 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Church of Scotland Act 1921" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(September 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Act of Parliament | |
 | |
| Long title | An Act to declare the lawfulness of certain Articles declaratory of the Constitution of the Church of Scotland in matters spiritual prepared with the authority of the General Assembly of the Church. |
|---|---|
| Citation | 11 & 12 Geo. 5. c. 29 |
| Territorial extent | Scotland |
| Dates | |
| Royal assent | 28 July 1921 |
Status: Current legislation | |
| Text of statute as originally enacted | |
| Revised text of statute as amended | |
TheChurch of Scotland Act 1921 (11 & 12 Geo. 5. c. 29) is anact of theBritish Parliament. The purpose of the act was to settle centuries of dispute between the British Parliament and theChurch of Scotland over the church's independence in spiritual matters. The passing of the act saw the British Parliament recognise the church's independence in spiritual matters, by giving legal recognition to theArticles Declaratory.
The Church of Scotland was founded as aPresbyterian church in 1560 during theScottish Reformation since when it has held that the civil power had no authority over it, in spiritual matters. The question of church establishment and in what sense the Church of Scotland was anEstablished church led to conflicts with successive rulers from the Stuart monarchs onward. Monarchs tended to prefer the model of theChurch of England, wherethe Crown had the power to appoint bishops, and various other forms of power over the Church (although it was not reduced to the complete state control found in Scandinavia).
The particular crisis came over the question of "lay patrons", who had the right to "present" (appoint) a minister. This was abolished in 1690 at the time of theGlorious Revolution but restored in 1712. In theory the congregation could accept or reject a candidate, but in practice this often meant little. By the late 18th century the church was divided into the Moderate and Evangelical parties. These differed especially on the question of lay patronage, which the Evangelicals rejected. Underlying this was the split between the Calvinism of the Evangelicals and the more Enlightenment tone of the Moderates.
In 1833 the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland passed a Veto Act giving congregations the clear power of veto. However the courts generally upheld the rights of lay patrons, and thus the issue became one of church and state. In 1843 a large part of the church seceded as theFree Church of Scotland — not rejecting Establishment in principle, but only its present form. This secession was known as theDisruption.
In the early 20th century a reunion between the Church of Scotland and the United Free Church seemed possible. To overcome problems (including legal problems which had followed the earlier merger of the Free Church and the United Presbyterian Church) the Church of Scotland Act 1921 (11 & 12 Geo. 5. c. 29) was passed. This noted that the General Assembly had passedDeclaratory Articles. These were declared to be lawful (thus, they were notcreated by Parliament.) It was declared that "no limitation of the liberty, rights, and powers in matters spiritual therein set forth shall be derived from any statute or law affecting the Church of Scotland in matters spiritual at present in force; it being hereby declared that in all questions of construction theDeclaratory Articles shall prevail..." (s. 1).
This has created a new and revised relationship between the Church and the State. The Church of Scotland remains the National Church, but it has complete independence in spiritual questions and appointments. After the passing of the act, a church historian proclaimed: "No Church in Christendom can so fully claim to be at once national and free as the Church of Scotland today."[1]
When legislating forScotland since the passing of the act, the British Parliament has to consider whether the Church of Scotland is to be excluded from the provisions. Examples included the passing of theScotland Act 1998, which had to be worded not to infringe on the independence of the Church, and prevent theScottish Parliament repealing the Church of Scotland Act.[2] Also during the passing of theHuman Rights Act 1998, an amendment was proposed when the bill was passing through theHouse of Lords to exclude the Church of Scotland from some of the provisions. In the end, this was not deemed necessary.
In 2005, the House of Lords finally decided the casePercy (AP) v Church of Scotland Board of National Mission [2005] UKHL 73[1], ruling that, despite the 1921 act, a ministerial appointment created a contract subject to the jurisdiction of the civil courts and employment tribunals.
