Bahram III (also spelledWahram III orWarahran III;Middle Persian:𐭥𐭫𐭧𐭫𐭠𐭭,New Persian:بهرام سوم), was the sixth king (shah) of theSasanian Empire. He was son and successor ofBahram II.[1] As a prelude to his kingship he wasviceroy in the province ofSakastan, which had been re-conquered by his father sometime in the 280s.
Bahram III ascended to the throne after his father's death in 293. Many nobles considered him too weak to rule, instead pledging allegiance to his grand-uncleNarseh. After reigning for a period of only four months, Bahram III was either captured or more likely killed during a campaign by Narseh, who took his place as king.
In Sasanian Iran, it was customary for kings after conquering a land or people, to give their sonstitles showing domination over them. Bahram III gained his title of "sākān shāh" presumably after his father's victory over theSakastan (present daySistan) region. Also following early Sasanian practices of giving appanage of provinces to princes, Bahram III was appointed to Sakastan, a region of strategic importance in defending the eastern extremes of the kingdom.[6]
Following the death ofBahram II in 293, Bahram III was proclaimed king inPars by a group of nobles led byWahnam and supported by Adurfarrobay, King ofMeshan. He was still a minor at the time of his ascension, and many nobles (outside his core group of supporters) considered him too weak to properly handle the threat posed by the Romans and the possibility of invasion. They decided to challenge his succession to the throne and instead pledged allegiance toNarseh, the last remaining son ofShapur I, perceived as being a stronger leader and better able to bring glory to Iran.[7][8]
Four months into Bahram's reign, his grand-uncle Narseh was summoned toMesopotamia at the request of many members of the Iranian nobility. He met them in the passage of Paikuli in the province ofGarmekan, where he was firmly approved and likely also declared shah for the first time. The reasons behind the nobles favour of Narseh might have been due to his jurisdiction as governor, his image as an advocate of theZoroastrian religion and as an insurer for harmony and prosperity of the empire. His ancestry from the early Sasanian family probably also played a role.[9]
In order to avoid bloodshed, Narseh proposed to make peace with both Bahram III and Wahnam.[9] Both seem to have agreed, as no accounts of battles have been made. The reason behind Bahram and Wahnam's quick agreement to peace may have been due to desertion amongst many of Bahram's men. Bahram abdicated as shah and was probably spared, whilst Wahnam was executed when Narseh entered the Sasanian capital ofCtesiphon.[10][9] Narseh then summoned the aristocrats to take part in the royal referendum, a ritual which had been used since the first Sasanian shah, Ardashir I (r. 224–242), and which Narseh now made use of in order to gain the approval of the aristocracy as a legitimate ruler instead that of a usurper. Narseh was decisively voted in favour by the majority, and guaranteed "to enter the throne of our father and our forefathers with the help of the Gods, in their name and that of our forefathers."[9]
Many coins that could be attributed to him are small in number and due to uncertainty, many are often attributed to Narseh. Because many of the coins are attributed to him are smoother than usual the details of his crown are faint. It is believed that he is depicted wearing agold crown with a crenellated lower rim and two largedeerhorns or at least replicas of them attached on each side. The Sasani sphere sits between the horns on the front of the crown.[11]
A low relief at theBishapur archeological site depicts a figure being trampled by a horse. It is assumed that this scene is a representation of either the death of Bahram III or more likely his ally Wahnam.[12]
Martindale, J. R.; Jones, A. H. M.; Morris, J. (1971).The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire: Volume 1, AD 260-395. Cambridge University Press.ISBN9780521072335.