| Battle of Abritus | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of theCrisis of the Third Century Gothic War (248-253) andRoman–Germanic Wars | |||||||
_-_Arte_Romana_-_Photo_Paolo_Villa_FO232047_ombre_gimp_bis.jpg) Relief depicting a battle between Romans and Goths. Decoration on theLudovisi Battle sarcophagus, dated to 250–260. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
| Goths | Roman Empire | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
| Cniva | Decius † Herennius Etruscus † | ||||||
| Strength | |||||||
| Unknown | Unknown | ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
| Unknown | Heavy | ||||||
TheBattle of Abritus[1] also known as theBattle of Forum Terebronii[2] occurred nearAbritus (modernRazgrad) in the Roman province ofMoesia Inferior in the summer of 251. It was fought between the Romans and a federation ofGothic andScythian tribesmen under the Gothic kingCniva. The Roman army was soundly defeated, andRoman emperorsDecius andHerennius Etruscus, his son, were both killed in battle. It was one of the worst defeats suffered by the Roman Empire against theGermanic tribes, rated by the Roman historianAmmianus Marcellinus as on par with theBattle of the Teutoburg Forest in 9, theMarcomannicinvasion ofRoman Italy in 170, and theBattle of Adrianople in 378.
The emperors' deaths led to more political instability atRome; and the loss of the army allowed repeated barbarian incursions in the region for the next two decades.
The new Roman emperorTrebonianus Gallus was forced to allow the Goths to return home with their loot and prisoners. The barbarians would not be expelled from Roman territory until 271.[3]
The long-debated location of Abritus was thought to be 1 km (0.62 mi) east of the city of Razgrad after excavations by T. Ivanov in 1969 and 1971.[4] However recent work has shown it took place about 15 km (9.3 mi) northwest of Abritus, in the valley of the riverBeli Lom, to the south of the village of Dryanovets near the site known locally as "Poleto" (the Field).[5]
This is evidenced by the large number of Roman coins and arms including swords, shields, spears, armour, greaves, and even military tentpoles found by archaeologists and local residents on the site which must be the last Roman camp.[5] For example, in 1952 a pottery vessel was found at ‘Poleto’ containing about 30aurei in mint condition dating fromGordian III to Trajan Decius.[6]
Soon after Decius ascended to the throne in 249, barbarian tribes invaded the Roman provinces ofDacia,Moesia Superior, andMoesia Inferior. Two factors had contributed to growing unrest in the area north of the Danube. First, Decius' predecessorPhilip the Arab had refused to continue payments, initiated by EmperorMaximinus Thrax in 238, of annual subsidies to the aggressive tribes of the region.[7] Second and more important, there were continuous movements of new peoples since the time of EmperorSeverus Alexander.[8] Decius may also have taken with him troops from the Danube frontier, in order to depose Philip in 249. He probably had with him three legions:legio XIV Gemina fromCarnuntum,legio IV Flavia Felix fromSingidunum, andlegio VII Claudia fromViminacium and/or theirvexillationes.[9]
The resultant military vacuum would inevitably attract invaders.[10]
In 250 a tribal coalition under Cniva crossed the RomanDanube frontier, probably advancing in two columns. Whether these were consisted only of Goths is rather unlikely so the name "Scythians" by which the Greek sources called them (a geographical definition) seems more appropriate.[11] It is quite possible that other people of Germanic and Sarmatian origin (likeBastarnae,Taifals, andHasdingian Vandals), perhaps Roman deserters as well, had joined the invaders.[12] However, the name of the king is indeed Gothic and probably genuine.[13] Meanwhile, theCarpi invaded Dacia, easternMoesia Superior, and western Moesia Inferior.[14]
The first column of Cniva's army, a detachment of about 20,000 or so likely led by the chieftains Argaith and Gunteric, besiegedMarcianopolis, without success it seems.[15] Then they probably headed south to besiege Philippopolis (nowPlovdiv in Bulgaria). Cniva's main column of 70,000 under the King himself crossed the Danube atOescus then headed eastwards toNovae, where he was repelled by the provincial governor (and future emperor)Trebonianus Gallus.[16][14] Then the invaders headed south to plunderNicopolis ad Istrum where Deciusdefeated them but not decisively.[17]
After these initial setbacks, the barbarians moved southwards throughHaemus mountain and Decius pursued them (likely through theShipka Pass) to save Philippopolis.[18] This time Decius' army was taken by surprise while resting atBeroe/Augusta Traiana. The Romans were heavily defeated in the ensuingBattle of Beroe. Decius was forced to withdraw his army to the north at Oescus, leaving Cniva ample time to ravage Moesia and finally capture Philippopolis in the summer of 251, in part with the help of its commander, a certainTitus Julius Priscus who had proclaimed himself Emperor.[19] It seems that Priscus, after receiving the news of the defeat at Beroe, thought that the Goths would spare him and the city. He was wrong and was probably killed when the city fell.[20] Then some of Cniva's forces began returning to their homeland, laden with booty and captives, among them many of senatorial rank.[18]
In the meantime, Decius had returned with his re-organized army, consisting of 80,000 men according toDexippus, accompanied by his son Herennius Etruscus and the generalTrebonianus Gallus, intending to defeat the invaders and recover the booty.[3] Decius had lost a force ofauxiliary soldiers due to their "wrongdoing", according to Dexippus.[3] Archaeology has revealed the presence of three legions at the battle.[21]
In either June,[22] July,[23] or August[24] of 251, the Roman army engaged the forces under Cniva near Abritus. The strengths of the belligerent forces are unknown, but we know that Cniva divided his forces into three units, with one of these parts concealed behind a swamp.[25] It seems that Cniva was a skilled tactician and that he was very familiar with the surrounding terrain.[12] Jordanes and Aurelius Victor claim that[26] Herennius Etruscus was killed by an arrow during a skirmish before the battle but his father addressed his soldiers as if the loss of his son did not matter. He allegedly said, "Let no one mourn. The death of one soldier is not a great loss to the Republic". However, other sources state that Herennius died with his father.[27]
Decius' forces initially defeated their opponents in the front line, but made the fatal mistake of pursuing their fleeing enemy into the swamp, where they were ambushed and completely routed under a barrage of Gothic missiles. The immense slaughter that ensued marked one of the most catastrophic defeats in the history of the Roman Empire.[25] Decius died in the midst of the chaos and slaughter, buried under the mud. The bodies of Decius and Herennius were never found.
The Goths captured Decius' treasury of tons of gold coins and many weapons which have since been discovered in many locations across Gothic territories.[28]
Zonaras[29] vividly narrates how:
He and his son and a large number of Romans fell into the marshland; all of them perished there, none of their bodies to be found, as they were covered by the mud.
A 6th-century Eastern Roman scholar,Zosimus, also described the total massacre of Decius' troops and the fall of the pagan emperor: "Proceeding therefore incautiously in an unknown place, he and his army became entangled in the mire, and under that disadvantage were so assailed by the missiles of the Barbarians, that not one of them escaped with life. Thus ended the life of the excellent emperor Decius."
Lactantius, a 4th-centuryearly Christian and advisor to Roman EmperorConstantine the Great, described the emperor's demise as following:[30]
He was suddenly surrounded by the barbarians, and slain, together with great part of his army; nor could he be honoured with the rites of sepulture, but, stripped and naked, he lay to be devoured by wild beasts and birds, a fit end for the enemy ofGod.
D. S. Potter rejects the story of Zosimus[31] about Treboniannus Gallus who supposedly conspired with the enemies of Romans for delivering Decius' army into the Gothic trap since it seems impossible that, afterwards, the shattered Roman legions proclaimed emperor a traitor who was responsible for the loss of so many soldiers from their ranks. Another strong point against Gallus' treason is the fact that he adoptedHostilian, the younger son of Decius, after returning to Rome.[27][32]
Gallus, who became emperor upon Decius' death, negotiated a treaty with the Goths under duress, which allowed them to keep their booty and return to their homes on the other side of the Danube. It is also possible that he agreed to pay an annual tribute in return for the Goths' promise to respect Roman territory.[33] This humiliating treaty, the contemporary spread of thePlague of Cyprian with its devastating effects, and the chaotic situation in the East with the Sassanian invasions left Gallus with a very bad reputation amongst the later Roman historians. However, D. S. Potter suggests that, before the defeat at Abritus, the situation was not so serious that the available Roman forces would not be able to manage the invasions. Therefore, it is Decius' bad conduct which was responsible for the disastrous turn of the events.[34] In any case, Gallus had no choice but to get rid of the Goths as soon as possible.[18]
In 271, the EmperorAurelian conclusively defeated the Goths and killed their kingCannabaudes in battle. Based on the similarity of the names, that king might coincide with the King Cniva who defeated Decius in Abritus.[35]
43°35′17″N26°22′12″E / 43.588120°N 26.369997°E /43.588120; 26.369997