This articleprovides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please helpimprove the article byproviding more context for the reader.(February 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Bite force quotient (BFQ) is a numerical value commonly used to represent the bite force of an animal adjusted for its body mass, while also taking factors like theallometry effects.

The BFQ is calculated as theregression of thequotient of ananimal's bite force innewtons divided by its body mass in kilograms.^[1] The BFQ was first applied byWroe et al. (2005) in a paper comparing bite forces, body masses and prey size in a range of living and extinct mammalian carnivores, later expanded on by Christiansen & Wroe (2007).^[2] Results showed that predators that take relatively large prey have large bite forces for their size, i.e., once adjusted forallometry. The authors predicted bite forces using beam theory, based on the directly proportional relationship betweenmuscle cross-sectional area and the maximal force muscles can generate. Because body mass is proportional to volume while muscle force is proportional to area, the relationship between bite force and body mass is allometric. All else being equal, it would be expected to follow a 2/3 power rule. Consequently, small species would be expected to bite harder for their size than large species if a simple ratio of bite force to body mass is used, resulting in bias. Applying the BFQ normalizes the data allowing for fair comparison between species of different sizes in much the same way as an encephalization quotient normalizes data for brain size to body mass comparisons. It is a means for comparison, not an indicator of absolute bite force. In short, if an animal or species has a high BFQ this indicates that it bites hard for its size after controlling for allometry.

Hite et al.,^[3] who include data from the widest range of living mammals of any bite force regression to date, produce from their regression the BFQ equation:

${\displaystyle BFQ=100\left(\frac{BF}{{10}^{0.5703({\log }_{10}BM)+0.1096}}\right)}$

Or equivalently

${\displaystyle BFQ=77.7\left(\frac{BF}{B{M}^{0.5703}}\right)}$

where BF = Bite Force (N), and BM = Body Mass (g)

Table sources (unless otherwise stated):^[1][4][2][5]

In a 2020 paper, the results of an estimation of the BFQ of various canid species separated by sex were published.^[6] Below there is a table with the BFQ averaged from the BFQ for each espécimen of each sex and for each species. BFQ coming from a single specimen for each sex in a given species will be marked with an asterisk.

Thisstandards- ormeasurement-related article is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it.

• v
• t
• e

Thiszoology–related article is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it.

• v
• t
• e

• Measurement
• Animal bites
• Standards and measurement stubs
• Zoology stubs

• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Wikipedia articles needing context from February 2013
• All Wikipedia articles needing context
• All pages needing cleanup
• All stub articles