52 centimetres (38 in) high at the highest point, and is broken at the top.[10] The Louvre Cippus is currently 1.05 metres (3 ft 5 in) high at its highest point, 0.34 m (1 ft 1 in) wide, and 0.31 m (1 ft 0 in) thick.[2] "Their form is light and gracefully executed ..." with a " ...Greek inscription upon the pedestal, [and] a masterpiece of Phoenicianepigraphy."[10] The artifacts are carved in white marble, a stone which is not found naturally in the Maltese islands.[4] As it is unlikely thatskilled marble-carvers were available, they were probably imported in their finished state.[4] The inscriptions, however, were probably engraved in Malta on behalf of the two patrons, Abdosir and Osirxamar. Judging by the names on the main inscription, the patrons were of Tyrian extraction. The addition of a synopsis of the dedication in Greek, with the names of the dedicators and of Melqart given in their Hellenised versions, confirms the existence and influence of Hellenistic culture.[4] Additionally, while Malta had been colonised by the Phoenicians since the 8th century BC, by the second century, the Maltese islands were underRoman occupation.[2][11] The use of Phoenician script also confirms the survival of Phoenician culture and religion on the islands.[n 4]
Although it is not rare for cippi to have dedications,[13] the Cippi of Melqart have an unusual construction, as they have two parts. The base, or pedestal, is a rectangular block with mouldings at the top and bottom.[2] The inscriptions in Greek and Phoenician are at the front, three lines in Greek and four in Phoenician. The inscriptions are lightly incised.[2] The bases support pillars which are interpreted ascandelabra. The lower parts of the candelabra are decorated with a shallow relief ofacanthus leaves. Calligraphic differences in the incised text, varying positioning of the words and differences in the depth of the relief and the mouldings, imply that the two cippi are separate offerings, carrying the same inscription because the patrons were brothers.[n 5]
When the Greek inscription was published in the third volume of theCorpus Inscriptionum Graecarum in 1853, the cippi were described as discovered in the coastal village of Marsaxlokk.[14] Before, their Marsaxlokk provenance had not been proposed by anyone, and it was more than a century later that the claim was discredited.[15] The attribution to Tas-Silġ was apparently reached by inference, because the candelabra were thought, with some plausibility, to have been dedicated and set up inside the temple of Heracles.[4][n 6][17]
Inscription of the Louvre Cippus, in Ancient Greek
The following is the Greek inscription, a rendering topolytonic andbicameral script and adding spaces, a transliteration including accents, and a translation:
In 1694, a Maltesecanonicus, Ignazio di Costanzo, was the first to report an inscription on the cippi which he considered to be in the Phoenician language.[19] This identification was on the basis that "Phoenicians" were recorded as ancient inhabitants of Malta by Greek writersThucydides andDiodorus Siculus.[n 10] Costanzo spotted these inscriptions, which were part of two almost identical votive cippi at the entrance ofVilla Abela inMarsa, the house of the celebrated Maltese historian,Gian Franġisk Abela.[3][n 11] Di Costanzo immediately recognised the Greek inscriptions, and he thought the other parts were written in Phoenician.[n 12] However, the Maltese historian Ciantar claimed that the cippi were discovered in 1732, and placed the discovery in the villa of Abela, which had become a museum entrusted to theJesuits.[n 13] The contradiction in the dates of the discovery is confusing, given di Costanzo's 1694 letter.[4]
Ignazio Paternò, prince ofBiscari, reports another story regarding their discovery. Paternò describes how twocandelabri were stored at theBibliotecha, after they had been found on the island ofGozo.[23] Paternò attributes the discovery to Fr. Anton Maria Lupi, who had found the two votive cippi with the Phoenician inscriptions abandoned in a villa owned by the Jesuit Order in Gozo, linking them with the cippi mentioned by Ciantar.[23][n 14]
Copies of the inscriptions, which had been made by Giovanni Uvit in 1687, were sent toVerona to an art historian, poet and Knight Commander in the Hospitaller order, Bartolomeo dal Pozzo.[19] These were then handed to another Veronese noble art collector, Francesco Sparaviero who wrote a translation of the Greek section.[n 15]
In 1735,Abbé Guyot de Marne, also a Knight Commander of the Maltese Order, published the text again in an Italian journal, theSaggi di dissertazioni accademiche of theEtruscan Academy of Cortona, but did not hypothesise a translation.[24] The first attempt had come in 1741, by the French scholarMichel Fourmont, who had published his assumptions in the same journal.[3] However, neither led to a useful translation.[25]
The shorter Phoenician text was transliterated and translated more than twenty years after Fourmont's publication, by the Abbé Jean-Jacques Barthélemy.[2] Barthélemy, who had already translatedPalmyrene, submitted his work in 1758.[26]
He correctly identified 16 of the 17 different letters represented in the text, but still mistook theShin and theHe.[3] Barthélémy began the translation of the script by reading the first word "lʾdnn" as "to our lord."[26] The hypothesis that Heracles corresponded with Melqart, Lord of Tyre, made Barthélemy pinpoint more letters, while the names of the patrons, being the sons of the same father in the Greek text, allowed the backward induction of the father's name in the Phoenician text.[2]
The Phoenician script, once translated read:
"To our lord Melqart, Lord of Tyre, dedicated by / your servant Abd' Osir and his brother 'Osirshamar / both sons of 'Osirshamar, son of Abd' Osir, for he heard / their voice, may he bless them."[2][n 8]
Thepaleographic table published by Barthélémy lacked the lettersTet andPe.[3] The study of the Phoenician inscription on the base of the Louvre cippus can be regarded as the true foundation of Phoenician and Punic studies, at a time when the Phoenicians and their civilisation were known only throughclassical orBiblical texts.[3]
The inscription in Phoenician and Greek, from a book printed in 1772 byFrancisco Pérez Bayer. Later studies of Phoenician grammar compared Punic specimens with Hebrew texts.
Work on the cippi now focused on a fuller understanding of Phoenician grammar, as well as the implications of the discovery of Phoenician texts in Malta.Johann Joachim Bellermann believed that theMaltese language was a distant descendant ofPunic.[27] This was refuted byWilhelm Gesenius, who like Abela before him, held that Maltese was a dialect ofArabic.[3] Further studies on theMelitensis prima text followed developments in the study of Phoenician grammar, comparingPunic specimens closely withHebrew texts.[3] In 1772,Francisco Pérez Bayer published a book detailing the previous attempts at understanding the text, and provided his own interpretation and translation.[28]
The termRosetta stone of Malta has been usedidiomatically to represent the role played by the cippi in decrypting the Phoenician alphabet and language.[6][30] The cippi themselves became atreasured symbol of Malta.[31] Their image has appeared on localpostage stamps,[32] and hand-crafted models of the artifacts have been presented to visiting dignitaries.[33]
The two cippi were reunited for the first time in 240 years at an exhibition at theLouvre Abu Dhabi in 2023.[34]
^The description of the Louvre cippus states that the inscription contains 18 out of the 22 letters in the Phoenician alphabet.[2] Lehmann, however, reports that there are 17.[3] The latter source appears to be more credible (Lehmann cites the cippi's lack of a proper provenance, while the Louvre collection states the cippi were found at Marsaxlokk).
^The Phoenician god Melqart was associated with the Hellenic god Heracles by means ofinterpretatio graeca.
^" Corpus Inscriptionum Græcarum vol. 3, no. 5733, 680‒681 " -(in Latin and Greek) "Ambo simul monumenta sunt reperta inter rudera, etiam nunc exstantia, portus hodie Marsa Scirocco, olim Ἡρακλέουϛ λιμήν, appellati".[4]
^(in French) "...en plein période dite 'punicò-romaine' (II siècle av. J.-C.), des Maltais restent Phéniciens, attachés à la religion et à la culture phéniciennes."[12]
^(in French) "...deux monuments distincts, chacun étant l'oeuvre d'un artisan et d'un scribe différents."[12]
^Μελίτη νῆσος ἐν ᾗ ... καὶ Ἡρακλέους ἱερόν.The island ofMelite on which is ... and the temple of Heracles.[16]
^Unfortunately the rendered direction of the Phoenician text may vary across web browsers. See relevanttalk page section.
^abImportant Note: As of 25 February 2014, in the Louvre Museum webpage of the Cippus,[2] the text in bold below is missing from the translation of the third line of the Phoenician inscription: both sons of 'Osirshamar, for he heard forboth sons of 'Osirshamar,son of Abd' Osir, for he heard.
^Apart from the aforementioned association and hence change fromMelqart toHeracles, the (theophoric) names of the two brothers and of their father and grandfather themselves change form between the inscribed languages, according to a form of interpretatio graeca, showing the great degree of culturalsyncretism characteristic of theHellenistic age, including in this case,Egypt: Abd' Osir, "Servant ofOsiris" and 'Osirshamar, "Osiris has guarded" or "Osiris has preserved", become respectively,Dionysios, a name derived fromDionysos, andSarapion, a name derived fromSerapis.[18]
^(in Italian) "Stimo esser stata simile lamina, qualche superstitioso Amuleto posto presso quel cadavere, ivi esistente per poco meno di tre mila anni, mentre da Geroglifìci Egytii, e da quei segni di caratteri posti su'l fine della prima linea scorgonsi in essa, da me giudicati per Fenici, si riconosce esser stato questo amuleo di personaggio Fenice, la di cui natio ne hebbe ne'trasandati tempo per piu secoli il dominio di quest'isola, conforme l'afferma Tucidide... E Diodoro Sicolo, parlando delle Colonie de Fenici, e commentando il detto testo di Tucidide, lasciò scritto...".[19]
^(in Italian) "Due iscrittioni scolpite con caratteri Greci, e Fenici a mio credere".[19]
^(in Italian) "L'anno 1732 essendo Rettore di questo collegio de' Padri Gesuiti il P. Ignazio Bonanno si scavò parte d'un viale del Giardino, in cui è situato il sovraccennato casino, posseduto un tempo dall'Abela, che scriveva l'anno 1647, per fabbricarvi una scala; e quivi sotterrate si rinvennero le due Pietre co' Fenici, e Greci caratteri segnate; le quali dal P. Luigi Duquait Francese sovrastante all'opera furon collocate nello stesso viale per ornamento. Dopo qualche tempo un altro accorto Religioso temendo, che di là tolte fossero (come fu lor tolto il capo della bella statua d'Ercole, che fu venduto per testa di S. Giuseppe, e poi da essi ricuperato, e riunito al suo luogo) trasportolle alla stanza contigua al Gabinetto, o Museo dell'Abela".[21] The episode is referred to briefly in Abela-Ciantar, vol. I, p. 465, and in further detail on pp. 527-528.[22]
^(in Italian) "Mi fu detto che nella Villetta del Collegio vi erano due Iscrizioni Arabiche sotto due balaustretti. Io ero stato alla Villa ed avevo visto i balaustri asserti; ma come essi sono vicini a terra sopra di un muricciolo al Sole, non avevo fatto altra riflessione sopra di essi, nè ve l'aveva fatta niuno, se non che poco eruditamente chi me ne diè notizia. Presi aldunque la barchetta, e là tornai, e trovai due iscrizioni non altrimente Arabiche, ma Fenicie e Greche; e dal tenore della Greca, che è in tutti due i dadi la stessa, credo, che i balaustrelli fossero due Candelabri rotti, offerti in dono ad Ercole Arcbagete, da due fratelli di Tiro in Fenicia. A buon conto abbiamo questo nome di Ercole, che io non so se ha noto altrove".Lupi let.11 s.64.[23]
^(in Italian) "[...] che tralasciatane la discifratione di quei caratteri stimati Fenici, per essere forse a lui ignoti, mit trasmise la seguente spiegatione delli Greci in esse tavole scolpiti. Dionysius et Sarapion Sarapionis Tirii, Herculi Duci".[19]
References
^Lehmann, p210 and 257, quote: "Soon thereafter, at the end of the 17th century, the abovementioned Ignazio di Costanzo was the first to report a Phoenician inscription and to consciously recognize Phoenician characters proper... And just as the Melitensis prima inscription played a prominent part as the first-ever published Phoenician inscription... and remained the number-one-inscription in the Monumenta (fig. 8), it now became the specimen of authentic Phoenician script par excellence... The Melitensis prima inscription of Marsa Scirocco (Marsaxlokk) had its lasting prominence as the palaeographic benchmark for the assumed, or rather deduced "classical" Phoenician ("echtphönikische") script."
^Ring, Trudy; Salkin, Robert M.; La Boda, Sharon (1995).Southern Europe. International Dictionary of Historic Places. Vol. III. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn. p. 413.ISBN1884964052. At Google Books.
^Marne, Guyot (1735).Dissertazione II del Commendatore F. Giuseppe Claudio Guyot de Marne [...] sopra un'inscrizione punica, e greca: Saggi di dissertazioni accademiche pubblicamente lette nella nobile accademia etrusca dell'antichissima città di Cortona. Rome: Tommaso / Pagliarini. pp. 24–34.
^Fourmont, Michele (1741).Dissertazione III [...] Sopra una Iscrizione Fenicia trovata a Malta, in: Saggi di dissertazioni accademiche pubblicamente lette nella nobile accademia etrusca dell'antichissima città di Cortona. Rome: Tommaso / Pagliarini. pp. 88–110.
^"Treasures of Malta". Fondazzjoni Patrimonju Malti [Maltese Heritage Foundation]. 2009. Archived fromthe original on 21 February 2014. Retrieved16 February 2014.
Culican, William (1980). Ebied, Rifaat Y.; Young, M.J.L (eds.).Oriental Studies. Leeds University Oriental Society - Near Eastern Researches II. Leiden, The Netherlands: E. J. Brill.ISBN90-04-05966-0.
Lewis, Harrison Adolphus (1977).Ancient Malta - A Study of its Antiquities. Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire: Colin Smythe.
Sagona, Claudia; Vella Gregory, Isabelle; Bugeja, Anton (2006).Punic Antiquities of Malta and Other Ancient Artefacts Held in Ecclesiastic and Private Collections. Ancient Near Eastern Studies. Belgium: Peeters Publishers.
.jpg)
