Beth Huzaye (Syriac:ܒܝܬ ܗܘܙܝܐ)[1] (Arabic:بيت حوزايي)[2] orʿIlam was anEast Syriac metropolitan province of theChurch of the East, between the fifth and fourteenth centuries. Themetropolitan bishops of Beth Huzaye sat atBeth Lapat (Jundishapur). The metropolitan province of Beth Huzaye had a number of suffragan dioceses at different periods in its history, includingKarka d'Ledan,Hormizd Ardashir,Shushter,Susa,Ispahan,Mihraganqadaq andRam Hormizd. The Diocese of Shahpur Khwast may also have been a suffragan Diocese of the province of Beth Huzaye.
The names Beth Huzaye and ʿIlam refer toKhuzestan andElam, respectively.
The bishop of Beth Lapat was recognised as metropolitan of Beth Huzaye in Canon XXI of the synod of Isaac in 410. The metropolitan of Beth Huzaye ranked above the metropolitans of the other four metropolitan provinces established in 410 (Nisibis, Maishan, Adiabene and Beth Garmaï), and was responsible for the suffragan dioceses of Karka d'Ledan, Hormizd Ardashir, Shushter andSusa.[3]
The metropolitan of Beth Huzaye (ʿIlam or Elam), who resided in the town of Beth Lapat (Veh az Andiokh Shapur), enjoyed the right of consecrating a new patriarch. In 410 it was not possible to appoint a metropolitan for Beth Huzaye, as several bishops of Beth Lapat were competing for precedence and the synod declined to choose between them. Instead, it merely laid down that once it became possible to appoint a metropolitan, he would have jurisdiction over the dioceses of Karka d'Ledan, Hormizd Ardashir, Shushter and Susa.[4] These dioceses were all founded at least a century earlier, and their bishops were present at most of the synods of the fifth and sixth centuries. A bishop of Ispahan was present at the synod ofDadishoʿ in 424, and by 576 there were also dioceses for Mihraganqadaq (probably the 'Beth Mihraqaye' included in the title of the Diocese of Ispahan in 497) and Ram Hormizd (Ramiz).
Only four of these seven dioceses were still in existence at the end of the ninth century. The Diocese of Ram Hormizd seems to have lapsed, and the dioceses of Karka d'Ledan and Mihrganqadaq had been combined with the dioceses of Susa and Ispahan respectively. In 893Eliya of Damascus listed four suffragan dioceses in the 'eparchy of Jundishapur', in the following order: Karkh Ladan and al-Sus (Susa and Karka d'Ledan), al-Ahwaz (Hormizd Ardashir), Tesr (Shushter) and Mihrganqadaq (Ispahan and Mihraganqadaq).[5] Shahpur Khwast may also have briefly been a diocese in the province of Beth Huzaye. It is doubtful whether any of these dioceses survived into the fourteenth century. The Diocese of Shushter is last mentioned in 1007/8, Hormizd Ardashir in 1012, Ispahan in 1111 and Susa in 1281. Only the metropolitan Diocese of Jundishapur certainly survived into the fourteenth century, and with additional prestige.ʿIlam had for centuries ranked first among the metropolitan provinces of the Church of the East, and its metropolitan enjoyed the privilege of consecrating a new patriarch and sitting on his right hand at synods. By 1222, in consequence of the demise of the Diocese of Kashkar in the province of the patriarch, he had also acquired the privilege of guarding the vacant patriarchal throne.
The bishop Gadyahb (or Gadhimhab) of Beth Lapat was one of several East Syriac bishops who opposed the claim to precedence put forward by the bishopPapa of Seleucia-Ctesiphon in 315.[6]
In 410 there were several rival bishops of Beth Lapat, and Canon XXI of the synod of Isaac merely recorded that 'for the metropolis of Beth Lapat there is not yet a bishop whose name we can inscribe among his fellow-metropolitans, since the town has two or three bishops not recognised by the synod'.[7] The bishops Yazdaidad, Agapit, Miles, Bar Shabtha, Mari and Shila were among the thirty-eight signatories of the synod's acts, and from their position in the list were probably the bishops concerned.[8]
The bishop Agapit of Beth Lapat was among the signatories of the acts of the synods ofYahballaha I in 420 andDadishoʿ in 424.[9]
The bishop Papa, 'bishop of Beth Lapat, metropolitan of Beth Huzaye', was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Acacius in 486.[10]
The deacon Pusaï was among the signatories of the acts of the synod ofBabaï in 497, on behalf of the metropolitan Marwaï of Beth Huzaye.[11]
The metropolitanPaul of Beth Huzaye, who had earlier been bishop of Hormizd Ardashir, was elected patriarch in 539.[12]
The metropolitan Paul of Beth Huzaye was among the bishops who rallied to the patriarch Aba I in 540 and signed his Pragmatic.[13]
The bishopShemʿon, 'bishop, metropolitan of Beth Huzaye', was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Joseph in 554.[14]
The bishop Dalaï, 'bishop, metropolitan of Beth Huzaye', was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Ezekiel in 576.[15]
The bishop Baraz, 'metropolitan of Beth Huzaye', was among the signatories of the acts of the synod ofIshoʿyahb I in 585.[16]
The patriarch Maremmeh (646–50), formerly bishop of Nineveh, was consecrated metropolitan ofʿIlam by the patriarchIshoʿyahb II (628–46).[17]
The metropolitanYaʿqob ofʿIlam was elected patriarch after the degradation of the patriarch Surin, and was consecrated in 751/2.[18]
The patriarchGiwargis II (828–31), formerly superior of the monastery ofBeth ʿAbe, was consecrated metropolitan ofʿIlam by Timothy Ic.807 at the request of the caliph Harun al-Rashid's powerful court physicianGabriel ibn Bokhtishoʿ. He was metropolitan ofʿIlam 'for twenty years', and was consecrated patriarch on 16 June 828 on the death ofIshoʿ Bar Nun.[19]
The patriarch Theodosius of Beth Garmaï (853–8) was consecrated bishop of Anbar by the patriarchSabrishoʿ II (831–5) and later became metropolitan ofʿIlam.[20]
The bishop Theodore of Qardu was appointed metropolitan ofʿIlam by the patriarchYohannan III immediately after his consecration on 15 July 893.[21] He was present at the consecration of the patriarch Yohannan IV in 900.[22]
The metropolitan Giwargis of Jundishapur was one of three bishops who went into hiding in 961 in protest against the election of the patriarchIsrael.[23]
The metropolitanHnanishoʿ ofʿIlam was present at the consecration of the patriarch Mari on 10 April 987.[24]
The bishopSabrishoʿ of Piroz Shabur (al-Anbar) was appointed metropolitan ofʿIlam during the reign of the patriarch Mari (987–99).[25]
The metropolitan Emmanuel, formerly bishop of Beth Huzaye (Hormizd Ardashir), was metropolitan ofʿIlam whenElijah of Nisibis completed hisChronography in 1018/19.[26]
The metropolitanStephen Abu ʿAmr, formerly archimandrite of the monastery of Mar Yohannan of Dailam, was consecrated metropolitan ofʿIlam by the patriarchSabrishoʿ III shortly after his consecration in 1063/4.[27]
The bishopSabrishoʿ of Balad was consecrated metropolitan ofʿIlam at an unknown date during the reign of the patriarchʿAbdishoʿ II (1074–90).[28]
The metropolitan andnatar kursyaʿAbdishoʿ ofʿIlam was present at the consecration of the patriarchSabrishoʿ IV in 1222.[29]
The metropolitan Eliya ofʿIlam was present as 'guardian of the throne' (natar kursya) at the consecration of the patriarchMakkikha II in 1257.[30] He was also present at the consecration of the patriarchDenha I in 1265.[31]
The metropolitanMaranʿemmeh ofʿIlam was present at the consecration of the patriarchYahballaha III in 1281.[32]
The metropolitan Joseph ofʿIlam was present at the consecration of the patriarchTimothy II in 1318.[33]
The Diocese of Karka d'Ledan was one of the four dioceses assigned to the metropolitan province of Beth Huzaye in Canon XXI of the synod of Isaac in 410. The bishops of the other three dioceses were confirmed as suffragans of the metropolitan of Beth Huzaye, but the status of the bishop of Karka d'Ledan (if there was one in 410) was not mentioned.[34]
The bishop Sawma of Karka d'Ledan was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Yahballaha I in 420.[35]
The bishop Samuel of Karka d'Ledan was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Babaï in 497.[36]
The bishop Shalmai of Karka d'Ledan was among the bishops who rallied to the patriarch Mar Aba I in 540 and signed his Pragmatic.[37]
The bishop Surin of Karka d'Ledan adhered by letter to the acts of the synod of Joseph in 554.[38]
The bishop Mushe of Karka d'Ledan was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Ezekiel in 576.[39]
The bishop Pusaï of Karka d'Ledan was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Gregory in 605.[40]
The bishop Yohannan of Hormizd Ardashir was confirmed as a suffragan bishop of the metropolitan of Beth Huzaye in Canon XXI of the synod of Isaac in 410.[41]
The bishop Bataï of Hormizd Ardashir was one of eleven named bishops listed in the acts of the synod ofDadishoʿ in 424 as having been reproved at the synods of Isaac in 410 and Yahballaha I in 420.[42]
The bishop Bataï of Hormizd Ardashir, presumably a different man, was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Acacius in 486.[43]
The priests Abraham, Maraï,Shemʿon and Adurhormizd were among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Babaï in 497, on behalf of the bishop Shila of Hormizd Ardashir.[44]
The bishop Buzaq (or Yozaq) of al-Ahwaz (Hormizd Ardashir) flourished in the 530s, during the schism of Narsaï andElishaʿ.[45]
Buzaq was succeeded as bishop of Hormizd Ardashir by his archdeaconPaul. Paul later became metropolitan of Beth Huzaye, and was elected patriarch in 539.[46]
The bishop Shila of Hormizd Ardashir, perhaps the same man, was among the bishops who rallied to the patriarch Mar Aba I in 540 and signed his Pragmatic.[47] The patriarch visited Hormizd Ardashir and 'having made some urgent corrections there, restored the concord and peace of Christ there with the reconciliation of its inhabitants with their shepherd, the bishop and friend of God Mar Shila'.[48] Shila was also among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Mar Aba I in 544, and adhered by letter to the acts of the synod of Joseph in 554.[49]
The bishop David of Hormizd Ardashir was among the signatories of the acts of the synods of Ezekiel in 576 andIshoʿyahb I in 585.[50]
The bishop Pusaï of Hormizd Ardashir was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Gregory in 605.[51]
The bishop Theodore of Hormizd Ardashir was sent by the patriarchIshoʿyahb III (649–59) on a mission to the refractory metropolitanShemʿon of Fars.[52]
The bishopShemʿon of 'Beth Huzaye' (Hormizd Ardashir) was present at the consecration of the patriarch Yohannan IV in 900.[53]
The bishop Emmanuel, metropolitan ofʿIlam whenElijah of Nisibis completed hisChronography in 1018/19, was formerly bishop of 'Beth Huzaye' (Hormizd Ardashir).[54]
The Diocese of Shushter (Syriac: Shushtra,ܫܘܫܛܪܐ) was recognised as a suffragan Diocese of the metropolitan of Beth Huzaye in Canon XXI of the synod of Isaac in 410.[55]
The bishop Abraham of Shushter was one of several East Syriac bishops who opposed the claim to precedence put forward by the bishop Papa of Seleucia-Ctesiphon in 380.[56]
The bishopsʿAbdishoʿ andShemʿon Barduq of Shushter were among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Isaac in 410, andʿAbdishoʿ was confirmed as a suffragan bishop of the metropolitan of Beth Huzaye in Canon XXI of the synod.[57] Neither of these two bishops was present at the synod of Yahballaha I in 420, whose acts were subscribed to by the bishop Gura of Shushter.[58] The bishopʿAbdishoʿ was among the signatories of the acts of the synod ofDadishoʿ in 424, along with the bishop Miles of Shushter.[59]
The bishop Pusaï of Shushter was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Acacius in 486.[60]
The bishop Yazdegerd of Shushter was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Babaï in 497.[61]
The bishopElishaʿ of Shushter was among the bishops who rallied to the patriarch Mar Aba I in 540 and signed his Pragmatic.[62] He was also among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Mar Aba I in 544, and adhered by letter to the acts of the synod of Joseph in 554.[63]
The bishop Daniel of Shushter was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Ezekiel in 576.[64]
The bishop Stephen of Shushter was among the signatories of the acts of the synod ofIshoʿyahb I in 585.[65]
The bishop Ahishma of Shushter was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Gregory in 605.[66]
The bishop Shlemun of Shushter was present at the consecration of the patriarch Yohannan IV in 900.[67]
The Diocese of Susa (Syriac: Shush,ܫܘܫ) may have been founded in the third century or earlier.
The bishopMilas al-Razi of Susa was one of several East Syriac bishops who opposed the claim to precedence put forward by the bishop Papa of Seleucia-Ctesiphon in 315.[68] The bishop Miles of Susa, perhaps the same man, was martyredc.340 in the persecution of Shapur II.[69]
The bishop 'Zuqa' of Susa was confirmed as a suffragan bishop of the metropolitan of Beth Huzaye in Canon XXI of the synod of Isaac in 410, and was among the signatories of the synod's acts.[70] The bishop 'Duqa' of Susa, doubtless the same man, was among the signatories of the acts of the synod ofYahballaha I in 420.[71]
The bishop Bar Shabtha of Susa was one of eleven named bishops listed in the acts of the synod ofDadishoʿ in 424 as having been reproved at the synods of Isaac in 410 and Yahballaha I in 420.[72]
The bishop Papaï of Susa adhered by letter to the acts of the synod ofBabaï in 497.[73]
The bishop Khosro of Susa was among the bishops who rallied to the patriarch Mar Aba I in 540 and signed his Pragmatic.[74] He also adhered by letter to the acts of the synod of Joseph in 554.[75]
The bishop Adurhormizd of Susa was among the signatories of the acts of the synods of Ezekiel in 576 andIshoʿyahb I in 585.[76]
The bishopYaʿqob of Susa was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Gregory in 605.[77]
The bishop Bar Sauma of Susa reproached the patriarchIshoʿyahb II (628–45) for compromising the Nestorian christology of the Church of the East during an embassy to the Roman empire in 628, in which he was admitted to communion by the Roman bishops.[78]
The monkIshoʿ Maran-zkha of themonastery of Beth ʿAbe was elected bishop of Susa at an unknown date in the second half of the eighth century or the first half of the ninth century.[79]
The bishopIshoʿyahb of Susa was appointed metropolitan of Hulwan by the patriarchYohannan III immediately after his consecration on 15 July 893.[80]
The bishop Macarius of Susa was present at the consecration of the patriarch Yohannan IV in 900.[81]
The bishop Yahballaha of Susa was present at the consecration of the patriarchMakkikha II in 1257.[82]
The bishop Yohannan of Susa was present at the consecration of the patriarchYahballaha III in 1281.[83]
The bishop Aphrahat of Ispahan was among the signatories of the acts of the synod ofDadishoʿ in 424.[84]
The bishop Abraham 'of Beth Mihraqaye and Ispahan' was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Babaï in 497.[85]
The bishop Abraham of Ispahan was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Joseph in 554.[86]
The bishop Ahron of Ispahan was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Ezekiel in 576.[87]
In 794/5 the patriarch Timothy I replaced the bishop Abraham of 'Gai' (the name of the old town of Ispahan), who had attempted to seize the neighbouring Diocese of Shushter, with the bishop Adorshabur.[88]
The bishopʿAbdishoʿ of Ispahan was appointed metropolitan of Merv during the reign of the patriarch Mari (987–99).[89]
The bishopʿAbdishoʿ of Ispahan was present at the consecration of the patriarch Eliya II in 1111.[90]
The bishop Papa of Mihraganqadaq was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Ezekiel in 576.[91]
The bishopShemʿon 'of Nisibis', abusively consecrated for 'Shurag, Ram Hormizd and other places' during the schism of Narsaï andElishaʿ in the early years of the sixth century, was deposed by the patriarch Mar Aba I in 540, but was allowed to continue as a priest in Shushter under the supervision of its bishopElishaʿ.[92]
The bishop Mihrshabur of Ram Hormizd was among the signatories of the acts of the synod of Ezekiel in 576.[93]
The bishopHnanishoʿ of Ram Hormizd was among the signatories of the acts of the synod ofIshoʿyahb I in 585.[94]
The East Syriac authorʿAbdishoʿ of Nisibis, writing around the end of the thirteenth century, mentions the bishop Gabriel of Shahpur Khwast (modernHurremabad), who perhaps flourished during the tenth century. From its geographical location, Shahpur Khwast might have been a diocese in the province ofʿIlam, but it is not mentioned in any other source.[95]
.jpg)
