Some authors define the binomial transform with an extra sign, so that it is not self-inverse:
whose inverse is
In this case the former transform is called theinverse binomial transform, and the latter is justbinomial transform. This is standard usage for example inOn-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.
Both versions of the binomial transform appear in difference tables. Consider the following difference table:
0
1
10
63
324
1485
1
9
53
261
1161
8
44
208
900
36
164
692
128
528
400
Each line is the difference of the previous line. (Then-th number in them-th line isam,n = 3n−2(2m+1n2 + 2m(1+6m)n + 2m-19m2), and the difference equationam+1,n =am,n+1 -am,n holds.)
The top line read from left to right is {an} = 0, 1, 10, 63, 324, 1485, ... The diagonal with the same starting point 0 is {tn} = 0, 1, 8, 36, 128, 400, ... {tn} is the noninvolutive binomial transform of {an}.
The top line read from right to left is {bn} = 1485, 324, 63, 10, 1, 0, ... The cross-diagonal with the same starting point 1485 is {sn} = 1485, 1161, 900, 692, 528, 400, ... {sn} is the involutive binomial transform of {bn}.
The relationship between the ordinary generating functions is sometimes called theEuler transform. It commonly makes its appearance in one of two different ways. In one form, it is used toaccelerate the convergence of analternating series. That is, one has the identity
which is obtained by substitutingx = 1/2 into the last formula above. The terms on the right hand side typically become much smaller, much more rapidly, thus allowing rapid numerical summation.
The Euler transform can be generalized (Borisov B. and Shkodrov V., 2007):
wherep = 0, 1, 2,....
The Euler transform is also frequently applied to theEuler hypergeometric integral. Here, the Euler transform takes the form:
[See[1] for generalizations to other hypergeometric series.]
The binomial transform, and its variation as the Euler transform, is notable for its connection to thecontinued fraction representation of a number. Let have the continued fraction representation
Let and be sequences of complex numbers. Their binomial convolution is defined byThis convolution can be found in the book by R.L. Graham, D.E. Knuth and O. Patashnik:Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science, Addison-Wesley (1989). It is easy to see that the binomial convolution is associative and commutative, and the sequence defined by and for serves as the identity under the binomial convolution. Further, it is easy to see that the sequences with possess an inverse. Thus the set of sequences with forms anAbelian group under the binomial convolution.
The binomial convolution arises naturally from the product of the exponential generating functions. In fact,
The binomial transform can be written in terms of binomial convolution. Let and for all. ThenThe formulacan be interpreted as a Möbius inversion type formulasince is the inverse of under the binomial convolution.
There is also another binomial convolution in the mathematical literature. The binomial convolution of arithmetical functions and is defined aswhere is the canonical factorization of a positive integer and is thebinomial coefficient. This convolution appears in the book by P. J. McCarthy (1986) and was further studied by L. Toth and P. Haukkanen (2009).
When the sequence can be interpolated by acomplex analytic function, then the binomial transform of the sequence can be represented by means of aNörlund–Rice integral on the interpolating function.
In the case where the binomial transform is defined as
Let this be equal to the function
If a newforward difference table is made and the first elements from each row of this table are taken to form a new sequence, then the second binomial transform of the original sequence is,
If the same process is repeatedk times, then it follows that,