Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contracts conferring rights and privileges to foreign Christian subjects
16th century copy of the 1569 capitulations betweenCharles IX andSelim II.
Draft of the 1536 treaty or capitulations negotiated between French ambassadorJean de La Forêt andIbrahim Pasha, a few days before his assassination, expanding to the wholeOttoman Empire the privileges received inEgypt from theMamluks before 1518.
Capitulation reopening trade betweenVenice and theOttoman Empire signed 2 October 1540, following theBattle of Preveza.
1 piaster overprint on 25-centimeType Sage, used at theFrench Post Office,Beirut in December 1885

Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire were contracts between theOttoman Empire and severalChristian powers, particularlyFrance. Turkishcapitulations, orAhidnâmes were generally bilateral acts whereby definite arrangements were entered into by each contracting party towards the other, not mere concessions.[1]

The Turkish capitulations were grants made by successivesultans toChristian nations, conferring rights and privileges in favour of their subjects resident or trading in the Ottoman dominions, following the policy towards European states of theByzantine Empire.

According to these capitulations traders entering the Ottoman Empire were exempt from local prosecution, local taxation, local conscription, and the searching of their domicile.

The capitulations were initially made during the Ottoman Empire's military dominance, to entice and encourage commercial exchange with Western merchants. However, after military dominance shifted to Europe, significant economic and political advantages were granted to the European powers by the Ottoman Empire.[2]

History

[edit]

In the first instance capitulations were granted separately to each Christian state, beginning with theGenoese in 1453, which entered into peaceful relations with the Ottoman Empire. Afterwards new capitulations were obtained which summed up in one document earlier concessions, and added to them in general terms whatever had been conceded to one or more other states; a stipulation which became amost favored nation article.

Around 1535 a capitulation was made bySuleiman the Magnificent regarding France. These treaties facilitated the entry of European finished goods into Ottoman markets, granting certain tax and tariff privileges to European merchants, and even someextraterritorial legal rights to allow the French consul to exercise jurisdiction over disputes arising with French merchants instead of the local IslamicSharia courts. These treaties were generally not disadvantageous to the Ottoman Empire while the Ottomans retained a superior military advantage.

France signed its first treaty ofCapitulations with theMamluk Sultanate inCairo in 1500, during the rule ofLouis XII.[3][4] After the Turks conquered Egypt in theOttoman–Mamluk War (1516–1517), the Ottomans upheld the capitulations to the French and applied them to the entire empire.

The Ottoman-French Treaty of 1740 marked the apogee of French influence in the Ottoman Empire in the eighteenth century. In the following years the French had an unchallenged position in Levant trade and in transportation between Ottoman ports. Near contemporary Ottoman capitulations to European powers such as Britain and Holland (1737), the Kingdom of Naples (1740), Denmark (1756), and Prussia (1761) were to offset and balance the capitulations granted to France in 1740.[5]

Status

[edit]

Capitulations signified that which was arranged under distinct headings; theOttoman Turkish phrase wasahid nameh (عهيدنامه), whereas a "treaty" wasmouahede (معاهده). The latter did, and the former did not, signify a reciprocal engagement.[citation needed]

According to capitulations, and treaties confirmatory of them, made between thePorte and other states, foreigners resident in Turkey were subject to the laws of their respective countries.

Thus, although the Turkish capitulations were not in themselves treaties, yet by subsequent confirmation they acquired the force of commercial durable instead of personal nature; the conversion of permissive into perfect rights; questions as to contraband and neutral trade stated in definite terms.

Abolition

[edit]

On 8 September 1914, the Ottoman Empire's rulingCommittee of Union and Progress unilaterally abrogated the capitulations as part of diplomatic maneuverings with Germany and the United Kingdom as to whetherthe Ottoman Empire would enter World War I. This action prompted a joint protest from the German, Austro-Hungarian, British, French, and Russian ambassadors. The decision was put into effect in early October.[6]

As far as Turkey is concerned, the capitulations were abolished by theTreaty of Lausanne (1923), specifically by Article 28:

Each of the High Contracting Parties hereby accepts, in so far as it is concerned, the complete abolition of the Capitulations in Turkey in every respect.[7]

Capitulations inEgypt ended in 1949 as stipulated in theMontreux Convention Regarding the Abolition of the Capitulations in Egypt in 1937.[8]

List of capitulations

[edit]

Capitulatory treaties were signed with the following states:[9][10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^As regards technical distinctions, an agreement, an exchange of notes, or a convention properly applies to one specific subject; whereas a treaty usually comprises several matters, whether commercial or political.
  2. ^Cleveland, William; Bunton, Martin (2009).A History of the Modern Middle East (4 ed.). Westview Press. p. 50.ISBN 978-0-8133-4374-7.
  3. ^Three years in Constantinople by Charles White p.139
  4. ^Three years in Constantinople by Charles White p.147
  5. ^Robert Olson, "The Ottoman-French Treaty of 1740"Turkish Studies Association Bulletin (1991) 15#2 pp. 347-355online
  6. ^Fromkin, David (2010).A Peace to End All Peace. Ch. 7 pt. III.
  7. ^In addition to Turkey, theBritish Empire,France,Italy,Japan,Greece,Romania and theKingdom of Yugoslavia were parties to the Treaty.
  8. ^Convention regarding the Abolition of the Capitulations in Egypt, Protocol, and Declaration by the Royal Egyptian Government (Montreux, 8 May 1936) Art 1.
  9. ^Lucius Ellsworth Thayer, "The Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire and the Question of their Abrogation as it Affects the United States",The American Journal of International Law,17, 2 (1923): 207–33.
  10. ^Philip Marshall Brown,Foreigners in Turkey: Their Juridical Status (Princeton University Press, 1914), p. 41.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Ahmad, F. "Ottoman perceptions of the capitulations 1800-1914,"Journal of Islamic Studies, 11,1 (2000), 1-20.
  • Boogert, Maurits H. van den (2005).The capitulations and the Ottoman legal system: qadis, consuls, and beraths in the 18th century.Leiden:Brill. xvi, 323p.
  • Hoyle, Mark S. W. (1991).Mixed courts of Egypt.London: Graham & Trotman. xxvii, 206p.
  • Maurits H. van den Boogert; Kate Fleet, eds. (2003).The Ottoman capitulations: text and context.Rome: Istituto per l'Oriente C.A. Nallino. pp. vii, [575]-727, 14p. of plates : ill., facsims.
  • Longva, Anh Nga. "From the Dhimma to the Capitulations: Memory and Experience of Protection in Lebanon." inReligious Minorities in the Middle East: Domination, Self-Empowerment, Accommodation (2012): 47-70.online
  • Olson, Robert. "The Ottoman-French Treaty of 1740"Turkish Studies Association Bulletin (1991) 15#2 pp. 347-355online
  • Vlami, Despina.Trading with the Ottomans: The Levant Company in the Middle East (Bloomsbury, 2014).
‹ ThetemplateCulture of the Ottoman Empire sidebar is beingconsidered for merging. ›
History
Politics
Government
House of Osman
Central (Porte)
Imperial Council
(classic period)
Imperial Government
(reform and constitutional period)
Millets
Provincial
Military
Army
Navy
Other
Economy
Society
Culture
Demographics
Religion
Symbols
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Capitulations_of_the_Ottoman_Empire&oldid=1324167932"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp