The early residents of both sides of the Amur in the region of today's Blagoveshchensk were theDaurs andDuchers. An early settlement in the area of today's Blagoveshchensk was the Ducher town whose name was reported by the Russian explorerYerofey Khabarov as Aytyun in 1652, as Aigun from 1683 to 1685, and as Aigun Old Town from 1685 untilthe massacre in 1900,[15] which is known to Russian archaeologists as the Grodekovo site, after the nearby village ofGrodekovo about 25–30 km (16–19 mi) southeast of Blagoveshchensk. The Grodekovo site is thought by archaeologists to have been populated since ca. AD 1000.[16]
Aaihom ruin'd (i.e., Old Aigun), in theProvince ofTcitcica on this 18th-century map corresponds to the Grodekovo site;Saghalien Ula Hoton, across the river, isAigun. There is nothing much near the site of Blagoveshchensk itself (at the confluence of theSaghalien (Amur) River and theTchikiri (Zeya) River)
As the Russians tried to assert their control over the region, the Ducher town was probably vacated when the Duchers were evacuated by theQing to theSungari orHurka in the mid-1650s.[16] Since 1673, the Chinese reused the site for their fort ("Old Aigun", in modern literature),[17] which served in 1683-1685 as a base for the Manchus's campaign against the Russian fort ofAlbazin further north.[18]
After the capture of Albazin in 1685 or 1686, the Chinese relocated their town, to a new site on the right (southwestern, i.e. presently Chinese) bank of the Amur, about 3 miles (4.8 km) downstream from the original site; it later became known asAigun.[19][20]
As the balance of power in the region had changed by the mid-19th century, theRussian Empire was ableto take over the left (generally northern, but around Blagoveshchensk, eastern) bank of the Amur from China. Since the 1858Aigun Treaty and the 1860Treaty of Peking, the river has remained the border between the countries, although theQing subjects were allowed to continue to live in the so-calledSixty-Four Villages east of the Amur and the Zeya (i.e., within today's Blagoveshchensk's eastern suburbs).
The triumphal arch erected in Blagoveshchensk to welcomeCrown Prince Nicholas in 1891
Although Russian settlers had lived in the area as early as 1644 and was known asHailanpao (Chinese:海兰泡;simplified Chinese:海兰泡;traditional Chinese:海蘭泡;pinyin:Hǎilánpāo), the present-day city began in 1856[3] as the military outpost ofUst-Zeysky; this name meanssettlement at the mouth of theZeya River in Russian.TsarAlexander II gave approval for the founding of the city in 1858 as the seat of government for the Amur region, to be named Blagoveshchensk (literally "the city of good news") after the parish church which was dedicated to theAnnunciation. According to Blagoveshchensk authorities, by 1877 the city had some 8,000 residents, with merely 15 foreigners (presumably, Chinese) among them.[17]
The city was an important river port and trade centre during the late 19th century, with growth further fuelled by agold rush early in the 20th century and by its position on the Chinese border opposite the city ofHeihe.
Local historians noted the pre-eminence of Blagoveshchensk in the economy of the late 19th centuryRussian Far East, which was reflected when the heir to the Russian throne,Nicholas Alexandrovich (the future Tsar Nicholas II), visited in 1891 during hisgrand tour of Asiatic Russia, and the locals presented him withbread and salt on a gold tray, rather than on a silver one as in other cities of the region.[21]
In the course of theBoxer Rebellion, the Qing Imperial army (made out of Manchus and Han Chinese) and Boxer insurgentsshelled the city in July 1900. ChineseHonghuzi forces joined the attack against Blagoveshchensk.[22] According to theOrthodox belief, the city was allegedly saved by a miraculousicon of Our Lady of Albazin, which was prayed to continuously during the shelling which lasted almost two weeks.
On 3 July (Old Style), a decision was made by the city's Police Chief Batarevich and the Military Governor Gribsky to deport the city's entire community of Qing subjects including ethnicManchus,Daur people and Han, numbering 4,008[17]), who were viewed as potentialfifth columnists. As cross-river shipping was interrupted by the rebellion, the question arose how to get them from the Russian to the Chinese side of the Amur. Batarevich suggested that the deportees could be first taken east of theZeya, where they should obtain boats from the local Chinese villagers. The plan, however, was vetoed by the governor, and the decision was made instead to take the deportees to thestanitsa of Verkhneblagoveshchenskaya—the place where the Amur is at its narrowest—and make them leave Russia there. As the localataman refused to provide boats to take them across the river (despite the orders of his superior), few of them made it to the Chinese side. The rest drowned in the Amur, or were shot or axed by the police, Cossacks and local volunteers, if they refused to leave the bank. Local Chinese memory holds that a massacre that took place then, at the hands of the Cossacks, which killed so many that the Amur River was choked.[23] According to Chinese sources, about 5,000 people reportedly died during these events of 4–8 July 1900.[24]
There were 1,266 households in the city, including 900 Daurs and 4,500 Manchus until the massacre.[25] Many Manchu villages were burned by Cossacks in the massacre according to Victor Zatsepine.[26]
This expulsion of the local Chinese caused some hardships for Blagoveshchensk consumers. For example, during the second half of 1900 it became almost impossible to buy any green vegetables in the town, and ten eggs would cost 30-50kopecks (and in winter, as much as a rouble), while before it had been possible to buy ten eggs for 10-15 kopecks.[17]
The massacre angered the Chinese and had ramifications for the future: the ChineseHonghuzi fought a guerilla war against Russian occupation and assisted the Japanese in theRusso-Japanese War against the Russians in revenge.Louis Livingston Seaman mentioned the massacre as being the reason for the ChineseHonghuzi hatred towards the Russians:
The Chinaman, be he Hung-hutze or peasant, in his relation to the Russians in this conflict with Japan has not forgotten the terrible treatment accorded him since the Muscovite occupation of Manchuria. He still remembers the massacre at Blagoveshchensk when nearly 8,000 unarmed men, women, and children were driven at the point of the bayonet into the raging Amur, until — as one of the Russian officers who participated in that brutal murder told me at Chin-Wang-Tao in 1900 — "the execution of my orders made me almost sick, for it seemed as though I could have walked across the river on the bodies of the floating dead." Not a Chinaman escaped, except forty who were employed by a leading foreign merchant who ransomed their lives at a thousand roubles each. These, and many even worse, atrocities are remembered and now is their moment for revenge. So, it was easy for Japan to enlist the sympathy of these men, especially when emphasized by liberal pay, as is now the case. It is believed that more than 10,000 of these bandits, divided into companies of from 200 to 300 each and led by Japanese officers, are now in the pay of Japan.[27]
The city was also the site of conflict during theRussian Civil War, with Japanese troops occupying the city in support of theWhite Army. From 1920 until 1922, the city was declared part of theFar Eastern Republic, an area which was nominally independent, but in reality, a buffer zone under control of theRussian SFSR. The city became the administrative centre ofAmur Oblast in 1932.
In July 2013, a public hearing was held at which citizens declared themselves to be in favour of a return to the direct election of the mayor. A meeting of deputies voted for rejection of the "two-headed" management. In September 2013, City Council voted for a return to themayoral election of the mayor[clarification needed][29]
Blagoveschensk experiences a monsoon-influencedhot-summer humid continental climate (KöppenDwa,TrewarthaDcac), bordering on a monsoon-influencedwarm-summer humid continental climate (Dwb,Dcbc) which it had before 1990. The climate is very strongly continental. The city features frigid, windy, but dry winters due to the influence of theSiberian high, and warm, wet summers, due to theEast Asian monsoon. On 1 August 2011, it became the first city in theRussian Far East to be hit by a tornado.[citation needed].Temperatures have never risen above freezing from December 21 to January 26, inclusive; conversely, there has never been a freeze between May 23 and September 12[30]
Climate data for Blagoveshchensk (1991-2020, extremes 1859-present)
Since thedissolution of the Soviet Union, the city's economic focus has turned to border trade with China. The town is now home to a large Chinese expatriate community. Blagoveshchensk is part of a free-trade zone which includes the Chinese city of Heihe, located on the other side of the Amur River.[33]
^Note that the distance between modern Grodekovo and the historic Aigun on the Chinese side of the river is about 15 kilometers (9.3 mi) on modern maps, rather than 3 miles (4.8 km), as Ravenstein states. However, the location of the Grodekovo archaeological site (i.e., the "Old Aigun") may be quite a distance from the eponymous village; and Ravenstein may be somewhat imprecise in the number.
^Joana Breidenbach (2005). Pál Nyíri, Joana Breidenbach (ed.).China inside out: contemporary Chinese nationalism and transnationalism (illustrated ed.). Central European University Press. p. 90.ISBN963-7326-14-6. Retrieved18 March 2012.The political component of Chinese banditry emerged only in the year 1900. For the first time, Khunkhuzy attacked the Russian city of Blagoveshchensk. It ended in the drowning of about 3,000 Chinese near Blagoveshchensk (called Hailanbao in Chinese). When during the Boxer Uprising Boxers and khunkhuzy assaulted Russian positions nearby, Cossacks stationed there decided to drive the Chinese from the Russian bank of the river back onto the Chinese bank. People were simply pushed into the river, and many of them drowned. Even Vladimir Lenin personally criticized the Russian tsarist government for its brutality.
^Олег Анатольевич Тимофеев (Oleg Anatolyevich Timofeyev)."Российско-китайские отношения в Приамурье (сер. XIX – нач. XX вв.)" (Russian-Chinese relations in the Amur region, mid-19th - early 20th centuries). Part 2. Blagoveshchensk, 2003. Quote: "3 июля благовещенский полицмейстер Батаревич предложил военному губернатору Амурской области К.Н. Грибскому депортировать китайцев на правый берег... Сразу же возник вопрос о транспортных средствах для перевозки нескольких тысяч человек...Батаревич в конечном итоге принял решение о переправе всех китайцев в районе ст. Верхнеблаговещенской – месте, где Амур наиболее узок...По прибытии в ст. Верхнеблаговещенскую события приняли еще более драматический оборот. Местный атаман Писарев, несмотря на приказ председателя амурского войскового правления полковника Волковинского, наотрез отказался предоставить китайцам имевшиеся у него шаланду и лодки, опасаясь их захвата противником. Китайцам было предложено переправляться самим, хотя среди них имелись старики и дети. К этому времени к берегу подошли озлобленные продолжающимся обстрелом местные жители. Совершенно естественное нежелание депортируемых самим идти на смерть окружившими их русскими было воспринято почти как вооруженное восстание. Во время последующего следствия Шабанов и Писарев пытались обвинить друг друга в попустительстве началу расправы. Начальник конвоя указывал в рапорте, что стрелял один из местных казаков, неизвестно по чьему приказу. При опросе атамана и казаков станицы ими было заявлено, что переправа (то есть истребление – О.Т.) началась лишь после того, как помощник пристава «принял более строгие меры».На деле эти меры свелись к уничтожению безоружных китайцев как на берегу, так и уже в воде. Как гласят цинские источники, депортируемых связывали косами по пять-шесть человек и штыками загоняли в воду. Отказавшихся переправляться Шабанов приказал, по свидетельству очевидцев, зарубить топорами. По некоторым данным, огонь был открыт и с цинской стороны. Из всей партии до противоположного берега доплыли лишь 80-100 человек".
^Louis Livingston Seaman (1904).From Tokio through Manchuria with the Japanese. PRINTED AT THE APPLETON PRESS, NEW YORK, U.S.A.: S. Appleton. p. 170. Retrieved18 March 2012.ant, in his relation to the Russians in this conflict with Japan has not forgotten the terrible treatment accorded him since the Muscovite occupation of Manchuria. He still remembers the massacre at Blagovestchensk when nearly 8,000 unarmed men, women, and children were driven at the point of the bayonet into the raging Amur, until—as one of the Russian officers who participated in that brutal murder told me at Chin-Wang-Tao in 1900—" the execution of my orders made me almost sick, for it seemed as though I could have walked across the river on the bodies of the floating dead." Not a Chinaman escaped, except forty who were employed by a leading foreign merchant who ransomed their lives at a thousand roubles each. These, and many even worse, atrocities are remembered and now is their moment for revenge. So it was easy for Japan to enlist the sympathy of these men, especially when emphasized by liberal pay, as is now the case. It is believed that more than 10,000 of these bandits, divided into companies of from 200 to 300 each and led by Japanese officers, are now in the pay of Japan. LONDON: SIDNEY APPLETON COPYRIGHT, 1904, BY D. APPLETON AND COMPANY Original from the University of California Digitized 21 November 2007.
