TheAvignon Papacy (Occitan:Papat d'Avinhon;French:Papauté d'Avignon) was the period from 1309 to 1376 during which seven successivepopes resided inAvignon (at the time within theKingdom of Arles, part of theHoly Roman Empire, now part ofFrance) rather than inRome.[1] The situation arose from the conflict between the papacy and theFrench crown, culminating in the death ofPope Boniface VIII after his arrest and maltreatment by agents ofPhilip IV of France. Following the subsequent death ofPope Benedict XI, Philip pressured a deadlocked conclave to elect the Archbishop of Bordeaux as popeClement V in 1305. Clement refused to move to Rome, and in 1309 he moved his court to the papal enclave at Avignon, where it remained for the next 67 years. This absence from Rome is sometimes referred to as the "Babylonian captivity" of the Papacy[2][3] (cf.Italiancattività avignonese, i.e. "Avignonese captivity").
A total of seven popes reigned at Avignon, allFrench,[4][5] and all under the influence of the French Crown. In 1376,Gregory XI abandoned Avignon and moved his court to Rome, arriving in January 1377. After Gregory's death in 1378, deteriorating relations between his successorUrban VI and a faction of cardinals gave rise to theWestern Schism. This started a second line of Avignon popes, subsequently regarded as illegitimate. The last Avignonantipope,Benedict XIII, lost most of his support in 1398, including that ofFrance. After five years besieged by the French, he fled toPerpignan in 1403. The schism ended in 1417 at theCouncil of Constance.[6]
The period from 1378 to 1417, when there were rival claimants to the title of pope, is referred to as the "Western Schism" or "the great controversy of the antipopes" by some Catholic scholars and "the second great schism" by many secular and Protestant historians. Parties within the Catholic Church were divided in their allegiance among the various claimants to the office of pope. TheCouncil of Constance finally resolved the controversy in 1417 when the election ofPope Martin V was accepted by all.
A map of Rome, showing an allegorical figure of Rome as a widow in black mourning the Avignon Papacy
The papacy in theLate Middle Ages played a majortemporal role in addition to its spiritual role. The conflict between thepope and theHoly Roman Emperor was fundamentally a dispute over which of them was the leader ofChristendom in secular matters. In the early 14th century, the papacy was well past the prime of its secular rule – its importance had peaked in the 12th and 13th centuries. The success of the earlyCrusades added greatly to the prestige of the Popes as secular leaders ofChristendom, with monarchs like those ofEngland,France, and even the Holy Roman Emperor merely acting asmarshals for the popes and leading "their" armies. One exception wasFrederick II, Holy Roman Emperor, who was twiceexcommunicated by the Pope during a Crusade. Frederick II ignored this and was moderately successful in theHoly Land.
This state of affairs culminated in the unbridled declaration of papal supremacy,Unam sanctam, in November 1302. In thatpapal bull,Pope Boniface VIII decreed that "it is necessary to salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman pontiff." This was directed primarily to King Philip IV of France who responded by saying, "Let thy foolishness know that in temporal things we are subject to no man."[10]
In 1303, Pope Boniface VIII followed up with a bull that would excommunicate the king of France and put an interdict over all France. Before this was finalized, Italian allies of the king of France broke into the papal residence and beat Pope Boniface VIII. He died shortly thereafter. Nicholas Boccasini was elected as his successor and took the namePope Benedict XI. He absolved King Philip IV and his subjects of their actions against Pope Boniface VIII, though the culprits who assaulted Boniface were excommunicated and ordered to appear before a pontifical tribunal. Benedict XI died within eight months of being elected to the papacy. After eleven months, Bertrand de Got, a Frenchman and a personal friend of King Philip IV, was elected as pope and took the name Pope Clement V.
Beginning withClement V, elected 1305, all popes during the Avignon papacy were French. However, this makes French influence seem greater than it was. Southern France (Occitania) at that time had a culture quite independent from northern France, where most of the advisers to the king of France were based. TheKingdom of Arles was not yet part of France, instead being formally a part of theHoly Roman Empire. The literature produced by thetroubadours inLanguedoc is unique and strongly distinct from that of royal circles in the north. Even in terms of religion, the south produced its own variety of Christianity,Catharism, which was ultimately declared heretical. The movement was fueled in no small part by the strong sense of independence in the south even though the region had been severely weakened during theAlbigensian Crusade a hundred years before. By the time of the Avignon Papacy, the power of the French king in this region was uncontested, although still not legally binding.
A stronger impact was made by the move of theRoman Curia fromRome toPoitiers in France in 1305, and then to Avignon in 1309. Following the impasse during the previousconclave, and to escape from the infighting of the powerful Roman families that had produced earlier Popes, such as theColonna andOrsini families, the Catholic Church looked for a safer place and found it in Avignon, which was surrounded by the lands of the papal fief ofComtat Venaissin. Formally it was part of Arles, but in reality it was under the influence of the French king.
During its time in Avignon, the papacy adopted many features of the Royal court: the life-style of itscardinals was more reminiscent of princes than clerics; more and more French cardinals, often relatives of the ruling pope, took key positions; and the proximity of French troops was a constant reminder of where secular power lay, with the memory of Pope Boniface VIII still fresh.
The temporal role of the Catholic Church increased the pressure upon the papal court to emulate the governmental practices and procedures of secular courts. The Catholic Church successfully reorganised and centralized its administration underClement V andJohn XXII. The papacy now directly controlled the appointments ofbenefices, abandoning the customary election process that traditionally allotted this considerable income.
Many other forms of payment brought riches to theHoly See and its cardinals:tithes, a ten-percent tax on church property;annates, the income of the first year after filling a position such as abishopric; special taxes for crusades that never took place; and many forms of dispensation, from the entering of benefices without basic qualifications like literacy for newly appointed priests to the request of a converted Jew to visit his unconverted parents. Popes such asJohn XXII,Benedict XII, andClement VI reportedly spent fortunes on expensive wardrobes, andsilver andgold plates were used atbanquets.
Overall the public life of leading church members began to resemble the lives of princes rather than members of the clergy. This splendor and corruption at the head of the Church found its way to the lower ranks: when a bishop had to pay up to a year's income for gaining a benefice, he sought ways of raising this money from his new office. This was taken to extremes by the pardoners who soldabsolutions for all kinds of sins. While pardoners were hated but popularly regarded as helpful to redeem one's soul,friars were commonly regarded as failing to follow the Church's moral commandments by ignoring their vows ofchastity andpoverty and were despised. This sentiment strengthened movements calling for a return to absolute poverty, relinquishment of all personal and ecclesiastical belongings, and preaching as the Lord and his disciples had.
For theCatholic Church, an institution embedded in the secular structure and its focus on property, this was a dangerous development, and beginning in the early 14th century, most of these movements were declaredheretical. These included theFraticelli andWaldensian movements in Italy and theHussites inBohemia (inspired byJohn Wycliffe in England). Furthermore, the display of wealth by the upper ranks of the church, which contrasted with the common expectation of poverty and strict adherence to principles, was used by enemies of the papacy to raise charges against the popes; King Philip of France employed this strategy, as didLouis IV, Holy Roman Emperor. In his conflict with the latter,Pope John XXII excommunicated two leading philosophers,Marsilius of Padua andWilliam of Ockham, who were outspoken critics of the papacy, and who had found refuge with Louis IV inMunich. In response, William charged the pope with seventy errors and seven heresies.
The proceedings against theKnights Templar in theCouncil of Vienne are representative of this time, reflecting the various powers and their relationships. In 1314, the collegium atVienne convened to make a ruling concerning the Templars. The council, overall unconvinced about the guilt of the order as a whole, was unlikely to condemn the entire order based on the scarce evidence brought forward. Exerting massive pressure in order to gain part of the substantial funds of the order, the King managed to get the ruling he wanted, and Pope Clement V ordered by decree the suppression of the order.
In thecathedral ofSaint Maurice in Vienne, the king of France and his son, theking of Navarre, were sitting next to him when he issued the decree. Under pain ofexcommunication, no one was allowed to speak at that occasion except when asked by the Pope. The Templars who appeared in Vienne to defend their order were not allowed to present their case—the cardinals of the collegium originally ruled that they should be allowed to raise a defense, but the arrival of the king of France in Vienne put pressure on the collegium, and that decision was revoked.
