Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Austro-Hungarian Navy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromAustrian Navy)
Branch of the military of Austria-Hungary
Not to be confused with theKriegsmarine (1935–1945) of Nazi Germany.
Austro-Hungarian Navy
  • Kaiserliche und königliche Kriegsmarine (German)
  • Császári és Királyi Haditengerészet (Hungarian)
Coat of arms of the Austro-Hungarian Navy
Active
  • 1786–1867 (as the Austrian Navy)
  • 1867–1918 (as the Austro-Hungarian Navy)
Country
TypeNavy
RoleDefence of Austria-Hungary's naval interests, its merchant marine, and its coastline
Size
Part ofAustro-Hungarian Armed Forces
Garrison/HQThe Naval Section of the War Ministry
Nickname(s)"Trieste Navy" (18th century)[1]
Motto(s)Indivisibiliter ac Inseparabiliter (Latin:Indivisibly and Inseparably)
Engagements
Commanders
Holy Roman Emperor (1786–1804)
Emperor of Austria (1804–1867)
Emperor of Austria andKing of Hungary (1867–1918)
Commander-in-Chief of the Navy (German:Oberkommandant der Marine)
Commander-in-Chief of the Fleet (German:Flottenkommandant)
  • Anton Haus (July 1914 – February 1917)
  • Maximilian Njegovan (February 1917 – February 1918)
  • Miklós Horthy (February 1918 – November 1918)
Chief of the Naval Section of the War Ministry (German:Chef der Marinesektion)
  • Ludwig von Fautz (March 1865 – April 1868)
  • Wilhelm von Tegetthoff (March 1868 – April 1871)
  • Friedrich von Pöck (October 1872 – November 1883)
  • Maximilian Daublebsky von Sterneck (November 1883 – December 1897)
  • Hermann von Spaun (December 1897 – October 1904)
  • Rudolf Montecuccoli (October 1904 – February 1913)
  • Anton Haus (February 1913 – February 1917)
  • Karl Kailer von Kaltenfels (February 1917 – April 1917)
  • Maximilian Njegovan (April 1917 – February 1918)
  • Franz von Holub (February 1918 – November 1918)
Insignia
Naval ensign: 1786–1915
Military unit
The Naval Section of the War Ministry Headquarters

TheAustro-Hungarian Navy orImperial and Royal War Navy (German:kaiserliche und königliche Kriegsmarine, in shortk.u.k. Kriegsmarine,Hungarian:Császári és Királyi Haditengerészet) was thenaval force ofAustria-Hungary. Ships of the Austro-Hungarian Navy were designatedSMS, forSeiner Majestät Schiff (His Majesty's Ship). The k.u.k. Kriegsmarine came into being after the formation of Austria-Hungary in 1867, and ceased to exist in 1918 upon the Empire's defeat and subsequent collapse at the end ofWorld War I.

Before 1867, theImperial Austrian Navy or simply theAustrian Navy, saw action in theFrench Revolutionary Wars, theNapoleonic Wars, theAustrian expedition against Morocco (1829), theSecond Egyptian–Ottoman War, theFirst andSecondWars of Italian Independence, theSecond Schleswig War, and theThird War of Italian Independence. Following Austria's defeat by Prussia and Italy during theSeven Weeks' War, the Austrian Empirereformed itself into the dual monarchy of Austria-Hungary, and the navy also became the Austro-Hungarian Navy. Largely neglected by the Empire in its early years, the k.u.k. Kriegsmarine expanded along with Austro-Hungarian industrialization into one of the largest navies in theAdriatic andMediterranean Seas. By 1914, the k.u.k. Kriegsmarine had a peacetime strength of 20,000 personnel, seeing action in theBoxer Rebellion and other conflicts before World War I.

During most ofWorld War I, the Allied Powers maintained theOtranto Barrage to bottle up the k.u.k. Kriegsmarine in theAdriatic Sea. Largely tasked with defending the Empire's 1,130nautical miles (2,090 km; 1,300 mi) of coastline and 2,172.4nautical miles (4,023.3 km; 2,500.0 mi) of island seaboard, the Navy chose to rely on itsU-boats to attack Allied shipping rather than risk the destruction of itsbattleships,cruisers and other surface vessels. In June 1918, it attempted to break the Otranto Barrage with a large naval fleet, but the attack was called off after the battleshipSzent István was sunk by an Italian torpedo boat on 10 June.

Five months later, with the Austro-Hungarian Empire facing collapse and defeat in the war, the Empire decided to transfer most of its navy to the newly declaredState of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs on 31 October, effectively bringing the k.u.k. Kriegsmarine to an end. Three days later, the Empire's military authorities signed theArmistice of Villa Giusti, pulling the rapidly disintegrating empire out of the war. With the signing of theTreaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye and theTreaty of Trianon, Austria and Hungary became landlocked, and the Empire's most important ports ofTrieste,Pola,Fiume andRagusa became part ofItaly and Yugoslavia. The k.u.k. Kriegsmarine's main ships were turned over to the Allies, who scrapped most of them in the 1920s during the era of naval disarmament.

History

[edit]

Origins

[edit]
An overview of Adriatic ports today

The k.u.k. Kriegsmarine was not formally established until the 18th century, but its origins can be traced back to 1382, with the incorporation of Trieste into theDuchy of Austria. During the 13th and 14th centuries, Trieste became a maritime trade rival to theRepublic of Venice, which occupied the Adriatic port city for intermittent periods between 1283 and 1372. Under the terms of thePeace of Turin in 1381, Venice renounced its claim to Trieste and the leading citizens of Trieste petitionedLeopold III, Duke of Austria, to make the port part of his domains. The agreement incorporating Trieste into the Duchy of Austria was signed at thecastle of Graz on 30 September 1382.[2][3]

While Austria had a port with the incorporation of Trieste, the city was granted a large degree of autonomy and successive Dukes of Austria paid little attention to the port or the idea of deploying a navy to protect it. Until the end of the 18th century, there were only limited attempts to establish an Austrian navy.[3] During theThirty Years War,GeneralissimoAlbrecht von Wallenstein was awarded the Duchies ofMecklenburg-Schwerin andMecklenburg-Güstrow as well as given the title "Admiral of the North and Baltic Seas" byHoly Roman EmperorFerdinand II in 1628 after scoring several military victories againstDenmark–Norway in northern Germany.[4] However, Wallenstein failed to captureStralsund, which resisted theCapitulation of Franzburg and thesubsequent siege with assistance of Danish, Scottish andSwedish troops, a blow that denied him access to the Baltic and the chance of challenging the naval power of theScandinavian kingdoms and of theNetherlands.[5] Wallenstein's assassination at the hands of his own officers in 1634 prevented the development of any Austrian navy in either theNorth orBaltic Seas.[3]

The next incursion Austria took into naval affairs occurred on theDanube River rather than at sea. During theGreat Turkish War,Prince Eugene of Savoy employed a small flotilla of ships along the Danube to fight the Ottoman Empire, a practice which theHouse of Habsburg had employed previously during the 16th and 17th centuries to fight duringAustria's numerous wars with the Ottomans. These river flotillas were largely manned by crews who came from Austria's coastal ports, and played a significant role in transporting troops across the Danube as well as denying Turkish control over the strategically important river.[3] Significant portion of the Danube flotila were made up by SerbŠajkaši.

Austria remained without a proper seagoing navy, however, even after the need for one became apparent with theFrench Navy bombardment of the port of Trieste during theWar of Spanish Succession. Lacking any sea power, Austria was unable to protect its coastal cities or project power into the Adriatic or Mediterranean Seas.[3] The war ended with the treaties ofUtrecht,Rastatt, andBaden. Under the terms of the Treaty of Rastatt, Austria gained theSpanish Netherlands, theKingdom of Naples, theKingdom of Sicily, theKingdom of Sardinia, and theDuchy of Milan.[6] While Austria's control over Sardinia and Naples was cut short by their loss to Spain in 1734 during theWar of Polish Succession,[7] these territories as well as the newAustrian Netherlands gave Austria greater access to the sea than ever before.[8]

Following the War of Spanish Succession, Austria once again developed interest in establishing a proper navy in order to protect its now numerous coastal possessions. This coincided with the majority of European nations' growing interest inmercantilism, the founding and development ofcolonies, and the chartering of overseas trading companies during the early 18th century. Austria's largest obstacle in engaging in overseas trade and naval enterprises however lay in the country's geography. Despite Austria having a lengthy coastline along the Adriatic Sea, the major ports it possessed along its main coastline were isolated fromVienna by the largeAustrian Alps. Furthermore, there were no major rivers linking Austria's Adriatic ports to the interior of the country. Austria also enjoyed three major navigable rivers which flowed through the country, theElbe, theOder, and the Danube. However, the Elbe and the Oder flowed through theKingdom of Prussia before emptying into the North and Baltic Sea respectively, while the mouth of the Danube lay within the territory of the Ottoman Empire. Both of these nations remained major rivals of Austria throughout the 18th century, preventing the Austrians from using its major rivers to gain access to the sea.[9]

The Ostend Company

[edit]
Main article:Ostend Company

Following the War of Spanish Succession, Austria's greatest outlet to the sea lay in the newly acquired Austrian Netherlands. While non-contiguous with the rest of Austria, the Austrian Netherlands lay within the boundaries of the Habsburg-dominatedHoly Roman Empire. The territory also possessed numerous ports with easy access to theAtlantic Ocean, such asGhent,Antwerp,Bruges andOstend. However, the economy of the Austrian Netherlands was very disconnected from the rest of Austria, and most Habsburg rulers paid little attention to the province.[9] Even Prince Eugene of Savoy, upon being appointed Governor-General of the Austrian Netherlands in June 1716, chose to remain in Vienna and direct policy through his chosen representative,Hercule-Louis Turinetti, marquis of Prié.[10]

The success of theDutch,British andFrench East India Companies throughout the 17th and early 18th centuries however led the merchants and shipowners of Ostend to want to establish direct commercial relations with theEast Indies.[11] In December 1722, Charles VI granted a 30-year charter to theOstend Company to conduct trade with the East andWest Indies, as well asAfrica.[12] The Ostend Company proved to be immensely profitable, and between 1724 and 1732, 21 company vessels were sent out to conduct trade in theCaribbean, Africa, and especiallyAsia. The most profitable voyages of the Ostend Company were toCanton, as rising tea prices resulted in high profits for ships conducting trade withChina. Between 1719 and 1728, the Ostend Company transported 7 million pounds of tea fromChina, roughly half of the total amount brought to western Europe at the time, placing the company on par in the tea trade with theEast India Company.[13] The Ostend Company proved to be short lived however, as Charles VI suspended the charter of the company due to British diplomatic requests following theTreaty of Vienna, with the company ceasing operations in 1731.[13][12]

Charles VI and Maria Theresa

[edit]
Main article:Austrian East India Company

Believing that "Navigation and commerce are the foremost pillars of the state,"[9] Holy Roman EmperorCharles VI engaged in other projects beyond the establishment of the Ostend Company in order to increase Austria's merchant marine and establish a proper navy to protect it. This included constructing a new road through theSemmering Pass in order to link Vienna to Trieste, and declaring Trieste andFiumefree ports in 1719.[9] In order to help protect Austrian merchants from piracy in the Adriatic and Mediterranean, Charles VI purchased the 80-gunship of the lineCumberland from Britain in 1720. The ship was renamedSan Carlos and stationed out ofNaples before being decommissioned and broken up in 1733.[14]

On the Adriatic, Charles VI constructed even more ships, usually employing Italian and Spanish officers to man them. This Adriatic fleet consisted of three ships of the line, one frigate, and severalgalleys. In total, this Adriatic fleet had 500 guns and a crew of 8,000 men. Following the end of the Ostend Company however, a committee was set up in 1738 by the Emperor to examine the status of Austria's Adriatic fleet. Its report concluded that the fleet "had little usefulness, caused great expense, and stood in danger of being defeated in case of attack".[12] This report eventually led to Charles VI scrapping his Adriatic fleet and transferring most of officers and crew members to Austria's Danube Flotilla.[12]

Upon the death of Charles VI on 19 October 1740,Saxony,Prussia,Bavaria, andFrance all repudiated the Pragmatic Sanction of 1713 which had paved the way for Charles' daughterMaria Theresa to succeed him.[15]Frederick II of Prussia almost immediately invaded Austria in December 1740 and took the affluent Habsburg province ofSilesia in the seven-year conflict known as theWar of the Austrian Succession.[16] This conflict proved to be primarily a land-based war for Austria, which led to naval affairs being neglected by the newly crowned Maria Theresa, who spent the entirety of the war preoccupied with securing her inheritance of the throne of Austria as opposed to rebuilding her father's former fleet in the Adriatic.[12]

By the time theSeven Years' War began in 1756, Austria still lacked a proper navy. Enemypirates andprivateers, as well asBarbary corsairs severely hampered Austria's merchant marine, to the point that most of Austria's sea trade had to be conducted in foreign ships. The lack of any naval force to protect Austria's shipping ledCount Kaunitz to push for the creation of a small force offrigates to protect the Adriatic Sea. However, the Seven Years' War forced Vienna to pay much more attention to Austria's land border with Prussia and its coastline along the Adriatic Sea, preventing Kaunitz's program from achieving success.[12]

In 1775, another attempt to formulate an overseas trading company was undertaken with the establishment of theAustrian East India Company. Headed byWilliam Bolts, the company's first voyage to India began on 24 September 1776 with Bolts sailing aboard theIndiamanGiuseppe e Teresa fromLivorno in theGrand Duchy of Tuscany, which was ruled by Maria Theresa's sonLeopold. Bolts was also granted a 10-year charter to trade under the flag of the Holy Roman Empire with Persia, India, China and Africa.[17]

The Austrian East India Company marked thefirst attempt by Austria to establish overseas colonies. Within the next two years, Bolts establishedfactories on theMalabar Coast, on the southeastern African coast atDelagoa Bay, and at theNicobar Islands.[12] These ventures ultimately failed however due to pressure from other colonial powers such as Portugal and Denmark-Norway, both of which forcefully evicted Bolts and his colonists from Africa and the Bay of Bengal respectively. Furthermore, the Austrian government did not wish to provoke other foreign powers after having to fight two major continental wars in the span of just 20 years. Vienna was also unwilling to lend much monetary support to either the company or towards the creation of a navy sufficiently large enough to protect its interests. This was partially because the Austrian government expected the ports of Trieste and Fiume to bear the cost of constructing and maintaining a fleet.[12]

Establishment of the Austrian Navy

[edit]
The Ships of the Line Laharpe, Stengel and Beyrand byAlexander Kircher, depicting three Austrian ships of the line after their capture at Ancona

The Austrian Navy was finally established in 1786, withEmperor Joseph II purchasing twocutters in Ostend, each armed with 20 guns, and sending them to Trieste. Joseph II also introduced Austria'sNaval Ensign, which consisted of a red-white-red standard with the crown of theArchduchy of Austria on the left. Prior to this, Austrian ships flew the yellow and blackflag of the Habsburg Monarchy. Joseph II'sMarineflagge remained the naval ensign of Austria, and later Austria-Hungary, until the middle of World War I.[18]

The onset of theFrench Revolution in 1789 and the subsequentFrench Revolutionary Wars greatly changed the political face of Europe and resulted in the largest expansion of the Austrian Navy up to that point in time. Under Joseph II's successor,Leopold II, the Austrian Navy was formally located out of the port of Trieste. In 1797 with theTreaty of Campo Formio between France and Austria which ended theWar of the First Coalition, Austria ceded to France the Austrian Netherlands and certain islands in the Mediterranean, includingCorfu and the otherIonian Islands. The Republic of Venice and its territories were divided between the two states, and Austria received the city ofVenice along withIstria andDalmatia.Venice's naval forces and facilities were also handed over to Austria and became the basis of the formation of the future Austrian Navy.[1]

The Treaty of Campo Formio resulted in Austria becoming the largest, and indeed the only, naval power in the Adriatic. Prior to the incorporation of the remnants of the Venetian navy, the Austrian Navy only consisted of the two cutters purchased in 1786, as well as several armed merchant vessels and gunboats. While Venice had suffered under French occupation, the ships Austria acquired from the city's annexation still allowed the Austrian Navy to grow to some 37 vessels by the start of theWar of the Second Coalition in 1799. These ships mostly consisted of small coastal craft, with some 111 guns and 787 crew members between them. This still remained a very small naval force, which with an average of just three guns and 21 crew members per ship, was largely unable to project power outside of the Adriatic or protect Austrian shipping in the Mediterranean. When theAustrian Army tookAncona in 1799, three former Venetian ships of the line,Laharpe,Stengel andBeyrand, were seized by the Austrians. Despite having 74 guns per ship, far more than any other vessels in the Adriatic, the Austrian government chose to sell the ships for breaking rather than incorporate them into the Navy.[19]

At the end of the 18th century, several new regulations were also imposed regarding naval activity. These included instructing officers to refrain from excessive shouting when giving sailing commands, directing the captains of each ship in the navy not to conduct business transactions on their own behalf, and ordering surgeons tofumigate their ships several times a day in order to prevent the outbreak of any disease. The most notable regulation imposed directed naval officers to learn German. At the time, most Austrian naval officers were Italian or Spanish, and Italian remained the main language of the officer corps until 1848. This policy change however reflected Austria's desire to re-order its multi-ethnic Empire more towards theGerman states of the Holy Roman Empire.[20]

The Napoleonic Wars

[edit]
The Austrian Empire following the Treaty of Schönbrunn, which left Austria landlocked and without a navy

On 17 March 1802,Archduke Charles of Austria, acting in his role as "Inspector General of the Navy", ordered the formation of the "Imperial and Royal Naval Cadet School" in Venice (German:k.u.k. Marine-Kadettenschule).[21] This school eventually moved toTrieste in 1848 and changed its name to "Imperial and Royal Naval Academy" (German:k.u.k. Marine-Akademie).[22]

Austria again fought against France during theSecond andThird Coalitions, when after meeting a crushing defeat atAusterlitz, Holy Roman EmperorFrancis II had to agree to theTreaty of Pressburg, weakening theAustrian Empire and reorganizing Germany under a Napoleonic imprint known as theConfederation of the Rhine.

