There is a long history of close cooperation between theUnited States and theUnited Kingdom intelligence services; seeClandestine HUMINT and Covert Action forWorld War II and subsequent relationships. There are permanent liaison officers of each country in major intelligence agencies of the other, such as theCentral Intelligence Agency (CIA) and theSecret Intelligence Service ("MI6") (which is the British counterpart of the CIA),FBI and the Security Service (MI5), andNational Security Agency (NSA) andGovernment Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). From 1943 to 2017, theOpen Source Enterprise, a division of the CIA, was run out ofCaversham Park inReading, Berkshire. American officials worked closely with their British counterparts to monitor foreign TV and radio broadcasts, as well as online information.[1]
Oleg Penkovsky, a Soviet military intelligence colonel, who was adefector in place, was a joint US-UK espionage operation. Much of Penkovsky's product is available online at the CIA FOIA Reading Room under the code name IRONBARK.[2]
A major source of tension between the two countries wasKim Philby, a senior UK SIS officer who was a Soviet agent. Philby, at one point, was the SIS liaison officer resident in the US.James Jesus Angleton, head of CIAcounterintelligence, was surprised by Philby's activity, and, as a consequence, began hunts formoles within CIA.
In January 2014, newly released documents revealed thatMargaret Thatcher had been warned while she was Prime Minister that the CIA did not always give sufficient notice in advance when it carried out operations in the UK. In 1984,Paddy Ashdown, who later becameleader of theLiberal Democrats, raised fears about clandestine approaches made by CIA agents, but his allegations were dismissed by Thatcher.[3]
During the 1960s and 1970s, MI5 and the CIA's chief of counterintelligence,James Jesus Angleton, spied onLabour Prime MinisterHarold Wilson[4] because elements in those agencies claimed that Wilson was a Soviet agent or a blackmail risk.[5]
AsPeter Wright confirmed in his bookSpycatcher, Wilson was the victim of a protracted, illegal campaign of destabilisation by a rogue element in the security services. Prompted by CIA fears that Wilson was a Soviet agent - put in place after theKGB had, the spooks believed, poisonedHugh Gaitskell, the previous Labour leader - these MI5 men burgled the homes of the prime minister's aides, bugged their phones and spread black, anti-Wilson propaganda throughout the media. They tried to pin all kinds of nonsense on him: that his devoted political secretary,Marcia Williams, posed a threat to national security; that he was a closet IRA sympathiser. –The Guardian (2006)[6]
A series of CIA memos were released in January 2017 after a legal case byMuckRock, which promotesfreedom of information.[7] One memo was dated May 1983, shortly before theUK general election, and stated that the CIA was concerned about certain figures in the Labour Party, such as then-leaderMichael Foot and deputy leader,Denis Healey, accusing them of "apinganti-American rhetoric". Titled "The British Labor Party: Caught Between Ideology and Reality", it cited Labour's then-commitment to trade "protectionism," withdrawal from theEuropean Economic Community (later theEuropean Union), and the dismantling of itsTrident nuclear programme. Consequently, "a majority government headed by Labor [sic] would pose the most serious threat to US interests." The Labour Party "roundly criticizesUS policy in the Third World, particularly inLatin America, and calls for ... improv[ing] relations with other socialist regimes."[8]
Jeremy Corbyn, who became a Labour MP in 1983 and was laterelected leader of the party in 2015, was the subject of CIA interest due to his visit toGrenada in 1979.
[In 1984], Corbyn had come to the attention of the CIA as a Labour MP (forIslington North). He was critical of theU.S. invasion of Grenada, which had taken place in the previous year. In 1979, saysthe Spectator, Corbyn "went to Grenada with dignitaries of the Islington race relations and feminist industry, to see and admire theRevolution." Corbyn participated in a fact-finding mission, which claimed that most Grenadian working class people supported the revolution. In 1983, the US invaded to restore a political system favourable to its elite interests. A year later, the CIA noted the publication of a book written about the revolution in which, it says, the findings of Corbyn are quoted.[8]
The CIA also kept tabs on Corbyn because of his support for theSalvadorian union,FENASTRAS. Notably, in a 1986 memo detailing FENASTRAS' conference inSan Salvador, Corbyn's name was mentioned explicitly, whilst other foreign "union members" were not named.
In a letter inviting certain U.S. labor leaders to attend FENASTRAS' November 13-15 congress in San Salvador, [trade unionist Francisco] Acosta called FENASTRAS "democratic" in spite of its guerrilla andWFTU connections. British Labor M.P. Jeremy Corbyn and French, Australian, and Swiss union members also lent their names to [a FENASTRAS newspaper ad].[8]
In February 2009, journalistTim Shipman revealed inThe Spectator that the CIA was "running its own agent networks on an unprecedented scale in theBritish Pakistani community."
A British security source told me that somewhere between 40 and 60 per cent of CIA activity designed to prevent a new terrorist spectacular on American soil is now directed at targets in the UK. This is a quite staggering number. I ran the figure by several former CIA officers in the US, all of whom still have close links with the intelligence community. The consensus was that the 40 per cent figure is about right. 'If you're talking about total global operations, that would be an exaggeration,' one national security official said. 'If you're talking about operations to deal with threats against the US homeland, that's the ball park.' This has caused some tensions in what my old tutor DrChris Andrew, now the official historian of MI5, calls 'the most special part of thespecial relationship'. A former CIA officer who still does freelance work for the agency, said: 'Britain is an Islamist swamp. You don't want to have to spend time spying on your friends.'
As far as our closest ally is concerned, Britain is not part of the problem, Britain is the problem.Bruce Riedel, a former CIA officer and Middle East expert on theNSC for three presidents, who has just been appointed to headBarack Obama's overhaul of Afghan strategy, told me: 'The 800,000 or so British citizens of Pakistani origin are regarded by the American intelligence community as perhaps the single biggest threat environment that they have to worry about.'[9]
In February 2019, theIntelligence and Security Committee unearthed a number of examples of GCHQ's intelligence being used to locate and detain terrorism suspects who were subsequently rendered and tortured during the 2000s as part of thewar on terror. The committee also found that GCHQ provided intelligence to assist the interrogation of terrorism suspects held at CIAblack sites.[10]
In January 2022, former CIA agent-turnedwhistleblower,John Kiriakou revealed that theNational Endowment for Democracy—a non-profit corporation created in the 1980s by PresidentRonald Reagan and funded by theUnited States Congress—had funnelled millions of dollars into British independent media groups since 2016. These include investigative outlets such asBellingcat,Finance Uncovered andopenDemocracy, as well as media freedom and training organisations likeIndex on Censorship,Article 19, theMedia Legal Defence Initiative, and theThomson Reuters Foundation.[11]
In 2011, the US Congress changed the law that forbade the Executive Branch from propagandizing the American people or nationals of the other 'Five Eyes' countries—the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The National Endowment for Democracy, likeRadio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, countless Washington-area 'think tanks', andRadio/TV Martí, are the vehicles for that propaganda", referring to the US broadcaster that transmits to Cuba. Kiriakou continued: "And what better way to spread that propaganda than to funnel money to 'friendly' outlets in 'friendly countries'? The CIA's propaganda efforts throughout history have been shameless. But now that they're not legally relegated to just Russia and China, the whole world is a target." –Declassified UK[11]