After the arrest of thebishop of Pamiers byPhilip IV of France in 1301,Pope Boniface VIII issued the bullSalvator Mundi, retracting all privileges granted to the French king by previous popes, and a few weeks laterAusculta fili with charges against the king, summoning him before a council to Rome. In a bold assertion of papal sovereignty, Boniface declared that "God has placed us over the Kings and Kingdoms."
In response, Philip wrote "Your venerable conceitedness may know, that we are nobody's vassal in temporal matters," and called for a meeting of theEstates General, a council of the lords of France, who had supported his position. The king of France issued charges ofsodomy,simony, sorcery, and heresy against the pope and summoned him before the council. The pope's response was the strongest affirmation to date of papal sovereignty. InUnam sanctam (18 November 1302), he decreed that "it is necessary to salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman pontiff."
He was preparing a bull that would excommunicate the king of France and put the interdict over France when in September 1303,William Nogaret, the strongest critic of the papacy in the French inner circle, led a delegation to Rome, with intentionally loose orders by the king to bring the pope, if necessary by force, before a council to rule on the charges brought against him. Nogaret coordinated with the cardinals of the Colonna family, long-standing rivals against whom the pope had even preached a crusade earlier in his papacy. In 1303, French and Italian troops attacked the pope inAnagni, his home town, and arrested him. He was freed three days later by the population of Anagni. Boniface VIII, then 68 years of age, was deeply shattered by this attack on his own person and died a few weeks later.
In reaction to the intransigence of popes like Boniface VIII, the French tightened their influence under the papacy, eventually reducing the popes to puppets and stacking the Papal court with French clerics.[11]
The death of Pope Boniface VIII deprived the papacy of its most able politician who could stand against the secular power of the king of France. After the conciliatory papacy of Benedict XI (1303–04),Pope Clement V (1305–1314) became the nextpontiff. He was born inGascony, in southern France, but was not directly connected to the French court. He owed his election to the French clerics. He decided against moving to Rome and established his court inAvignon. In this situation of dependency on powerful neighbours in France, three principles characterized the politics of Clement V: the suppression of heretic movements (such as the Cathars in southern France); the reorganization of the internal administration of the church; and the preservation of an untainted image of the church as the sole instrument of God's will on earth.
The latter was directly challenged by Philip IV when he demanded a posthumous trial of his former adversary, the late Boniface VIII, for allegedheresy. Philip exerted strong influence on the cardinals of the collegium, and compliance with his demand could mean a severe blow to the church's authority. Much of Clement's politics was designed to avoid such a blow, which he finally did (persuading Philip to leave the trial to the Council of Vienne, where it lapsed). However, the price won concessions on various fronts; despite strong personal doubts, Clement supported Philip's proceedings against the Templars, and he personally ruled to suppress the order.
One important issue during the papacy ofPope John XXII (born Jacques Duèze inCahors, and previously archbishop in Avignon) was his conflict withLouis IV, Holy Roman Emperor, who denied the sole authority of the pope to crown the emperor. Louis followed the example of Philip IV, and summoned the nobles of Germany to back his position.Marsilius of Padua justified secular supremacy in the territory of the Holy Roman Empire. This conflict with the Emperor, often fought out in expensive wars, drove the papacy even more into the arms of the French king.
Pope Benedict XII (1334–1342), born Jacques Fournier in Pamiers, was previously active in the inquisition against the Cathar movement. In contrast to the rather bloody picture of theInquisition in general, he was reported to be very careful about the souls of the examined, taking a lot of time in the proceedings. His interest in pacifying southern France was also motivation for mediating between the king of France and the king of England, before the outbreak of theHundred Years' War.
Under Pope Clement VI (1342–1352) the French interests started dominating the papacy. Clement VI had beenArchbishop of Rouen and adviser to Philip IV before, so his links to the French court were much stronger than those of his predecessors. At some point he even financed French war efforts out of his own pockets. He reportedly loved luxurious wardrobe and under his rule the extravagant life style in Avignon reached new heights.
Clement VI was also pope during theBlack Death, theepidemic that swept through Europe between 1347 and 1350 and is believed to have killed about one-third ofEurope's population. Also during his reign in 1348, the Avignon papacy bought the city of Avignon from the Angevins.[12]
Pope Innocent VI (1352–1362), born Etienne Aubert, was less partisan than Clement VI. He was keen on establishing peace between France and England, having worked to this end in papal delegations in 1345 and 1348. His gaunt appearance and austere manners commanded higher respect in the eyes of nobles at both sides of the conflict. However, he was also indecisive and impressionable, already an old man when being elected Pope. In this situation, the king of France managed to influence the papacy, although papal legates played key roles in various attempts to stop the conflict.
Most notably in 1353, thebishop of Porto, Guy de Boulogne, tried to set up a conference. After initial successful talks the effort failed, largely due to the mistrust from the English side over Guy's strong ties with the French court. In a letter Innocent VI himself wrote to theDuke of Lancaster: "Although we were born in France and although for that and other reasons we hold the realm of France in special affection, yet in working for peace we have put aside our private prejudices and tried to serve the interests of everyone."
WithPope Urban V (1362–1370), the control byCharles V of France of the papacy became more direct. Urban V himself is described as the most austere of the Avignon popes after Benedict XII and probably the most spiritual of all. However, he was not a strategist and made substantial concessions to the French crown especially in finances, a crucial issue during the war with England. In 1369, Pope Urban V supported the marriage ofPhilip the Bold of theDuchy of Burgundy andMargaret III, Countess of Flanders, rather than giving dispensation to one ofEdward III of England's sons to marry Margaret. This clearly showed the partisanship of the papacy; correspondingly, the respect for the church dropped.
PopeGregory XI returned to Rome in 1376 and ended the Avignon Papacy.
The most influential decision in the reign ofPope Gregory XI (1370–1378) was the return to Rome, beginning on 13 September 1376 and ending with his arrival on 17 January 1377.[13][14] Although the Pope was French born and still under strong influence by the French king, the increasing conflict between factions friendly and hostile to the Pope posed a threat to the papal lands and to the allegiance of Rome itself. When the papacy established an embargo against grain exports during a food scarcity 1374 and 1375,Florence organized several cities into a league against the papacy:Milan,Bologna,Perugia,Pisa,Lucca andGenoa.
The papal legate, Robert of Geneva, a relative of theHouse of Savoy, pursued a particularly ruthless policy against the league to re-establish control over these cities. He convinced Pope Gregory to hire Breton mercenaries. To quell an uprising of the inhabitants ofCesena he hiredJohn Hawkwood and had the majority of the people massacred (between 2,500 and 3,500 people were reported dead). Following such events opposition against the papacy strengthened.
Florence came in open conflict with the pope, a conflict called"the war of the eight saints" in reference to the eight Florentine councilors who were chosen to orchestrate the conflict. The entire city of Florence was excommunicated and as reply the forwarding of clerical taxes was stopped. Trade was seriously hampered and both sides had to find a solution. In his decision about returning to Rome, the pope was also under the influence ofCatherine of Siena, later canonized, who preached for a return to Rome.
This resolution was short-lived when, having returned the papal court to Rome,Pope Gregory XI died. A conclave met and elected an Italian pope,Urban VI. Pope Urban alienated the French cardinals, who held a second conclave electing one of their own, Robert of Geneva, who took the nameClement VII, to succeed Gregory XI, thus beginning a second line of Avignon popes. Clement VII and his successors are not regarded as legitimate, and are referred to asantipopes by theCatholic Church. This situation, known as theWestern Schism, persisted from 1378 until theecumenicalCouncil of Constance (1414–1418) settled the question of papal succession and declared the French conclave of 1378 to be invalid. A new pope,Pope Martin V, was elected in 1417; other claimants to succeed to Avignon line (though not resident at Avignon) continued until c. 1437.
The period has been called the "Babylonian captivity" of the popes. When and where this term originated is uncertain although it may have sprung fromPetrarch, who in a letter to a friend (1340–1353) written during his stay at Avignon, described Avignon of that time as the "Babylon of the west", referring to the worldly practices of the church hierarchy.[15] The nickname is polemical, in referring to the claim by critics that the prosperity of the church at that time was accompanied by a profound compromise of the papacy's spiritual integrity, especially in the alleged subordination of the powers of the Church to the ambitions of the French kings. As noted, the "captivity" of the popes at Avignon lasted about the same amount of time as the exile of the Jews in Babylon, making the analogy convenient and rhetorically potent. The Avignon papacy has been and is often today depicted as being totally dependent on the French kings, and sometimes as even being treacherous to its spiritual role and its heritage in Rome.
Almost a century and a half later, Protestant reformerMartin Luther wrote his treatiseOn the Babylonian Captivity of the Church (1520), but he claimed it had nothing to do with the Western Schism or papacy in Avignon.
The relationship between the papacy and France changed drastically over the course of the 14th century. Starting with open conflict betweenPope Boniface VIII and King Philip IV of France, it turned to cooperation from 1305 to 1342, and finally to a papacy under strong influence by the French throne up to 1378. Such partisanship of the papacy was one of the reasons for the dropping esteem for the institution, which in turn was one of the reasons for theschism from 1378 to 1417.
In the period of the Schism, the power struggle in the papacy became a battlefield of the major powers, with France supporting the antipopes inAvignon and England supporting the popes inRome. At the end of the century, still in the state of schism, the papacy had lost most of its direct political power, and thenation states of France and England were established as two of the main powers in Europe.
^The Avignon Papacy, P.N.R. Zutshi,The New Cambridge Medieval History: c. 1300 – c. 1415, Vol. VI, Ed. Michael Jones, (Cambridge University Press, 2000), 653.
^Adrian Hastings, Alistair Mason and Hugh S. Pyper,The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought, (Oxford University Press, 2000), 227.
^Joseph F. Kelly,The Ecumenical Councils of the Catholic Church: A History, (Liturgical Press, 2009), 104.
^Eamon Duffy,Saints & Sinners: A History of the Popes, (Yale University Press, 1997), 165.
^The History of the Council of Constance, page 403, Stephen Whatley, Jacques Lenfant, published by A. Bettesworth, 1730.
^P. M. Jones,Reform and Revolution in France: The Politics of Transition, 1774–1791, (Cambridge University Press, 1995), 13.
^A. Theiner (ed.),Caesaris Baronii Annales Ecclesiastici Tomus 23 (Bar-le-Duc 1871), under year 1296, §17, pp. 188–189; under year 1300, §26, pp. 272–273; under year 1303, §33, pp. 325–326.
^François Guizot and Mme. Guizot de Witt,History of France from the Earliest Times to 1848 Volume I (New York 1885), p. 474.
^Foxe, John (1576).The Acts and Monuments (1576 ed.). The Digital Humanities Institute. pp. Book 4. Retrieved23 October 2024.
^Williams, George L. (2004).Papal Genealogy: The Families and Descendants of the Popes. McFarland. pp. 41–43.ISBN0786420715.
^Avignon Papacy, Thomas M. Izbicki,Medieval France: An Encyclopedia, ed. William Kibler, (Routledge, 1995), 89.
^Joëlle Rollo-Koster,Raiding Saint Peter: Empty Sees, Violence, and the Initiation of the Great Western Schism (1378), (Brill, 2008), 182.
^Margaret Harvey,The English in Rome, 1362–1420: Portrait of an Expatriate Community, (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 3.
Beattie, Blake (2025), "The Avignon Papacy and the Great Western Schism", The Cambridge History of the Papacy: Volume 1: The Two Swords, Cambridge University Press, pp. 269–298.
Ladurie, E. le Roi.Montaillou, Catholics and Cathars in a French Village, 1294–1324, trans. B. Bray, 1978. Also published asMontaillou: The Promised Land of Error.
Read, P. P.,The Templars, Phoenix Press. Chapter 17, "The Temple Destroyed"
Vale, M., "The Civilization of Courts and Cities in the North, 1200–1500". In:Holmes, G. (ed.)The Oxford History of Medieval Europe, Oxford University Press, 1988.
Voltaire, F-M, "Essai sur les mœurs et l'esprit des nations et sur les principaux faits de l'histoire depuis Charlemagne jusqu'à Louis XIII". (English: "Essay on the manners and spirit of nations and on the principal facts of history from Charlemagne to Louis XIII") Vol I, T XI, Chap LXV; edited by René Pomeau (1990) in 2 Volumes (Garnier frères, Paris)OCLC70306666
Zutschi, P. N. R., "The Avignon Papacy". In: Jones, M. (ed.),The New Cambridge Medieval History. Volume VI c.1300–c.1415, pp. 653–673, 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.