Brachiopods (/ˈbrækioʊˌpɒd/),phylumBrachiopoda, are aphylum of animals that have hard "valves" (shells) on the upper and lower surfaces, unlike the left and right arrangement inbivalvemolluscs. Brachiopod valves are hinged at the rear end, while the front can be opened for feeding or closed for protection.
Two major categories are traditionally recognized,articulate andinarticulate brachiopods. The word "articulate" is used to describe the tooth-and-groove structures of the valve-hinge which is present in the articulate group, and absent from the inarticulate group. This is the leading diagnostic skeletal feature, by which the two main groups can be readily distinguished as fossils. Articulate brachiopods have toothed hinges and simple, vertically oriented opening and closing muscles. Conversely, inarticulate brachiopods have weak, untoothed hinges and a more complex system of vertical and oblique (diagonal) muscles used to keep the two valves aligned. In many brachiopods, a stalk-likepedicle projects from an opening near the hinge of one of the valves, known as the pedicle or ventral valve. The pedicle, when present, keeps the animal anchored to the seabed but clear of sediment which would obstruct the opening.
Brachiopod lifespans range from three to over thirty years. Ripegametes (ova orsperm) float from thegonads into the main coelom and then exit into the mantle cavity. Thelarvae of inarticulate brachiopods are miniature adults, withlophophores (a feeding organ consisting of an array of tentacles) that enable the larvae to feed and swim for months until the animals become heavy enough to settle to the seabed. The planktonic larvae of articulate species do not resemble the adults, but rather look like blobs withyolk sacs, and remain among the plankton for only a few days beforemetamorphosing and leaving the water column.
Brachiopods live only in the sea, and most species avoid locations with strong currents or waves. The larvae of articulate species settle in quickly and form dense populations inwell-defined areas while the larvae of inarticulate species swim for up to a month and have wide ranges. Fish and crustaceans seem to find brachiopod flesh distasteful and seldom attack them.
The word "brachiopod" is formed from theAncient Greek words brachion ("arm") and podos ("foot").[3] They are often known as "lamp shells", since the curved shells of theclassTerebratulida resemble pottery oil-lamps.[2]
Although superficially resembling bivalves, brachiopods are not particularly closely related, and evolved their two valved structure independently, an example ofconvergent evolution. Brachiopods are part of the broader groupLophophorata, alongsideBryozoa andPhoronida, with which they share the characteristic lophophores.
Brachiopods are thought to have evolved from "tommotiid" ancestors during the EarlyCambrian.[4] Brachiopods were highly diverse during thePaleozoic era, when their diversity exceeded that of bivalves.[5] Their diversity was strongly affected by theend-Capitanian[6] andend-Permian mass extinction events, from which their diversity would never recover to its former Paleozoic levels, with bivalves subsequently ascending to dominance in marine ecosystems.[5] Today, there are around 400 living species of brachiopods,[7] in comparison to around 9,200 species of bivalves.[8] Brachiopods now live mainly in cold water and low light.
Among brachiopods, only the lingulids (Lingula sp.[9]) have been fished commercially, on a very small scale.
Modern brachiopods range from 1 to 100 millimetres (0.039 to 3.937 in) long, and most species are about 10 to 30 millimetres (0.39 to 1.18 in).[2]Magellania venosa is the largest extant species.[10] The largest brachiopods known—Gigantoproductus andTitanaria, reaching 30 to 38 centimetres (12 to 15 in) in width—occurred in the upper part of the Lower Carboniferous.[11] Brachiopods have two valves (shell sections), which cover the dorsal (top) and ventral (bottom) surface of the animal, unlikebivalvemolluscs whose shells cover thelateral surfaces (sides). The valves are unequal in size and structure, with each having its own symmetrical form rather than the two being mirror images of each other. The formation of brachiopod shells during ontogeny builds on a set of conserved genes, includinghomeobox genes, that are also used to form the shells of molluscs.[12]
The brachial valve is usually smaller and bears brachia ("arms") on its inner surface. These brachia are the origin of the phylum's name, and support thelophophore, used forfeeding andrespiration. The pedicle valve is usually larger, and near the hinge it has an opening for the stalk-like pedicle through which most brachiopods attach themselves to the substrate. (R. C. Moore, 1952) The brachial and pedicle valves are often called the dorsal and ventral valves, respectively, but some paleontologists regard the terms "dorsal" and "ventral" as irrelevant since they believe that the "ventral" valve was formed by a folding of the upper surface under the body. The ventral ("lower") valve actually lies above the dorsal ("upper") valve when most brachiopods are oriented in life position. In many living articulate brachiopod species, both valves are convex, the surfaces often bearing growth lines and/or other ornamentation. However, inarticulate lingulids, which burrow into the seabed, have valves that are smoother, flatter and of similar size and shape. (R. C. Moore, 1952)
Articulate ("jointed") brachiopods have a tooth and socket arrangement by which the pedicle and brachial valves hinge, locking the valves against lateral displacement. Inarticulate brachiopods have no matching teeth and sockets; their valves are held together only by muscles. (R. C. Moore, 1952)
All brachiopods haveadductor muscles that are set on the inside of the pedicle valve and which close the valves by pulling on the part of the brachial valve ahead of the hinge. These muscles have both "quick" fibers that close the valves in emergencies and "catch" fibers that are slower but can keep the valves closed for long periods. Articulate brachiopods open the valves by means of abductor muscles, also known as diductors, which lie further to the rear and pull on the part of the brachial valve behind the hinge. Inarticulate brachiopods use a different opening mechanism, in which muscles reduce the length of thecoelom (main body cavity) and make it bulge outwards, pushing the valves apart. Bothclasses open the valves to an angle of about 10 degrees. The more complex set of muscles employed by inarticulate brachiopods can also operate the valves as scissors, a mechanism that lingulids use to burrow.[13]
The inarticulate speciesLingula anatina, showing the long pedicle, flattened shells and prominentchaetae around the front edge of the shells
Each valve consists of three layers, an outerperiostracum made oforganic compounds and twobiomineralized layers. Articulate brachiopods have an outermost periostracum made ofproteins, a "primary layer" ofcalcite (a form ofcalcium carbonate) under that, and innermost a mixture of proteins and calcite.[13] Inarticulate brachiopod shells have a similar sequence of layers, but their composition is different from that of articulated brachiopods and also varies among theclasses of inarticulate brachiopods. TheTerebratulida are an example of brachiopods with a punctate shell structure; the mineralized layers are perforated by tiny open canals of living tissue, extensions of the mantle called caeca, which almost reach the outside of the primary layer. These shells can contain half of the animal's living tissue. Impunctate shells are solid without any tissue inside them. Pseudopunctate shells have tubercles formed from deformations unfurling along calcite rods. They are only known from fossil forms, and were originally mistaken for calcified punctate structures.[14][15]
Lingulids and discinids, which have pedicles, have amatrix ofglycosaminoglycans (long, unbranchedpolysaccharides), in which other materials are embedded:chitin in the periostracum;[13]apatite containingcalcium phosphate in the primary biomineralized layer;[16] and a complex mixture in the innermost layer, containingcollagen and other proteins, chitinophosphate and apatite.[13][17]Craniids, which have no pedicle and cement themselves directly to hard surfaces, have a periostracum ofchitin and mineralized layers of calcite.[13][18] Shell growth can be described as holoperipheral, mixoperipheral, or hemiperipheral. In holoperipheral growth, distinctive of craniids, new material is added at an equal rate all around the margin. In mixoperipheral growth, found in many living and extinct articulates, new material is added to the posterior region of the shell with an anterior trend, growing towards the other shell. Hemiperipheral growth, found in lingulids, is similar to mixoperipheral growth but occurs in mostly a flat plate with the shell growing forwards and outwards.[19]
Brachiopods, as withmolluscs, have anepithelialmantle which secretes and lines the shell, and encloses the internal organs. The brachiopod body occupies only about one-third of the internal space inside the shell, nearest the hinge. The rest of the space is lined with the mantlelobes, extensions that enclose a water-filled space in which sits the lophophore.[13] Thecoelom (body cavity) extends into each lobe as a network of canals, which carry nutrients to the edges of the mantle.[20]
Relatively new cells in a groove on the edges of the mantle secrete material that extends the periostracum. These cells are gradually displaced to the underside of the mantle by more recent cells in the groove, and switch to secreting the mineralized material of the shell valves. In other words, on the edge of the valve the periostracum is extended first, and then reinforced by extension of the mineralized layers under the periostracum.[20] In most species the edge of the mantle also bears movable bristles, often calledchaetae orsetae, that may help defend the animals and may act assensors. In some brachiopods groups of chaetae help to channel the flow of water into and out of the mantle cavity.[13]
In most brachiopods,diverticula (hollow extensions) of the mantle penetrate through the mineralized layers of the valves into the periostraca. The function of these diverticula is uncertain and it is suggested that they may be storage chambers for chemicals such asglycogen, maysecrete repellents to deter organisms that stick to the shell or may help inrespiration.[13] Experiments show that a brachiopod'soxygen consumption drops ifpetroleum jelly is smeared on the shell, clogging the diverticula.[20]
Likebryozoans andphoronids, brachiopods have a lophophore, a crown of tentacles whosecilia (fine hairs) create a water current that enables them tofilter food particles out of the water. However a bryozoan or phoronid lophophore is a ring of tentacles mounted on a single, retracted stalk,[21][22] while the basic form of the brachiopod lophophore is U-shaped, forming the brachia ("arms") from which the phylum gets its name.[13] Brachiopod lophophores are non-retractable and occupy up to two-thirds of the internal space, in the frontmost area where the valves gape when opened. To provide enough filtering capacity in this restricted space, lophophores of larger brachiopods are folded in moderately to very complex shapes—loops and coils are common, and some species' lophophores contort into a shape resembling a hand with the fingers splayed.[13] In all species the lophophore is supported bycartilage and by ahydrostatic skeleton (in other words, by the pressure of its internal fluid),[20] and the fluid extends into the tentacles.[13] Some articulate brachiopods also have a brachidium, a calcareous support for the lophophore attached to the inside of the brachial valve,[20] which have led to an extremely reduced lophophoral muscles and the reduction of some brachial nerves.[23]
The tentacles bearcilia (fine mobile hairs) on their edges and along the center. The beating of the outer cilia drives a water current from the tips of the tentacles to their bases, where it exits. Food particles that collide with the tentacles are trapped bymucus, and the cilia down the middle drive this mixture to the base of the tentacles.[24] A brachial groove runs round the bases of the tentacles, and its own cilia pass food along the groove towards the mouth.[13] The method used by brachiopods is known as "upstream collecting", as food particles are captured as they enter the field of cilia that creates the feeding current. This method is used by the relatedphoronids andbryozoans, and also bypterobranchs.Entoprocts use a similar-looking crown of tentacles, but it is solid and the flow runs from bases to tips, forming a "downstream collecting" system that catches food particles as they are about to exit.[25]
A lingulid in its burrow, in "up" and retracted positions[26]
Most modern species attach to hard surfaces by means of a cylindrical pedicle ("stalk"), an extension of the body wall. This has a chitinouscuticle (non-cellular "skin") and protrudes through an opening in the hinge.[13] However, somegenera have no pedicle, such as the inarticulateCrania and the articulateLacazella; they cement the rear of the "pedicle" (ventral) valve to a surface so that the front is slightly inclined up away from the surface.[2][13] In these brachiopods, the ventral valve lacks a pedicle opening.[27] In a few articulate genera such asNeothyris andAnakinetica, the pedicles wither as the adults grow and finally lie loosely on the surface. In these genera the shells are thickened and shaped so that the opening of the gaping valves is kept free of the sediment.[2]
Pedicles of inarticulate species are extensions of the main coelom, which houses the internal organs. A layer of longitudinal muscles lines theepidermis of the pedicle.[13] Members of theorder Lingulida have long pedicles, which they use to burrow into soft substrates, to raise the shell to the opening of the burrow to feed, and to retract the shell when disturbed.[20] A lingulid moves its body up and down the top two-thirds of the burrow, while the remaining third is occupied only by the pedicle, with a bulb on the end that builds a "concrete" anchor.[26] However, the pedicles of the order Discinida are short and attach to hard surfaces.[13]
The pedicle of articulate brachiopods has no coelom, and itshomology is unclear. It is constructed from a different part of thelarval body, and has a compact core composed ofconnective tissue. Muscles at the rear of the body can straighten, bend or even rotate the pedicle. The far end of the pedicle generally has rootlike extensions or short papillae ("bumps"), which attach to hard surfaces. However, articulate brachiopods of the genusChlidonophora use a branched pedicle to anchor insediment. The pedicle emerges from the pedicle valve, either through a notch in the hinge or, in species where the pedicle valve is longer than the brachial, from a hole where the pedicle valve doubles back to touch the brachial valve. Some species stand with the front end upwards, while others lie horizontal with the pedicle valve uppermost.[13]
Some early brachiopods—for examplestrophomenates,kutorginates andobolellates—do not attach using their pedicle, but with an entirely different structure known as the "pedicle sheath", which has no relationship to the pedicle.[28][29] This structure arises from the umbo of the pedicle valve, at the centre of the earliest (metamorphic) shell at the location of the protegulum. It is sometimes associated with a fringing plate, the colleplax.[29]
A fossil ofSpiriferina rostrata with visible brachidium (lophophore support)Rhynchonellid brachiopod with interior spondylium ("C" in image) visible; Roadian,Guadalupian (MiddlePermian); Glass Mountains, Texas
The water flow enters the lophophore from the sides of the open valves and exits at the front of the animal. In lingulids the entrance and exit channels are formed by groups of chaetae that function as funnels.[13] In other brachiopods the entry and exit channels are organized by the shape of the lophophore.[20] The lophophore captures food particles, especiallyphytoplankton (tinyphotosynthetic organisms), and deliver them to the mouth via the brachial grooves along the bases of the tentacles.[13] The mouth is a tiny slit at the base of the lophophore.[30] Food passes through the mouth, muscularpharynx ("throat") andoesophagus ("gullet"),[13] all of which are lined with cilia and cells that secretemucus and digestiveenzymes.[20] Thestomach wall has branched ceca ("pouches") where food is digested, mainly within the cells.[13]
Nutrients are transported throughout the coelom, including the mantle lobes, by cilia.[20] The wastes produced bymetabolism are broken intoammonia, which is eliminated bydiffusion through the mantle and lophophore.[13] Brachiopods havemetanephridia, used by manyphyla to excrete ammonia and other dissolved wastes. However, brachiopods have no sign of thepodocytes, which perform the first phase of excretion in this process,[31] and brachiopod metanephridia appear to be used only to emitsperm andova.[13]
The majority of food consumed by brachiopods is digestible, with very little solid waste produced.[32] The cilia of the lophophore can change direction to eject isolated particles of indigestible matter. If the animal encounters larger lumps of undesired matter, the cilia lining the entry channels pause and the tentacles in contact with the lumps move apart to form large gaps and then slowly use their cilia to dump the lumps onto the lining of the mantle. This has its own cilia, which wash the lumps out through the opening between the valves. If the lophophore is clogged, the adductors snap the valves sharply, which creates a "sneeze" that clears the obstructions.[20] In some inarticulate brachiopods the digestive tract is U-shaped and ends with an anus that eliminates solids from the front of the body wall.[30] Other inarticulate brachiopods and all articulate brachiopods have a curved gut that ends blindly, with no anus.[13] These animals bundle solid waste with mucus and periodically "sneeze" it out, using sharp contractions of the gut muscles.[20]
The lophophore and mantle are the only surfaces that absorboxygen and eliminatecarbon dioxide. Oxygen seems to be distributed by the fluid of the coelom, which is circulated through the mantle and driven either by contractions of the lining of the coelom or by beating of its cilia. In some species oxygen is partly carried by therespiratory pigmenthemerythrin, which is transported in coelomocyte cells.[13] The maximum oxygen consumption of brachiopods is low, and their minimum requirement is not measurable.
Brachiopods also have colorlessblood, circulated by a muscular heart lying in the dorsal part of the body above the stomach.[13] The blood passes through vessels that extend to the front and back of the body, and branch to organs including the lophophore at the front and the gut, muscles, gonads and nephridia at the rear. The blood circulation seems not to be completely closed, and thecoelomic fluid and blood must mix to a degree.[20] The main function of the blood may be to deliver nutrients.[13]
The "brain" of adult articulates consists of twoganglia, one above and the other below theoesophagus. Adult inarticulates have only the lower ganglion.[33] From the ganglia and thecommissures where they join, nerves run to the lophophore, the mantle lobes and the muscles that operate the valves. The edge of the mantle has probably the greatest concentration of sensors. Although not directly connected tosensory neurons, the mantle'schaetae probably sendtactile signals to receptors in theepidermis of the mantle. Many brachiopods close their valves if shadows appear above them, but the cells responsible for this are unknown. Some brachiopods havestatocysts, which detect changes in the animals' position.[13]
Lifespans range from 3 to over 30 years.[2] Adults of most species are of one sex throughout their lives. Thegonads are masses of developinggametes (ova orsperm), and most species have four gonads, two in each valve.[13] Those of articulates lie in the channels of the mantle lobes, while those of inarticulates lie near the gut.[20] Ripe gametes float into the main coelom and then exit into the mantle cavity via themetanephridia, which open on either side of the mouth. Most species release both ova and sperm into the water, but females of some species keep theembryos in brood chambers until the larvae hatch.[13]
Thecell division in the embryo is radial (cells form in stacks of rings directly above each other), holoblastic (cells are separate, although adjoining) and regulative (the type of tissue into which a cell develops is controlled by interactions between adjacent cells, rather than rigidly within each cell).[13][34] While some animals develop the mouth andanus by deepening theblastopore, a "dent" in the surface of the early embryo, the blastopore of brachiopods closes up, and their mouth and anus develop from new openings.[13]
Thelarvae of lingulids (Lingulida and Discinida) areplanktotrophic (feeding), and swim asplankton for months[2] resembling miniature adults, with valves, mantle lobes, a pedicle that coils in the mantle cavity, and a small lophophore, which is used for both feeding and swimming.[13] The larvae ofcraniids have no pedicle or shell.[20] As the shell becomes heavier, the juvenile sinks to the bottom and becomes a sessile adult.[13] The larvae of articulate species (Craniiformea and Rhynchonelliformea) are lecithotrophic (non-feeding) and live only onyolk, and remain among the plankton for only a few days. The Rhynchonelliformea larvae has three larval lobes, unlike the Craniiformea which only have two larval lobes.[35][2] This type of larva has aciliated frontmost lobe that becomes the body and lophophore, a rear lobe that becomes the pedicle, and a mantle like a skirt, with the hem towards the rear. Onmetamorphosing into an adult, the pedicle attaches to a surface, the front lobe develops the lophophore and other organs, and the mantle rolls up over the front lobe and starts tosecrete the shell.[13] In cold seas, brachiopod growth is seasonal and the animals often lose weight in winter. These variations in growth often form growth lines in the shells. Members of somegenera have survived for a year in aquaria without food.[2]
Brachiopod fossils show great diversity in the morphology of the shells and lophophore, while the modern genera show less diversity but provide soft-bodied characteristics. Both fossils and extant species have limitations that make it difficult to produce a comprehensive classification of brachiopods based on morphology. The phylum also has experienced significantconvergent evolution and reversals (in which a more recent group seems to have lost a characteristic that is seen in an intermediate group, reverting to a characteristic last seen in an older group). Hence some brachiopodtaxonomists believe it is premature to define higher levels of classification such asorder, and recommend instead a bottom-up approach that identifies genera and then groups these into intermediate groups.[36]
However, other taxonomists believe that some patterns of characteristics are sufficiently stable to make higher-level classifications worthwhile, although there are different views about what the higher-level classifications should be.[36]The "traditional" classification was defined in 1869; two further approaches were established in the 1990s:[17][37]
In the "traditional" classification, brachiopods are divided into the Articulata and Inarticulata. The Articulata have toothed hinges between the valves, while the hinges of the Inarticulata are held together only by muscles.[13][17]
About 330 living species are recognized,[17] grouped into over 100 genera. The great majority of modern brachiopods are rhynchonelliforms (Articulata).[2]
Genetic analysis performed since the 1990s has extended the understanding of the relationship between different organisms. It is now clear the brachiopods do not belong to theDeuterostomia (such asechinoderms andchordates) as was hypothesized earlier, but should be included in the broad groupProtostomia, in a subgroup now calledLophotrochozoa. Although their adult morphology seems rather different, thenucleotide sequence of the18S rRNA indicates that thephoronids (horseshoe worms) are the closest relatives of the inarticulate brachiopods, more so than articulate brachiopods. For now, the weight of evidence is inconclusive as to the exact relations within the inarticulates. Consequently, it has been suggested to include horseshoe worms in the Brachiopoda as a class namedPhoronata (B.L.Cohen & Weydmann) in addition to the Craniata and Lingulata, within the subphylum Linguliformea. The other subphylum, Rhynchonelliformea contains only one extant class, which is subdivided into the extant orders Rhynchonellida, Terebratulida and Thecideida.[42][43]
This shows the taxonomy of brachiopods down to the order level, including extinct groups, which make up the majority of species. Extinct groups are indicated with a (†) symbol:
Strophomenid brachiopod with attachedcornulitid worm tube (UpperOrdovician, SEIndiana, USA). Brachiopod valves often serve as substrates for encrusting organisms.
Brachiopods are an entirely marine phylum, with no known freshwater species. Most species avoid locations with strong currents or waves, and typical sites include rocky overhangs, crevices and caves, steep slopes ofcontinental shelves, and in deep ocean floors. However, some articulate species attach tokelp or in exceptionally sheltered sites inintertidal zones. The smallest living brachiopod,Gwynia, is only about 1 millimetre (0.039 in) long, and lives in betweengravel grains.[2] Rhynchonelliforms, whose larvae consume only their yolks and settle and develop quickly, are oftenendemic to an area and form dense populations that can reach thousands per meter. Young adults often attach to the shells of more mature ones. On the other hand, inarticulate brachiopods, whose larva swim for up to a month before settling, have wide ranges. Members of the discinoid genusPelagodiscus have acosmopolitan distribution.[2]
Brachiopods have a lowmetabolic rate, between one third and one tenth of that ofbivalves. While brachiopods were abundant in warm, shallow seas during theCretaceousperiod, most of their former niches are now occupied by bivalves, and most now live in cold and low-light conditions.[45]
Brachiopod shells occasionally show evidence of damage by predators, and sometimes of subsequent repair. Fish and crustaceans seem to find brachiopod flesh distasteful.[2] The fossil record shows that drilling predators likegastropods attackedmolluscs andechinoids 10 to 20 times more often than they did brachiopods, suggesting that such predators attacked brachiopods by mistake or when other prey was scarce.[46] In waters where food is scarce, the snailCapulus ungaricus steals food from bivalves, snails, tube worms, and brachiopods.[47]
Among brachiopods only thelingulids have been fished commercially, and only on a very small scale.[48] It is mostly the fleshy pedicle that is eaten.[49][50][51][52] Brachiopods seldom settle on artificial surfaces, probably because they are vulnerable to pollution. This may make the population ofCoptothyrus adamsi useful as a measure of environmental conditions around an oil terminal being built in Russia on the shore of theSea of Japan.[1]
Brachiopods are the state fossil of the U.S. state ofKentucky.[53]
Over 12,000 fossil species are recognized,[17] grouped into over 5,000 genera. While the largest modern brachiopods are 100 millimetres (3.9 in) long,[2] a few fossils measure up to 200 millimetres (7.9 in) wide.[55] The earliest confirmed brachiopods have been found in the earlyCambrian, inarticulate forms appearing first, followed soon after by articulate forms.[56] Three unmineralized species have also been found in the Cambrian, and apparently represent two distinct groups that evolved from mineralized ancestors.[57] The inarticulateLingula is often called a "living fossil", as very similargenera have been found all the way back to theOrdovician. On the other hand, articulate brachiopods have produced major diversifications, and suffered severemass extinctions[55]—but the articulate Rhynchonellida and Terebratulida, the most diverse present-day groups, appeared at the start of the Ordovician andCarboniferous, respectively.[54]
Since 1991 Claus Nielsen has proposed a hypothesis about the development of brachiopods, adapted in 2003 by Cohen and colleagues as a hypothesis about the earliest evolution of brachiopods. This "brachiopod fold" hypothesis suggests that brachiopods evolved from an ancestor similar toHalkieria,[30] aslug-like animal with "chain mail" on its back and a shell at the front and rear end.[58] The hypothesis proposes that the first brachiopod converted its shells into a pair of valves by folding the rear part of its body under its front.[30]
However, fossils from 2007 onwards have supported a new interpretation of the Early-Cambriantommotiids, and a new hypothesis that brachiopods evolved from tommotiids. The "armor mail" of tommotiids was well-known but not in an assembled form, and it was generally assumed that tommotiids were slug-like animals similar toHalkieria, except that tommotiids' armor was made oforganophosphatic compounds while that ofHalkieria was made ofcalcite. However, fossils of a new tommotiid,Eccentrotheca, showed an assembled mail coat that formed a tube, which would indicate a sessile animal rather than a creeping slug-like one.Eccentrotheca's organophosphatic tube resembled that ofphoronids,[59] sessile animals that feed bylophophores and are regarded either very close relatives or a sub-group of brachiopods.[60]Paterimitra, another mostly assembled fossil found in 2008 and described in 2009, had two symmetrical plates at the bottom, like brachiopod valves but not fully enclosing the animal's body.[61]
At their peak in thePaleozoic,[62] the brachiopods were among the most abundant filter-feeders and reef-builders,[63] and occupied otherecological niches, including swimming in the jet-propulsion style ofscallops.[2] However, after thePermian–Triassic extinction event, informally known as the "Great Dying",[63] brachiopods recovered only a third of their former diversity.[63] It was often thought that brachiopods were actually declining in diversity, and that in some way bivalves out-competed them. However, in 1980,Gould and Calloway produced a statistical analysis that concluded that both brachiopods and bivalves increased all the way from the Paleozoic to modern times, but bivalves increased faster; the Permian–Triassic extinction was moderately severe for bivalves but devastating for brachiopods, so that brachiopods for the first time were less diverse than bivalves and their diversity after the Permian increased from a very low base; there is no evidence that bivalves out-competed brachiopods, and short-term increases or decreases for both groups appeared synchronously.[64] In 2007 Knoll and Bambach concluded that brachiopods were one of several groups that were most vulnerable to the Permian–Triassic extinction, as all had calcareous hard parts (made ofcalcium carbonate) and had lowmetabolic rates and weak respiratory systems.[65]
Brachiopod fossils have been useful indicators of climate changes during thePaleozoic era. When global temperatures were low, as in much of theOrdovician, the large difference in temperature between equator and poles created different collections of fossils at differentlatitudes. On the other hand, warmer periods, such much of theSilurian, created smaller difference in temperatures, and all seas at the low to middle latitudes were colonized by the same few brachiopod species.[66]
Radial cleavage in the earliestdivisions of the egg appears to be the original condition for the ancestral bilaterians, in the earliest Ecdysozoa and possibly in the earliestEutrochozoa, a major sub-group of the Lophotrochozoa.[71] Hence radial cleavage does not imply that brachiopods are affiliated with deuterostomes.[70]
The traditional view is that thecoelom(s) in deuterostomes and protostomes form by different process, calledenterocoely andschizocoely, respectively.[70] However, research since the early 1990s has found significant exceptions.[71][72] Both types of coelom construction appear among brachiopods, and therefore do not imply that brachiopods are deuterostomes.[70]
The terms "deuterostomes" and "protostomes" originally defined distinct ways of forming the mouth from theblastopore, a depression that appears in an early stage of theembryo. However, some "protostomes" form the mouth using a process more like that typical of deuterostomes.[73][74] Hence forming the mouth via a deuterostome-like process does not imply that brachiopods are affiliated with deuterostomes.[70]
Nielsen views the brachiopods and closely relatedphoronids as affiliated with the deuterostomepterobranchs because their lophophores are driven by onecilium per cell, while those ofbryozoans, which he regards as protostomes, have multiple cilia per cell.[75] However, pterobranchs arehemichordates and probably closely related toechinoderms, and there is no evidence that the latest common ancestor of pterobranchs and other hemichordates or the latest common ancestor of hemichordates and echinoderms wassessile and fed by means of tentacles.[70]
Some combined studies in 2000 and 2001, using both molecular and morphological data, support brachiopods as Lophotrochozoa,[77][78] while others in 1998 and 2004 concluded that brachiopods were deuterostomes.[76]
Thephoronids feed with a lophophore, burrow or encrust on surfaces, and build three-layered tubes made ofpolysaccharide, possiblychitin, mixed with particles with seabed material. Traditionally they have been regarded as a separate phylum, but increasingly detailed molecular phylogeny studies between 1997 and 2000 have concluded that phoronids are a sub-group of brachiopods.[60] However, an analysis in 2005 concluded that phoronids are a sub-group ofbryozoans.[79]
While all molecular phylogeny studies and half the combined studies until 2008 conclude that brachiopods arelophotrochozoans, they could not identify which lophotrochozoan phylum were the closest relatives of brachiopods—except phoronids, which are a sub-group of brachiopods.[60][76] However, in 2008 two analyses found that brachiopods' closest lophotrochozoan relatives werenemertines. The authors found this surprising, since nemertines havespiral cleavage in the early stages ofcell division and form atrochophorelarva, while brachiopods haveradial cleavage and a larva that shows no sign of having evolved from a trochophore.[80][81] Another study in 2008 also concluded that brachiopods are closely related to nemertines, casting doubt on the idea that brachiopods are part of acladeLophophorata of lophophore-feeding animals within the lophotrochozoans.[76]
^Huber, Markus (2010).Compendium of Bivalves. A Full-color Guide to 3,300 of the World's Marine Bivalves. A Status on Bivalvia after 250 Years of Research. ConchBooks. p. 23.ISBN978-3-939767-28-2.
^Printrakoon, Cheewarat; Kamlung-Ek, Apiwan (2013). "Socioeconomic study and economic value of living fossil, Lingula sp. in mangrove ecosystem in Trat Province, Thailand".Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment.11 (3):187–199.Bibcode:2013CJPRE..11..187P.doi:10.1080/10042857.2013.800376.S2CID129829675.
^Araya, J. F.; Bitner, M. A. (2018). "Rediscovery of Terebratulina austroamericana Zezina, 1981 (Brachiopoda: Cancellothyrididae) from off northern Chile".Zootaxa.4407 (3):443–446.doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4407.3.11.PMID29690189.
^"Apatite" is strictly defined in terms of its structure rather than chemical composition. Some forms contain calcium phosphate and others have calcium carbonate. SeeCordua, W.S."Apatite Ca5(PO4, CO3)3(F, Cl, OH) Hexagonal". University of Wisconsin. Archived fromthe original on 30 August 2009. Retrieved23 October 2009.
^Wells, Roger M."Brachiopodia Morphology and Ecology".Invertebrate Paleontology Tutorial. State University of New York College at Courtland. Archived fromthe original on 20 June 2010. Retrieved6 March 2010.
^Holmer, LE; Zhang, Z; Topper, TP; Popov, L (2018). "The attachment strategies of Cambrian kutorginate brachiopods: the curious case of two pedicle openings and their phylogenetic significance".Journal of Paleontology.92 (1):33–39.Bibcode:2018JPal...92...33H.doi:10.1017/jpa.2017.76.S2CID134399842.
^abBassett, M.G. and Popov, L.E. (2017). "Earliest ontogeny of the Silurian orthotetide brachiopodCoolinia and its significance for interpreting strophomenate phylogeny".Lethaia.50 (4):504–510.Bibcode:2017Letha..50..504B.doi:10.1111/let.12204.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^"Marginal mantle setae were long thought to be absent in craniides, but NIELSEN (1991) has now demonstrated their presence in juvenileNeocrania." --Williams, Alwyn; Brunton, C.H.C.; Carlson, S.J.; et al. (1997–2007). Kaesler, Roger L.; Selden, Paul (eds.).Part H, Brachiopoda (Revised).Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Boulder, Colorado; Lawrence, Kansas: Geological Society of America; University of Kansas.
