Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Cascades in financial networks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Failure of one institution triggering further failures

Cascades in financial networks are situations in which the failure of onefinancial institution causes acascading failure in another member of the financial network. In an extreme this can cause failure of the whole network in what is known assystemic failure. It can be defined as the discontinuous value loss (e.g. default) of the organization caused by the discontinuous value loss of another organization in the network. There are three conditions required for a cascade, there are; a failure, contagion and interconnection.[1]: 3116–3117, 3122 

Diversification and integration in the financial network determine whether and how failures will spread. Using the data on cross-holdings of organizations and on the value of organizations, it is possible to construct the dependency matrix to simulate cascades in the financial network.[1]: 3121, 3128 

Diversification and integration

[edit]

Elliot, Golub and Jackson (2014) characterize the financial network by diversification and integration. Diversification means to which extentassets of the one organization are spread out among the other members of the network, given the fraction of the assets of the organization cross-held by other organizations is fixed. Integration refers to the fraction of the assets of the organization cross-held by other organizations given the number of the organizations cross-holding is fixed.[1]: 3117–3118 

Using random network, the authors show that high integration decreases the percentage offirst failures; and as the network approaches complete integration the percentage of the first failures approaches zero. However, the integration increases the percentage of organizations that fail due to higher interconnection. In addition, up to some threshold, diversification does increase the percentage of discontinuous drops in value. Yet after the threshold level, the diversification decreases the percentage of failures: the authors say the following with respect to diversification: “it gets worse before it gets better”.[1]: 3132, 3138 

Intuitively, the higher the threshold value for the discontinuous drop in the organization’s value the higher the percentage of failures is.[1]: 3122–3123 

The authors conclude that the financial network is most susceptible to cascades if it has medium diversification and medium integration.[1]: 3143 

Models

[edit]

Without failure costs

[edit]

Eliot, Golub and Jackson (2014) provide an empirical method how to model cascades in financial networks. They assume that organizations in the network can cross hold assets of other organizations in the network. Also, they assume that players outside of the network can hold assets of the organizations in the network. They call the letteroutside shareholders. Their model starts with the following assumptions:[1]: 3119 

The authors find the equity value of an organization using the works by Brioschi, Buzzachi and Colombo (1989)[2] and Fedina, Hodder and Trianitis (1994):[3]

Vi=kDikpk+jCijVj{\displaystyle V_{i}=\sum _{k}D_{ik}p_{k}+\sum _{j}C_{ij}V_{j}}

The equity value is defined as the value of primitive assets and the value of claims on the primitive assets in other organizations in the network.

The counterpart of the equation above in terms of matrix algebra is given by

V=Dp+CV{\displaystyle V=Dp+CV}

The letter implies

V=(IC)1Dp{\displaystyle V=(I-C)^{-1}Dp}

The market value is defined by

vi=kDikpk+jCijjCjiVi{\displaystyle v_{i}=\sum _{k}D_{ik}p_{k}+\sum _{j}C_{ij}-\sum _{j}C_{ji}V_{i}}

Market value ofi is the equity value ofi less the claims of other organizations in the network on i.

The letter implies

v=FV=F(IC)1Dp=ADp{\displaystyle v=FV=F(I-C)^{-1}Dp=ADp}

whereA is the dependence matrix.

The elementAij{\displaystyle A_{ij}} represents the fraction ofj's primitive assets thati holds directly and indirectly.

With failure costs

[edit]

The equity value and the market value equations are extended by introducing threshold valueti{\displaystyle t_{i}}. If the value of the organizationi goes below this value, then a discontinuous drop in value happens and the organization fails. The cap on failure costs iski{\displaystyle k_{i}}.

Further, letI{\displaystyle I} be an indicator function that is equal to 1 if the value ofi is below the threshold and 0 if the value ofi is above the threshold.

Then the equity value becomes

Vi=kDikpk+jCijVjkiIi{\displaystyle V_{i}=\sum _{k}D_{ik}p_{k}+\sum _{j}C_{ij}V_{j}-k_{i}I_{i}}

Using matrix algebra, the expression above is equivalent to

V=(IC)1(Dpb(v)){\displaystyle V=(I-C)^{-1}(Dp-b(v))}

whereb(v){\displaystyle b(v)} is a vector whose elementbi=kiIi{\displaystyle b_{i}=k_{i}I_{i}}.

The market value including failure costs is given then by

v=F(IC)1(Dpb(v))=A(Dpb(v)){\displaystyle v=F(I-C)^{-1}(Dp-b(v))=A(Dp-b(v))}

The elementAij{\displaystyle A_{ij}} represents the fraction of failure costs ofj{\displaystyle j} thati incurs ifj fails.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefgElliott, M., Golub, B. and Jackson, M. O. 2014."Financial Networks and Contagion",The American Economic Review, 104(10):3115-3153.doi:10.2139/ssrn.2175056
  2. ^Brioschi, F., Buzzachi, L., and Colombo, M. 1989."Risk Capital Financing and the Separation of Ownership and Control in Business Groups,"Journal of Banking and Finance, 13:742-772.doi:10.1016/0378-4266(89)90040-X
  3. ^Fedina, M., Hodder J. E., and Trianitis, A. J. 1994."Cross Holdings Estimation Issues, Biases, and Distortions,"The Review of Financial Studies, 7(1):61-69.doi:10.1093/rfs/7.1.61
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cascades_in_financial_networks&oldid=1310931555"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp