 | |
| Founded | March 30, 1989; 36 years ago (1989-03-30) |
|---|---|
| Founder | Charles Lewis |
| Defunct | March 31, 2025; 10 months ago (2025-03-31) |
| Type | 501(c)(3) |
| 54-1512177 | |
| Focus | Investigative journalism |
| Location | |
| Revenue | $3.83 million (2023)[1] |
| Endowment | $5.22 million (2023)[1] |
| Website | www |
TheCenter for Public Integrity (CPI) was an Americannonprofitinvestigative journalism organization. CPI's stated mission was "to counter the corrosive effects of inequality by holding powerful interests accountable and equipping the public with knowledge to drive change."[2] It won the 2014Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting, and in 2023, theEdward R. Murrow Award for General Excellence.[3]
Mass layoffs in 2024 saw almost the entirety of CPI's workforce dismissed. In March 2025, CPI announced that it had officially ceased operations and was seeking to turn its archives over to theProject on Government Oversight.
CPI was founded on March 30, 1989, byCharles Lewis, a former producer forABC News andCBS News60 Minutes.[4][5][6] By the late 1980s Lewis observed that fewer resources—time, money and space—were being invested in investigative reporting in the United States by established news outlets and major publications.[7]In his book entitled935 Lies: The Future of Truth and the Decline of America's Moral Integrity Lewis recounted how he recruited two trusted journalists, Alejandro Benes andCharles Piller—whom he had met through his television work— to serve on the board of directors of the nascent CPI. All three had grown dissatisfied with what was being done in the name of investigative journalism by established news organizations.[7] They chose the name Public Integrity as a way of underscoring the "ultimate purpose of investigative journalism" which is "to hold those in power accountable and to inform the public about significant distortions of the truth."[4][8] In their tenth anniversary Annual Report Piller described their first meetings in their "Boardroom—the cheap seats at the Baltimore Orioles game.
In May 1990, Lewis used the money he had raised and his house as collateral to open an 1,800-square-foot (170 m2) office inWashington, D.C.[6] In its first year, the CPI's budget was $200,000.[9] In 1996, CPI launched its first website, although CPI did not begin to publish reports online until 1999.[9]
In August 2000 the CPI published a story entitled "Cheney Led Halliburton to Feast at Federal Trough: State Department Questioned Deal With Firm Linked to Russian Mob", in which the authors argued that whileDick Cheney was CEO ofHalliburton—from 1995 to 2000—the company received "$3.8 billion in federal contracts and taxpayer-insured loans".[7][10]
In 2001,Global Integrity, an international project, was launched to systematically track and report on openness, accountability and the rule of law in various countries. It has since been incorporated independently.[11]
In 2004, CPI'sThe Buying of the President book was onThe New York Times Best Seller list for three months.[9]
Lewis served as CPI's director until January 2005. As of his departure, CPI had published 14 books and more than 250 investigative reports. In 2005, CPI had a staff of 40 full-time Washington-based reporters who partnered with a network of writers and editors in more than 25 countries.[9] Years later, Lewis said he decided to leave his position at CPI because "he didn't want it to become 'an institution that was Chuck's Excellent Adventure".[12] Lewis' departure surprised and upset philanthropists Herb and Marion Sandler, who had partially funded the CPI's activities.[13]
In December 2004, CPI's board of directors chose television journalistRoberta Baskin as Lewis's successor. Baskin came to CPI after directing consumer investigations forABC News's 20/20 and serving as Washington correspondent for PBS'sNOW with Bill Moyers.[14] Lewis wrote that "most of the Center's carefully assembled, very talented, senior staff had quit by the fall of 2005".[9]
In September 2005, CPI announced that it had discovered a pattern of plagiarism in the past work of a staff writer for CPI's 2002 bookCapitol Offenders. CPI responded by hiring a copy editor to review all work, issuing a revised version ofCapitol Offenders, sending letters of apology to all reporters whose work was plagiarized, authoring a new corrections policy, and returning an award the book received fromInvestigative Reporters and Editors.[15] He went on to work for a political consulting firm that specializes inopposition research.[16][17] In March 2007, he told theMilwaukee Journal-Sentinel that the center's official version "is not accurate in telling the full story of why I left the center," but did not elaborate.
Baskin led the organization until May 24, 2006.[18]
Baskin was followed by Wendell Rawls Jr., who was named the center's interim executive director.[19] Rawls had previously worked as the center's managing director — being named to that post by Baskin on December 19, 2005. He joined CPI in August 2005.[20]
In 2007, Rawls was succeeded byWilliam Buzenberg, a vice president atAmerican Public Media/Minnesota Public Radio.[21] Buzenberg was first interviewed for the position in 2004 during the hiring process that ultimately led to the selection of his predecessor, Roberta Baskin.[12]
According to a report by Lewis, "the number of full-time staff was reduced by one-third" in early 2007.[9] By December 2007, the number of full-time staff had dropped to 25, down from a high of 40.[12] At the time, Buzenberg said "It's a great, great place, but I will not mislead you... [Lewis] quite frankly left the center in great shape financially, but when you have a visionary who leaves, how do you continue? 'With difficulty' is the answer."[12]
Baskin publicly disputed Buzenberg's claims in a letter to theAmerican Journalism Review where she wrote, "contrary to the statement from current Executive Director Bill Buzenberg, the center was not left 'in great shape financially' by my predecessor. Much of the money raised during the year prior to my tenure was used to offsetbudget overruns on several previous projects. I replaced our director of development and made fundraising my number one priority, much as Buzenberg has done. As a rookie fundraiser, I take pride in the fact that I was able to raise millions of dollars."[15]
In 2008, Lewis reflected on the transition period following his resignation and said, "I regret what happened to my staff and the condition of the Center. It's no secret it had a less than enviable few years. But that's one of the reasons I thought it was important to leave. I had founded it and run it for 15 years, and at some point the founder does have to leave the building...I don't regret it, I think it was important that I left, but I do feel badly about the hardship it brought to people I think the world of."[22]
In 2010,The Huffington Post Investigative Fund merged into the CPI, and eightHuffington Post journalists moved to CPI.[23]
In 2011, CPI eliminated 10 staff positions in order to compensate for a $2 million budget shortfall. Buzenberg and other senior staffers also took salary cuts. CPI board chairman Bruce Finzen said the budget would be "reduced between $2 million and $3 million, more like $2.5 million. The budget for next year will be in the 6 to 7 million range."
In April 2011, with support from theKnight Foundation, CPI launched iWatchnews.org as its main investigative reporting website.[24] In August 2012, CPI stopped using iWatchnews.org and returned to its original domain.[25]
Buzenberg stepped down from CPI at the end of 2014, at which timePeter Bale was named CEO.[26] In November 2016, Bale resigned from the center to "pursue other international media opportunities" and John Dunbar assumed the role of chief executive officer.[27]
In 2019,Susan Smith Richardson was named chief executive officer, becoming the first African-American CEO in the center's history.[28][29]
In February 2024, CEO Paul Cheung resigned. The board also acted to eliminate the position of editor-in-chief, a post that had been held by Matt DeRienzo.[30]
CPI had a revenue goal of $6 million for 2023, and fell about $2.5 million short of that. According to theNew York Times, this shortfall created a situation of financial peril that threatened "to extinguish a newsroom of about 30 journalists that has watchdogged powerful institutions for decades."[30] Due to the organization's financial difficulties, CPI considered merging with a competitor or shutting down.[30]
In March 2024, CPI laid off 11 newsroom employees.[31][32] That same month,Richard Tofel, the former president ofProPublica, wrote aSubstack piece entitled "What Went Wrong at the Center for Public Integrity?" in which he discussed "what seems likely to be the end, one way or another, of CPI." Tofel identified considerable turnover at the top of the organization, cultural shortcomings of its board of directors, and strategic missteps as the three major factors which led to the organization's demise.[33] In May 2024, a mass layoff saw almost all CPI workers lose their jobs.[34]
CPI's last major piece was co-published in June 2024 and the organization had no staff by November 2024. In March 2025, CPI announced it had officially ceased operations and was in talks to give its archive to theProject on Government Oversight.[35]
In its first year, CPI's budget was reported to be $200,000.[9] In 2010, CPI had $9.2 million in revenue and $7.7 million in expenses.[36] By 2022, annual revenues had declined to $5 million.[37]
CPI reported receiving foundation support from a number of foundations, including theSunlight Foundation, theEthics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation, theFord Foundation, theJohn D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, theJohn S. and James L. Knight Foundation, theOmidyar Network, theOpen Society Foundations, and thePew Charitable Trusts.[38] The Barbra Streisand Foundation reported that it had funded CPI.[39]
In July 2014, theLaura and John Arnold Foundation donated $2.8 million to CPI to launch a new project focused on state campaign finance. According to theInternational Business Times, "as CPI was negotiating the Arnold grant,Arnold's name was absent from a CPI report on pension politics". Arnold has spent at least $10 million on a campaign to roll back pension benefits for public workers.[40][41]
As of March 2025, CPI's board of directors included chairmanWesley Lowery and members Jamaal Glenn,Olivier Kamanda,Jennifer 8. Lee, Sue Suh, Daniel Suleiman, and Andres Torres. Emeritus board members include Charles Lewis andCraig Newmark.[42] In March 2025, Lowery stepped down as board chair amid allegations that he made inappropriate sexual comments and unwanted sexual advances at his full time job atAmerican University. At the same time, CPI announced that it had officially ceased operations.[43]
In 1997, CPI launched theInternational Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), based inWashington, D.C.[44] In 2016, the ICIJ spun off from CPI and became its own nonprofit due to financial difficulties with CPI.[45][46]
In April 2016, the ICIJ made headlines worldwide with the announcement that it and the German newspaperSüddeutsche Zeitung had received a leaked set of 11.5 million confidential documents from a secret source, created by the Panamanian corporate service providerMossack Fonseca. The Panama Papers provided detailed information on more than 214,000offshore companies, including the identities of shareholders and directors.[47] The documents named the leaders of five countries — Argentina, Iceland, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine and the United Arab Emirates — as well as government officials, close relatives and close associates of various heads of government of more than 40 other countries, including Brazil, China, France, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Malta, Pakistan, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Syria and the United Kingdom.[48]
The ICIJ andSüddeutsche Zeitung received the Panama Papers in 2015 and distributed them to about 400 journalists at 107 media organizations in more than 80 countries. The first news reports based on the set, along with 149 of the documents themselves,[49] were published on April 3, 2016.[50] Among other planned disclosures, the full list of companies is to be released in early May 2016.[51]
A 2012The New York Times editorial described the CPI as a "nonpartisan watchdog group".[52]
In relation to a story in February 1996, CPI was characterized as a "liberal group" by theLos Angeles Times andThe New York Times.[53][54]Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, a progressive media watchdog, has described CPI as "progressive."[55]
CPI's first report,America's Frontline Trade Officials, reported that nearly half of White House trade officials studied over a fifteen-year period became lobbyists for countries or overseas corporations after retirement. According to Lewis, it "prompted a Justice Department ruling, a General Accounting Office report, a Congressional hearing, was cited by four presidential candidates in 1992 and was partly responsible for an executive order in January 1993 by President Clinton, placing a lifetime ban on foreign lobbying by White House trade officials."[9][7]
In 1996, CPI released a report calledFat Cat Hotel: How Democratic High-Rollers Are Rewarded with Overnight Stays at the White House. This report, written by Margaret Ebrahim, won an award from theSociety of Professional Journalists. The report was an examination of the connection between overnight stays in theLincoln Bedroom during theClinton presidency and financial contributions to theDemocratic Party as well as the Clinton re-election campaign.[56]
In 2003, CPI publishedWindfalls of War, a report arguing that campaign contributions toGeorge W. Bush affected the allocation of reconstruction contracts in Afghanistan and Iraq.[57]Slate ran a piece arguing that due to a statistically insignificant correlation coefficient between campaign donations and winning contracts, "CPI has no evidence to support its allegations."[58]
CPI'sLobbyWatch series of reports started with its first reports in 2005.[18] In their January 2005 publication entitledPushing Prescriptions, CPI revealed that major pharmaceutical companies were the number one lobbyist in the United States spending $675 million over seven years on lobbying. They continued with this series in 2005 revealing how pharmaceutical companies had contacts even within the Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Trade Representatives.
CPI's report,Who's Behind the Financial Meltdown?,[59] looking at the causes of the2008 financial crisis, was featured in numerous media outlets, leadingColumbia Journalism Review to ask, "Why hasn't a newspaper or magazine done this?"[60]
More than 100 newspapers, magazines, wire services and websites cited CPI's report,The Climate Change Lobby Explosion, an analysis of Senate records showing that the number of climate lobbyists had grown by three hundred percent, numbering four for every Senator.[61]
Tobacco Underground, an ongoing project tracing the global trade in smuggled cigarettes,[62] produced by CPI's International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, was honored with the Renner Award for Crime Reporting from Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE), and the Overseas Press Club Award for Best Online International Reporting.[citation needed] TheTobacco Underground Project was funded by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Health. It is a cooperative project between the Center for Public Integrity's International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) andOrganized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) with journalists in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Romania, Russia and Ukraine. Journalists in Brazil, Belgium, Canada, China, Italy, Paraguay and the UK also participated.[63] that won the Overseas Press Club Award andInvestigative Reporters and Editors's Tom Renner Award for crime reporting.[64][65]
In 2010, CPI partnered withNational Public Radio to publish "Sexual Assault on Campus",[66] a report which showcases the failures of colleges and government agencies to preventsexual assaults and resolve sexual assault cases.[67]
The year long investigation by CPI,Toxic Clout, produced in partnership with thePBS NewsHour, "unmasked the deep, sometimes hidden, connections entangling thechemical industry, scientists and regulators, revealing the industry's sway and the public's peril."[68] Investigative journalists examined the work of the thenCalifornia Department of Public Health's John Morgan who had been working since 1995, to debunk allegations thatchromium had contributed to the cancer cluster attributed toHinkley groundwater contamination. The CPI found glaring weaknesses in Morgan's analysis that challenge the validity of his findings. "In his first study, he dismisses what others see as a genuine cancer cluster in Hinkley. In his latest analysis, he excludes people who were exposed to the worstcontamination."[69]PBS Newshour broadcast the series which included "EPA Contaminated by Conflict of Interest", "Ouster of Scientist fromEPA Panel Shows Industry Clout", starting in early 2013.[70][71] CPI published a series of articles including "Toxic clout: how Washington works (badly)" and "How industry scientists stalled action oncarcinogen."[72][73]
In 2013,International Consortium of Investigative Journalists released the results of a 15-month-long investigation based on 260 gigabytes of data regarding the ownership of secret offshore bank accounts. The data was obtained byGerard Ryle as a result of his investigation into theFirepower scandal. The ICIJ partnered with theGuardian,BBC,Le Monde,The Washington Post,SonntagsZeitung,Süddeutsche Zeitung andNDR to produce an investigative series onoffshore banking.[74][75] ICIJ and partnering agencies used the ownership information to report on government corruption across the globe, tax avoidance schemes used by wealthy people, the use of secret offshore accounts inPonzi schemes, the active role of major banks in facilitating secrecy for their clients, and the strategies and actors that make these activities possible.[76]
In early 2014 the ICIJ revealed as part of their "Offshore Leaks" that relatives of China's political and financial elite were among those usingoffshore tax havens to store wealth.[77]
The 2016 series entitled Science for Sale included, the February 8, 2016 article "About Science for Sale",[78] the February 8, 2016 article "Meet the 'rented white coats' who defend toxic chemicals", the February 10, 2016 article "Making a cancer cluster disappear", the February 16, 2016 article "Ford spent $40 million to reshape asbestos science", the February 18, 2016 article "Brokers ofjunk science?",[79] and the March 31, 2016 article "Senators seek better conflict disclosures for scientific articles."[80] In this investigative series which was co-published with Vice, journalist revealed how research backed by industry has opened debates on asbestos and arsenic with some of the paid scientists saying that "there are 'safe' levels of asbestos despite statements to the contrary from the World Health Organization and many other august bodies".[80]
In December 2017, CPI journalist Sarah Kleiner published a report on professional fundraisers who use telemarketing to collect donations for US military veterans, then keep 90 percent of the funds collected.[81] According to the December 12, 2017 article, Brian Arthur Hampton co-founded twoFalls Church, Virginia-based non-profit organizations: theCircle of Friends for American Veterans (COFAV)—also known as "American Homeless Veterans"—in 1993 and then the Center for American Homeless Veterans—also known as the "Association for Homeless and Disabled Veterans". During the 2000s, Hampton said he had "hosted more than 100 members of Congress across 196 veterans shelter-themed forums in 46 cities" in rallies for these non-profits.[81] Kleiner revealed that according to the 2015 Center for American Homeless Veterans' tax returns, "it provided just $200 in grants to other organizations out of $2.5 million in overall expenditures, the vast majority of which paid telemarketers."[81] This report confirms findings from the investigation by theSaint Louis, MissouriBetter Business Bureau (BBB)[82] andCharityWatch.[83] The BBB had advised "consumers to exercise caution when deciding whether to contribute money" to Hampton's non-profit.[82]
BBB also found that "[c]ontracts between the Center for American Homeless Veterans and "its two main fundraisers" – Reno, Nevada-basedOutreach Calling andPhoenix, Arizona-based Midwest Publishing – revealed that "just 10 percent of all donations" go to the Center for American Homeless Veterans.[82] The BBB investigation also revealed that from September 2014 to September 2016, Outreach Calling and Midwest Publishing "collected nearly $5 million, with about $508,000 going to the [Center for American Homeless Veterans] and "almost all the money retained" by the center, "went to pay salaries, legal fees and office-related expenses."[82]
According to New York state regulators, "a wealthy 49-year-old New Jersey businessman", Mark Gelvan (b.1978), is the "driving force behind Outreach Calling."[84] Outreach Calling collects money for "homeless veterans," "breast cancer survivors", "disabled police officers", and "children with leukemia", among others.[84] According to a 2017 CPI analysis, "Outreach Calling, raised more than $118 million on behalf of about two dozen charities from 2011 to 2015", retaining $106 million. This left c. 10.3 percent or $12.2 million, for the non-profit charities and those they serve - homeless veterans, breast cancer survivors, disabled police officers, and children with leukemia. In the United States, it is legal for for-profit telemarketers to keep 90% of the donations they solicit as long as they to not "mislead prospective donors" or "lie to them about how their contributions will be used", according toJim Sheehan, "head of the charities bureau for the office ofNew York Attorney GeneralEric T. Schneiderman."[84]
The CPI,USA TODAY, andThe Arizona Republic undertook a collaborative two-year investigation intocopycat bills,[85] involving 30 investigative reporters across the United States, which culminated in a series of articles published in 2019.[86][87]: 110 [88] Specifically, their investigation examined the role of organizations, such as theAmerican Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), in the American legislative process through the use of so-called "model bills" or copycat bills. Data journalists, using a "unique-data analysis engine built on hundreds of cloud computers", compared "millions of words of legislation" from the LegiScan service,[89] found that, from 2010 through 2018, legislators have introduced ALEC model bills 2,900 times. Six hundred of these became law.[90] The data identified about 10,000 bills introduced in all American states, that included almost identical language.[91] The investigation called the widespread successful use of these model bills spanning an eight-year period—which the report described as "fill-in-the-blank legislation"—amounts to "perhaps the largest unreported special-interest campaign in American politics."[90] Journalists wrote that copycat bills drive agendas in almost "every statehouse" and touch almost every area of public policy.[87]: 110 The data revealed how the traditional way of writing legislation "from scratch" had been supplanted by the use of ALEC bills in many states.[87]: 110 Mississippi—with a total population of less than three million—has had more "model bills", that were written outside Mississippi, introduced into its Legislature than in any other state" in the United States.[92]
Kevin Phillips ofNational Public Radio has said, "no other investigative organization shines so many probing flashlights into so many Washington dirty-laundry baskets."[7]
In 2006,Slate media criticJack Shafer described CPI as having "broken as many stories as almost any big-city daily in the last couple of decades".[93]
Writing inThe Wall Street Journal in March 2005, commentatorJohn Fund accused CPI of being a member of what he termed the "campaign finance lobby."[94] Citing a speech by Sean Treglia, former program manager atPew Charitable Trusts, Fund argued that a "stealth campaign" by "eight liberal foundations" fomented a false sense of public demand for new restrictions on the financing of public campaigns.[94] Fund singled out CPI as a front group pushing Pew's agenda, arguing that "reporters are used to attempts to hoodwink officials into thinking an issue is genuinely popular, and they frequently expose them. But when "good government" groups like the Center for Public Integrity engage in the same tactics, journalists usually ignore it."[94]
CPI's Bill Allison responded to criticisms arising from Tregalia's speech by emphasizing that Pew's contributions to the CPI's work on campaign finance have always been forthrightly disclosed.[95] In a published argument with blogger Ryan Sager, Allison also disputed the notion that the CPI's work amounted to advocacy. Allison stated, "the purpose of our grants is to do things like code hundreds of thousands of public records, put them in a database and post them on our Website so anyone can use them. The amount of money we've gotten to pushcampaign finance reform is $0.[96]
In another essay on CPI's website, Allison challenged CPI's critics, and Fund specifically, arguing that:[97]
[Fund] doesn't cite a single instance in which the Center has attempted to "hoodwink" government officials (or anyone else, for that matter) into thinking campaign finance is a genuinely popular issue, because he can't. We simply don't operate that way. We don't do public relations campaigns. We don't lobby Congress. We don't petition the Federal Election Commission. We don't pretend we have legions of individuals contributing money to support our work. Our paid membership amounts to around six thousand people; we'd certainly be happy to have more... as for Mr. Fund, back in the days when campaign finance issues were of concern to him, he sought us out to lend authority to his writings on John Huang and quoted us in an Oct. 29, 1996, column on the subject. Is it Mr. Fund's view that when he wrote about various DNC campaign finance violations, he was trying to hoodwink federal officials into thinking that people cared about the issue?
In November 2010, CPI published a report on bluefin tuna overfishing entitled "Looting the Seas".[98]Politico reported that "to obtain key information for the project, reporters accessed a database maintained by an intergovernmental fisheries regulatory body with a password given by a source, likely breaking the law." CPI's own lawyer and an outside law firm both determined that CPI's staff likely broke the law in obtaining information for the report. In addition, one of the experts quoted in the associated documentary was paid $15,000 as a project consultant to CPI.[99] The investigative methods used to produce the report became a point of contention within the organization when CPI employee John Solomon made a number of accusations against the team that had worked on the series.
CPI board member and formerThe New York Times Washington bureau chiefBill Kovach was asked by then-CPI presidentWilliam Buzenberg to look into the matter. Kovach concluded that CPI's reporting was "sound, ethical and fully in the public interest."[100] In addition, the board hired an outside law firm to answer the legal questions.Columbia Journalism Review reported: "As for the legality of using the password to access data, the lawyers concluded that, in theory, a prosecutor might argue it violated theComputer Fraud and Abuse Act. But whether it actually did was open to debate. And, in any case, it was highly unlikely that charges would ever be brought." In the wake of the controversy, David Kaplan and John Solomon resigned from CPI. CPI officials also withdrew their entry of the tuna story for aPulitzer Prize.[99] Andy Revkin ofThe New York Times wrote, "the relationship of the television production to a United Nations agency and an environmental group can prompt questions about objectivity, but the package, over all, appears robust."[101] The Looting the Seas series won two journalism awards: the Renner Award fromInvestigative Reporters and Editors[102] and the 2010 Whitman Bassow Award from the Overseas Press Club of America.[103]
In 2011,Politico called into question CPI's collaboration with advocacy organizations.Politico reported that CPI had coordinated the release of a report onKoch Industries withGreenpeace.Politico also reported thatPew Charitable Trusts, a funder of the Looting the Seas report, hosted a screening of a CPI documentary and then organized a call to action with other NGOs for the protection of bluefin tuna. In 2008, CPI published a report on tobacco that was both funded by and promoted by an advocacy group called Tobacco Free Kids.[104][105][106]
In 1996, the CPI received theSociety of Professional JournalistsSigma Delta Chi Award for Public Service in Online Journalism (Independent) for their report entitled "Fat Cat Hotel: How Democratic High-Rollers are Rewarded with Overnight Stays at the White House" by the Public i staff and Margaret Ebrahim.[107]
CPI received theGeorge Polk Award in 2003 for its investigation ofUS military spending inIraq andAfghanistan ("Windfalls of War: U.S. Contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan").[108] Its work led to widespread media coverage that increasedcongressional scrutiny of military spending.[109][110]
In 2011, CPI won aJames Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism for their investigation of weak inspections endangering factory workers and surrounding communities.[111]
In 2012, CPI reporterMichael Hudson won a "Best-in-Business" award for digital investigative reporting from theSociety of American Business Editors and Writers. Hudson won the award for his report entitledThe Great Mortgage Cover-Up.[112]
CPI's work has also received awards fromPEN USA,Investigative Reporters and Editors,the Society of Professional Journalists, the Association of Capitol Reporters and Editors, theNational Press Foundation, theJoan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy and others.[113]
CPI reporter Chris Hamby won the 2014Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting. Hamby's story reported that doctors and lawyers working for the coal industry helped defeat benefit claims of coal miners who had contracted black lung disease.[114] After CPI's Pulitzer win,Politico reported that "ABC News has accused The Center for Public Integrity of downplaying the network's contributions to a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative report, setting off a bitter public dispute between two news organizations that once worked as partners." CPI executive director Bill Buzenberg said that ABC News overstated its contributions to the story.[115]
In 2022, theCenter for Public Integrity and Transmitter Media was nominated for a Podcast & RadioPeabody Award for their episodeThe Wealth Vortex.[116]
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)[permanent dead link]Businessman banned in New York still raking in millions from unsuspecting donors, regulators say
Report: Generate dynamic status reports of monitored bills with numerous reporting and formatting options that can also be shared with clients or other interested parties.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| People | |
| Other | |
