Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Buddhism and Gnosticism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 
Part ofa series on
Buddhism

BuddhologistEdward Conze (1966) has proposed that similarities existed betweenBuddhism and Gnosticism, a term deriving from the nameGnostics, which was given to a number ofChristian sects. To the extent thatBuddha taught the existence of evil inclinations that remain unconquered, or that require special spiritual knowledge to conquer,Buddhism has also qualified as Gnostic.

Edward Conze

[edit]
Main article:Buddhism and Christianity

Edward Conze claimed to have noted phenomenological commonalities betweenMahayana Buddhism andGnosticism,[1] in his paperBuddhism and Gnosis, following an early suggestion byIsaac Jacob Schmidt.[2][a] Conze explicitly compared Mahayana Buddhism with "gnosis," that is, knowledge or insight, and not with the Gnostics, because too little was known about the Gnostics as a social group.[2] Based on Conze's eight similarities,Stephan A. Hoeller gives the following list of similarities:[4]

  • Liberation or salvation can be achieved by a liberating insight, namelygnosis orjnana
  • Ignorance, or a lack of insight, calledagnosis oravidyā, is the root cause of entrapment in this world
  • Liberating insight can be achieved by interior revelation, not by external knowledge
  • Both systems give a hierarchical ordering of spiritual attainment, from blindmaterialism to complete spiritual attainment
  • Wisdom, as the feminine principle personified inSophia andprajna, plays an important role in both religions
  • Myth is preferred over historical fact;Christ andBuddha are not mere historical figures, but archetypalprimordial beings
  • Both systems haveantinomian tendencies, that is, a disregard for rules and social conventions in higher spiritual attainment
  • Both systems are intended for spiritual elites, not for the masses, and have hidden meanings and teachings
  • Both systems aremonistic, aiming at a metaphysical oneness beyond the multiplicity of thephenomenal world

According to Conze, these commonalities were not by chance, but inherent to the essence of both religions.[1] How these similarities came into existence was unclear for Conze,[1] but according to Verardi they may be related to the sea trade between theRoman Empire andIndia, which was intense at the time.[5] Verardi further notes the similarities between the social-economic base of both Gnosticism and Buddhism, namely merchants, which both had to compete with the "great organised powers," of Rome and theChristian Church, and of theBrahmans.[6] Both communities represented "an open economy and society lacking the defenses (and the vexations) ofnomos," the law and institutions of the establishment.[7]

Conze's suggestions were noted byElaine Pagels as a "possibility," in the introduction toThe Gnostic Gospels,[8][9][b] but Pagels' and Conze's suggestion has not gained academic acceptance or generated significant further study.

Manichaeism

[edit]

Influences from Buddhism

[edit]
Main articles:Manichaeism § Influences, andThe Buddha in Manichaeism

Manichaeism was directly influenced byBuddhism. Like Buddha,Mani aimed fornirvana and used this word, showing the significance of Buddhist influences. He further believed in thetransmigration of souls, sangha, and used various Buddhist terms in his teachings.[1]Mircea Eliade noted similarities in the symbolism of light and mystic knowledge, predating Manichaeism, and possibly going back to an early commonIndo-Iranian source. Mani considered himself to be a reincarnation of Buddha. He also claimed that he was preaching the same message of Buddha.[10]Giovanni Verardi notes that Manichaeism is the prime source for comparisons between Buddhism and Gnosticism, Manichaeism representing "the same urban and mercantile ambience of which Buddhism was an expression in India."[11] When the mercantile economy declined due to the decline of theRoman Empire, Manichaeism lost its support.[12] The Manichaeans were hostile to the closed society of farming and landownership, just like Buddhism conflicted with the "non-urban world controlled by Brahman laymen."[13][c]

Mani, anArsacid Persian by birth,[15][16][17] was born 216 AD inMesopotamia (modernIraq), then within the PersianSassanid Empire.[18] According to theCologne Mani-Codex, Mani's parents were members of theJewish ChristianGnostic sect known as theElcesaites.[19]

Mani believed that the teachings ofBuddha,Zoroaster, andJesus were incomplete, and that his revelations were for the entire world, calling his teachings the "Religion of Light."[20] Following Mani's travels to theKushan Empire[f] at the beginning of his proselytizing career, variousBuddhist influences seem to have permeated Manichaeism:

Buddhist influences were significant in the formation of Mani's religious thought. The transmigration of souls became a Manichaean belief, and the quadripartite structure of the Manichaean community, divided between male and female monks (the "elect") and lay followers (the "hearers") who supported them, appears to be based on that of the Buddhistsangha.[21]

According toWillis Barnstone and Marvin Meyer, evidence of the influence of Buddhist thought on the teachings of Mani can be found throughout texts related to Mani.[22] In the story of the death of Mani, the Buddhist term nirvana is used:

It was a day of pain
and a time of sorrow
when the messenger of light
entered death
when he entered completeNirvana.

Influences on Buddhism

[edit]
Main article:Chinese Manichaeism

Following the introduction of Manichaeism to China, Manichaeans in China adopted a syncretic, sinified vocabulary borrowed primarily from Chinese Buddhism. Between 9th and 14th-centuries, following centuries of pressure to assimilate and persecution by successive Chinese dynasties, Chinese Manichaeans increasingly involved themselves with thePure Land school ofMahayana Buddhism insouthern China, practicing together so closely alongside the Mahayana Buddhists that over the years Manichaeism came to be absorbed into the Pure Land school making the two traditions indistinguishable.[23] Through this close interaction, Manichaeism had profound influence on ChineseMaitreyan Buddhist sects such as theWhite Lotus Sect.[24]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^The paper was presented at the conferenceOrigins of gnosticism: colloquium of Messina, held 13–18 April 1966. Conze: "The topic of my paper has a fairly long ancestry. Already in 1828 Isaac Jacob Schmidt, a German living in Russia, published a pamphlet entitledÜber die Verwandtschaft der gnostisch-theosophischen Lehren mit den Religionssystemen des Orients, vorzüglich dem Buddhaismus."[3] ("About the relationship of Gnostic theosophical teachings with religious systems of the East, especially Buddhism").
  2. ^Bennett: "Pagels does not rule out Buddhist andHindu influence on the Gnostic corpus. She cites the eminent Buddhologist Edward Conze (1904-79): 'Buddhists were in contact with Thomas Christians (that is, Christians who knew and used such.'"[9]
  3. ^Note thatBuddhism declined in India after the end of theGupta Empire (c. 320–650 CE), which was related to the decline of the Roman Empire and the decline ofsea trade with the Romans. Power was decentralised in India, and Buddhism lost its support from royal courts, being replaced by Brahmanical Hinduism.[14]
  4. ^"He was Iranian, of noble Parthian blood..."
  5. ^"Manichaeism was a syncretic religion, proclaimed by the Iranian Prophet Mani."
  6. ^Several religious paintings inBamiyan are attributed to him.[citation needed]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdVerardi 1997, p. 323.
  2. ^abConze 1967.
  3. ^Conze 1967, p. 651.
  4. ^Hoeller 2012, p. 180.
  5. ^Verardi 1997, p. 334-336.
  6. ^Verardi 1997, p. 337-338.
  7. ^Verardi 1997, p. 339-340.
  8. ^Pagels 1979.
  9. ^abBennett 2001, p. 68.
  10. ^Verardi 1997, pp. 323–324.
  11. ^Verardi 1997, p. 332.
  12. ^Verardi 1997, pp. 332–333.
  13. ^Verardi 1997, p. 333.
  14. ^Michaels 2004, p. 42.
  15. ^Boyce 2001, p. 111[d]
  16. ^Ball 2001, p. 437[e]
  17. ^Werner 2009.
  18. ^Coyle 2009.
  19. ^Koenen & Römer 1988.
  20. ^Coyle 2009, p. 13.
  21. ^Foltz 2010.
  22. ^Barnstone & Meyer 2005.
  23. ^Yar 2012.
  24. ^Ma & Meng 2011.

Bibliography

[edit]
   Topics inBuddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
Concepts
Proto-Gnostics
Gnostic sects
Early sects
Syrian-Egyptian
Persian
Medieval
Gnostic texts
Gnostic Gospels
Other
In modern times
 Organisations
People
Related articles
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buddhism_and_Gnosticism&oldid=1320226109"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp