| Brexit: The Movie | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Directed by | Martin Durkin[1] |
| Written by | Martin Durkin |
Production company | Wag TV[1] |
Release date |
|
Running time | 81 minutes[2] |
| Country | United Kingdom[1] |
| Language | English |
| Budget | £300,000[3] |
Brexit: The Movie is a 2016 British film written and directed byMartin Durkin, advocating for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from theEuropean Union, commonly calledBrexit (aportmanteau ofBritish andexit). The film's production was funded through crowdfunding via Kickstarter.
It premiered in London on 11 May 2016, before being released the following day onYouTube andVimeo.
Brexit: The Movie was written and directed byMartin Durkin to advocate for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from theEuropean Union (Brexit) prior to theUnited Kingdom European Union membership referendum in June 2016.[4][5] The film wascrowdfunded throughKickstarter, with its £100,000 goal having been met with contributions from 1,500 donors by 26 February 2016.[1][6][7]
According to the film's official website, by the end of production, a total of over £300,000 had been raised by over 1,800 contributors.[3] One of the producers of the film David Shipley was convicted of fraud by false representation and received a jail sentence of three years and nine months in February 2020.[8] The fraud occurred in 2014 when he was attempting to find funding for his corporate finance advisory firm Spitfire Capital.[9] The firm provided £50,000 towards the production of the film.[10]
The film featured many leading advocates of leaving the European Union, including:
The film argued it was in the interest for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, due to lack of accountability of its institutions and that Britain should follow the Swiss economic model and strike new trade deals with the rest of the world.
The film explains that the United Kingdom will not require a trade deal with the European Union after leaving, it will likely to get one because 'the Union is desperate to keep it goods flowing into the UK'[20]'.David Davies MP then encourages the viewer to stand outside and count how many German manufactured cars are outside, explaining that the UK car market is worth £16 billion every for German car companies.[20] Meanwhile, the percentage of trade from the UK into the rest of the European Union is declining. Daniel Hannan explains 'that it is falling virtually by the minute, I mean its tumbling while we are doing this interview'.[20] Ruth Lea states simply 'They need us more than we need them[20]'.David Davies MP comments that Britain has a long established history of trading since the days of the slave trader,Sir Francis Drake[11] and believes that once out of the European Union, the UK will be able strike further trade deals.<[11]
Matt Ridley believes by leaving the European Union, the UK "we could have prosperity on a level that we can’t even imagine now".[21] The film narrator reinforces point by explaining that by "escaping fortress Europe could be a new start for Britain; a return at last to the global commercial and trading giant we were in the 19th Century. If we embrace free trade and escape the stultifying restrictions of EU over-regulation, there’s the potential for an extraordinary economic renaissance[21]".
Kelvin Mackenzie comments that "It comes down to the essential issue, the working man and woman of this country against people who think we have a better plan and a better mind than you, and if you don’t like it, what are you going to do – and the answer is, we’re going to vote Leave".[22] He then proceeds toblow a raspberry along with thereverse v-sign.[22]
Simon Heffer argues that: "If I was told I'd be stewing grass to feed my own family in 5 years' time if we left the EU - I would still do it".[22]
The film was made available for free onlinestreaming onYouTube andVimeo on 12 May 2016,[2][23] the day after its release and premiere at theOdeon Leicester Square inLondon.[24] The film's premiere was organised by Brexit campaignLeave.EU with sponsorship from the aircraft manufacturer,Britten-Norman.[5][25]
Sam Kriss of Vice Magazine described the audience at the showing "of what appeared to be sixth-formers, gangly with pinched-in faces, still growing into their dinner jackets, the kind of kids who occasionally exclaim "huzzah!" without any sense of shame..between them were the potato-headed men with their scabbed, port-stained faces and their leathery wives, draped generously in tan cloth and ancestral privilege".[26]
He goes on to explain that the premiere of the film showed the "face of our new social insurgency. Brexit is the upper classes in revolt".[26] Those who attended the premiere includedMike Read,Nigel Lawson,Ben Volpeliere-Pierrot,Nigel Evans,Kate Hoey,John Redwood,Nigel Farage,Ben Duncan,Peter Whittle,Daniel Hannan,Harry Cole,Lizzie Cundy andDavid Davis.[27][28][29][30][31]
During the showing of the film, a member of the audience shouted "Nonce!" when footage was shown of Edward Heath signing Britain into the European Economic Community.[26][32] Further boos and hisses were aimed atTony Blair andDavid Cameron when showed up on the screen.[32] One member of the audience called for them to be hanged.[30]
It was also broken into a twenty six part series published as aYouTube playlist, embedded on the film's official website.[33]
Brexit: The Movie received over 1.5 million views onYouTube by 23 June 2016 (the date of the referendum).[2] The film received mixed reviews from critics. Paul Baldwin writing forThe Daily Express, a pro-Brexit newspaper, called it a "powerful" exposure of the lack of accountability within the European Union.[6] Nicholas Dunn-McAfee of thePublic Relations and Communications Association commented that the film was "easily digestible" and "witty" but felt that it was a "little too late and a little too stretched".[34]
Newsweek's reviewer noted the film's attempt to market toconservative,anti-establishment audiences, calling it "alibertarian's wet dream ofRandian proportions" but criticised alleged inconsistencies in the film.[35]The Huffington Post reviewer felt that relied onethnic stereotypes and omitted certain perspectives. However also praised the film's persuasiveness, but indicated that it could potentially drive voters to support the UK remaining within the EU.[24] German newspaperFrankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, criticised the lack of balance in the film, as it did not feature a single pro-European Union viewpoint.[36]
There was further criticism of the film's use of national stereotypes. Owen Bennett explained that the Italians were "portrayed as shoddy with workers more concerned with snogging a curvaceous woman than making quality brollies",[32] while the French "was, yep you guessed it, wearing a beret, a striped top and had a string of onions round his neck".[32]
Vice reviewer Sam Kriss also criticised the national stereotypes : "A French farmer is readingLe Monde with a string of garlic around his neck. A ramshackle European umbrella factory is represented by two skinny men in white vests and suspenders who spend their time pawing at a woman in a red dress; their Chinese competitors have straight backs, expressionless faces, and are very good at sums".[26] Reviewers from The Tab who attended the premier, Joseph Archer & Claire Anderson at this point "sat uneasy in our seats as the film rolled on".[31]
Sam Kriss argued that while the film had strong arguments against the European Union, he believed "why the upper classes are so excited for Brexit. They see an undemocratic and unaccountable EU elite ruling by diktat and an unfounded sense of their own superiority, and they think: hey, that's our job".[26]
The comedian John Oliver pointed out the inaccuracies of the claims made in the film including that sleeping pillows were subjected to 109 different types of regulations.[11] He pointed that some of those regulations were not for sleeping pillows but for breakfast cereals or for air mattress foot-pumps.[37]
Since the referendum, many of the contributors have voiced their concerns in Britain leaving the European Union. One contributor, Kelvin Mackenzie, said shortly after the vote that "Four days later, I don’t feel quite the same. I’ve buyer’s remorse. A sense of be careful what you wish for. To be truthful, I am fearful of what lies ahead[38]". He commented on 10 May 2023 onGBNews that "This is not the Brexit we signed up for. I feel we are in the worst of both worlds...we voted for something..it's not being delivered".[39] John Mills, in an interview with the New Statesman, believed that “Brexit has been disappointing, quite honestly".[40]
{{cite web}}:|first= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)| Referendum question | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Referendum legislation | |||||||||||||
| Background |
| ||||||||||||
| Campaign | |||||||||||||
| Campaign organisations |
| ||||||||||||
| Aftermath of referendum |
| ||||||||||||
| Brexit process | |||||||||||||
| Impact of Brexit and potential effects |
| ||||||||||||
| Brexit legislation |
| ||||||||||||
| Related |
| ||||||||||||
| Media depictions |
| ||||||||||||
