TheHouse of Commons Special Committee on Electoral Reform (ERRE) (French:Comité spécial sur la réforme électorale) was aspecial committee of theHouse of Commons of Canada established in 2016 during the42nd Canadian Parliament to investigate reforms to theCanadian electoral system. The formation of "an all-party Parliamentary committee to review... [electoral] reforms" was an election promise byLiberal Party leaderJustin Trudeau in the2015 federal election.[1] After the Liberals won a majority in the election, and Trudeau becamePrime Minister of Canada, he indicated the formation of a special committee was a priority in his mandate letter forMinister of Democratic InstitutionsMaryam Monsef. Shortly after the committee submitted its report toParliament on December 1, 2016, Monsef was transferred to the position of theMinister of Status of Women andKarina Gould took over the electoral reform file.[2][3] Shortly after taking her position, Gould announced that the government would no longer be pursuing reform of the electoral system, stating "It has become evident that the broad support needed among Canadians for a change of this magnitude does not exist."[4]
On May 10, 2016, Maryam Monsef gave notice in the House of Commons of the government's plans for the composition of the Special Committee.[5] The initial proposed structure of the Special Committee was three voting members allocated based on eachofficial party's seats in the House (sixLiberal members, threeConservative members, and oneNew Democratic member), with a member of theBloc Québécois andGreen Party leaderElizabeth May given additional non-voting seats.[6]
The structure of the Special Committee was criticized by the opposition party leaders, as the government would have possessed a majority of the committee seats and could unilaterally recommend alterations to the electoral system without the support of any other party. Interim Conservative leaderRona Ambrose, theLeader of the Official Opposition, denounced the plan as "stacking the deck", whileNathan Cullen, the NDP critic for Democratic Institutions, urged the government to reconsider this plan as well. The Green Party and Bloc Québécois additionally objected to their lack of voting representation on the committee.[7]
On June 2, 2016, Monsef announced that the government would support a motion by Cullen to alter the structure of the committee to have seats allocated based on percentage of the nationwide popular vote in the 2015 election and give the Bloc Québécois and Greens one voting seat each on the committee.[8][9] The Liberal caucus on the committee would have in effect only four voting members, as the chair would not vote unless there was a tie.[10]
On June 7, 2016, Cullen's motion, seconded by NDP MPMatthew Dubé, was approved by the House of Commons. The special committee was thereby empowered to "conduct a study of viable alternate voting systems to replacethe first-past-the-post system, as well as to examinemandatory voting andonline voting", all with an eye to improving the legitimacy, integrity, and inclusiveness of the voting system and the extent to which it could facilitate local representation and citizen engagement.
The motion directed that parties' whips assign members to the committee within ten sitting days of its passage, and that the committee issue its final report to the House of Commons no later than December 1, 2016.[11] This deadline was extended to June 23, but this proved to be unnecessary, as the final membership was deposited with theClerk of the House on June 17.[12] The committee held its first meeting on June 21, 2016.
The deadline for making submissions to the committee was October 7, 2016. Citizens were able to make submissions online, attendtown hall meetings hosted by Members of Parliament or attend committee hearings which were held in cities across Canada in September and early October 2016.[13]
By October 8, 2016 a poll byMainstreet Research for theOttawa Citizen revealed that, while 45 per cent ofOttawa voters are following the electoral reform process and that two in three Ottawa residents favour reforms, most of those surveyed missed out on local town hall meetings on electoral reform already held by MPs because they were not aware that they were happening.[14]
The committee heard from numerous public servants, academics, members of the public, and electoral officers from Canada and around the world.[15] The first witness before the committee wasMaryam Monsef,Minister of Democratic Institutions, who outlined the government's approach.[16][17] The following day,Chief Electoral OfficerMarc Mayrand[18] and his predecessorJean-Pierre Kingsley testified.[19] Their counterparts Robert Peden, from theNew Zealand Electoral Commission, and Tom Rogers, of theAustralian Electoral Commission, also appeared later in July.[20] Among the many academics that testified before the committee wasArend Lijphart, an expert on electoral systems.[21][22] In September and October 2016, the committee held public meetings in cities across Canada. Computer security expertBarbara Simons presented to the committee inVancouver.[23]
The committee adopted its final report,Strengthening Democracy in Canada: Principles, Process and Public Engagement for Electoral Reform,[23] on November 28, 2016. The report was presented to the House of Commons on December 1, 2016. The twelfth recommendation of thirteen was that a referendum should be held, with both the current voting system and a proposed proportional electoral system on the ballot.[24][25][26][27] The government would design the system with the goal of any proposed system scoring a 5 or less on theGallagher index but preserve local representation by avoidingparty-list proportional representation systems, and the committee recommended that the design of the proposed system be finalized and shared with Canadians before any referendum campaign is conducted.[28]
The report also included recommendations against implementingonline voting andmandatory voting and recommended exploring the use of other technologies in the voting process to improve accessibility, especially for persons with disabilities and segments of the population which have historically been disenfranchised.[28] The report considers the optionInstant-runoff voting (Alternative Vote in Single-Member Constituencies), but does not recommend it.
On February 1, 2017, the newly appointed Minister of Democratic InstitutionsKarina Gould announced that the government was no longer pursuing electoral reform and it was not listed as a priority in her mandate letter fromJustin Trudeau.[4] In the letter, Trudeau wrote that "a clear preference for a new electoral system, let alone a consensus, has not emerged" and that "without a clear preference or a clear question, a referendum would not be in Canada's interest."[29]
BothNathan Cullen andElizabeth May addressed Gould's announcement during the nextQuestion Period. Cullen said that Trudeau and the Liberals "will certainly pay a political price" in the next election for not following through on their electoral reform promise, while May stated her disappointment with Trudeau and her frustration that "our feminist prime minister threw two young women cabinet ministers [Gould and Monsef] under the bus on a key election promise."[30] Defending the decision, Trudeau claimed in later statements that implementing a proportional system would "augment extremist voices and activist voices" and promote instability in the country.[31][32]
Gould tabled the government's official response to the committee report in the House of Commons on April 3, 2017.[33] In response to Recommendations 1, 2, 11, 12, and 13 (related to changing the electoral system) she reiterated that "changing the electoral system is not in [her] mandate as Minister of Democratic Institutions" and that the government "remains committed to improving, strengthening and safeguarding Canada's democratic institutions."[34] Gould indicated that the government accepted the remaining recommendations, including the recommendations against implementing online and mandatory voting.[33]
Press reaction reflected the view that abandoning basic system reform had broken a promise.[35]
On May 31, 2017 a non-whipped vote to adopt the Dec 1, 2016 report of the Canadian House of Commons Special Committee on Electoral Reform was held[36] but was defeated by 159 votes to 146.[37] Thus the federal reform effort was abandoned. Only two Liberal MPs voted in favour:Nathaniel Erskine-Smith ofBeaches—East York in Ontario andSean Casey ofCharlottetown inPrince Edward Island (PEI) voted in favor. Casey explicitly citedthe 2016 PEI referendum as a factor in his vote:
In 2018, Trudeau had continued to express reservations aboutproportional representation has but expressed openness to considering other systems.[38] Gould said, "The first-past-the-post system may not be perfect — no electoral system is, but it has served this country for 150 years and advances a number of democratic values that Canadians hold dear, such as strong local representation, stability and accountability."[39]
On January 6, 2025, Trudeau expressed regret at not introducing electoral reform during his resignation speech.[40]