Амурский областной Совет народных депутатов. Закон №127-ОЗ от 23 декабря 2005 г. «О порядке решения вопросов административно-территориального устройства Амурской области», в ред. Закона №272-ОЗ от 11 ноября 2013 г. «О внесении изменений в Закон Амурской области "О порядке решения вопросов административно-территориального устройства Амурской области"». Вступил в силу со дня первого официального опубликования, за исключением подпункта "б" пункта 2 статьи 7, вступающего в силу с 1 января 2006 г. Опубликован: "Амурская правда", №11, 24 января 2006 г. (Amur Oblast Council of People's Deputies. Law #127-OZ of December 23, 2005On the Procedures of Handling the Issues of the Administrative and Territorial Structure of Amur Oblast, as amended by the Law #272-OZ of November 11, 2013On Amending the Law of Amur Oblast "On the Procedures of Handling the Issues of the Administrative and Territorial Structure of Amur Oblast". Effective as of the day of the first official publication, with the exception of subitem "b" of item 2 of Article 7, which is effective January 1, 2006.).
Амурский областной Совет народных депутатов. Закон №447-ОЗ от 14 марта 2005 г «О наделении муниципального образования города Благовещенск статусом городского округа и об установлении его границ», в ред. Закона №175-ОЗ от 26 апреля 2013 г. «О внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Амурской области по вопросам установления границ муниципальных образований». Вступил в силу в соответствии со статьёй 3. Опубликован: "Амурская правда", №61, 25 марта 2005 г. (Amur Oblast Council of People's Deputies. Law #447-OZ of March 14, 2005On Granting the Municipal Formation of the Town of Blagoveshchensk the Urban Okrug Status and on Establishing Its Borders, as amended by the Law #175-OZ of April 26, 2013On Amending Various Legislative Acts of Amur Oblast on the Issues of Establishing the Borders of the Municipal Formations. Effective as of the date set forth in accordance with the provisions of Article 3.).
Амурский областной Совет народных депутатов. Закон №51-ОЗ от 21 сентября 2005 г. «Об установлении границ и наделении соответствующим статусом муниципального образования Благовещенского района и муниципальных образований в его составе», в ред. Закона №175-ОЗ от 26 апреля 2013 г. «О внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Амурской области по вопросам установления границ муниципальных образований». Вступил в силу со дня первого опубликования, за исключением статьи 3, вступившей в силу с 1 января 2006 г. Опубликован: "Амурская правда", №190, 27 сентября 2005 г. (Amur Oblast Council of People's Deputies. Law #51-OZ of September 21, 2005On Establishing the Borders of and Granting a Corresponding Municipal Formation Status to Blagoveshchensky District and to the Municipal Formations It Comprises, as amended by the Law #175-OZ of April 26, 2013On Amending Various Legislative Acts of Amur Oblast on the Issues of Establishing the Borders of the Municipal Formations. Effective as of the day of the first publication, with the exception of Article 3 which took effect on January 1, 2006.).
Дума города Благовещенска. Решение №62/89 от 26 мая 2005 г. «О принятии Устава муниципального образования города Благовещенска», в ред. Решения №11/119 от 28 мая 2015 г. «О внесении изменений в Устав муниципального образования города Благовещенска». Вступил в силу после официального опубликования. Опубликован: "Благовещенск", №38, 23 сентября 2005 г. (Duma of the City of Blagoveshchensk. Decision #62/89 of May 26, 2005On the Adoption of the Charter of the Municipal Formation of the City of Blagoveshchensk, as amended by the Decision #11/119 of May 28, 2015On Amending the Charter of the Municipal Formation of the City of Blagoveshchensk. Effective as of after the official publication.).
Благовещенская городская Дума. Решение №14/60 от 25 мая 2006 г. «О гимне города Благовещенска», в ред. Решения №19/141 от 25 ноября 2010 г. «О внесении изменения в Положение о гимне города Благовещенска, утверждённое решением Благовещенской городской Думы от 25 мая 2006 г. №14/60». Вступил в силу со дня официального опубликования в газете "Благовещенск". Опубликован: "Благовещенск", №22–23, 2 июня 2006 г. (Blagoveshchensk City Duma. Decision #14/60 of May 25, 2006On the Anthem of the City of Blagoveshchensk, as amended by the Decision #19/141 of November 25, 2010On Amending the Statute on the Anthem of the City of Blagoveshchensk #14/60 Adopted by the Decision of the Blagoveshchensk City Duma of May 25, 2006. Effective as of the day of the official publication in theBlagoveshchensk newspaper.).
.JPG)
