| T.T.A | |
|---|---|
| General information | |
| Type | Two-seat fighter |
| National origin | United Kingdom |
| Manufacturer | British and Colonial Aeroplane Company |
| Designer | F. Barnwell & L.G. Frise |
| Number built | 2 |
| History | |
| First flight | 26 April 1916 |
TheBristol Type 6 T.T.A was a British two-seat, twin-enginebiplane, designed in 1915 as a defencefighter. Two prototypes were built, but the T.T.A. did not go into production.
The Bristol T.T.A was designed in 1915 to aWar Office requirement for a local defence aircraft. The T.T.A was a two-seat, twin-engine biplane withT.T. standing for twintractor; the Bristol Type number 6 was added retrospectively in 1923.[1] The guiding principles in the design were compactness and a wide field of fire from both cockpits.
The T.T.A[2] was anunswept biplane with slightstagger, the wings having constantchord and carrying longailerons on the upper planes. The wings were of three-bay construction, the innerinterplane struts supporting the engines in rectangular nacelles midway between the wings. Twin-wheeledundercarriage units were mounted below each engine, with a tailskid and a noseskid to prevent nosing over. The large areatailplane was the same shape as that of theScout D, with the same unbalancedelevators, but the finlessrudder was balanced. The gunner sat in a cockpit in the nose of the aircraft, armed with two free-mounted 0.303 in (7.7 mm)Lewis Guns. The pilot, sitting behind the wing trailing edge, had a rear-pointing Lewis gun.[2]
The original design, (the Bristol T.T.), envisaged the use of two 150 hp (110 kW)R.A.F. 4a engines, but theB.E.12 andR.E.8 aircraft had been given priority for these engines and Bristol were advised to use 120 hp (90 kW)Beardmore engines. With these engines, the aircraft was designated T.T.A, two prototypes were ordered and the first completed on 26 April 1916. The second followed in May, and both aircraft flew toUpavon for service tests. Top speed and climb rate were better than the T.T.'s higher powered but larger competitor, theF.E.4, but the aircraft was not liked and gained no production orders.[2]
Data fromBarnes 1970, p. 103
General characteristics
Performance
Armament