Believing his position as Holy Roman Emperor to be untenable, Francis abdicated the throne of the Holy Roman Empire on 6 August 1806, anddeclared the Holy Roman Empire to be dissolved in the same declaration. This was a political move to impair the legitimacy of the Confederation of the Rhine. Two years earlier, as a reaction toNapoleon making himself anEmperor of the French, Francis hadraised Austria to the status of an empire. Hence, after 1806, he reigned as Francis I, Emperor of Austria.[23] This move meant that the naval forces under the banner of the Holy Roman Empire were now reconstituted as solely being a part of the Austrian Navy.[24]

Three years later Austria again declared war on France, beginning theWar of the Fifth Coalition. Following Austria's defeat at theBattle of Wagram, the Empire sued for peace. The resultingTreaty of Schönbrunn imposed harsh terms on Austria. Austria had to hand over theDuchy of Salzburg to theKingdom of Bavaria and lost its access to theAdriatic Sea by ceding theLittoral territories ofGorizia and Gradisca and theImperial Free City of Trieste, together withCarniola, theMarch of Istria, westernCarinthia withEast Tyrol, and theCroatian lands southwest of the riverSava to the French Empire.West Galicia was ceded to theDuchy of Warsaw, andTarnopol was given to theRussian Empire. These terms eliminated Austria's coastline along the Adriatic, thus destroying the Austrian Navy, with its warships being handed over to the French to guard the newly formed theIllyrian provinces. Between 1809 and 1814, there was no Austrian coastline and subsequently no navy to defend it.[24]

Modernising the Navy

[edit]
The Austrian frigatesAugusta andAustria in the port of Trieste prior to the voyage of Maria Leopoldina to Brazil

Following theCongress of Vienna and the 1815Treaty of Paris, Austria's coastline was restored. Under the conditions of the Congress of Vienna, the former Austrian Netherlands were transferred to the newly createdUnited Kingdom of the Netherlands, while Austria receivedLombardy-Venetia as compensation. These territorial changes gave Austria five ships of the line, two frigates, onecorvette, and several smaller ships which had been left in Venice by the French during the Napoleonic Wars. The decades of warfare Austria had participated in since 1789 however had left the Empire on the verge of bankruptcy, and most of these ships were sold or abandoned for financial reasons.[24]

By the end of the decade however, the Austrian Navy began to be rebuilt. The growth of the Austrian Navy in the years following the Congress of Vienna were largely driven by political necessities, as well economic conditions. The marriage between ArchduchessMaria Leopoldina and EmperorPedro I of Brazil in 1817 marked the first time a ship from the Austrian Navy crossed theAtlantic Ocean to the Americas, with the Archduchess traveling with the frigatesAugusta andAustria toRio de Janeiro.[24] Three years later, the frigateCarolina escorted Austria's ambassador to Brazil across the Atlantic, before sailing on to China, marking the first time a ship from the Austrian Navy had traveled toEast Asia. During the 1820s and early 1830s, Austrian trade along the Danube and within the Mediterranean grew rapidly. In 1830, the Austrian Danube Steam Navigation Company was founded and in 1834, itssteamshipMarie Dorothee became the first of its kind to travel the Mediterranean on a voyage between Trieste and Constantinople. In 1836, theAustrian Lloyd (German:Österreichischer Lloyd) was established. While Austria's merchant marine grew throughout the 1820s and 1830s, the Austrian Navy grew alongside it in order to provide protection on the high seas.[25]

Archduke Friedrich Leopold became the youngest Commander-in-Chief of the Austrian Navy in history when he was appointed to the office at the age of 23.

During theGreek War of Independence, the Austrian Navy engaged Greek pirates who routinely attempted to attack Austrian shipping in order to help fund the Greek rebellion against Ottoman rule. During the same time period, Barbary corsairs continued to prey upon Austrian shipping in the Western Mediterranean. These two threats greatly stretched the resources of Austria's naval forces, which were still rebuilding after the Napoleonic Wars.[26] In 1829, two Austrian corvettes, abrig, and aschooner under Lieutenant Commander (German:Korvettenkapitän) Franz Bandiera sailed Morocco's Atlantic coast to obtain the release of an Austrian merchant ship which had been captured by pirates.[27] While the mission resulted in the return of the ship's crew, the Moroccans refused to return the ship, resulting in the Austrian bombardment ofLarache. This action resulted in Morocco returning the captured Austrian ship, as well as pay damages to Vienna. The bombardment of Larache resulted in the end of North African pirates raiding Austrian shipping in the Mediterranean Sea.[26]

By the 1830s, an attempt to modernize the Navy had begun. The Austrian government granted new funding for the construction of additional ships and the purchasing of new equipment. The most notable change which was undertaken was the incorporation of steamships, with the first such ship in the Austrian Navy, the 500-tonne (492-long-ton)paddle steamerMaria Anna, being constructed in Fiume.Maria Anna's first trials took place in 1836.[28] In 1837,Archduke Friedrich Leopold enlisted into the Navy at the age of 16. The third son of Archduke Charles, a famous veteran of the Napoleonic Wars, Friedrich's decision to join the Navy greatly enhanced its prestige among the Austrian nobility and public, and he pursued a career enthusiastically, commanding a ship sailing to the Orient by 1839. During his time in the Navy, Friedrich introduced many modernizing reforms, aiming to make the Austrian Navy less "Venetian" in character and more "Austrian".[29]

Oriental Crisis of 1840

[edit]
Main article:Oriental Crisis of 1840

Friedrich and the Austrian Navy had their first major military encounter during theOriental Crisis of 1840. After his victory over theOttoman Empire during theFirst Egyptian-Ottoman War,Muhammad Ali of Egypt conquered large parts ofSyria. In 1839, the Ottomans attempted to reclaim these territories but after a decisive defeat at theBattle of Nezib, the Ottoman Empire appeared on the verge of collapse.[30] Through theConvention of London, the United Kingdom, Austria, Prussia, and Russia intervened to save the Ottoman Empire. The Convention offered Muhammad Ali hereditary rule of Egypt while nominally remaining part of the Ottoman Empire if he withdrew from most of Syria. Muhammad Ali hesitated to accept the offer however and in September 1840 the European powers moved to engage Muhammad Ali's forces.

The British and Austrian navies subsequently blockaded theNile Delta and bombardedBeirut on 11 September 1840. On 26 September, Friedrich, commanding the Austrian frigateGuerriera, bombarded the port ofSidon with British support. The Austrians and British landed in the city and stormed its coastal fortifications, capturing it on 28 September. After capturing Sidon, Austria's naval squadron sailed on toAcre which bombarded the city in November, destroying its coastal fortifications and silencing the city's guns. During the storming of the city, Friedrich personally led the Austro-British landing party and hoisted the Ottoman, British, and Austrian flags over the Acre's citadel upon its capture.[31] For his leadership during the campaign, Archduke Friedrich was awarded theKnight of the Military Order of Maria Theresa. In 1844, Archduke Friedrich was promoted to the rank ofVice-Admiral and become Commander-in-Chief of the Navy at the age of 23, but his tenure as the head of the Austrian Navy ended just three years after his appointment when he died in Venice at the age of 26.[32]

Revolutions of 1848

[edit]
Main article:Revolutions of 1848 in the Austrian Empire
Map of Europe in 1848–1849 depicting the main revolutionary centers, important counter-revolutionary troop movements and states with abdications

After a successfulrevolution in France in February 1848 toppled KingLouis Philippe I and established aSecond French Republic,revolutionary fervor broke out across Europe. In Vienna,Austrian ChancellorKlemens von Metternich resigned his post and went into exile to London while EmperorFerdinand I was forced to abdicate the throne in favor of his nephew, Franz Joseph. Across the Austrian Empire,nationalist sentiments among Austria's various ethnic groups led to therevolutions in Austria to take several different forms. Liberal sentiments prevailed extensively among the German Austrians, which were further complicated by thesimultaneous events in the German states. The Hungarians within the Empire largely sought to establish their own independent kingdom or republic, which resulted in arevolution in Hungary. Competing national ideas in the South Hungary saw combat in theŠajkaška region, primarily populated by Serbs who served in the Danube flotila.Italians within the Austrian Empire likewise sought to unify with the other Italian-speaking states of the Italian Peninsula to form a "Kingdom of Italy".[33]

The revolution in Vienna sparked anti-Habsburg riots in Milan and Venice. Field Marshal Joseph Radetzky was unable to defeat theVenetian andMilanese insurgents in Lombardy-Venetia, and had to order his forces to evacuate western Italy, pulling his forces back to a chain of defensive fortresses between Milan and Venice known as theQuadrilatero. WithVienna itself in the middle of an uprising against the Habsburg Monarchy, the Austrian Empire appeared on the brink of collapse. On 23 March 1848, just one day after Radetzky was forced to retreat from Milan, The Kingdom of Sardinia declared war on the Austrian Empire, sparking theFirst Italian War of Independence.[34]

First War of Italian Independence

[edit]
Main article:Naval operations of the First Italian War of Independence
Blockade of Venice by Alexander Kircher, depicting the Austrian Navy blockading the revolutionaryRepublic of San Marco in 1849

Venice was at the time one of Austria's largest and most important ports, and the revolution which began there nearly led to the disintegration of the Austrian Navy. The Austrian commander of the Venetian Naval Yard was beaten to death by his own men, while the head of the city's Marine Guard was unable to provide any aid to suppress the uprising as most of the men under his command deserted. Vice-Admiral Anton von Martini, Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, attempted to put an end to the rebellion but was betrayed by his officers, the majority of whom were Venetians, and subsequently captured and held prisoner.[35] By the end of March, the Austrian troops in Venice were forced from the city and the Austrian Navy appeared to be collapsing as many of the Austrian sailors and officers were of Italian descent. Fearing mutinies, Austrian officers ultimately relieved these Italian sailors of their duty and permitted them to return home. While this action left the Navy drastically undermanned, it prevented any wide-scale disintegration within the Navy which the Austrian Army had repeatedly suffered from in Italy.[35]

The loss of so many Italian crew members and officers meant that the remaining ships which did not fall into rebel hands in Venice were lacking many crews. Out of roughly 5,000 men who were members of the Austrian Navy prior to the revolution, only 72 officers and 665 sailors remained. Further complicating matters for the Austrian Navy was the loss of Venice's naval dockyards, warehouses, its arsenal, as well as three corvettes and several smaller vessels to the Venetian rebels.[35] The loss of Vice-Admiral Martini was also a blow to Austrians, as the Navy had gone through no less than four Commanders-in-Chief within three months of the death of Archduke Friedrich in late 1847. Martini's capture left the Navy without a commander for the fifth time in as many months.[35] In the aftermath of the loss of Venice, the Austrian Navy reorganized itself under the temporary command of General CountFranz Gyulai. Gyulai recalled every Austrian ship in the Mediterranean, the Adriatic, and in the Levant. Due to Trieste's close location to the parts of Italy revolting against Austrian rule at the time, Gyulai also chose the small port of Pola as the new base for the Austrian Navy. This marked the first time the city had been used as an Austrian naval base, and from 1848 onwards the city continued to serve as a base for Austrian warships until the end of World War I.[36] In late April, this fleet began a blockade of Venice in order to assist Austria's army currently fighting the Italian nationalists who had seized the city.[37]

Meanwhile, fortunes continued to fade for the Austrians. ThePapal States and theKingdom of the Two Sicilies both joined the war on the side of Sardinia,[38][39] the latter sending a naval force into the Adriatic in cooperation with Sardinia to help seize Venice. This Italian fleet consisted of five frigates and several smaller vessels acquired by the Italian nationalists in Venice. Against this force, the Austrian Navy counted three frigates of 44 to 50 guns, two corvettes of 18 and 20 guns, eight brigs of six to 16 guns, 34 gunboats with three guns each, and two steamers of two guns. Despite its relatively large size for navies in the Adriatic, the Austrian Navy lacked experience against the combined Italian forces and Gyulai decided to withdraw his ships to Pola.[37] After the Austrians moved back to Trieste due to the fact that Pola's small and undeveloped dockyards could not handle the size of the Austrian fleet, a stalemate ensued in the Adriatic. The Austrian fleet was too small to go on the offensive against the Italians, while the Italian naval commander, Rear Admiral Giovanbattista Albini, was under orders not to attack the port of Trieste as its location within theGerman Confederation may draw in other powers incentral Europe against Sardinia.[40] Austrian efforts to purchase additional warships from the United Kingdom, Russia, the Ottoman Empire, and from Egypt, all ended in failure as the funds to purchase the ships were instead used to fight Austria's many land battles with Hungarian and Italian nationalists, as well as the war with Sardinia. Early experimentation on the use of a self-propelled explosive device—forerunner to the torpedo—to attack the Italian ships also failure due to the technological constraints of the time. Additional proposals to break the Italian fleet by usingfire ships was rejected as an "inhumane" way of fighting.[41][note 1]

Venice under Austrian bombardment, 1849

The stalemate in the Adriatic came to an end as the Papal States and the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies pulled out of the war.[38][39] Austrian reinforcements bolstered Radetzky's forces in the Italian peninsula and following theBattle of Custoza in July 1848, the tide of the war turned in Austria's favor.[42] On 9 August, an armistice was signed between Sardinia and Austria, and a month later, Admiral Martini was released in a prisoner exchange and returned as head of the Navy. While Martini unsuccessfully lobbied for the purchase of new steam ships to re-establish a blockade of Venice, Sardinia resumed the war with Austria on 12 March 1849. This led to the disastrous Sardinian defeat at theBattle of Novara ten days later. The decisive defeat forced KingCharles Albert of Sardinia to abdicate the throne of Sardinia in favor of his son Victor Emmanuel II and brought the First War of Italian Independence to an end in August 1849.[43] Venice was the last Italian nationalist holdout to fall on 27 August 1849.[44][note 2]

Aftermath and effects on the Navy

[edit]

The Revolutions of 1848 marked a turning point in the history of the Austrian Navy. Up until that time, the Navy had been dominated by the Italian language, customs, and traditions. Prior to the revolution, the Austrian Navy was mostly made up of Italian crew members, the Italian language was the primary language, and even Italian ship names were used over German ones, such asLipsia rather thanLeipzig. Indeed, in the years before 1848, the Navy was largely considered to be a "local affair of Venice".[35] In the years after 1848, most of the navy's officers corps hailed from the German-speaking parts of the Empire, while most of the sailors came from Istria and the Dalmatian Coast, leading to Croats, Germans, and even Hungarians to begin to be represented among the ranks of the Austrian Navy.[35]

After retaking Venice, the Austrians acquired several warships which were under construction or already seaworthy. Most of these ships were added to the strength of the Austrian Navy, increasing the size and strength of the Navy considerably by the year 1850.[44] In Venice the naval shipyard was retained. Here the Austrian screw-driven gunboatKerka (crew: 100) was launched in 1860 (in service until 1908).

Naval strength of the Austrian Empire, January 1850[44]
TypeNumberGunsTonnage
Frigates432–421,200 tonnes (1,181 long tons)
Corvettes620800–900 tonnes (787–886 long tons)
Brigs716500 tonnes (492 long tons)
Miscellaneous sailing ships10
Steamers4

In the final months of the blockade of Venice, the Danish-bornHans Birch Dahlerup was appointed Commander-in-Chief of the Austrian Navy. Emperor Franz Joseph I selected Dahlerup due to his desire to replace Italian influence within the Navy. Dahlerup introduced many personal reforms, such as reorganizing the command structure of the Navy, establishing new service regulations, and setting up a school for naval officers. He also began the process of replacing Italian with German as the spoken de facto language of the Austrian Navy. However, Dahlerup's command style clashed heavily with the prevailing culture within the Austrian Navy and he resigned after just over two years.[45]

The Ferdinand Max era

[edit]
See also:Maximilian I of Mexico
Archduke Ferdinand Maximilian of Austria served as Commander-in-Chief of the Austrian Navy throughout the 1850s and early 1860s.

After a two-year interim period in which Lieutenant General CountFranz Wimpffen commanded the Navy, in September 1854 Emperor Franz Joseph I promoted his younger brother,Archduke Ferdinand Maximilian (commonly referred to as Ferdinand Max), to the rank of Rear Admiral and named him Commander-in-Chief of the Austrian Navy. At the age of 22, Ferdinand Max became the youngestOberkommandant in the history of the Austrian Navy, being a year younger than when Archduke Friedrich of Austria assumed command of the navy ten years earlier.[46]

Despite his age, the fact that he had only been in the Navy for four years, and his lack of experience in battle or command on the high seas, Ferdinand Max proved to be among the most effective and successful commanders of the Austrian Navy in history. He was described by Lawrence Sondhaus in his bookThe Habsburg Empire and the Sea: Austrian Naval Policy, 1797–1866 as "the most gifted leader the navy had ever had, or ever would have".[47] Anthony Sokol describes Ferdinand Max in his bookThe Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian Navy as "one of the most talented of the Habsburg princes...He used his prestige, youthful enthusiasm, and love of the Service to promote it in every way possible."[48]

Ferdinand Max worked hard to separate the Austrian Navy from its dependence upon the Austrian Army, which had nominal control over its affairs. On 14 January 1862, Franz Joseph I agreed to establish the Ministry of Marine, which oversaw the affairs of both the Austrian Navy, and the Austrian merchant marine, and named Count Matthias von Wickenburg its head. Under this new system, Ferdinand Max continued to be theOberkommandant, but he was no longer responsible for the political management of the fleet.[49] In addition to obtaining support for the creation of Ministry of Marine, Ferdinand Max was given great freedom by the Emperor to manage the navy as he saw fit, especially with respect to the construction and acquisition of new warships.[50]

Development of the Austrian Navy: 1854–1860

[edit]

Ferdinand Max immediately went to work expanding the Austrian Navy. Fears of over-dependence upon foreign shipyards to supply Austrian warships enabled him to convince his brother to authorize the construction of a new drydock atPola, and the expansion of existing shipyards in Trieste. Furthermore, Ferdinand Max initiated an ambitious construction program in the ports of Pola, Trieste, and Venice, the largest the Adriatic had seen since the Napoleonic Wars.[50] Pola in particular saw a considerable amount of attention as its natural harbor and strategic location along the Adriatic coastline of Austria enabled ships docked there to provide protection for Trieste as well as the Dalmatian Coast. While it had been used as a base for the Navy during the Revolutions of 1848, the small dockyards and port facilities, coupled with surrounding swampland had hindered its development. In addition to Pola's new drydock, Ferdinand Max had the swamps drained and constructed a new arsenal for the city.[48]

By 1855, a screw-powered ship-of-the-line was under construction in Pola after failed bids to construct the ship with British and American shipbuilding firms,[51] while two screw-frigates and two screw-corvettes were being built in Trieste and Venice respectively.[52] Within a year of Ferdinand Max's promotion toOberkommandant, the Austrian Navy consisted of four frigates, four corvettes, and two paddle steamers in active service in the Mediterranean Sea. Ferdinand Max followed up on this progress however by purchasing the steam frigateRadetzky from the United Kingdom in 1856. Her design was used for the construction of future ships of the Navy, and marked the beginning of Austria's modern shipbuilding industry. From 1856 onward, a majority of Austria's ships were constructed by domestic shipyards.[48] Ferdinand Max's next construction project was the last Austrian ship-of-the-line,Kaiser. She was commissioned into the Austrian Navy in 1859 after being constructed at the newly builtPola Navy Yard between 1855 and 1858.[53]

As a result of these construction projects, the Austrian Navy grew to its largest size since the War of Austrian Succession over 100 years prior. Despite these efforts however, the Navy was still considerably smaller than its French, British, or Sardinian counterparts.[54] Indeed, the Austrian Navy was still attempting to catch up to the technological developments which had emerged during the first half of the 19th century with respect to steam power, when the emergence of the French iron-platted floating batteryDévastation gained international attention following its use during theCrimean War in October 1855.Dévastation signalled the beginning of the emergence of ironclad warships over the course of the next decade.[55][56]

Indeed, the French Navy's technological and numerical edge proved to be decisive in driving the Austrian Navy to port shortly after the outbreak of theSecond War of Italian Independence.[57] After the failure of the First Italian War of Independence, Sardinia began the search for potential allies. Sardinian Prime MinisterCamillo Benso, Count of Cavour, foundFrench EmperorNapoleon III supportive of an alliance with Sardinia following the Crimean War, in which France and Sardinia were allies against the Russian Empire. After thePlombières Agreement of 1858,[58] Napoleon III and Cavour signed a secret treaty of alliance against Austria whereby France would assist Sardinia in return forNice andSavoy being ceded to France.[59] During the first half of 1859, the Franco-Sardinian forces quickly defeated the Austrians on land, culminating in theBattle of Solferino, while the French Navy blockaded the Adriatic Sea and forced the Austrian Navy to remain in port, preventing its use for the duration of the war.[60] After the defeat at Solferino, Austria ceded most of Lombardy and the city of Milan to France under theTreaty of Zürich, who transferred it to Sardinia in exchange for Savoy and Nice.[61][62]

In response to Austria's quick defeat during the Second War of Italian Independence, Ferdinand Max proposed an even larger naval construction program than the one he had initiated upon his appointment asOberkommandant. This fleet would be large enough not only to show the Austrian flag around the world, but also to protect its merchant marine as well as thwart any Adriatic ambitions from the growing Kingdom of Sardinia. However, constitutional reforms enacted in Austria after the defeat, as well as the recent introduction ofironclads into the navies of the world, made the proposal more expensive than he had initially intended.[63] While the Archduke had previously been given free rein over naval affairs, and had enjoyed an unprecedented allocation of new funds to complete his various expansion and modernization projects,[64] Austria's recent military defeats and financial difficulties in the immediate aftermath of the war stalled his plans for further construction projects.[63] Despite these obstacles, the initiation of the Italian ironclad program between 1860 and 1861, coupled with Austrian fears of an Italian invasion or seaborne landing directed against Venice, Trieste, Istria, and the Dalmatian Coast,[65][66] necessitated an Austrian naval response to counter the growing strength of the Italian Regia Marina.[67]

The Austro-Italian ironclad arms race

[edit]
Main article:Austro-Italian ironclad arms race
The Austrian ironcladDrache, lead ship of theDrache class. She and her sister shipSalamander were Austria's first ironclad warships and were intended to counter Italy's own ironclad program.

After the Second War of Italian Independence, Sardinia ordered two small ironclads from France in 1860.[68] While these ships were under construction, the Italian revolutionaryGiuseppe Garibaldi began his campaign to conquerSouthern Italy in the name of the Kingdom of Sardinia. He quicklytoppled theKingdom of the Two Sicilies, the largest state in the region in a matter of months.[69] On 17 March 1861,Victor Emmanuel II was proclaimedKing of Italy. With theunification of Italy, the various navies of the former Italian states were merged into a single military force, named theRegia Marina (Royal Navy).[70][71] By the time the twoFormidabile-class ironclads had been commissioned, they formed the firstbroadside ironclads of the Italian Regia Marina.[72]

Following up on these ships, Italy launched a substantial program to bolster the strength of the Regia Marina. The Italians believed that building a strong navy would play a crucial role in making the recently unified kingdom aGreat Power.[73] These actions captured the attention of theAustrian Empire, which viewed Italy with great suspicion and worry, asirredentist claims by Italiannationalists were directed at key Austrian territories such asVenice,Trentino, andTrieste.[74][75] In response to the growing strength of the Regia Marina, the Imperial Austrian Navy subsequently ordered twoDrache-class ironclads in 1860.[76] In the years immediately after the unification of Italy, Austria and Italy engaged in a navalarms race centered upon theconstruction and acquisition of ironclads. This arms race between the two nations continued for the rest of Ferdinand Max's tenure asOberkommandant.[77][78]

Novara Expedition

[edit]
Main article:SMS Novara (1850)

Archduke Ferdinand Maximilian also initiated a large-scale scientific expedition (1857–1859) during which thefrigateSMS Novara became the first Austrian warship tocircumnavigate the globe. The journey lasted 2 years and 3 months and was accomplished under the command of KommodoreBernhard von Wüllerstorf-Urbair, with 345 officers and crew, and 7 scientists aboard. The expedition was planned by theImperial Academy of Sciences in Vienna and aimed to gain new knowledge in the disciplines ofastronomy,botany,zoology,geology,oceanography andhydrography. SMSNovara sailed from Trieste on 30 April 1857, visitingGibraltar,Madeira,Rio de Janeiro,Cape Town,St. Paul Island,Ceylon,Madras,Nicobar Islands,Singapore,Batavia,Manila,Hong Kong,Shanghai,Puynipet Island,Stuarts,Sydney (5 November 1858),Auckland,Tahiti,Valparaiso andGravosa before returning to Trieste on 30 August 1859.

In 1863 theRoyal Navy's battleshipHMS Marlborough, the flagship of AdmiralCharles Fremantle, made a courtesy visit toPola, the main port of the Austro-Hungarian Navy.[79]

In April 1864 Archduke Ferdinand Maximilian stepped down as Commander-in-Chief of the Navy and accepted the throne ofMexico fromLouis Napoleon, becomingMaximilian I of Mexico. He traveled fromTrieste toVeracruz aboard the SMSNovara, escorted by thefrigates SMS Bellona (Austrian) andThémis (French), and the Imperial yachtPhantasie led the warship procession from his palace atSchloß Miramar out to sea.[80] When he was arrested and executed four years later, admiralWilhelm von Tegetthoff was sent aboard theNovara to take Ferdinand Maximilian's body back to Austria.

Second Schleswig War

[edit]

TheSecond Schleswig War was the 1864 invasion ofSchleswig-Holstein by Prussia and Austria. At that time, Theduchies were part of theKingdom of Denmark.Rear-AdmiralWilhelm von Tegetthoff commanded a small Austrian flotilla which traveled from theMediterranean Sea to theNorth Sea.

On May 9, 1864, Tegetthoff commanded the Austrian naval forces in thenaval action off Heligoland from his flagship, the screw-driven SMS Schwarzenberg.[79] The action was a tactical victory for the Danish forces. However, in strategic sense the Austro-Prussian fleet succeed breaking the Danish blockade. It was also the last significant naval action fought by squadrons of wooden ships and the last significant naval action involving Denmark.

Tegetthoff (centre) at the Battle of Lissa, painting byAnton Romako, 1880

Third Italian War of Independence

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Lissa (1866)
Screw-driven corvetteErzherzog Friedrich in 1868, a veteran of the Battle of Lissa

On 20 July 1866, near the island ofVis (Lissa) in theAdriatic, the Austrian fleet, under the command of Rear-Admiral Wilhelm von Tegetthoff, made its name in the modern era at theBattle of Lissa during theThird Italian War of Independence. The battle pitted Austrian naval forces against thenaval forces of the newly createdKingdom of Italy. It was a decisive victory for an outnumbered Austrian over a superior Italian force, and was the first major European sea battle involving ships using iron and steam, and one of the last to involve large wooden battleships and deliberate ramming.

Peacetime

[edit]

In 1873 the new sail and steam frigate SMS Laudon (crew 480) was added to the fleet, which took part in the International Naval Review offGruž in 1880.[79]

During peacetime, Austrian ships visited Asia, North America, South America, and thePacific Ocean.[81]

In 1869 Emperor Franz Joseph travelled on board the screw-driven corvette SMSViribus Unitis (not to be confused with the laterbattleship of the same name) to the opening of theSuez Canal. The ship had been named after his personal motto.[82]

Polar Expedition

[edit]
Main article:Austro-Hungarian North Pole Expedition

Austro-Hungarian ships and naval personnel were also involved inArctic exploration, discoveringFranz Josef Land during an expedition which lasted from 1872 to 1874.

Led by the naval officer Karl Weyprecht and the infantry officer and landscape artistJulius Payer, the custom-builtschoonerTegetthoff leftTromsø in July 1872. At the end of August, she got locked in pack-ice north ofNovaya Zemlya and drifted to hitherto unknown polar regions. It was on this drift when the explorers discovered an archipelago which they named afterEmperorFranz Joseph I.

In May 1874 Payer decided to abandon the ice-locked ship and try to return by sledges and boats. On 14 August 1874 the expedition reached the open sea and on 3 September finally set foot onRussian mainland.

Between the centuries

[edit]

Crete Rebellion

[edit]
Main article:Greco-Turkish War (1897)

In late 1896 a rebellion broke out onCrete, and on 21 January 1897 aGreek army landed in Crete to liberate the island from theOttoman Empire and unite it withGreece. The European powers, includingAustria-Hungary, intervened, and proclaimed Crete aninternational protectorate. Warships of the k.u.k. Kriegsmarine patrolled the waters off Crete in blockade of Ottoman naval forces. Crete remained in an anomalous position until finally ceded to Greece in 1913.

The Boxer Rebellion

[edit]
Main article:Boxer Rebellion

Austria-Hungary was part of theEight-Nation Alliance during theBoxer Rebellion inChina (1899–1901). As a member of the Allied nations, Austria sent two training ships and the cruisersSMS Kaiserin und Königin Maria Theresia,SMS Kaiserin Elisabeth,SMS Aspern, andSMS Zenta and a company of marines to the North China coast in April 1900, based at the Russia concession ofPort Arthur.

In June they helped hold theTianjin railway againstBoxer forces, and also fired upon several armedjunks on theHai River nearTong-Tcheou. They also took part in the seizure of theTaku Forts commanding the approaches to Tianjin, and the boarding and capture of four Chinesedestroyers byCapt. Roger Keyes ofHMS Fame. In all k.u.k. forces suffered few casualties during the rebellion.

After the uprising, a cruiser was maintained permanently on the China station, and a detachment of marines was deployed at the embassy inBeijing.

LieutenantGeorg Ludwig von Trapp, who served as a submarine commander during World War I and became famous in the musicalThe Sound of Music after World War II, was decorated for bravery aboardSMS Kaiserin und Königin Maria Theresia during the Rebellion.

Montenegro

[edit]
Main article:First Balkan War

During theFirst Balkan War Austria-Hungary joinedGermany,France, theUnited Kingdom andItaly in blockading the seaport town ofBar (Antivari) in theKingdom of Montenegro.

European naval arms race

[edit]
Scale drawing of aRadetzky-class semi-dreadnought.

Among the many factors giving rise to World War I was the navalarms race between theBritish Empire andImperial Germany. Germany enhanced her naval infrastructure, building newdry docks, and enlarging theKiel Canal to enable larger vessels to navigate it. However, that was not the only European naval arms race. Imperial Russia too had commenced building a new modern navy[83] following their naval defeat in theRusso-Japanese War. TheAustro-Hungarian Empire and theKingdom of Italy were in a race of their own for domination of theAdriatic Sea.[84] The k.u.k. Kriegsmarine had another prominent supporter at that time in the face of theArchduke Franz Ferdinand. Like other imperial naval enthusiasts before him, Franz Ferdinand had a keen private interest in the fleet and was an energetic campaigner for naval matters.

The dreadnought era

[edit]

In 1906 Britain completed the battleshipHMS Dreadnought, and it was so advanced that some argued that this rendered all previous battleships obsolete, although Britain and other countries kept pre-dreadnoughts in service.

Dreadnought SMSTegetthoff, named after Admiral von Tegetthoff

Austria-Hungary'snaval architects, aware of the inevitable dominance of all big gun dreadnought type designs, then presented their case to theMarinesektion des Reichskriegsministeriums (Naval Section at the War Ministry) inVienna, which on 5 October 1908 ordered the construction of their own dreadnought, the first contract being awarded to 'Werft dasStabilimento Tecnico Triestino (STT)', the naval weaponry to be provided by theŠkoda Works inPlzeň. The Marine budget for 1910 was substantially enlarged to permit major refits of the existing fleet and more dreadnoughts. The battleshipsSMS Tegetthoff andSMS Viribus Unitis were both launched by theArchduke Franz Ferdinand at Trieste, amongst great rejoicing, on 24 June 1911, and 21 March 1912 respectively. They were followed bySMS Prinz Eugen, andSMS Szent István. These battleships, constructed later than many of the earlier British and German dreadnoughts, were considerably ahead in some aspects of design, especially of both the French and Italian navies, and were constructed withMarconi wireless rooms as well as anti-aircraft armaments. It has been claimed they were the first battleships in the world equipped with torpedo launchers built into their bows.[82]

Between 22 and 28 May 1914Tegetthoff, accompanied byViribus Unitis, made a courtesy visit to the British Mediterranean fleet inMalta.[82]

Submarine fleet

[edit]
Main article:Austro-Hungarian U-boats

In 1904, after allowing the navies of other countries to pioneer submarine developments, the Austro-Hungarian Navy ordered the Austrian Naval Technical Committee (MTK) to produce a submarine design. The January 1905 design developed by the MTK and other designs submitted by the public as part of a design competition were all rejected by the Navy as impracticable. They instead opted to order two submarines each of designs bySimon Lake,Germaniawerft, andJohn Philip Holland for a competitive evaluation. The two Germaniawerft submarines comprised theU-3 class.[85] The Navy authorized two boats,U-3 andU-4, from the Germaniawerft in 1906.[86]

TheU-3-class was an improved version of Germaniawerft's design for theImperial German Navy's first U-boat,U-1,[86] and featured a doublehull with internalsaddle tanks. The Germaniawerft engineers refined the design's hull shape through extensive model trials.[87]

U-3 andU-4 were bothlaid down on 12 March 1907 at Germaniawerft in Kiel and werelaunched in August and November 1908, respectively.[87][88] After completion, each was towed toPola viaGibraltar,[87] withU-3 arriving in January 1909 andU-4 arriving in April.[88]

TheU-5 class was built to the same design as theC-class for the US Navy[89] and was built byWhitehead & Co. under license from Holland and his company,Electric Boat.[87] Components for the first two Austrian boats were manufactured by the Electric Boat Company and assembled at Fiume, while the third boat was a speculative private venture by Whitehead that failed to find a buyer and was purchased by Austria-Hungary upon the outbreak of World War I.[89]

TheU-5-class boats had a single-hulled design with ateardrop shape that bore a strong resemblance to modern nuclear submarines.[90] The boats were just over 105 feet (32 m) long anddisplaced 240 tonnes (260 short tons) surfaced, and 273 tonnes (301 short tons) submerged.[87] Thetorpedo tubes featured unique, cloverleaf-shaped designhatches that rotated on a central axis.[87] The ships were powered by twin 6-cylindergasoline engines while surfaced, but suffered from inadequate ventilation which resulted in frequent intoxication of the crew.[85] While submerged, they were propelled by twinelectric motors.[87] Three boats were built in the class: U-5, U-6, andU-12.

World War I

[edit]
Main article:The Adriatic Campaign of World War I
See also:Raid on Ruse
Austro-Hungarian dreadnoughts atPola
Austro-Hungarian fleet manoeuvres in February 1913

Austro-Hungarian Naval Budget: 1901–1914
(in millions of Austro-Hungarian krone)[91]

After theassassination ofArchduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife in 1914, the Austro-Hungarian Navy honoured them with alying in state aboardSMS Viribus Unitis.

During theFirst World War, the navy saw some action, but prior to the Italian entry spent much of its time in its major naval base at Pola, except for small skirmishes. Following the Italian declaration of warthe mere fact of its existence tied up theItalian Navy and theFrench Navy in the Mediterranean for the duration of the war.

Following the declaration of war in August 1914, the French and Montenegrin forces attempted to cause havoc atCattaro, KuK Kriegsmarine's southernmost base in the Adriatic. Throughout September, October and November 1914 the navy bombarded theAllied forces resulting in a decisive defeat for the latter, and again in January 1916 in what was called theBattle of Lovćen, which was instrumental inMontenegro being knocked out of the war early.

Linienschiffsleutnantvon Trapp on the bridge ofU-5

On 23 May 1915, when Italy declared war on Austria-Hungary, the Austro-Hungarian Navy left their harbors inPola (today Pula, Croatia),Sebenico (today Šibenik, Croatia) andCattaro (today Kotor, Montenegro) to bombard the eastern Italian coast between Venice andBarletta. Main targets were the cities ofAncona,Rimini,Vieste,Manfredonia, Barletta and bridges and railway tracks along the coast. Until 1917 the Austro-Hungarian fleet was as yet largely undamaged.

The presence of three Allied navies in the Mediterranean made any measures of their co-ordination and common doctrine extraordinarily difficult. The Mediterranean was divided into eleven zones, of which the British naval authorities were responsible for four, the French for four, and the Italians for three. Differing command structures, national pride and the language barrier all contributed to a lack of cohesion in the application of Allied sea power, producing a situation in which German and Austro-Hungarian U-boat attacks on shipping flourished.

Battle at Durazzo

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Durazzo (1915)

In December 1915 a k.u.k. Kriegsmarine cruiser squadron attempted to make a raid on theSerbiantroops evacuatingAlbania. After sinking a French submarine and bombarding the town ofDurazzo the squadron ran into a minefield, sinking one destroyer and damaging another. The next day the group ran into a squadron ofBritish,French, andItaliancruisers anddestroyers. The resulting battle left two Austro-Hungarian destroyers sunk and inflicted light damage upon another, while dealing only minor damage to the Allied cruisers and destroyers present.

A three-power conference on 28 April 1917, atCorfu, discussed a more offensive strategy in the Adriatic, but the Italians were not prepared to consider any big ship operations, considering the size of the Austro-Hungarian fleet. The British and French seemed reluctant to move alone against the Austro-Hungarians, especially if it meant a full-scale battle. But the Austrians were not inactive either, and even as the Allied conference was in session they were planning an offensive operation against the Otranto Barrage.

Battle of the Otranto Straits

[edit]
Main article:Battle of the Strait of Otranto (1917)
SMS Novara after the Battle of Otranto Straits
Monument for the "Heroes of Otranto Battle" on thePrevlaka in Croatia

Throughout 1917 the Adriatic remained the key to the U-boat war on shipping in the Mediterranean. Cattaro, some 140 miles above the narrow Straits of Otranto, was the main U-boat base from which almost the entire threat to Mediterranean shipping came.

TheOtranto Barrage, constructed by the Allies with up to 120naval drifters, used to deploy and patrol submarine nets, and 30 motor launches, all equipped with depth charges, was designed to stop the passage of U-boats from Cattaro. However, this failed to do so, and from its inception in 1916, the barrage had caught only two U-boats, the AustrianU-6 and the GermanUB-44 out of hundreds of possible passages.

However, the barrage effectively meant that the Austro-Hungarian surface fleet could not leave theAdriatic Sea unless it was willing to give battle to the blocking forces. This, and as the war drew on bringing supply difficulties especially coal, plus a fear of mines, limited the Austro-Hungarian navy to shelling the Italian and Serbian coastlines.

There had already been four small-scale Austro-Hungarian attacks on the barrage, on 11 March, 21 and 25 April and 5 May 1917, but none of them amounted to anything. Now greater preparations were made, with two U-boats despatched to lay mines offBrindisi with a third patrolling the exits in case Anglo-Italian forces were drawn out during the attack. The whole operation was timed for the night of 14/15 May, which led to the biggest battle of the Austro-Hungarian navy in World War I, the Battle of the Otranto Straits.

The first Austro-Hungarian warships to strike were the twodestroyers,SMS Csepel andSMS Balaton. An Italian convoy of three ships, escorted by the destroyer Borea, was approachingValona, when, out of the darkness, the Austrians fell upon them.Borea was left sinking. Of the three merchant ships, one loaded with ammunition was hit and blown up, a second set on fire, and the third hit. The two Austrian destroyers then steamed off northward.

Meanwhile, three Austro-Hungariancruisers under the overall command of CaptainMiklós Horthy,SMS Novara,SMS Saida, andSMS Helgoland, had actually passed a patrol of four French destroyers north of the barrage, and thought to be friendly ships passed unchallenged. They then sailed through the barrage before turning back to attack it. Each Austrian cruiser took one-third of the line and began slowly and systematically to destroy the barrage with their 100mm (3.9") guns, urging all Allies on board to abandon their ships first.

During this battle the Allies lost two destroyers, 14drifters and oneglider while the Austro-Hungarian navy suffered only minor damage (Novara's steam supply pipes were damaged by a shell) and few losses. The Austro-Hungarian navy returned to its bases up north in order to repair and re-supply, and the allies had to rebuild the blockade.

Cattaro Mutiny

[edit]
Main article:Cattaro Mutiny

In February 1918 a mutiny started in the 5th Fleet stationed at theGulf of Cattaro naval base. Sailors on up to 40 ships joined the mutiny over demands for better treatment and a call to end the war.

The mutiny failed to spread beyond Cattaro, and within three days a loyal naval squadron had arrived. Together withcoastal artillery the squadron fired several shells into a few of the rebel's ships, and then assaulted them with Marine Infantry in a short and successful skirmish. About 800 sailors were imprisoned, dozens were court-martialed, and four seamen were executed, including the leader of the uprising, Franz Rasch, aBohemian. Given the huge crews required in naval vessels of that time, this is an indication that the mutiny was limited to a minority.

Late World War I

[edit]
AdmiralMiklós Horthy

A second attempt to force the blockade took place in June 1918 under the command of Rear AdmiralHorthy. A surprise attack was planned, but the mission was doomed when the fleet was by chance spotted by an ItalianMAS boat patrol, commanded byLuigi Rizzo, which had already sunk, at anchor, the 25 year-old battleshipSMS Wien (5,785 tons) the year before. Rizzo'sMAS boat launched two torpedoes, hitting one of the four Austriandreadnoughts, theSMS Szent István, which had already slowed down due to engine problems. The element of surprise lost, Horthy broke off his attack. Huge efforts were made by the crew to saveSzent István, which had been hit below the waterline, and the dreadnought battleshipTegetthoff took her in tow until a tug arrived. However just after 6 a.m., thepumps being unequal to the task, the ship, now listing badly, had to be abandoned.Szent István sank soon afterwards, taking 89 crewmen with her. The event was filmed from a sister ship.[82]

In 1918, in order to avoid having to give the fleet to the victors, the Austrian Emperor handed down the entire Austro-Hungarian Navy and merchant fleet, with all harbours, arsenals and shore fortifications to the newState of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs. The state of SCS was proclaimed officially on 29 October 1918 but never recognized by other countries. Diplomatic notes were sent to the governments of France, the United Kingdom, Italy, theUnited States and Russia, to notify them that the State of SCS was not at war with any of them and that the Council had taken over the entire Austro-Hungarian fleet; no response was provided, and for all practical purposes the war went on unchanged. Austria asked for an armistice on 29 October; after a few days' negotiation and the signatures, the armistice entered into force on 4 November.

On 1 November 1918, two sailors of the ItalianRegia Marina, Raffaele Paolucci andRaffaele Rossetti, rode a primitive manned torpedo (nicknamed theMignatta or "leech") into the Austro-Hungarian naval base at Pola. Usinglimpet mines, they then sank the anchoredViribus Unitis, with considerable loss of life, as well as the freighterWien.[92] The French navy commandeered the new dreadnoughtPrinz Eugen, which it took to France and later used for target practice in the Atlantic, where it was destroyed.[82]

Ships lost

[edit]

Organisation

[edit]

Ports and locations

[edit]
Austro-Hungarian naval yard atPula; ca. 1890

The home port of the Austro-Hungarian Navy was theSeearsenal (naval base) at Pola (nowPula, Croatia); a role it took over from Venice, where the early Austrian Navy had been based. Supplementary bases included: the busyport ofTrieste and the natural harbour of Cattaro (nowKotor, Montenegro). Both Trieste and Pola had major shipbuilding facilities.[79] Pola's naval installations contained one of the largest floatingdrydocks in theMediterranean. The city of Pola was also the site of the central church of the navy "Stella Maris" (k.u.k. Marinekirche "Stella Maris"), of the Austro-Hungarian Naval Observatory and the empire's navalmilitary cemetery (k.u.k. Marinefriedhof).[97] In 1990, the cemetery was restored after decades of neglect by the communist regime in Yugoslavia. The Austro-Hungarian Naval Academy (k.u.k. Marine-Akademie) was located in Fiume (nowRijeka, Croatia).

