| Christopher Columbus: The Discovery | |
|---|---|
 Theatrical release poster byJohn Alvin | |
| Directed by | John Glen |
| Screenplay by | John Briley Cary Bates Mario Puzo |
| Story by | Mario Puzo |
| Produced by | Alexander Salkind Ilya Salkind[1] |
| Starring | |
| Cinematography | Alec Mills |
| Edited by | Matthew Glen |
| Music by | Cliff Eidelman |
Production companies | Christopher Columbus Productions Quinto Centenario |
| Distributed by |
|
Release dates |
|
Running time | 121 minutes[2] |
| Countries | United States United Kingdom Spain |
| Language | English |
| Budget | $45 million[3] |
| Box office | $8.6 million(US/UK) |
Christopher Columbus: The Discovery is a 1992historicaladventure film directed byJohn Glen. It was the last project developed by the father and son production team ofAlexander andIlya Salkind. The film follows events after the fall of theEmirate of Granada (an Arab principality which was located in the south ofSpain), and leads up tothe voyage ofColumbus to theNew World in 1492.
Its behind-the-scenes history involved an elaborate series of financial mishaps, which later brought about an emotional falling-out between Alexander and Ilya; as a frustrated Alexander would later lament in a November 1993 interview with theLos Angeles Times, "I know, after this, that I'll never make movies again."[4]
The film was released for the500th anniversary of Columbus' voyage.[5][6] The premiere took place at almost exactly the same time as1492: Conquest of Paradise, which has often led to confusion between the two films. Neither would be a critical or commercial success.
 | This section'splot summaryneeds to be improved. Please helpdo so. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page.(February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The titularGenoese navigator overcomes intrigue in the court of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain and gains financing for his expedition to theWest Indies, which eventually leads to the European discovery of theAmericas.
The initial directorGeorge P. Cosmatos left the production due to "creative differences",[7] with Cosmatos later suing the producers for millions with the matter settled out-of-court.[8] Cosmatos was then replaced byJohn Glen shortly before shooting began.[8] At one point during the production, the $42 million budget was being slashed with the producers considering scrapping the theatrical approach in favor of a TV miniseries. However, this was alleviated when Ilya Salkind was able to secure a budget of $50 million.[8]
Marlon Brando received $5 million for the film, and his name remains in the credits despite his request that it be removed.[7] Following Cosmatos' departure as director, actorsTimothy Dalton andIsabella Rossellini soon followed suit with Dalton later filing a lawsuit against the producers forbreach of contract and fraud, stating that they did not provide a bank guarantee for his $2.5 million salary.[9][7][8]
The film was not a commercial success, debuting at number 4 at the US box office[10][11] and grossing $8.3 million in the United States and Canada.[12] It grossed $500,000 in the United Kingdom.[13]
The film received mostly negative reviews, with a rotten 7% rating onRotten Tomatoes based on 29 reviews, with the website's critical consensus reading "Ironically, for a biopic about a voyage many associate with people accepting that the world is round,Christopher Columbus: The Discovery falls completely flat."[14]Roger Ebert criticized Brando and gave the movie one out of four stars, stating "This movie takes one of history's great stories and treats it in such a lackluster manner that Columbus's voyage seems as endless to us as it did to his crew."[15] It is also on his "Most Hated" list.[16] Brando's performance, in particular, was singled out as his "worst" by critic Paul Brenner of ArtistDirect.[17]
Vincent Canby ofThe New York Times called the picture "expensive, sloppy and, at its most ambitious, a frail reminder of theWarner Brothers swashbucklers thatMichael Curtiz used to turn out withErrol Flynn."[18] Peter Rainer of theLos Angeles Times said "it's not politically correct. It's also not cinematically correct, humanly correct or historically correct. With one possible exception: The reconstructed versions of theNina, Pinta and Santa Maria look pretty correct—more so at least than the actors who sail them."[19] ANewsweek reviewer called the film a "characterless movie that seems to have been made for no better reason than the marketing ploy of a 500th anniversary."[20] Film critic and historianLeonard Maltin declared the picture a "BOMB" (he gave1492: Conquest of Paradise an only-slightly better rating, and conveyed his sentiments with this variation on the popular rhyme: "In nineteen-hundred-and-ninety-two, Columbus sailed two screen boo-boos.")...adding that the movie was hardly ripe for re-discovery, and lamenting "Isthis any way to celebrate the 500th anniversary of Europe's finding America?"[21]
Audiences surveyed byCinemaScore gave the film a grade of "C" on scale of A+ to F.[22]
Tom Selleck won theGolden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor.Marlon Brando was also nominated for Worst Supporting Actor and the film received another fourGolden Raspberry Award nominations including;Worst Picture,Worst Director –John Glen,Worst New Star –Georges Corraface andWorst Screenplay –Mario Puzo.[23]At the 1992Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, it received a nomination for Worst Picture.
DirectorRidley Scott had considered making a Christopher Columbus movie for the Salkinds but instead opted to direct a rival project from producerAlain Goldman and written byRoselyne Bosch:1492: Conquest of Paradise.[24] The Salkinds filed a lawsuit against Scott, alleging that the director stole ideas from their project.[24] $40 million in damages were sought, in addition to a ruling barring Scott from proceeding with the Goldman-backed film.[24] Throughout November 1990, various contemporary sources pointed out that the scripts for the two projects were rumored to be quite different: Scott's "biopic" would survey twenty-three years of Columbus's life, while Salkind's "adventure-epic" would focus on the singular event of discovering the Americas in 1492.[24] Six months after filing the lawsuit against Scott, the Salkinds decided to abandon it.[24] Goldman and Salkind acknowledged that releasing two films on the same subject at approximately the same time could split audiences and box office returns, but with both "Columbus" pictures angling for a release date to coincide with the 500-year anniversary, the conflict seemed unavoidable.[24]
In September 1994, producer Ilya Salkind, along with Ilya's wife and the film's executive producer Jane Chaplin, sued Alexander Salkind, co-producer Bob Simmonds, and other creditors for $10 million.[7]
The film was released on VHS and LaserDisc formats fromWarner Home Video in 1993. It has not been released on DVD in North America, but is available in other format regions on DVD.
