Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Bondage pornography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pornography depicting bondage and related acts
This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This articlepossibly containsoriginal research. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(November 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Bondage pornography" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(April 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
A bondage porn shoot forKink.com in the United States, 2011

Bondage pornography is the depiction ofsexual bondage or otherBDSM activities using photographs, stories, films or drawings. Though often described as pornography, the genre involves the presentation ofbondage fetishism or BDSM scenarios and does not necessarily involve the commonly understood pornographic styles. In fact, the genre is primarily interested with the presentation of a bondage scene and less with depictions of sexuality, such asnudity orsex scenes, which may be viewed as a distraction from theaesthetics anderoticism of the sex scenario itself.

Historically, most subjects of bondage imagery have been women, and the genre has been criticized for promotingmisogynistic attitudes andviolence against women.

Magazines and comics

[edit]

Before 1970s

[edit]

In the early 20th century, bondage imagery was available through "detective magazines", andcomic books often featured characters being tied up or tying others up, particularly in "damsel in distress" plots.

There were also a number of dedicatedfetish magazines which featured images of fetishism and bondage. The first of such magazines in the United States wasBizarre, first published in 1946 byfetish photographerJohn Willie (the phallic pseudonym of John Coutts), who developed the concept in the 1920s. Willie was able to avoid controversy in censorship through careful attention to guidelines and the use of humor. Publication ofBizarre was suspended completely from 1947 to 1951 because of post-War paper shortages. By 1956 Willie was ready to give up the magazine, and in that year he sold it to someone described only as R.E.B., who published six more issues beforeBizarre finally folded in 1959.

Willie is better remembered for hisSweet Gwendoline comic strips, in which Gwendoline is drawn as a rather naïve blonde "damsel in distress", with ample curves, who is unfortunate enough to find herself tied up in scene after scene by the raven-haireddominatrix and the mustachioed villain "Sir Dystic D'Arcy". She is rescued and also repeatedly tied up (though for benevolent reasons) by secret agent U-69 (censored to U89 in some editions). The comic strips were published largely in the 1950s and 60s. The story was published as a piecemeal serial, appearing usually two pages at a time in several different magazines over the years.[1]

ThoughBizarre was a small format magazine, it had a huge impact on laterkink publications, such asENEG's fetish magazine,Exotique, published 1956–1959.Exotique was entirely devoted to fetish fashions and female-dominant bondage fantasies. The 36 issues featured photos and illustrations of dominatrix-inspired vamps (including Burtman's wifeTana Louise and iconic modelBettie Page) wearing exotic leather and rubber ensembles,corsets, stockings/garters, boots, andhigh heels.Gene Bilbrew contributed illustrations to the magazine. The articles, many written by Leonard Burtman, using an alias, covered various aspects ofsadomasochism andtransvestism, with men depicted as slaves to imperious, all-powerful women.Exotique had no nudity, pornographic content, or even sexually suggestive situations. Nevertheless, much like fellow publisherIrving Klaw, in 1957, Burtman would be targeted as a pornographer. He was relentlessly pursued by theU.S. Postal Inspection Service (acting as a censorship agency under theComstock laws) and local law enforcement (which functioned in coordination with Postal Inspectors and the Catholic Church). Eventually, he was arrested, his magazines and materials confiscated, and brought to trial. This led to the demise of the magazine in 1959. However, starting in 1960, Burtman (under a different imprint) would go on to publish many more fetish magazines that were nearly identical toExotique such asNew Exotique,Masque,Connoisseur,Bizarre Life,High Heels,Unique World,Corporal (a pioneering spanking-fetish magazine) and others well into the 1970s.

New York photographer Irving Klaw also published illustrated adventure/bondage serials by fetish artistsEric Stanton, Gene Bilbrew, Adolfo Ruiz and others. Klaw is best known for operating an international mail-order business selling photographs and film of attractive women (sometimes inbondage) from the 1940s to the 1960s. His most famousbondage model was Bettie Page, who became the first celebrity of bondage film and photography.

These publications disappeared for a time with a crackdown on pornography in the late 1950s.

1970s onwards

[edit]

Dedicated bondage magazines again became popular in America in the 1970s. From the mid-1970s through the late 1990s, they were produced by publishers such as Harmony Concepts, California Star, and House of Milan (HOM, Inc.). House of Milan, owned and run by Barbara Behr, was one of the most influential publishers and distributors of BDSM erotica in this period. The company was based in southern California, one of a number of pornographic magazine and film companies working in the Los Angeles area. In the mid-1980s, House of Milan was sold by Behr who went on to work for California Star.[2] House of Milan was subsequently owned by Lyndon Distributors.

House of Milan was amail-order business that distributed up to 30 similarly themed titles, producing three or four magazines a month. Most of the images in the magazines depicted women, either alone or together. They focussed on straight male bondage fantasies and also had a lesbian audience. Some of the best-known titles wereBound to Please,Knotty, andHogtie. House of Milan eventually expanded from books and magazines intohome videos.[2] The products were not generally available through mainstream distributors, though they were sold insex shops in addition to being available through mail order. They contained little advertising content, and funding was entirely dependent on sales.

Typically, each magazine consisted of several multi-page pictorials of tied-up women, often with a fictional narrative attached, and one fictional story of three or four pages in length. Sometimes pictorials were replaced by artwork by afetish artist or included an interview with one of the performers in the industry. In the case of House of Milan and Lyndon Distributors, the magazines were simply illustrated text versions of videos published by the same title. Such practice cut costs and allowed a streamlined output of material.

Another type of magazine was the "compendium magazine", usually consisting of a large number of individual photographs drawn from previous magazines, without any linking story.

Because of their relatively small circulation, compared with mainstream pornography, most bondage magazines were printed in black and white, except for the cover and centerfold. In the 1980s and 1990s, experiments were made with adding more color content, but most magazine content remained black and white.

The attitude of some of the early magazines could be regarded asmisogynistic according tofeminist views on pornography, in spite of editorial disclaimers that the magazines represented only fantasies, as the storylines deviated from the old-fashioned "damsel in distress" motif towards more restrictive and explicit BDSM practices. However, in reality the opposite effect often happened: as a bondage performer was cast in more material and engaged in more acts, she would often develop a stronger fan base and became a recognized star in her own right. Nikki Dial and Ashley Renee are two examples of performers who won awards for their work assubs in bondage videos, and typically endured the most onscreen punishment.

In the 1990s, as homosexuality and bi-sexuality began to be more socially accepted, magazine publishers started to producefemdom material depicting men in bondage, as well as portraying female models as participants in mutually satisfying bondage games, usually with at least one actress performing as a dom and at least one as a sub. Sometimes, the roles of dom and sub would be reversed. Be Be LeBadd and Alexis Payne are two professional dominatrices who also sometimes found themselves on the receiving end of a whip.

Websites and imagery in mainstream pornography

[edit]

From the late 1990s onwards, specialist BDSM pornographic websites such asInsex and the various websites ofKink.com appeared. AsInternet pornography became more widely available, the bondage magazine market began to decrease. As of 2003, specialist bondage magazines were mostly displaced by bondage material on the Internet, and bondage imagery is to be found in mainstream pornographic magazines, such asNugget andHustler'sTaboo magazine.

However, the tradition of bondage magazines continues in the form of "art books" of bondage photographs, published by mainstream publishers such asTaschen.

Certain websites have begun providing bondage videos and photographs featuring thekidnappingroleplay, which has been largely thehallmark of "detective" style bondage magazines. These styles are much closer to the style of bondage scenes in mainstream television.

Criticism

[edit]

As the availability of free pornography on the Internet has increased, its possible effects onmicroaggression towards women have been discussed.[3] The concern has been raised that since bondage pornography mostly depicts women (who are portrayed primarily in situations offemale submission), such pornography may promote an attitude legitimising violence against women.[3]

The book series and film50 Shades of Grey has been said to perpetuatemisogyny and portray BDSM/bondage subcultures in a patriarchal and misogynistic light.[4] In this view, to properly reflect the BDSM/bondage subculture it is necessary for pornography to "focus on mutual consent, mutual power, and communication," as in the film50 Shades of Dylan Ryan.[4]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^The Adventures of Sweet Gwendoline, 2nd Edition, byJohn Willie.ISBN 978-0-914646-48-8
  2. ^abCaporale, Micco (12 June 2024)."Fetish media empire House of Milan was bound to please".Chicago Reader.
  3. ^abMakin, DA; Morczek, AL (2016). "X Views and Counting: Interest in Rape-Oriented Pornography as Gendered Microaggression".Journal of Interpersonal Violence.31 (12):2131–55.doi:10.1177/0886260515573572.PMID 25724876.S2CID 206564636.
  4. ^abStevens, Sarah (2014). "Rope Sluts, and Bottoms, and Subs, Oh My: 50 Shades of Grey and the Shifting Discourse on Female Submission in Feminist Kink Porn".The Communication Review.17 (3):256–268.doi:10.1080/10714421.2014.930602.S2CID 145210538.

External links

[edit]
Pornography
Types
Genres
Related
Organizations
Opposition to
pornography
Movements
Organizations
Overuse
Views
Media
Possible effects
People
Events
Miscellaneous
See also
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bondage_pornography&oldid=1318188092"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp