 | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
Bokashi is a process that convertsfood waste and similarorganic matter into asoil amendment which addsnutrients and improvessoil texture. It differs from traditionalcomposting methods in several respects. The most important are:
Other names attributed to this process includebokashi composting,bokashi fermentation andfermented composting.
The namebokashi is transliterated from spokenJapanese (ぼかし). However, Japanese-English dictionaries give the word an older artistic meaning: "shading or gradation" of images – especially applied towoodblock prints.[1][2] This later extended to mean pixellation orfogging in censored photographs. Therefore, its application to fermented organic matter is of uncertain origin; if both uses are related, unifying concepts may be "alteration" or "fading away".
Bokashi as a food waste process is borrowed in many other languages. As a noun, it has various meanings depending on context, in particular the process itself, the inoculant and the fermented output. This variety can lead to confusion. As an adjective, it qualifies any related noun, such as bokashi bin (a household fermentation vessel), bokashi soil (after adding the preserve), and even bokashi composting – a contradiction in terms.
The basic stages of the process are:
The process is typically applied to food waste from households, workplaces and catering establishments, because such waste normally holds a good proportion of carbohydrates. It is applied to other organic waste by supplementing carbohydrates and hence lactic acid production. Recipes for large scale bokashi in horticulture often includerice, andmolasses orsugar.[7][8] Any carbohydrate-poor waste stream would benefit from this.
Homolactic fermentation can process significantly more kinds of food waste than home composting. Even items considered problematic in traditional composting, such as cooked leftovers, meat and skin, fat, cheese and citrus waste are, in effect, pre-digested to enable soil life to consume them. Large pieces may take longer to ferment and concave surfaces may trap air, in which cases cutting down is advised in support literature.[9]
Pieces of input are discarded if they are already badly rotten, or show green or black mould. These harbourputrefying organisms which may overwhelm the fermentation.
Homolactic fermentation and similar anaerobic fermentation pathways in general provide a very small amount of energy to the cell compared to the aerobic process. In homolactic fermentation, 2 ATP molecules are made when one glucose molecule (produced by digesting complex carbohydrates) is converted to 2 lactic acid molecules,[10] only1⁄15 of what aerobic respiration provides.[11] The process will also halt before all available carbohydrates are used, as the acidity ends up inhibiting all bacteria. As a result, a bokashi bucket barely heats up and remains at ambient temperature.[12]
As a waste processing technique, bokashi is notable in that minimal loss of mass in the form of offgassing happens. Compost, which is aerobic, "burns up" much of the carbon into carbon dioxide to sustain the metabolism of microbes as it matures.Biogas production does not burn the carbon, but the bacterial culture is optimized to extract the carbon in the form ofmethane – a potent greenhouse gas and a useful fuel. In addition, compost can also lose the key plant nutrient nitrogen (in the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide and in ammonia), while bokashi almost does not.[12]
When fermentation begins, physical structures start to break down and release some of the input's water content as a liquid runoff. Over time this constitutes more than 10% of the input by weight. The quantity varies with the input: for example cucumber and melon flesh lead to a noticeable increase.
The liquid leaches out a valuable fraction ofproteins,nutrients and lactic acid. To recover them, and to avoid drowning the fermentation, runoff is captured from the fermentation vessel, either through a tap, into a base of absorbent material such asbiochar or waste cardboard, or into a lower chamber. The runoff is sometimes called "bokashi tea".
The uses of bokashi tea are not the same as those of "compost tea". It is used most effectively when diluted and sprinkled over a targeted area of soil to feed the soilecosystem. Dilution makes it less acidic and thus less dangerous to plants. Dilution also causes more acid to convert into lactate which is an attractive food for soil microbes. Other uses are either potentially damaging (e.g. feeding plants with acidic water) or wasteful (e.g. cleaning drains with plant nutrients, feeding plants with nutrients in a form they cannot take up).
Household containers ("bokashi bins") typically give a batch size of 5–10 kilograms (11–22 lb). This is accumulated over a few weeks of regular additions. Each regular addition is best accumulated in a caddy, because it is recommended that one opens the bokashi bin no more frequently than once per day to let anaerobic conditions predominate.
In horticultural settings batches can be orders of magnitude greater.[7][12] Silage technology may be usable if it is adapted to capture runoff. An industrial-scale technique mimics thewindrows of large-scale composting, except that bokashi windrows are compacted, covered tightly and left undisturbed, all to promote anaerobic conditions. One study suggests that such windrows lose only minor amounts of carbon, energy and nitrogen.[12]
Bokashi is inherentlyhygienic in the following senses:
Fermented bokashi is added to a suitable area of soil. The approach usually recommended by suppliers of household bokashi is along the lines of "dig a trench in the soil in your garden, add the waste and cover over."[18]
In practice, regularly finding suitable sites for trenches that will later underlie plants is difficult in an established plot. To address this, an alternative is a 'soil factory'.[19] This is a bounded area of soil into which several loads of bokashi preserve are mixed over time. Amended soil can be taken from it for use elsewhere. It may be of any size. It may be permanently sited or inrotation. It may be enclosed, wire-netted or covered to keep out surface animals. Spent soil or compost, and organic amendments such as biochar may be added, as may non-fermented material, in which case the boundary between bokashi and composting becomes blurred.
A proposed alternative[20] is to homogenise (and potentially dilute) the preserve into a slurry, which is spread on the soil surface. This approach requires energy for homogenisation but, logically from the characteristics set out above, should confer several advantages: thoroughly oxidising the preserve; disturbing no deeper layers, except by increased worm action; being of little use to scavenging animals; applicable to large areas; and, if done repeatedly, able to sustain a more extensive soil ecosystem.
The practice of bokashi is believed to have its earliest roots in ancientKorea.[citation needed] This traditional form ferments waste directly in soil, relying on native bacteria and on careful burial for an anaerobic environment. A modernised horticultural method calledKorean Natural Farming includes fermentation by indigenousmicro-organisms (IM or IMO) harvested locally, but has numerous other elements too. A commercial Japanese bokashi method was developed byTeruo Higa in 1982 under the 'EM' trademark (short forEffective Microorganisms).[21] EM became the best known form of bokashi worldwide, mainly in household use, claiming to have reached over 120 countries.[21]
While none have disputed that EM starts homolactic fermentation and hence produces a soil amendment, other claims have beencontested robustly. Controversy relates partly to other uses, such as direct inoculation of soil with EM and direct feeding of EM to animals, and partly to whether the soil amendment's effects are due simply to the energy and nutrient values of the fermented material rather than to particular microorganisms.[22] Arguably, EM's heavy focus on microorganisms has diverted scientific attention away from both the bokashi process as a whole and the particular roles in it of lactic acid, lactate, and soil life above the bacterial level.
Some organisms in EM, specifically photosynthetic bacteria and yeast, appear to be logically superfluous, as they will first be suppressed by the dark and anaerobic environment of homolactic fermentation, then killed by its lactic acid. Consequently, practitioners have sought to reduce costs and to widen the scale of operations. Success has been reported with:
The main use of bokashi that is described above is to recover value from organic waste by converting it into a soil amendment.
In Europe, food and drink material that is sent to animal feed does not legally constitute waste because it is regarded as 'redistribution.'[29] This may apply to bokashi made from food, because it enters the soil food web, and furthermore is inherentlypathogen-free.
A side effect of diverting organic waste to the soil food web is to divert it away from localwaste management streams and their associated costs of collection and disposal. To encourage this, for example most UK local authorities subsidise household bokashi starter kits through a National Home Composting Framework.[30]
Another side effect is to increase theorganic carbon content of the amended soil. Some of this is a relatively long-termcarbon sink – insofar as the soil ecosystem createshumus – and some is temporary for as long as the richer ecosystem is sustained by measures such as permanent planting,no-till cultivation and organicmulch. An example of these measures is seen at theFerme du Bec Hellouin [fr] in France.[24] Bokashi would therefore have potential uses in enabling communities to speed up the conversion of land from chemical toorganic horticulture andagriculture, toregenerate degraded soil, and to developurban and peri-urban horticulture close to the sources of input.
The anti-pathogenic nature of bokashi is applied tosanitation, in particular to the treatment offaeces. Equipment and supplies to treat pet faeces are sold commercially[31] but do not always give prominence to the hygiene risks.[32] Treatment of human faeces for soil amendment has been extensively studied, notably with the use ofbiochar (a soil improver in its own right) to remove odours and retain nutrients.[33] Social acceptability is a major obstacle, butniche markets such as emergency aid sanitation, outdoor events and temporary workplaces may develop the technology into adisruptive innovation.
