Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Buddhi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sanskrit term for intellect

This article is about the Sanskrit term. For the consort of Ganesha, seeConsorts of Ganesha § Buddhi (Wisdom).
This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)
icon
This articleneeds attention from an expert in Hinduism. The specific problem is:to review objectivity and include more schools of Hindu philosophy.WikiProject Hinduism may be able to help recruit an expert.(October 2025)
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Buddhi" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(October 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Buddhi (Sanskrit: बुद्धि) refers to the intellectual faculty and the power to "form and retain concepts, reason, discern, judge, comprehend, understand".[1][2]

Etymology

[edit]

Buddhi (Sanskrit:बुद्धि) is derived from the Vedic Sanskrit rootBudh (बुध् ), which literally means "to wake, be awake, observe, heed, attend, learn, become aware of, to know, be conscious again".[1] The term appears extensively inRigveda and other Vedic literature.[1]Buddhi means, statesMonier Williams, the power to "form, retain concepts; intelligence, reason, intellect, mind", the intellectual faculty and the ability to "discern, judge, comprehend, understand" something.[1][3]

Buddhi is a feminineSanskrit noun derived from*budh, to beawake, tounderstand, toknow. The same root is the basis for the more familiar masculine formBuddha and theabstract nounbodhi.

Buddhi contrasts frommanas (मनस्) which means "mind", andahamkara (अहंंकाऱ) which means "ego, I-sense in egotism".[2][3][4]

Usage

[edit]

InSankhya andyogic philosophy both the mind and the ego are forms in the realm of nature (prakriti) that have emerged into materiality as a function of the threegunas (गुण) through a misapprehension ofpurusha (पुरूष) (the consciousness-essence of thejivatman). Discriminative in nature (बुद्धि निश्चयात्मिका चित्त-वृत्ति),buddhi is that which is able to discern truth (satya) from falsehood and thereby to make wisdom possible.[citation needed]

The Sānkhya-Yoga view

[edit]

According to theSānkhya-Yoga view,buddhi is in essence unconscious, and as such, cannot be an object of its own consciousness. This means that it can neither apprehend an object nor manifest itself.[5]

In theYoga Sutra, it is explained that thebuddhi cannot illuminate itself, since it itself is the object of sight, "na tat svabhāsam draśyatvāt" ("That is not self-luminous, because it is perceptible").[6]

In theSamkhyakarika,buddhi, originally referred to asmahat, is the fundamental entity that emerges during Prakrti's cosmic self-transformation. It has the sense of knowledge, and is synonymous with words like thought, idea, wisdom, and insight. Buddhi is characterized by its function as judgment, as it not only identifies the nature of things but also determines the best course of action. Frombuddhi arisesahamkara, the "I-maker", which begins the cosmic differentiation, producing inner sensation (indriya) through its transformed (sattvika) aspect and external perceptions through its elemental (tamasika) aspect, laying the foundation for subjectivity, objectivity, and self-awareness.[7]

Reference in Bhagavad Gita

[edit]

InBhagavad Gita Chapter 18,Krishna mentions influences of twogunas,rajas andtamas, onbuddhi. In verse 18.31, Krishna tellsArjuna that whenbuddhi is influenced byrajas, the person cannot clearly distinguish betweendharma (right action) andadharma (wrong action). Verse 18.32 explains that whenbuddhi is influenced bytamas, the person may confusedharma withadharma and has distorted understanding of all subjects.[8]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdSir Monier Monier-Williams; Ernst Leumann; Carl Cappeller (2002).A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 733.ISBN 978-81-208-3105-6.
  2. ^abIan Whicher (1998).The Integrity of the Yoga Darsana: A Reconsideration of Classical Yoga. State University of New York Press. pp. 18, 71, 77,92–95, 219, 231.ISBN 978-0-7914-3815-2.
  3. ^abJadunath Sinha (2013).Indian Psychology Perception. Routledge. pp. 120–121.ISBN 978-1-136-34605-7.
  4. ^Sir Monier Monier-Williams; Ernst Leumann; Carl Cappeller (2002).A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages.Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 124,783–784.ISBN 978-81-208-3105-6.
  5. ^Saksena, Shri Krishna.Essays on Indian Philosophy.ISBN 978-0-8248-8595-3.OCLC 1256407633.
  6. ^Patañjali. (1996).Yoga : discipline of freedom : the Yoga Sutra attributed to Patanjali; a translation of the text, with commentary, introduction, and glossary of keywords. University of California Press.ISBN 0-520-20190-6.OCLC 34894404.
  7. ^Parrott, Rodney J.; Parrot, Rodney J. (1986)."The Problem of the Sāṃkhya Tattvas as Both Cosmic and Psychological Phenomena".Journal of Indian Philosophy.14 (1):55–77.doi:10.1007/BF00165826.ISSN 0022-1791.JSTOR 23444164.
  8. ^Sutton, Nicholas (2016).Bhagavad-Gita. Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies. pp. 258–259.ISBN 978-1-366-61059-1.

External links

[edit]
Topics
Ancient
Āstika
Nāstika
Medieval
Modern
Texts
Philosophers
Concepts
Stub icon

ThisHindu philosophy–related article is astub. You can help Wikipedia byadding missing information.

Stub icon

This article aboutHindureligious studies,scripture orceremony is astub. You can help Wikipedia byadding missing information.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buddhi&oldid=1328746400"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp