
Edward Elgar'sCello Concerto in E minor, Op. 85, is a cornerstone of the solocello repertoire. Elgar composed it in the aftermath of theFirst World War, when his music had already become out of fashion with the concert-going public. In contrast with Elgar's earlierViolin Concerto, which is lyrical and passionate, the Cello Concerto is for the most part contemplative and elegiac.
The October 1919 premiere was a debacle because Elgar and the performers had been deprived of adequate rehearsal time. Elgar made two recordings of the work withBeatrice Harrison as soloist. Since then, leading cellists fromPablo Casals onward have performed the work in concert and in the studio, but the work did not achieve wide popularity until the 1960s, when a recording byJacqueline du Pré caught the public imagination and became a classical best-seller.
Elgar is not known to have begun work on the concerto until 1919. In 1900 the cellist of theBrodsky Quartet,Carl Fuchs [de], had obtained the composer's agreement to write something for the cello one day.[1] Fuchs and his friend the cellistPaul Grümmer later reminded Elgar of this.[2] The composer's biographerJerrold Northrop Moore speculates that Elgar may have recalled the promise when planning a new concerto in 1919.[3]
In 1918 Elgar underwent an operation in London to have an infected tonsil removed.[4] The night after his return from hospital to his London house he wrote down the melody that would become the first theme of the concerto.[5] He andhis wife soon retired to their secluded country cottage "Brinkwells" nearFittleworth, Sussex. During 1918 Elgar composed three chamber works there[n 1] which his wife commented were noticeably different in style and character from his previous compositions. After their premieres in the spring of 1919, he began realising his idea of a cello concerto.[6] The work is dedicated toSidney Colvin and his wife, friends of Elgar.[7]
The concerto had a disastrous premiere, at the opening concert of theLondon Symphony Orchestra's 1919–20 season on 27 October 1919. Apart from the concerto, which the composer conducted, the rest of the programme was conducted byAlbert Coates, who overran his rehearsal time at the expense of Elgar's. Lady Elgar wrote, "that brutal selfish ill-mannered bounder ... that brute Coates went on rehearsing."[8] The critic ofThe Observer,Ernest Newman, wrote, "There have been rumours about during the week of inadequate rehearsal. Whatever the explanation, the sad fact remains that never, in all probability, has so great an orchestra made so lamentable an exhibition of itself. ... The work itself is lovely stuff, very simple – that pregnant simplicity that has come upon Elgar's music in the last couple of years – but with a profound wisdom and beauty underlying its simplicity."[9] Elgar attached no blame to his soloist,Felix Salmond, who played for him again later.[10] Elgar said that if it had not been for Salmond's diligent work in preparing the piece, he would have withdrawn it from the concert entirely.[11]
In contrast with theFirst Symphony, which received a hundred performances worldwide in just over a year from its premiere, the Cello Concerto did not have a second performance in London for more than a year.[12] Elgar's music was by this time widely seen as old-fashioned, less appropriate to the post-war era than to theEdwardian.[13] The American premiere of the concerto was given inCarnegie Hall, New York on 21 November 1922 byJean Gerardy with thePhiladelphia Orchestra conducted byLeopold Stokowski.[14] It was received with little enthusiasm:The New York Herald found most of the work "reflective, melancholy and generally depressing";[14]The New York Times thought the thematic material "is not rich; it is spun out, sometimes pretty thin".[15] Gerardy later introduced the concerto in Poland and Australia.[16]The Sydney Morning Herald found the work original, musicianly and an admirable addition to the cello repertoire, but "without the qualities that kindle the imagination of the listener".[17]
Later the concerto gained greater appreciation. In 1955 the authors ofThe Record Guide wrote of "the irresistible appeal of the Cello Concerto", although "the task of interpreting the solo is extremely difficult", requiring "a reserved dignity that is peculiarly English".[18] By 1967, according to the criticEdward Greenfield,Jacqueline du Pré was "convincing audiences from New York to Moscow that Elgar is – on occasion at least – exportable".[19]
The work has become, along withDvořák'sOp. 104, one of the two most frequently performed cello concertos in the international repertoire.[7]
This work is scored for solo cello, 2flutes, 2oboes, 2clarinets in A, 2bassoons, 4horns in F, 2trumpets in C, 3trombones,tuba,timpani, andstrings.
The work typically plays for a little under 30 minutes;[n 2] it has fourmovements:
The first movement is internary form with an introduction. It opens with arecitative for the solo cello, immediately followed by a short answer from the clarinets, bassoons and horn.
Anad lib modified scale played by the solo cello follows. Theviola section then presents a rendition of the main theme in Moderato, and passes it to the solo cello who repeats it. Elgar considered it to be his tune: "if you ever hear someone whistling this melody around theMalvern Hills, that will be me".[20]
The string section plays the theme a third time and then the solo cello modifies it into a fortissimo restatement. The orchestra reiterates, and the cello presents the theme a final time before moving directly into a lyricalE major middle section.
This transitions into a similar repetition of the first section. This section omits the fortissimo modified theme in the solo cello. The slower first movement moves directly into the second movement.

The second movement opens with a fast crescendo withpizzicato chords in the cello. Then, the solo cello plays what will be the main motive of the Allegro molto section.
Pizzicato chords follow. A briefcadenza is played, and sixteenth-note motive and chords follow. A ritardando leads directly to a scherzo-like section which remains until the end.
The slow third movement starts and ends with a lyrical melody, and one theme runs through the entire movement.
The fourth movement begins with another fast crescendo and ends at fortissimo. The solo cello follows with another recitative and cadenza. The movement's main theme is noble and stately, but with undertones and with many key-changes.

Near the end of the piece, the tempo slows into apiù lento section, in which a new set of themes appears.

The tempo slows further, to the tempo of the third movement, and the theme from that movement is restated. This tempo continues to slow until it becomes stagnant, and the orchestra holds a chord. Then, at the very end of the piece, the recitative of the first movement is played again. This flows into a reiteration of the main theme of the fourth movement, with tension building until the final three chords, which close the piece.
Elgar andBeatrice Harrison made a truncated recording in 1920, using theacoustic recording process.[n 3] The first complete recording was made in 1928, by Harrison, Elgar and theNew Symphony Orchestra.[22] There were later78 rpm recordings withW. H. Squire andPablo Casals as soloists, but the work was infrequently recorded until the LP era of the 1950s to the 1970s.[23]
A key recording was made in 1965 byEMI, with British cellist Jacqueline du Pré as soloist and the London Symphony Orchestra conducted bySir John Barbirolli.[n 4] It was this recording that according to one critic "even persuaded the Americans to listen enraptured to Elgar".[25] Since then there have been more than seventy recordings issued, with soloists including in the 1960sPierre Fournier andMstislav Rostropovich, in the 1970sPaul Tortelier, in the 1980sLynn Harrell,Heinrich Schiff,Yo-Yo Ma andSteven Isserlis, in the 1990sMischa Maisky,János Starker,Pieter Wispelwey andTruls Mørk, in the 2000sAnne Gastinel andRaphael Wallfisch, and laterSol Gabetta,Paul Watkins,Antonio Meneses andSheku Kanneh-Mason.[26]
In 1985Julian Lloyd Webber recorded the concerto with theRoyal Philharmonic Orchestra conducted byYehudi Menuhin. ForBBC Music Magazine Jerrold Northrop Moore chose this as the finest version to date and it won aBrit Award for "Best Classical Recording" of 1985.[27] TheBBC Radio 3 feature "Building a Library" has presented comparative reviews of all available versions of the concerto on three occasions.The Penguin Guide to Recorded Classical Music, 2008, has three pages of reviews of the work. The only recording to receive the top recommendation of both the BBC andThe Penguin Guide is du Pré's 1965 recording with the LSO and Barbirolli. Other recordings commended by both the BBC andThe Penguin Guide are by Beatrice Harrison (1928);[28] Stephen Isserlis (1988);[29] Yo-Yo Ma (1985) and Truls Mørk (1999).[30][31]
The German periodicalFono Forum in a 2022 discographic survey of the work recommends recordings featuring as soloists Harrison, du Pré, Tortelier,Robert Cohen,Michaela Fukačová,Daniel Müller-Schott and Watkins.[32]