After becoming the Duke of Burgundy in 1467, Charles pursued his ambitions for an independent kingdom which would stretch contiguously from theNorth Sea in the north to the borders ofSavoy in the south. For this purpose, he acquiredGuelders andUpper Alsace; sought the titleKing of the Romans; and gradually became an enemy of theGermans. Charles marriedMargaret of York for an English alliance. He arranged the betrothal of his only child,Mary, toMaximilian of Austria.
A passionate musician and patron of the arts, Charles supported the production ofilluminated manuscripts and music. His court was famously known as a centre of arts, chivalry, and etiquette. He was obsessed with order and regulation and issued many ordinances throughout his rule, dictating military matters, legislation, and diplomacy in the minutest detail. Charles was religious and his patron saint wasSaint George. He turned down multiple requests from thepope and theVenetians to undertake a crusade against theOttoman Turks.
John the Fearless, Philip the Bold's eldest son, inherited the Duchy of Burgundy and the major part of his maternal inheritance the following year.[5] The division of Philips's lands reduced John's income severely and by 1407, his treasury was nearly empty.[6] John was forced to borrow money.[7] To restore his influence, John turned to French politics and bitterly vied for power in the French court against the king's brother,Louis of Orleans.[8] In 1407, John ordered theassassination of Louis and sparked theArmagnac–Burgundian Civil War. John himself was assassinated in the conflict in 1419.[9]
John was succeeded by his only son,Philip the Good.[10] Unlike his father and grandfather, Philip distanced himself from French politics. He forged alliances elsewhere, marryingIsabella of Portugal in 1430. Isabella was Philip's third wife afterMichelle of Valois andBonne of Artois, who both died without producing any children.[11] Philip the Good desired a strong, centralised duchy ruled by a prestigious dynasty with a new, non-French cultural heritage.[11]
Charles Martin (second forename)[16] was born on 10 November 1433 inDijon, capital of theDuchy of Burgundy. He was the third child ofPhilip the Good with his third wifeIsabella of Portugal and the only one to survive past infancy. His mother, fearing that she would lose another child, consecrated the infant to theBlessed Sacrament. Philip the Good arrived in Dijon in late November to celebrate the birth. He made his son aknight of the Golden Fleece and the count ofCharolais in France. The Golden Fleece was aknightly order created by Philip in 1430, and Charolais was a title given to the heirs of the dukes of Burgundy.[17][18] Charles was baptised on 20 November, with CountCharles of Nevers andAntoine from the influentialde Croÿ family as his sponsors; he was named after the count of Nevers, Philip the Good's stepson through his second wife,Bonne of Artois.[19]
La Duchesse de Bourgogne arrêtée aux portes de Bruges bySophie Frémiet. 19th-century depiction of the arrest ofIsabella of Portugal, her son Charles, and their entourage at the gates of Bruges
In early spring 1434, Isabella and her son moved to the mountain fortress ofTalant, in fear of multiple outbreaks ofplague in Burgundy.[20] In winter, the Duchess and her son travelled to Paris to join Philip the Good.[18] En route, they stayed inBruges, where a rebellion against Philip the Good was brewing. In 1436, when Isabella and her entourage were to leave the city, rebels forcefully arrested them near the city gate.[21] The rebellion was suppressed in 1438, when Philip the Good blockaded the city and forced the rebels to surrender.[22]
During infancy, Charles was described as a robust child.[23] Philip the Good assigned many tutors for the young Charles, the most important among them being Antoine Haneron, professor of rhetoric in theUniversity of Louvain.[24] Like his father, Charles developed a fondness for reading histories, chronicles, and historical romances.[24] Charles aspired to become a conqueror likeAlexander the Great. The fact that both he and Alexander had fathers named Philip stimulated his imagination and further encouraged his ambition.[25]
Until the age of six, Charles was brought up by his cousins,John andAgnes of Cleves, who both were the children ofMary of Burgundy, the daughter ofJohn the Fearless. Of the two, Agnes was more prominent in Charles's early education. Agnes and Charles were constantly in his mother's company.[26]
In 1435, with theTreaty of Arras, Philip the Good reconciled withCharles VII, King of France, marking the end of the Armagnac–Burgundian Civil War.[27] As a sign of good faith in his new ally, Charles VII also allowed a marriage between one of his daughters and Philip's heir and sent his daughters to Burgundy. Philip choseCatherine, the king's ten-year-old daughter, to marry the six-year-old Charles.[28] The two were married on 11 June 1439, during a ceremony accompanied by concerts, jousts, and banquets in the city ofSaint-Omer.[29] The two were put under the care of agoverness, but were often separated from each other to spend their time with hobbies in line with their ages.[30] Catherine died on 30 July 1446, and her death was deeply mourned at the Burgundian court.[31]
In 1441, Philip the Good appointed Jean d'Auxy,seigneur ofAuxi-le-Château, as the eight-year-old Charles's guardian. D'Auxy later served as Charles'schamberlain, from 1456 to 1468.[32] At the age of 12, Charles began to participate in the public affairs of his father's realm. In 1445, he accompanied his father on a rare state visit to Holland and Zealand.[33]
In 1449, the wealthy city of Ghentrebelled against Burgundian rule in response to new taxes on salt.[34] Charles took part in the fighting; however, to keep him out of danger, Philip the Good falsely told Charles that his mother Isabella was seriously ill inLille. Charles left shortly before the decisiveBattle of Gavere in 1453.[35] In Lille, his mother honoured him with a feast, and to everyone's surprise, encouraged him to return to the battlefield and fight for his inheritance. By that time, Philip the Good had won the battle and defeated the rebelliousburghers.[36]
Charles remained a widower for eight years until he marriedIsabella of Bourbon in 1454.[37] Isabella was the daughter ofAgnes of Burgundy, and was Philip the Good's niece. Her father,Charles I, Duke of Bourbon, sent her as a child to the Burgundian court as a ward of Isabella of Portugal. A shy and pliant young woman, Isabella was adored by Philip the Good, who saw an opportunity to renew the Treaty of Arras (which had been debased by Charles VII's threatening actions towards Burgundy) by marrying a Bourbon to his son.[38] Charles was not aware of his father's intention until the night before his marriage on 31 October; he did not resist the match.[39] With his marriage, the town ofChinon was incorporated into Philip the Good's realm, as part of Isabella's dowry.[40]
From 1454 to 1464, Charles was excluded from power—the ducal council and the Burgundian court—by his father, Philip the Good.[41][c] In 1454, Philip appointed Charles "governor and lieutenant-general in absence" while he attended theImperial Diet inRegensburg.[43] Philip hoped to meetEmperor Frederick III and attach him tohis aspirations for a crusade to retakeConstantinople from theOttomans. However, the emperor did not show up.[44] Even as regent, Charles held little to no power compared to his mother, the duchess, and his father.[43] Nevertheless, Charles still was able to issue documents in his own name. His regency was short-lived, for Philip returned to Burgundy on 7 or 9 August, and Charles returned to his former powerless position.[43]
Charles was on bad terms with his father due to his exclusion from power, and their bad relations climaxed in 1457, when Charles wanted to appoint Antoin Rolin, theseigneur ofAymeries, as his chamberlain. Antoin was the son ofNicolas Rolin, Philip the Good's chancellor. The Duke, wary of the power his chancellor might get with this appointment, refused his son's request and instead proposedPhilip I of Porcéan,high bailiff ofHainault and a member of the influentialHouse of Croÿ.[45][46] Charles distrusted Philip, because he suspected that the Croÿ family accepted money from Charles VII to undermine Philip the Good,[47] and refused his father's proposal. Philip was so furious that Charles's mother feared for Charles's life and had him removed from court. Charles fled toDendermonde (today in northern Belgium) and Philip got lost in the forests ofSoignies trying to find his son. Through the mediation of Isabella of Bourbon, who was pregnant with Charles's child, Philip and his son reached a truce.[48]
When Charles's daughter,Mary, was born on 13 February 1457, neither Charles nor his father attended her baptism, for both wanted to avoid each other.[49] Nicolas Rolin was removed from the chancellery, and Rolin's close ally,Jean Chevrot, was removed from the ducal council. Consequently, de Croÿ became more powerful.[17] Charles left the court for his personal estate atLe Quesnoy in Hainaut. There, he was entrusted with minor tasks regarding the Flemish subjects of his father. He also constructed theBlue Tower castle inGorinchem as his personal seat in 1461. He attempted to formalise his status as the heir to theBurgundian State, which in turn prompted his father to cut off his allowance.[17] Charles was deprived of any money to pay his staff or otherwise maintain his estate. According to Burgundian court chroniclerGeorges Chastellain, in 1463, Charles dismissed his staff because he could not pay their salaries, however, his staff were adamant to serve him and even offered him a share of their money.[50] According to German historian Werner Paravicini, such acts ofaltruism were typical of that time, rendring the account more plausible.[51]
In 1462, Charles survived a poisoning attempt on his life by Jehan Coustain,premier valet de chambre. Coustain was executed inRupelmonde. Charles blamed de Croÿ for the assassination attempt, while de Croÿ came to believe that Charles had staged this attempt.[52] By the end of 1463, the disputes between Charles and his father caused theStates General of the Burgundian Netherlands to intervene. On 5 February 1464, Charles made a speech, attacking de Croÿ's family, to the deputies assembled at Ghent.[53] Charles and Philip the Good reconciled in June 1464, after they met in Lille, although de Croÿ maintained his hold on power.[41] Later that year, Charles assumed full power by arguing that Philip was becoming senile. Charles put pressure on de Croÿ, but Philip protected de Croÿ by threatening Charles.[54] Ten days later, the States General gave Charles full power by appointing himlieutenant général.[54] His first act was to confiscate de Croÿ's estates; de Croÿ and his family were banished to France, where their French patron, Louis XI, gave them no support.[55]
The Duke of Burgundy providing a sumptuous feast for Louis, Dauphin of France, byJob, 1905
In 1457,Louis, Dauphin of France and the heir to Charles VII, suddenly arrived at Philip the Good's court at Brussels.[56] Philip saw his guest as an opportunity to mend his relations with the crown and took the dauphin in, indulging him with kindness, showing humility, and refusing all the king's requests to send the dauphin back. At Philip's expense, Louis lived inGenappe, where he led a comfortable life.[56] Charles VII attempts to regain his son failed. He reportedly said: "My cousin Burgundy is feeding a fox who will eat up all his chickens".[57] Louis would go on to become Philip'sfavourite, in consequence of Philip's quarrel with his son.[58]
In contrast to Louis's friendship with Philip the Good, Louis and Charles disliked each other.[59] However, Charles asked the dauphin to be godfather to his daughter, Mary.[49] Charles's hatred for Louis increased when the latter ascended to the French throne after the death of his father on 22 July 1461.[59] Louis was crowned king on 31 August inReims under theregnal name Louis XI, with Philip the Good personally placing the crown on his head.[60] While the duke thought that the hostilities between France and Burgundy were at an end, the new king at his coronation ceremony refused to participate in the feast sponsored by Philip in his honour. The latter thus returned to his realm disappointed.[61] Charles feared Louis's intention was to demolish the Burgundian defensive system in Picardy, and he was furious when a crisis occurred in autumn 1463 regarding theSomme towns, land belonging to his father.[62] De Croÿ persuaded Philip to agree to amend the Treaty of Arras, which had given him cities such asSaint-Quentin,Abbeville,Amiens,Péronne, andMontdidier. Philip agreed to accept 400,000 goldécus from Louis to return those cities tothe crown domains.[63] When Charles was chosen aslieutenant général in 1464, he provoked a war against Louis by forming theLeague of the Public Weal.[64]
The League of the Public Weal was a confederation of prominent French princes —Charles of Berry (the king's brother),Francis II, Duke of Brittany,John II, Duke of Bourbon, andJacques andJohn d'Armagnac — which was formed to undermine Louis XI's authority.[64] They declared Charles of Berry the regent of France and appointed Francis II as the captain general of the army.[65] With the threat of rebellion looming, Louis offered to pardon all the dukes and lords. Minor lords accepted the pardon, but the dukes persisted with their demands.[65] The members of the league chose Charles as their leader and began amassing an army.[65] The League became the most dangerous in a series of princely revolts against the French crown; one chronicle recorded the number of the participants against Louis XI to be seven dukes, twelve counts, two lords, one marshal, and 51,000 men-at-arms.[66]
To counteract the rebels, Louis XI amassed an army and sent it southwards to central France to defeat John II of Bourbon. Charles soon mustered an army of 25,000 men and marched towards Paris.[65] Louis and his army hastily returned to Paris to defend the city against Charles's army.[67] On 15 July, Charles reached the village ofMontlhéry; in search of his allies' armies, he discovered that the royal army was camped inArpajon, a few miles south.[68] On learning of Charles's position, Louis moved to fight him.[67]
On 16 July 1465, the two armies met and fought theBattle of Montlhéry.[67] Charles placed himself next to the defensively positioned Burgundian vanguard, led byLouis of Saint-Pol. He attacked into the French left flank led byCharles IV, Count of Maine. Charles was pursuing the fleeing count and his army, when the French vanguard counterattacked,[67] and Charles was wounded in the throat. He evaded capture and returned to his lines.[67] After his return, he ordered his gunners to shoot at the king's army; by his account, 1,200–1,400 men and a large number of horses were killed.[69] In the late evening, Louis XI retreated eastwards to Paris.[68]
While each side claimed victory in the battle, neither side achieved all their objectives.[67] Charles could not capture Louis on the battlefield, and Louis could not prevent Charles from joining his allies.[68] In spite of his ability to form his battle troops in a cohesive battle order, Charles had yet to become an able tactician.[70] The rebel armies joined in the town ofÉtampes and began marching towards Paris on 31 July.[69] The rebels laid siege to Paris, during which Charles directed his gunfire at the city's walls.[71] The rebels successfully entered the city when a nobleman named Charles de Melun opened theSaint-Antoine gate for them.[72] Louis XI was then forced to negotiate.[67] The parties signed theTreaty of Conflans, which ceded the rule ofNormandy to Charles, Duke of Berry, and returned the Somme lands to Burgundy.[73]
Charles the Bold in mourning attire after the death of Philip the Good.Georges Chastellain stands on the left with greying hair and carrying a book. Illumination from a manuscript of Chastellain's Chronicle of the Dukes of Burgundy
On 12 June 1467, Philip the Good suddenly fell ill.[74] For the next few days, he could hardly breathe and constantly vomited. Charles was summoned from Ghent to immediately come to his father.[75] By the time he arrived, Philip had fallen unconscious and was struggling to breathe; he died on 15 June.[75] Charles arranged for his father's funeral to be held inSt. Donatian's Cathedral; the funeral was attended by 1200 people from both Charles's and Philip's households. The cathedral was lit by 1400 candles which heated the inside of the church so much that holes had to be made in the windows to cool the air.[76] Charles showed extreme emotions during the funeral: he shook, trembled, pulled his hair, and kept shouting and crying. The Court Chronicler, Georges Chastellain, doubted the sincerity of Charles's distress, expressing astonishment that he could show such emotion.[77]
Fourteen days later, Charles officially became the Duke of Burgundy. In celebration, he paraded through the city of Ghent on 28 June 1467, emulating Caesar.[78] ThisJoyous Entry caused an uproar in the city.[79] The people demanded an end to the humiliating penalties imposed on them after the revolt of 1449.[80] Charles left the city with his daughter, the ten-year-old Mary, and the treasure kept by Philip the Good in thePrinsenhof of Ghent.[81] The following January, Charles coerced the mayors of Ghent into asking for his pardon. Then, he abolished their governmental rights and announced that only he could appoint the town government, in contravention ofPhilip IV's constitution of 1301.[82]
On 26 September 1465, Charles's wife, Isabella of Bourbon, died oftuberculosis at the age of 31. Court chronicles briefly recorded the long months of her illness.[37] The most important part of her life for these chronicles was her marriage to Charles—during which she had only brought him one daughter and no male heirs—and the fact that she and Charles purportedly fell in love during what was initially merely a political marriage.[37] Charles, busy with the political negotiations after the War of the Public Weal, could not attend her funeral.[37][d]
Within weeks of Isabella of Bourbon's death, Charles's mother sought an English marriage for her son. She sent Guillaume de Clugny, one of Charles's close advisors, toLondon to negotiate withEdward IV for a marriage between his sister,Margaret of York, and Charles.[83] To prevent an English-Burgundian alliance, Louis XI proposed the hand of his daughter, the four-year-oldAnne, to Charles in marriage. Charles refused this proposal.[83] In the Spring of 1466, an embassy led byEdward Woodville, Edward IV's brother-in-law, arrived in Burgundy to propose two marriages between the English royal family and the Burgundians: one between Margaret of York and Charles, and the other between Mary, Charles's daughter, andGeorge Plantagenet, Duke of Clarence, Edward IV's younger brother.[83] Woodville's visit failed in its purpose, as Charles was not interested in marrying his young daughter to the Duke of Clarence.[84]
In October 1467, Edward IV publicly ratified the marriage between Charles and his sister, and Margaret of York appeared before theMagnum Concilium ofKingston upon Thames and formally gave her consent to the marriage.[85] Charles welcomed the English delegation—led by Edward andAnthony Woodville—to Burgundy, and then had her mother accompany him to negotiate the final marriage treaty.[86] The marriage treaty and the alliance was signed and ratified in February 1468, while the marriage ceremony was delayed to eight months later.[87] Since Charles and Margaret were fourth-degree cousins, they needed aPapal dispensation to legitimise their marriage.[88] As the dispensation was the groom's duty, Charles sent a delegation to Rome. The delegation took until May 1469 to win the dispensation.[88] Edward IV announced the marriage of his sister to Charles and dubbed him as "a mighty Prince who bears no crown".[88]
Charles and Margaret were married on 3 July atDamme, a town three miles from Bruges.[89] For their wedding ceremony, Charles prepared nine receptions, each ending with a jousting match. He wished to outdo his father's famous Feast of the Pheasant.[90] The wedding displayed the power and wealth of the dukedom.[91] At the end of the ceremonies, Charles left his wife alone to catch up on sleep; the two did not spend their wedding night together.[92]
Charles and Margaret never had children.[93] They spent little time together: only three weeks during the first six months after their marriage, one-quarter of the time during the years 1469 and 1470, and only three weeks throughout 1473.[94] According to contemporary jurist,Filips Wielant, Charles housed Margaret far away from him because he did not want women to hamper his court life.[95]
Like his father, Charles pursued territorial expansion; however, whereas Philip the Good pursued this policy by peaceful means, Charles vied for territory through conflict.[96] In the Netherlands, he sought to expand his realm to the north-east: theDuchy of Guelders.[97] Although it was never a part of the Burgundian lands, the duchy was dependent on Burgundian trade.[98] In 1463,Adolf of Egmond rebelled against his father, the ruling duke,Arnold. With Philip the Good's support, Adolf usurped the duchy and imprisoned his father in 1465.[99] Adolf's treatment of his father caused a scandal that resonated as far asRome, where the Pope sought a mediator to end the conflict in Guelders. In 1471, Charles was appointed as the mediator; he marched into Guelders and restored Arnold to power.[100] Adolf was placed under house arrest, and then to prison after a failed escape attempt.[101] To retain Burgundian assistance, Arnold made Charles the Regent of Guelders; when Arnold died in February 1473, having left no heirs but his imprisoned son, he bequeathed the duchy to Charles.[102]
Valois Burgundy at its greatest extent under Charles the Bold
However, Charles's inheritance met with opposition. The Estates of Guelders, and the towns ofNijmegen,Arnhem, andZutphen rejected Arnold's will, and Louis XI askedFrederick III, the Holy Roman Empire, to confiscate the duchy.[103] Frederick III was diplomatically close to Charles and did not intervene. Charles subdued the rebelling cities and the nobles of Guelders by force.[104] On 9 June 1473, with a sizeable army, he entered the city ofMaastricht without resistance.Roermond andVenlo quickly surrendered.Moers, whose count, Vincent von Moers, was the leader of the resistance, yielded to Charles's artillery.[105] The only serious conflict was the siege of Nijmegen, which only surrendered after inflicting severe losses on the Burgundian army. After the successful conquest of Guelders, Charles imposed heavy taxes and replaced the aldermen in the region. Charles gave more power to the ducal judicial officers to control the rebellious cities and to impose a centralised administration.[101]
The Burgundian state under Charles was divided into two separate areas, theDuchy of Burgundy in the south andFlanders in the north.[106] To unify them, Charles needed theDuchy of Lorraine andAlsace.[107] On 21 March 1469, he receivedSigismund, Archduke of Austria to his court to negotiate the purchase of Sigismund's lands inUpper Alsace.[108] Sigismund was in a desperate financial situation and eagerly agreed to sell.[109] With this purchase, Charles acquired a claim to the city ofFerrette, close to the Swiss border, alarming theSwiss Confederacy.[99] Charles's rights and income from his new territories were severely limited because most of the land rights were mortgaged to local nobles.[110] Charles's deputy in the area,Peter von Hagenbach, imposed harsh taxes on the people.[111] Soon, several towns of Alsace formed a league against Hagenbach.[107] For the most part, Charles ignored the area.[112]
Meeting of Charles the Bold and Frederick III in Trier, 1473
Charles greatly desired to transform the Duchy of Burgundy into a kingdom, to free it from the limitations of vassalage to the French crown and to enhance his personal stature.[113][114] The only way for Charles to realise such a transformation was within the framework of the Holy Roman Empire.[115] At Charles's request, Sigismund of Austria proposed Charles to be the nextking of the Romans, the title of the successor of the emperor, with the marriage between the Emperor's son and the Charles's daughter as an inducement.[116] As one of the richest men in the Europe, and also an ally of the rebellious princes in the empire, theHungarians, and theBohemians, Charles was a coveted ally for EmperorFrederick III,[117] who agreed to receive him atTrier.[118]
In October 1473, both parties reached Trier: the Emperor with his sonMaximilian and 2,500 horsemen, while the Burgundian entourage consisted of 13,000 men at arms (including artillery), Burgundian nobility, bishops, and treasures and relics.[113][e] Despite all the grandeur, Frederick III was disappointed that Charles had not brought his daughter,[119] amidst rumours spread byHabsburg adversaries alleging that Mary was physically defective.[120] Charles wished to become the king of the Romans and to succeed Frederick as emperor. In return, Maximilian would inherit the Burgundian State, and later become emperor.[121][f] In addition, Charles wanted to become aprince-elector, taking theBohemian seat in theElectoral College, and be recognised as the duke of Guelders.[123]
Although Charles received recognition for his possession of the Duchy of Guelders, he still was not recognised as king of the Romans, in part because Frederick III was convinced that the prince-electors would not vote for Charles to receive the title.[124] During the conference, Charles ignored and alienated the prince-electors.[125] When he realised how much he needed their support, Charles tried to impress them with displays of his wealth, but the Germans were not swayed.[126] Charles's decision to only interact with the emperor, and not the prince-electors, was a fatal mistake, showing an utter ignorance of German political norms.[127]
As an alternative, Frederick III proposed to elevate the Duchy of Burgundy to a kingdom; Charles accepted.[128] The two parties planned for Frederick III to crown Charles in theTrier Cathedral on 25 November.[129] However, the next day the Emperor secretly departed from Trier, embarking on theMoselle at dawn.[130] Charles became enraged, locked himself in his room and smashed the furniture to pieces. But he did not break the betrothal between Maximilian and Mary, hoping that he could still become a king.[131]
Solemn opening session of the Parliament of Mechelen under Charles the Bold, Jan Coessaet, 1587,Museum Hof van Busleyden [nl]
Upon his ascension as duke in 1468, Charles sought to dismantle the jurisdiction of theParlement of Paris as the highest juridical power within his country. The cities and institutions in Burgundy relied on the parlement for challenging legal decisions. This irritated the Dukes of Burgundy who detested any reliance on France. Philip the Good had established an itinerant, but less powerful, court of justice that travelled all across the country.[132] Charles established acentral sovereign court inMechelen under his 1473 ordinance ofThionville. The city would house the newCourt of Auditors, which previously resided in Lille and Brussels. The language of this parliament was French, with two-thirds of its personnel being Burgundian.[133] The Mechelen parliament only held authority in theLow Countries. In the Burgundian mainlands, Charles established another parliament whose seat moved betweenBeaune andDole.[134]
In Charles's own words, the proper administration of justice was "the soul and the spirit of the public entity."[135] He was recognised as the first sovereign to make a serious effort to impose peace and justice upon the Low Countries, and he was regarded as "a prince of Justice" by historian Andreas van Haul, a century after his death.[136] However,Georges Chastellain criticized Charles for his lack of mercy while imposing justice.[137] Charles damaged his relations with his people by inspecting and regulating every aspect of their lives, and he was unnecessarily harsh.[138] Charles wanted to reduce the influence of the local aldermen, who were viewed by the commoners as the local court, and he undermined the Mechelen parliament.[136] To both increase his grip on the seats of justice and to fill up his treasury, Charles dismissed the aldermen and sold their offices to the highest bidders; only the wealthiest subjects came to hold those positions.[136] Many institutions protested against these practices, but Charles persisted because he constantly needed to fund his armies.[139]
Charles the Bold presented by Saint George,Lieven van Lathem, opening of the Prayer Book of Charles the Bold,c. 1471
Charles the Bold was religious, and regarded himself as more devout and pious than any ruler of his day.[140] He considered his sovereignty as bestowed upon him by God and thus owed his power to God alone.[141] From a young age, Charles choseSaint George as hispatron saint.[142] He kept a sword purported to have belonged to Saint George in his treasury, and he revered otherwarrior saints, such asSaint Michael.[143] He commissioned aprayer book, fromLieven van Lathem, which was completed in 1469.[144] The openingdiptych of the manuscript, as well as two other pieces, demonstrate Charles's devotion to Saint George.[142] In Margaret of York's copy ofLa Vie deSainte Colette, she and Charles are shown as devotees ofSaint Anne. Multiple modern scholars, such asJeffrey Chipps Smith, have made a connection between the saint and the duke from the fact that both were married three times. According to Nancy Bradley Warren, the portrayal of Charles and Saint Anne may have been a way to legitimise his marriage to Margaret and reassure those who were dubious regarding an alliance with England.[145]
Throughout his reign, Charles faced multiple requests to pledge his men to a crusade against theOttoman Empire.[146]Pope Sixtus IV sent three instructions to thepapal legate at the Burgundian court, Lucas de Tollentis, directing him to encourage Charles to undertake a crusade against the Ottomans.[147] Tollentis reported to the Pope on 23 June 1472 that Charles was "resolved in our favour", and the welfare ofChristendom was never far from his mind.[148] Charles may have considered an expedition to the east as the climax of his life's work; however, during his lifetime, he never undertook a crusade nor did he make preparations for it as his father had.[149] Only for a short time, between late 1475 and early 1476, did he seriously consider a crusade and that was only after a meeting withAndreas Palaiologos, the deposedDespot of the Morea, who agreed to cede his claim as the Emperor ofTrebizond andConstantinople to Charles.[150][151][g]
Charles the Bold ordering Louis XI to sign the Treaty of Péronne; 1913;Histoire de France et notions d'Histoire Générale byGustave Hervé, illustrated by Valéry MüllerCharles and Emperor Frederick III at a banquet in Trier
Charles the Bold pursued a risky and aggressive foreign policy.[152] Trying to have as many allies as possible, he considered everyone, aside from Louis XI, as his ally.[153] In 1471, he made a list of his nineteen allies. He increased the number to twenty-four by the next year and had twenty-six allies in 1473, in contrast to Louis XI's fifteen allies.[153] Some of these relations, such as withScotland, were only formalities. The kings of Scotland andDenmark would also sign treaties with Louis XI and appear on his list of allies.[154]
Initially, Charles was hesitant about an alliance withMatthias Corvinus, theking of Hungary.[155] However, the mutual friendship with theKingdom of Naples brought Burgundy and Hungary closer to each other, and in his pursuit to ally with Frederick III's opponents, Charles made contact with Matthias.[156] Charles hoped that by supporting Matthias' claim to theKingdom of Bohemia, Matthias would back him in the electoral college.[157] In November 1474, the two successfully concluded a treaty by which they agreed to partition the Holy Roman Empire between themselves, with Charles becoming the king of the Romans and having the lands along the Rhine under his authority while Matthias would acquireBreslau and Bohemia.[158] In 1473, through negotiations with the new Duke of Lorraine,René II, Charles obtained the right to pass his armies through the duke's lands, and assign Burgundian captains to important fortifications in Lorraine, essentially turning the duchy into a Burgundianprotectorate.[159] Among Charles's other allies wereAmadeus IX,Duke of Savoy, whose wife,Yolande of Valois, Louis XI's sister, drove the duchy into an alliance with Burgundy on the basis of their shared dislike of Louis XI.[160]
The intense rivalry between Louis XI and Charles kept both rulers always prepared for an eventual war.[161] The suspicious death of Charles of Valois, Duke of Berry, the king's brother, in 1472, prompted Charles to raise arms to avenge his ally's death, stating that Berry had been poisoned by Louis.[162] After a short conflict, the two ceased their fighting in the winter 1473 without any talk of peace. Neither would declare war on the other for the rest of their reigns.[98] In 1468, Charles and Louis tried to make peace, which astonished the rest of France.[163] Their peace talks soon turned into hostility once Charles learned that Louis had his hands in a recent rebellion in Liége.[164] Afterwards, Charles imprisoned Louis in the city ofPéronne and coerced him into signing a treaty favourable to Burgundy, with conditions such as forfeiting the Duke of Burgundy from paying homage, guarantying Charles's sovereignty over Picardy, and abolishing French jurisdiction over Burgundian subjects.[165] Louis reluctantly agreed to all the demands and signed theTreaty of Péronne.[166] However, the crown did not abide by the treaty terms and Franco-Burgundian relations remained poor.[167]
King Ferdinand I of Naples depicted as a knight of the Order of the Golden Fleece inStatuts, Ordonnances et Armorial by Gilles Gobet, theToison d'or King of Arms, 1473
At the start of Louis XI's reign, Italy's triple alliance between theDuchy of Milan, theRepublic of Florence, and theKingdom of Naples, allowed the influence of France grow in the peninsula, for Milan and Florence were long-standing allies of Louis.[168] To remedy this, Charles enlarged Burgundy'ssphere of influence in Italy to dwarf that of France.[169] The first Burgundian alliance with an Italian ruler was with KingFerdinand I of Naples, a ruler admired by both Charles and Louis.[170]
Ferdinand was the legitimised bastard ofAlfonso I, and the Pope did not recognize his claim to the throne.[171] Meanwhile,René of Anjou, the deposed King of Naples, persistently sought his title back. In the constant fear of an invasion from René or his heirs with the support of Louis XI, Ferdinand allied himself with Charles, who made Ferdinand a member of the Order of the Golden Fleece in 1473.[172] Charles constantly toyed with the idea of marrying his daughter, Mary, to Ferdinand's second son,Frederick of Naples, who visited the Burgundian court in 1469 and 1470.[173] In 1474, when war with Louis XI was on the horizon, Ferdinand's participation was dependent on his son's marriage to Mary. Charles hinted at his willingness to give his daughter's hand to Frederick, and Ferdinand dispatched his son to Burgundy on 24 October 1474.[174] Although Frederick became a lieutenant and close military advisor to Charles, he failed in his ultimate mission of marrying Mary.[175]
The Duchy of Milan was France's most important ally in theItalian peninsula; Milan's ruler,Galeazzo Maria Sforza was attached to the King of France through his marriage with Louis' niece,Bona of Savoy.[176] Charles tried to form an alliance with Milan. In 1470, he offered Galeazzo membership in the Order of the Golden Fleece, on the premise of an alliance, but was rejected.[177] One time he even included Milan on one of his lists of allies, which caused Galeazzo to protest.[153] To bring Galeazzo into alliance, Charles started a rumour that he wished to conquer Milan.[178] Concerns about a probable war, and Charles's bringing diplomatic pressure to isolate Milan from France, persuaded Galeazzo to sign a treaty, on 30 January 1475 atMoncalieri, that formed an alliance between Savoy, Burgundy, and Milan.[179] As a result of this treaty, diplomatic relations between the two duchies were established, and Galeazzo sent Giovanni Pietro Panigarola as his envoy to Burgundy.[180]
Charles's relation with theRepublic of Venice was based on his willingness to launch a crusade against the Turks.[181] With Ferdinand of Naples's insistence, thesenate of Venice agreed to a treaty against the King of France on 20 March 1472.[182] From then on, Venice constantly urged Charles to uphold his part of the bargain and support them intheir war with the Ottomans.[183] Charles's inaction led to gradual estrangement from Venice.[184] For instance, when he wanted to recruit the VenetiancondottieroBartolomeo Colleoni (who would have brought with him 10,000 men at arms) to his ranks, the Venetian government did not allow Colleoni to go. Charles spent two years negotiating with the Venetian ambassadors, but in the end, was unsuccessful in convincing them.[185] By 1475, the alliance between Venice and Burgundy had ceased to seem like a genuine union.[186]
The Italian peninsula saw a shift in spheres of influence after the Treaty of Moncalieri in 1475. Charles the Bold triumphantly replaced Louis XI as the dominant influence in Italian politics, with three of four major secular powers in the region—Milan, Naples, and Venice—all aligned with him.[187] Only Florence remained a French ally, though they remained neutral toward Charles on the basis of their mutual alliance with Venice.[188] Charles successfully eliminated any possible Italian support for France, and now could count on the support of his Italian allies if a war with France ensued.[187] However, from 1472, relations with France amounted to a truce, and remained as such during rest of Charles's reign.[189]
The Burgundian court under Charles the Bold was famous and magnificent.[190] It was seen as a place to learn arts and etiquette and where chivalry and courtly life were more intact than in the rest of the Europe. For this reason, the Burgundian court was the host to many young noblemen and princes from all across the continent.[191] Even future generations admired Charles's court.Philip II, for instance, at the urging of his father,Charles V, introduced the "ceremonial of the court of Burgundy" into Spain, usingOlivier de la Marche's account of Charles the Bold's court.[192] Charles's Burgundian court thus became the idealized courtly life that sparked inspiration throughout17th century Spain.[193] While Charles's court did not differ much from those of his contemporaries, certain special features increased the court's appeal: the number of knights and nobles, the sacred image of the ruler who was distant from other courtiers, and the splendour of the court.[194] Charles, like his predecessors, displayed his glamour through extravagantpatronage of the arts.[195]
Charles was a patron of music and was a capable musician.[203] In his 1469 ordinance, Charles gave a clear view of what his musical entourage should be: aconcert band, ceremonial trumpeters,chamber musicians, an organist, and thechapel musicians, whose music had more variety than that of Philip the Good's chapel.[204] He brought his chapel with himself on his campaigns and had choristers sing a new song to him every night in his chambers.[205] Charles was a patron of the composerAntoine Busnois, who became his choirmaster;[206] his court musicians also includedHayne van Ghizeghem andRobert Morton.[207] His favourite song wasL'homme armé, a song that may have been written for him.[208] Charles composed amotet that was sung in theCambrai Cathedral, presumably in the presence ofGuillaume Du Fay, one of the most well-known composers of his era.[209] Among his other works werechansons andsecular songs.[210] Although no pieces from his motet or chansons remain, two songs are attributed to him:Del ducha di borghogna (of the Duke of Burgundy) andDux Carlus (Duke Charles). Both are from Italiansongbooks wherein no name of the composers is mentioned. Nevertheless, the songs have uncanny similarities to each other: invoice ranges, in their use of pitchC, theirmusical form (rondeau), and both songs start with the phraseMa dame. According to themusicologistDavid Fallows, with such similar traits, the songs are most likely both composed by Charles in the 1460s.[211] Charles also liked to sing; however, he did not have a good singing voice.[212]
Military Ordinance of Charles the Bold, Master of Fitzwilliam 268, c. 1475
When Charles became the Duke of Burgundy, his army functioned under a feudalistic system, with most of its men either recruited through summons or hired under contract. The majority of his army consisted of French nobles, and their retainers, andEnglish archers; this army suffered from an inefficient distribution of resources and slow movement.[213] Having lived through a period of peace under Philip the Good, the army scarcely trained and was unprepared. Furthermore, in comparison to other armies of Europe, their structure was outdated.[214] To remedy these problems, Charles issued a series of military ordinances, between 1468 and 1473, that not only would revolutionise the Burgundian army, but also would influence every European army in the 16th century.[215] The first of these ordinances, addressed to the Marshal of Burgundy, contains instructions on who could be recruited to the army and describes the personnel of the artillery: namely, masons, assistants,cannoneers, and carpenters.[216] The second ordinance, issued atAbbeville in 1471, proclaimed the formation of astanding army, calledCompagnie d'ordonnance, made up of 1250lances fournies, who were accompanied by 1200 crossbows, 1250 handgunners, and 1250 pikemen.[217] A squad consisted of a man-at-arms, a mounted page, a mounted swordsman, threehorse archers, a crossbowmen, and a pikeman. Charles designed a uniform for each of the companies (Cross of Burgundy inscribed on the ducal colours).[218] He also designed an overlapping military hierarchy that sought to preclude the infighting between captains and their subordinates that would arise in a pyramidal hierarchy.[219]
Armour of Charles the Bold in the Vinkhuijzen collection of military uniforms, 1910, kept at theNew York Public Library
The last of these ordinances, issued at Thionville, marked the culmination of Charles's martial administration. The organisation of a squad was categorised to the merest detail; specific battle marches were created to keep order between the men; a soldier's equipment were explained in detail, and discipline among the ranks was regarded as of the utmost importance.[220] Charles forbade individual soldiers to have acamp follower, instead, he permitted each company of 900 to have 30 women in their ranks who would attend to them.[218] He set brutal rules against defaulters and deserters. In 1476, he appointed Jehan de Dadizele to arrest deserters. Those guilty of encouraging soldiers to desert were to be executed and the deserters were to return to the army.[221] Charles intended for his soldiers to tutor their compatriots about these new conditions in private settings without a disciplinarian presiding over them.[219] Charles's erratic pace in promulgating new, detailed reforms every few years was too much for his captains and men-at-arms to sufficiently implement.[222]
Charles's ordinances were mostly inspired by Xenophon'sCyropaedia.[223] After observing howCyrus the Great achieved the willing obedience of his subjects, Charles became obsessed with discipline and order among his men-at-arms.[224] He applied Xenophon's comments in the Abbeville ordinance, thus ensuring that through a complexchain of command, his soldiers would both command and obey.[219] The influence ofVegetius'sDe re militari is also quite apparent in Charles's writings. Vegetius suggested that soldiers were to be recruited from men offering themselves to a martial life; afterwards, they would swear an oath to stay loyal to the duke. Charles adapted both ideas in his 1471 ordinance.[225] Charles's 1473 ordinance included exercises from Vegetius to keep soldiers disciplined and prepared.[226]
The Burgundian standing army struggled with recruitment.[227] Although the army had enough men-at-arms, pikemen, and mounted archers, it lackedculverins and foot archers.[228] To solve this problem, Charles diversified his army and recruited from other nationalities.[229] Italian mercenaries were his favourite and by 1476 filled most of his ranks.[230] Despite the constant warning from military authors of the past against the recruitment of mercenaries, contemporary chroniclerJean Molinet praised Charles for his brilliant solution, saying that he was favoured by both heaven and earth and thus above the "commandments of philosophers".[231]
Over the span of five years, Charles's deputy in Upper Alsace, Peter von Hagenbach, alienated his Alsatian subjects; antagonized the neighbouring Swiss Confederacy, who felt threatened by his rule; and showed aggressive intentions towards the city ofMulhouse. As a result, the Swiss sought alliances with German towns and Louis XI.[228] By February 1473, a handful of free cities had combined to end Burgundian rule in Alsace.[232]
The cities ofStrasbourg,Colmar,Basel, andSélestat offered money to Sigismund of Austria to buy back Alsace from Charles; but Charles was determined to keep it and refused to sell.[233] To emphasize his claim, Charles toured the province around Christmas 1473, reportedly with an army.[234] He tried to make peace with the Swiss, who questioned his sincerity.[235] Charles's threats prompted the Swiss to ally themselves with their former enemy, Sigismund.[233]
In April 1474, the rebelling Alsatian cities and the Swiss formed theLeague of Constance to drive Charles and Peter von Hagenbach from Alsace,[235] and rebellion quickly broke out.[107] The league overthrew Hagenbach, put him on trial, and on 9 May executed him.[233] Upon hearing this news, Charles was enraged. In August, he sent an army led by Peter's brother, Stefan von Hagenbach, into Alsace.[236] After Charles refused again to give up control of Alsace, the League of Constance officially declared war on him.[237] Hagenbach's death might be considered the catalyst to the conflict now called the "Burgundian Wars".[236]
When Alsace rose up against Burgundian authority, Charles was already preoccupied with another campaign, in Cologne.[237] Charles aided theArchbishop of Cologne,Ruprecht against a rebellion, hoping to turn theelectorate into a Burgundian protectorate.[238] He held peace talks at Maastricht on 14 May 1474, which failed. From 22 June, he planned to lay siege to Colognian cities and force Ruprecht's subjects to accept the latter's terms.[239] The first of his targets was the city ofNeuss, which Charles needed to control in order to guarantee Burgundian supply lines for an attack on Cologne. Neuss was expected to fall within a few days, and many contemporary historians feared its fall would open up Germany to the Burgundians.[239]
Siege of Neuss by Charles the Bold in 1475, by Adriaen Van den Houte
On 28 July 1474, Charles's army reached the southern gate of Neuss.[240] Its artillery immediately began bombardment to breach the walls.[241] To isolate the city, Charles assigned men to every gate, blockaded the river across Neuss with fifty boats, and secured the two isles adjacent to the city.[242] Despite all attempts, communications between Neuss and the outside world continued.[243] In September, the Burgundian night watch caught a man swimming in the river with a letter detailing Emperor Frederick's intention to attack the Burgundian besiegers.[244] Upon learning of Frederick's plan, Charles intensified the barrage, and attempted to drain the city'smoat by diverting theRiver Erft and sinking overloaded barges into the Rhine.[244]
Residents of Neuss endured the constant bombardment, and refused to surrender even though their food had been reduced from cows to snails and weeds.[245] Their resistance gained admiration from all the contemporary chronicles.[246] Emperor Frederick was slow to amass an army. When he had gathered 20,000 German forces in Spring 1475, he took seventeen days to march from Cologne toZons, their encampment.[247] Charles was constantly petitioned by his brother-in-law, Edward IV of England, to leave the siege and join Edward in fighting the French. But in the face of the Emperor's forces, Charles did not want to withdraw and lose face.[248] The Emperor had no desire to fight the Burgundians and limited his involvement in the conflict to a few skirmishes.[249] The conflict quickly came to an end after an emissary from the Pope threatened both sides withexcommunication, and all parties signed a peace treaty on 29 May 1475.[250]
Charles left Neuss on 27 June.[251] The city had been so badly damaged that it was on the verge of surrender.[250] His propagandists presented him as the Caesar of their age who had brought a humiliating defeat on the German forces. After signing the peace treaty, hundreds of German soldiers lined up to see him. According to one chronicle, many of them threw themselves at Charles and worshipped him.[252] However, theSiege of Neuss cost Burgundy dearly in army strength and strategic opportunities.[251] Besides the number of men and equipment lost, this siege also cost Charles a chance to destroy Louis XI and France. Edward IV, after seeing no support from his ally, agreed to sign theTreaty of Picquigny with Louis XI; the terms of the treaty included a seven-year truce and a marriage alliance between the two kingdoms.[250] Charles had to sign a treaty with Louis as well, so that he would be free to march south and deal with the League of Constance, whose members now also included René II of Lorraine.[253]
Charles commenced his full-fledged invasion against the Swiss and their allies immediately after signing the peace treaty with Louis XI. Splitting his army into two parts, he advanced through Lorraine with no resistance and captured the capital city ofNancy.[254] At the beginning of 1476, Charles besieged the recently captured castle ofGrandson which was fortified by a garrison fromBern.[255] Despite the many relief forces sent to defeat the Burgundians, the Swiss were unable to relieve the city from the siege, and Charles recaptured Grandson, executing all of the Bernese garrison as retaliation for Swiss brutality in Burgundian towns.[256] On 1 March, Charles, expecting the Swiss army to march towards him for a battle, decided to leave Grandson and head northwards for a mountain pass north of the town ofConcise. As he had foreseen, the Swiss army marched fromNeuchâtel, with their vanguard, made up of eight thousand men, several hours ahead of the rest of their army. The vanguard reached the mountain pass first and surprised the Burgundian army.[257]
Charles quickly rallied his troops, ordered his artillery to fire at the enemy lines, and then launched an attack.[255] Meanwhile, the Swiss had knelt down to pray, which the Burgundians may have mistaken for submission, which only motivated the Burgundians more for the attack.[258] The initial charge, commanded byLouis de Châlon-Arlay [fr], Lord of Grandson, failed to penetrate the Swiss defensive line, with Louis himself killed in the process.[258] Charles then made a second attack. In order to lure the enemy further down the valley to give his artillery a better target, Charles soon retreated.[259]
However, the rest of Charles's army mistook his tactical retreat for a complete withdrawal. Around this time, the rest of the Swiss army had reached the valley, announcing their arrival by bellowing their horns. The Burgundians panicked and abandoned their positions, ignoring Charles's pleas to stay in line.[260] The panicking army even forsook their camp at Grandson, leaving it for the Swiss to capture.[255][261] TheBattle of Grandson became a humiliating defeat for Charles the Bold, as his army's cowardice had caused him the loss of many valuable treasures and all of his artillery and supplies.[262] For two or three days after the battle, Charles refused any food or drink. By 4 March, he began to reorganize his army in hopes of giving battle two weeks later.[263]
Charles retreated toLausanne, where he reorganised his army. He demanded more artillery and men-at-arms from his lands; in Dijon, anything made of metal was melted to make cannon; in occupied Lorraine, he confiscated all artillery.[264][h] He received funds from all his allies, and men from Italy, Germany, England, andPoland came to join his army.[265] At the end of May, he had amassed 20,000 men in Lausanne, outnumbering the local population.[266] He trained these men from 14 to 26 May while he himself grew sicker by the day, resulting in stagnation among his troops. With the supply lines delayed, and the payment long overdue, Charles's army had to cut costs. Many horse archers went on foot instead. The army, though magnificent in appearance, was incohesive and unstable.[267]
On 27 May, Charles and his army began their slow march towards the fortress ofMorat. His main objective was the city of Bern; to eliminate all support for the city, he first needed to conquer Morat.[265] He arrived at Morat on 9 June and immediately besieged the fortress. By 19 June, after several assaults on the fortress and with several of its walls destroyed, Morat sent a message to Bern, asking for help.[268] On 20 June, theEidgenossen (oath companion[i]) arrived at Morat.[271] The forces were larger than the army at Grandson; the Swiss commanders estimated themselves to be 30,000 men, while recent historians believe it was 24,000.[272] Charles expected a decisive battle in the wake of 21 June but no attack came.[271] The Swiss instead attacked the following day, 22 June, a holy day attributed to theTen thousand martyrs, catching the slumbering Burgundians by surprise.[273] Charles was too slow in organizing his troops for a counterattack: he himself tarried in putting on his armour, and before his men finished taking their positions, the Swiss army had already reached them.[274] The Burgundian army soon abandoned their posts and fled for their lives.[275]
The battle was a total victory for the Swiss, and a slaughter of the fleeing Burgundian army ensued. Many retreated intoLake Morat and drowned. Some climbed the walnut trees, and were shot dead witharquebuses andhand cannons. The Swiss showed no mercy to men who surrendered. They killed knights, soldiers, and high officials alike.[276] Charles himself fled with his men and rode for days until he reachedGex, Ain.[277] The Milanese ambassador, Panigarola, reported that Charles laughed and made jokes after his defeat at Morat. He refused to believe he was defeated and continued to think God was on his side.[278]
While Charles may have wanted to continue the war against the Swiss, his plans changed drastically when Nancy was reconquered by René II on 6 October.[278] In need of money, Charles took a large loan from theMedici bank with which he assembled 10,000 hastily gathered men.[279] The rest of his army consisted of the Italian mercenaries under the command of theCount of Campobasso [fr], the Burgundian garrison in Nancy, and 8,000 reinforcements from theNetherlands.[280] Charles arrived before Nancy at 11 October and by 22 October had begun bombarding the city walls. The siege continued throughout the harsh winter.[281] Charles was hoping that he could enter the city before any of Rene's allies came to raise the siege.[282]
Meanwhile, René spent November and December negotiating with the Swiss to hire an army of mercenaries and with Louis XI to pay the Swiss. He was eventually successful with both and marched towards Nancy from Basel on 26 December with 9,000 Swiss mercenaries.[283] Between 31 December and 3 January 1477, the Count of Campobasso and his Italian mercenaries deserted the Burgundians.[284][285] They joined René and fought the Burgundians in the forthcoming battle.[285][j]
On 5 January, in heavy snow, René and his army marched towards the Burgundian position.[288] The snow obscured their movements, and theyoutflanked the Burgundian army by marching around towards their front, where Charles had not placed pickets.[289] Around noon they attacked the Burgundians, whose artillery was too slow to engage with the quickly approaching army.[290] Charles tried to rally his men, but to no avail, for the Burgundians were already fleeing from the battlefield.[291] Meanwhile, the Alsatian and Swiss infantry encircled Charles and his horsemen. In theRiver Meurthe he fell from his horse, and was struck on his head with ahalberd, which pierced his helmet and went into his skull.[291] Half of the Burgundian army died during the battle or while retreating.[291] Only those who escaped the fifty kilometers toMetz survived.[290]
Duke René II of Lorraine holding the hands of the corpse of Charles the Bold,Chronique scandaleuse by Jean de Roye
The corpse of Charles the Bold was found two days after the battle, when it was found lying on the ice-bound river, with half of his head frozen.[291] It took a group consisting of Charles's Romanvalet, his Portuguese personal physician, his chaplain,Olivier de la Marche, and two of his bastard brothers to identify the corpse through a missing tooth, ingrown toenail, and long fingernails.[292] His body was moved to Nancy with full honours, where it was displayed for five days.[291] René buried him in the Saint-Georgecollegiate church of Nancy.[293] In Artois, people refused to believe he was dead; they believed he had escaped to Germany to undergo seven years of penance, and would reappear again.[292]
Margaret of York, Charles's wife, requested the return of his body, but René refused.[293] Over 70 years after Charles's death, on 22 September 1550,Charles V exhumed the body and brought it toLuxembourg to strengthen his claim over Burgundy. Three years later, Charles's bones were again exhumed to their final resting place, theChurch of Our Lady, Bruges, beside his daughter, Mary of Burgundy.[293] In 1559,Philip II ordered the construction of a monument over the tomb of Charles, which was completed in 1563.[293] Philip would holdmasses for the repose of the soul of Charles andcommemorated the date of his death, 5 January.[294]
Burgundian territories (orange/yellow) and limits of France (red) after theBurgundian Wars.
Louis XI learned of Charles's death even before it reached Burgundy; he took advantage of the lack of leadership to invade Burgundy through Picardy, Artois, andMâcon only three weeks after the Battle of Nancy.[295] Ghent rose in rebellion, executing two of Charles's closest collaborators,William Hugonet andGuy of Brimeu.[296] Charles's former conquests, Liége and Guelders, rapidly sought their independence, and in Luxembourg a struggle broke out about whether to recognize Mary of Burgundy as Charles's successor.[295] Sigismund of Austria and the Swiss vied forFranche-Comté; Holland, Zeeland, Frisia, and Hainault were claimed by the Count Palatine and the Duke of Bavaria.[297]
Mary, the sole child of Charles, and Margaret of York, his widow, were confronted by a crisis. To secure her legitimacy as ruler, Mary signed theGreat Privilege on 11 February 1477 and restored powers to the States General inFlanders,Brabant,Hainaut, andHolland.[298] To secure an alliance with the Habsburgs, Mary married Maximilian, son of Holy Roman Emperor Frederick III, in August 1477.[296] Maximilian used a combination of diplomacy and military strength to defend and regain territories from Louis XI, though France kept the geographic Duchy of Burgundy; he also quelled several internal revolts to preserve a great deal of the Burgundian State.[295] Mary died on 27 March 1482, and passed her lands and the title of Duke of Burgundy to her son and heir,Philip.[299]
Charles the Bold's untimely death directly led to the sudden collapse of the Burgundian State.[300] He had no legitimate male heir to succeed him and he did not provide a capable husband for his daughter that he could train and prepare for succession.[300] He was obsessed with uniting the "lands over there" (Low Countries) and the "lands over here" (Burgundy proper) throughLorraine,[139] and sought to forge a national identity independent from that of the French.[301] He spent his few years as the Duke of Burgundy in securing a crown and forging a new kingdom to unite his subjects, and to enhance his own glory.[114] However, his efforts inadvertently united his German enemies under the banner of a "German nation" opposing Charles, whom they called "The Grand Turk of the West".[302]
Charles's death marks a significant moment in the modern history of Lorraine;[303] in Nancy, the victory of René II is still remembered fondly.[304] The Swiss victory at Morat was a confirmation of their national identity, a mark of pride, and a preservation of their independence. The Battle of Morat contributed to the decline of feudalism and heralded the end to the concept of chivalry.[305] German-language historiography treats Charles ambivalently; he is seen both as a tragic representative of the fall of the Middle Ages, and as an immoral and flawed prince. Until recently, Swiss literature generally presented Charles negatively.[306]
Charles's death and the crisis of 1477 was an inspiration to two authors,Olivier de La Marche andAnthonis de Roovere [nl], who wroteLe chevalier délibéré andDen droom van Rouere op die doot van hertoge Kaerle van Borgonnyen saleger gedachten,[k] respectively, about his death.[308] The hatred between Charles the Bold and Louis XI was an inspiration for the17th-century French moralistic dialogues by authors such asFrançois Fénelon, who in hisDialogues of the dead portrays Charles and Louis reconciling by drinking from theRiver Styx.[309]
^According to Bart van Loo, Charles's epithet,le Téméraire, was given to him by his contemporaries.[1]Richard Vaughan argues that the nickname is a 19th-century invention and a misnomer.[2] The English translation, Charles the Bold, suggests that he was named after the progenitor of his family,Philip the Bold. While Philip's epithet,le Hardi can be translated as "bold", Charles' epithet in French means "foolhardy" and "reckless".[1]
^From the early stages of his reign, Philip the Good had employed many juridical and political advisors, who were the central institution of the government. In the decade 1435-45, with the acquisition of theBurgundian Netherlands, the state had doubled in size; the need for a specialized council gave rise to the Ducal Council (French:grand conseil), whose ranks were filled with Philip's advisors.[42]
^According to the German historian, Christian Kiening, the narrative of their love may be fictitious and created by the authors of the time.[37]
^This encounter showcased the economical and cultural differences betweenChristendom's richer west and poorer east, with the Germans amazed by the wealth of Burgundy and the Burgundians shocked by the Germans' poor equipment.[113]
^Maximilian's eventual succession reinforced the continuity of the emperorship in the Hapsburg dynasty, which appealed to Frederick III's attachment to his house.[122]
^Andreas inherited the claims to the Byzantine and Trebizond empires with the death of the main claimants from the empires' dynasties,Palaiologos andKomnenos, respectively.[150]
^Philippe de Commines, the Burgundian chronicler, reported that in an official decree to all his realm, Charles ordered "Der Meyer zu Lockie an den Grafen zu Aarburg" (all the world to come to him with all (its) cannon and all (its) manpower).[264]
^The wordEidgenossen is literary translated as 'oath companion', and was a synonym for the Swiss, referring to the members of the Old Swiss Confederacy.[269] Until the Siege of Morat, most of the confederacy had not declared war on Burgundy, because Charles had yet to invade a territory officially part of one of its members. But during the siege, Charles attacked a bridge which was a part of Bernese territory, thus obligating the confederacy to join Bern in their campaign against Burgundy.[270]
^It is not clear what was Campobasso's position during the battle. One Neapolitan account reports that Charles found himself engaged in a duel with Campobasso during the battle.[286] According to Angelo de Tummmulilis, Charles had Campobasso at his mercy but spared him and told him to flee.[287]
^Translation: De Roovere's dream about the death of the late Charles of Burgundy.[307]
Alden, Jane (2010).Songs, Scribes, and Society: The History and Reception of the Loire Valley Chansonniers. The New Cultural History of Music. New York: Oxford University Press.ISBN9780199700738.OCLC953459041.
Ainsworth, Maryan W. (1998). "The Business of Art : Patrons, Clients, and Art Markets".From Van Eyck to Bruegel: Early Netherlandish Painting in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. pp. 23–39.ISBN9780870998706.OCLC39131019 – via H.N. Abrams.
Bakos, Adrianna E. (2013).Images of Kingship in Early Modern France: Louis XI in Political Thought, 1560–1789. London: Routledge.ISBN9781136191909.OCLC1463361960.
Blockmans, Wim; Pervenier, Walter (1999).The Promised Lands: The Low Countries Under Burgundian Rule, 1369–1530. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.ISBN9780812231304.OCLC40143018.
Brady, Thomas A. (2009).German Histories in the Age of Reformations, 1400–1650. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN9781139481151.OCLC667034110.
Brown, Anthony; Small, Graeme (2007).Court and Civic Society in the Burgundian Low Countries, c. 1420–1520. Manchester: Manchester University Press NBN International.ISBN9780719056208.OCLC898037451.
Brown, Andrew (2010).Civic Ceremony and Religion in Medieval Bruges c. 1300–1520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN9781139494748.OCLC1369788014.
Cuttler, S.H. (1981).The Law of Treason and Treason Trials in Later Medieval France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN9780521239684.OCLC7462091.
Drake, Michael S. (2013) [First published 2002].Problematics of Military Power: Government, Discipline and the Subject of Violence. Portland: Routledge.ISBN9780415865296.OCLC827973166.
D'Arcy, Jonathan; Dacre, Boulton (2000).The Knights of the Crown: The Monarchical Orders of Knighthood in Later Medieval Europe, 1325–1520. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.ISBN9780851157955.OCLC491598816.
Graves, Michael A.R (2014).The Parliaments of Early Modern Europe, 1400–1700. London: Taylor & Francis.ISBN9781317884330.OCLC881417402.
Gunn, S.J.; Janse, A. (2006).The Court as a Stage: England and the Low Countries in the Later Middle Ages. Woodbridge: Boydell.ISBN9781843831914.OCLC62344765.
Golubeva, Maria (2013).Models of Political Competence: The Evolution of Political Norms in the Works of Burgundian and Habsburg Court Historians, c. 1470–1700. Leiden: Brill.ISBN9789004250741.OCLC846551779.
Housley, N. (2004).Crusading in the Fifteenth Century: Message and Impact. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.ISBN9781403902832.OCLC55518414.
Hicks, Michael A. (1992).False, Fleeting, Perjur'd Clarence: George, Duke of Clarence 1449–78. Bangor: Headstart History.ISBN9781873041086.OCLC463748217.
Jenks, Stuart (2018).Documents on the Papal Plenary Indulgences 1300–1517 Preached in the Regnum Teutonicum. Leiden: Brill.ISBN978-90-04-36063-1.OCLC1043953147.
Kendall, Paul Murray (1971).Louis XI: The Universal Spider. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.ISBN978-1842124116.OCLC1012832822.
Knechtges, David R. (2012).Rhetoric and the Discourses of Power in Court Culture: China, Europe, and Japan. Washington: University of Washington Press.ISBN9780295802367.OCLC10019317967.
Koenigsberger, H. G. (2001).Monarchies, States Generals, and Parliaments: The Netherlands in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN9780521803304.OCLC46448960.
Kontler, Laszlo; Somos, Mark (2017).Trust and Happiness in the History of European Political Thought. Leiden: Brill.ISBN9789004353664.OCLC1005741749.
Kren, Thomas; McKendrick, Scot (2003).Illuminating the Renaissance: The Triumph of Flemish Manuscript Painting in Europe. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.ISBN9780892367030.OCLC51553612.
Lecuppre-Desjardin, Élodie (2022).The illusion of the Burgundian state. Manchester Medieval Studies. Vol. 30. Manchester: Manchester University Press.ISBN9781526174550.OCLC10017268838.
Potter, Philip J. (2012).Monarchs of the Renaissance The Lives and Reigns of 42 European Kings and Queens. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company.ISBN9780786468065.OCLC757461974.
Roelens, Jonas (2024).Citizens and Sodomites: Persecution and Perception of Sodomy in the Southern Low Countries (1400–1700). Leiden: Brill.ISBN9789004686175.OCLC1411841075.
Schepper, Hugo de (2007). "The individual on trial in the sixteenth-century Netherlands : between tradition and modernity". In Parker, Charles H.; Bentley, Jerry H. (eds.).Between the Middle Ages and modernity: individual and community in the early modern world. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 187–211.ISBN9780742553095.OCLC1474133219.
Schnitker, Harry (2004). "Margaret of York on Pilgrimage: The Exercise of Devotion and the Religious Traditions of the House of York". In Biggs, Doughlas; Michalove, Sharon; Reeves, Compton (eds.).Reputation and Representation in Fifteenth-Century Europe. Leiden: Brill. pp. 81–123.ISBN9789004136137.OCLC191952657.
Sieber-Lehmann, C. (1997). "Der türkische Sultan Mehmet II und Karl der Kühne, der "Türk im Occident"". In Erkens, F.R (ed.).Europa und die osmanische Expansion im ausgehenden Mittelalter. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. pp. 13–39.ISBN978-3-428-09180-5.OCLC1146394225.
Smith, Robert Douglas; De Vries, Kelly (2005).The Artillery of the Dukes of Burgundy, 1363–1477. Rochester, New York: Boydell Press.ISBN9781843831624.OCLC60322326.
Stein, Robert (2017).Magnanimous Dukes and Rising States: The Unification of the Burgundian Netherlands, 1380–1480. Oxford: Oxford University Press.ISBN9780191078309.OCLC973882565.
Vaughan, Richard; Small, Graem (2010).Philip the Good: The Apogee of Burgundy. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.ISBN9780851159171.OCLC1015575845.
Vaughan, Richard; Paravicini, Wener (2002).Charles the Bold: The Last Valois Duke of Burgundy. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.ISBN9780851159188.OCLC973170828.
Villalon, L. J. Andrew; Kagay, Donald J. (2005).The Hundred Years War: A Wider Focus. Leiden: Brill.ISBN978-90-47-40586-3.OCLC274191996.
Walsh, Richard J. (2005).Charles the Bold and Italy (1467–1477): Politics and Personnel. Liverpool Historical Studies. Vol. 19. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.ISBN9781846312809.OCLC269009493.
Watson, Noelle; Schellinger, Paul; Ring, Trudy (2013).Northern Europe: International Dictionary of Historic Places. London: Taylor & Francis.ISBN9781136639449.OCLC7385588780.
Weightman, Christine (2009).Margaret of York: The Diabolical Duchess. Stroud: Amberley Publishing.ISBN9781445609683.OCLC784578796.
Woodacre, Elena; McGlynn, Sean (2014).The Image and Perception of Monarchy in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.ISBN9781443868525.OCLC892799119.
Beazley, Matthew (2014). "Burgundian blunder at Concise: The Battle of Grandson".Medieval Warfare.4 (4). Karwansaray BV:27–33.eISSN2589-3548.ISSN2211-5129.JSTOR48578372.
Brunner, Jean-Claude (2011). "Misery at Morat: Charles the Bold's English Archers at the Battle of Murten".Medieval Warfare.1 (4). Karwansaray BV:43–48.eISSN2589-3548.ISSN2211-5129.JSTOR48577888.
Williams, Gareth (2014). "Fools Rush In: Charles the Bold and the Siege of Neuss".Medieval Warfare.4 (4). Karwansaray BV:22–26.eISSN2589-3548.ISSN2211-5129.JSTOR48578371.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
