Burkhart was a student ofFelix Salzer.[2] He holds a M.Mus. degree fromYale University.[3] His M.A. thesis forColorado College, written in 1952,[4] concentrated on the musical culture ofOld Order Amish and ofOld Colony Mennonites.[5] Among Burkhart's many students are Channan Willner, Stephen Lindeman, Stephen Slottow, Roy Nitzberg, William Renwick, and Gary S. Karpinski.
Burkhart is known for work on the relations between Schenkerian readings, analysis of rhythm and meter, and implications for performance. Most of the compositions he discusses are for keyboard, especially Bach, Beethoven, and Chopin, but he has also written about opera (Don Giovanni) and song cycles (Schumann'sLiederkreis, Op. 39).[6]
A frequently cited article is regarded as the "classic treatment"[7] of motivic parallelisms in Schenkerian analysis. Burkhart introduces the term "Ursatz parallelism"[8]—when a motive in a small span of music (foreground) duplicates one covering a far longer span (background)—but because of its generality (and the abstract nature of theUrsatz) such a figure alone normally does not create significant motivic associations within a composition. Thus, it is more productive to focus on how "motivic parallelisms operate within individual pieces" rather than as symptoms of a tonal system.[9] Burkhart finds that the motivic parallelisms of various surface motives and their "hidden repetitions" in middle-level segments are "much more unusual and interesting." An oft-cited example relates brief motives in the first two bars of Chopin'sNocturne in F♯ major, Op. 15, No. 2, to larger spans: a neighbor-note figure that is also the frame of the melody in bars 1–16; and an arpeggiated chord that is also stretched across bars 1–45.[10] As Burkhart notes, it is common—as in these examples—for the smaller motive to be nested inside the larger parallelism. The limit in breadth of such parallelisms may be found in another oft-cited example: Schubert's "Erlkönig", where Burkhart finds that two motives in the piano's introduction map onto the key sequence of the entire song.[11]
"The Polyphonic Melodic Line of Chopin's B-minor Prelude." InPreludes, op. 28: An Authoritative Score, Historical Background, Analysis, Views and Comments, edited by Thomas Higgins, 80–88. New York, 1973.
"Chopin's 'Concluding Expansions'." InNineteenth-century Piano Music: Essays in Performance and Analysis, edited by David Witten, 95–116. New York, 1997.
"The Phrase Rhythm of Chopin'sA-flat Mazurka, Op. 59, No. 2." InEngaging Music: Essays in Music Analysis, edited by Deborah Stein and William M. Marvin, 3–12. New York, 2005.
"The Two Curious Moments in Chopin's E-flat MajorPrelude." InStructure and Meaning in Tonal Music: Festschrift in Honor ofCarl Schachter, edited by L. Poundie Burstein and David Gagné, 5–18. Hillsdale, New York, 2006.
"The Suspenseful Structure of Brahms's C-major Capriccio, Op. 76, no. 8: A Schenkerian Hearing." InBach to Brahms: Essays on Musical Design and Structure, edited by David Beach and Yosef Goldenberg, 259–278. Rochester, New York, 2015.
^Burkhart, Charles (1952).The music of the Old Order Amish and the Old Colony Mennonites: A Contemporary Monodic Practice. Colorado College.OCLC9250631.
^Burkhart, Charles; Ferris, David; Damschroder, David (2017). "Schumann: Three songs from Liederkreis (op. 39)".Harmony in Mendelssohn and Schumann. pp. 146–170.doi:10.1017/9781108284110.014.ISBN9781108284110.
^Matthew Bribitzer-Stull,Understanding the Leitmotif: From Wagner to Hollywood (Cambridge, 2015), p. 134n12. Others who have described the article as "classic" include James William Sobaskie ("Contextual Drama in Bach,"Music Theory Online 12/3 (2006);[1] and Michael Baker, "Aspects of Tonal Pairing in the Lieder of Robert Franz," inHistories and Narratives of Music Analysis, edited by Miloš Zatkalik, Milena Medić, and Denis Collins (2013), p. 358n25.
^According to Lauri Suurpää, Allen Cadwallader does the opposite, arguing that "the origins of the motivic network of a specific piece can be traced to configurations so fundamental to the tonal system that they transcend individual works" (Lauri Suurpää, "The Path from Tonic to Dominant in the Second Movement of Schubert's String Quintet and in Chopin's Fourth Ballade,"Journal of Music Theory 44/2 (2000): 454; referred work: Allen Cadwallader, "Prolegomena to a General Description of Motivic Relationships in Tonal Music,"Intégral 2 (1988): 1–35).