^Skovsted, C. B.; Brock, G. A.; Paterson, J. R.; Holmer, L. E.; Budd, G. E. (2008). "The scleritome ofEccentrotheca from the Lower Cambrian of South Australia: Lophophorate affinities and implications for tommotiid phylogeny".Geology.36 (2): 171.Bibcode:2008Geo....36..171S.doi:10.1130/G24385A.1.
Eernisse, D.J.; Albert, J.S.; Anderson, F.E. (1992). "Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: A phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology".Systematic Biology.41 (3):305–330.doi:10.1093/sysbio/41.3.305.
Lüter, C.; Bartholomaeus, T. (July 1997). "The phylogenetic position of Brachiopoda—a comparison of morphological and molecular data".Zoologica Scripta.26 (3):245–253.doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00414.x.S2CID83934233.
Ruppert, E.E (1991). "Introduction to the aschelminth phyla: A consideration of mesoderm, body cavities, and cuticle". In Harrison, F.W.; Ruppert, E.E (eds.).Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, volume 4: Aschelminthes. Wiley-Liss. pp. 1–17.
Barry, P.L (January 28, 2002)."The Great Dying".Science@NASA. Science and Technology Directorate, Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA. Archived fromthe original on April 7, 2009. RetrievedMarch 26, 2009.
Bourlat, S.J; Nielsen, C.; Economou, A.D.; Telford, M.J (October 2008). "Testing the new animal phylogeny: A phylum level molecular analysis of the animal kingdom".Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.49 (1):23–31.Bibcode:2008MolPE..49...23B.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.07.008.PMID18692145.
Conway Morris, S; Peel, J. S (1995). "Articulated Halkieriids from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland and their Role in Early Protostome Evolution".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.347 (1321):305–358.Bibcode:1995RSPTB.347..305C.doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0029.
Doherty, P.J (2001). "The Lophophorates". In Anderson, D.T (ed.).Invertebrate Zoology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 356–363.ISBN978-0-19-551368-4.
Dunn, C.W; Hejnol, A.; Matus, D.Q.; Pang, K.; Browne, W.E.; Smith, S.A.; Seaver, E.; Rouse, G.W.; et al. (2008). "Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life".Nature.452 (7188):745–749.Bibcode:2008Natur.452..745D.doi:10.1038/nature06614.PMID18322464.S2CID4397099.
Emig, C.C (1997)."Ecology of Inarticulated Brachiopods"(PDF). In Kaesler, R.L (ed.).Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Vol. Part H. Geological Society of America. pp. 473–481. Retrieved14 November 2009.
Parkinson, D; Curry, G.B.; Cusack, M.; Fallick, A.E (2005). "Shell structure, patterns and trends of oxygen and carbon stable isotopes in modern brachiopod shells".Chemical Geology.219 (1–4):193–235.Bibcode:2005ChGeo.219..193P.doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.02.002.
Skovsted, C. B.; Brock, G. A.; Paterson, J. R.; Holmer, L. E.; Budd, G. E. (2008). "The scleritome ofEccentrotheca from the Lower Cambrian of South Australia: Lophophorate affinities and implications for tommotiid phylogeny".Geology.36 (2): 171.Bibcode:2008Geo....36..171S.doi:10.1130/G24385A.1.
Wood, T.S; Lore (2005). "The higher phylogeny of phylactolaemate bryozoans inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences". In Moyano, H. I.; Cancino, J. M.; Wyse-Jackson, P.N (eds.).Bryozoan Studies 2004: Proceedings of the 13th International Bryozoology Association. M. London: Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 361–367.
Zvyagintsev, A.Y; Radashevsky, V. I.; Kashin, I. A (August 2007). "First record of a brachiopod (Brachiopoda: Terebrataliidae) in the fouling of hydrotechnical installations in Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan".Russian Journal of Marine Biology.33 (4):264–266.Bibcode:2007RuJMB..33..264Z.doi:10.1134/S1063074007040098.S2CID23370813.
Candela, Y. (2003). "Late Ordovician brachiopods of the Bardahessiagh Formation of Pomeroy, Ireland".Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London (618, part of Volume 156):1–95, pls 1–12.
Harper, D.A.T. (2006) [1984]. "Brachiopods from the Upper Ardmillan succession (Ordovician) of the Girvan district, Scotland. Parts 1-3".Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London:1–187, pls 1–33.
_01_svg.svg)
.jpg)
_slab_2.jpg)
_(Tertiary%3b_New_Egypt%2c_New_Jersery%2c_USA)_7.jpg)
.jpg)
_(modern%3b_offshore_California%2c_USA)_4.jpg)