Trieste was also the headquarters of the merchant lineÖsterreichischer Lloyd (founded in 1836 and, later, Lloyd Triestino; nowItalia Marittima), whose headquarters stood at the corner of the Piazza Grande and Sanita. By 1913, Österreichischer Lloyd had a fleet of 62 ships comprising a total of 236,000 tons.[79]

Structure

[edit]

The Austro-Hungarian Navy was under the control of the Imperial and Royal Naval Section (K. u. k. Marinesektion), a separate department under the common War Ministry of the Realm (Reichskriegsministerium). An independent Naval Ministry (Marineministerium) existed in the short period of time between 1862 and 1865 and the Austrian admirals have demanded, that it should be reinstated, but this fell through due to the ongoing negotiations between the Imperial court and Hungary in preparation for theAustro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867. The Hungarian politicians strongly objected the creation of a fourth common ministry, unless two of the eventually four ministries relocate to Budapest. The Austro-Hungarian Navy had the following structure:[98]

Naval Section

[edit]

Imperial and Royal Naval Section(K. u. k. Marinesektion),Vordere Zollamtsstraße 9, III. Urban District, Vienna

Chief of the Naval Section and Commander of the Navy (Chef der Marinesektion und Marinekommandanten)

  • Deputy Commander of the Navy (Stellvertreter des Marinekommandanten)
  • - the naval staff -
    • Office of Administration (Präsidialkanzlei)
    • Office of Operations (Operationskanzlei)
    • I. Work Group (I. Geschäftsgruppe)
      • 1. Department (1. Abteilung) - Personnel affairs for sailors, petty officers and junior officers
      • 2. Department (2. Abteilung) - Manpower generation, career development and social affairs for servicemen and family members
      • 3. Department (3. Abteilung) - Logistics
    • II. Work Group (I. Geschäftsgruppe)
      • 4. Department (4. Abteilung) - Technical R&D department
      • 5. Department (5. Abteilung) - Marine fortifications and coastal installations
      • 6. Department (6. Abteilung) - Expenditures, comptrolling, commercial negotiations and contracting
      • 7. Department (7. Abteilung) - Legal department
      • 8. Department (8. Abteilung) - Financial auditing
      • 9. Department (9. Abteilung) - Medical department
  • Naval Inspection (Materialkontrollamt), Vienna, Chairman (Vorstand) - Rear Admiral
  • Central Naval Archive (Marinezentralarchiv), Vienna

Commands and units

[edit]

Harbour Admiralty (Hafenadmiralat),Pola (all in Pola, except for the Trieste Seamen Detachment), Harbour Admiral and Commander of the War Port (Hafenadmiral und Kriegshafenkommandant) - Vice-Admiral

  • Harbour Admiral's Deputy (Adlatus des Hafenadmirals) - Rear Admiral
  • Military Department (Militärabteilung)
  • Mobilisation Department (Mobilisierungsabteilung)
  • Telegraph Bureau (Telegraphenbureau)
  • Medical Department (Sanitätsabteilung)
  • Department for Economy and Administration (Ökonomisch-administrative Abteilung)
  • Legal Advisor and Military Attorney (Justizreferent und Militäranwalt)
  • Naval Pay Service (Marinezahlamt)
  • Seamen Corps (Matrosenkorps) - army regiment equivalent for the seamen on shore duty
    • I. Seamen Depot (I. Matrosendepot) - army battalion equivalent
    • II. Seamen Depot (I. Matrosendepot) - army battalion equivalent
    • III. Seamen Depot (I. Matrosendepot) - army battalion equivalent
    • Trieste Seamen Detachment (Matrosendetachement zu Triest), in Trieste - army battalion equivalent
  • School for Naval Machinery (Maschinenschule)
  • Naval Boys' School (Marine-Volks- und -Bürgerschule für Knaben)
  • Naval Girls' School (Marine-Volks- und -Bürgerschule für Mädchen)
  • Hydrographic Service (Hydrographisches Amt)
    • Starwatch (Sternwarte)
    • Department for Geophysics (Abteilung für Geophysik)
    • Depot for Fine Instruments (Instrumentendepot)
    • Depot for Naval Maps (Seekartendepot)
  • Naval Hospital (Marinespital)
  • Naval Food Provision Service (Marineproviantamt)
  • Naval Cloathing Service (Marinebekleidungsamt)
  • Naval Prison (Marinegefangenhaus)

Naval Arsenal Command (Seearsenalskommando), Pola, Commander of the Arsenal (Arsenals-Kommandant) - Vice-Admiral

  • Deputy Commander of the Arsenal (Stellvertretender Arsenals-Kommandant) - Rear Admiral
  • Administrative Director (Verwaltungsdirektor)
  • Equipment Directorate (Ausrüstungsdirektion)
  • Port Depot (Hafendepot)
  • Torpedo Boats Directorate (Torpedobootsdirektion)
  • Rigging Directorate (Takeldirektion)
  • Arsenal Commission (Arsenalskommission)
  • Shipbuilding Directorate (Schiffbaudirektion)
  • Machinery Construction Directorate (Maschinenbaudirektion)
  • Artillery Directorate (Artilleriedirektion)
  • Chemical Laboratory (Chemisches Laboratorium)
  • Naval Ammunitions Establishment (Marinemunitionsetablissement)
  • Main Ammunition Storage (Hauptmagazin)
  • School for Basic and Specialised Training (Lehrlings- und Arbeiterschule)

Marine Fortifications and Coastal Installations Service (Marine-Land- und -Wasserbauamt), Pola, Director (Direktor) - Major-General

Naval Technical Committee (Marinetechnisches Komitee), Pola, Chairman (Präses) - Vice-Admiral

  • Deputy (Stellvertretender) - Rear Admiral

Naval Intelligence Bureau (Marineevidenzbureau), Pola

Naval Technical Control Commission (Marinetechnische Kontrollkommission), Pola

Naval Superiorate (Marinesuperiorat) (chaplaincy)

Naval Academy (Marineakademie),Fiume, Commandant (Kommandant) - Rear Admiral

Sea Transport Coordination Office (Seetransportleitung), Trieste

Shore services

[edit]

Sea District Command Trieste (Seebezirkskommando zu Triest), Commandant (Kommandant) - Rear Admiral

  • Technical Department (Technische Abteilung)
  • Financial Department (Rechnungsabteilung)

Sea District CommandSebenico (Seebezirkskommando zu Sebenico), Commandant (Kommandant) - Rear Admiral

  • Military Department (Militär-Abteilung)
  • Legal Department (Justizabteilung)
  • Medical Department (Sanitätsabteilung)
  • Department for Economy and Administration (Ökonomisch-administrative Abteilung)

Defence District CommandCastelnuovo (Verteidigungsbezirkskommando zu Castelnuovo)

Warfleet [Personnel] Replacement Commands (Kriegsmarine-Ergänzungsbezirkskommandos) in Triest, Sebenico and Fiume

Secondary Location Commands (Platzkommandos) in Sebenico andSpalato

Naval Detachment inBudapest (Marine-Detachement zu Budapest)

Overseas services

[edit]

Naval Detachment inBeijing (Marinedetachement in Peking)

Naval Detachment inTianjin (Marinedetachement in Tientsin)

The Fleet

[edit]

The entire operational fleet was called theImperial and Royal Squadron (K.u.k. Eskadre). TheEskadre was divided into a Ship-of-the-Line Fleet, a Cruiser Flotilla and a Submarine Flotilla, plus technically outdated warships for harbour defence and various support ships.

Imperial and Royal Squadron

Ship-of-the-Line Fleet

Cruiser FlotillaThe Cruiser Flotilla included all the lighter and light surface forces of the Navy - armored cruisers, light cruisers, destroyers and torpedo boats under the command of Vice-Admiral Paul Fiedler.

  • 1st Destroyer Division - Fregattenkapitän Heinrich Seitz
  • 2nd Destroyer Division - Fregattenkapitän Benno von Millenkovich
    • SMS Admiral Spaun (Division Leader)
    • SMS Dampfer (Depot ship)
    • SMS Turul
    • SMS Uskoke
    • SMS Scharfschutze
    • SMS Wildfang
    • SMS Streiter
    • SMS Ulan
    • SMS Meteor
    • SMS Blitz
    • SMS Komet
    • SMS Planet
    • SMS Trabant
    • SMS Satellit
    • SMS Magnet
    • 5th Torpedo Division
      • 4th Torpedo Group
        • SMS 55T
        • SMS 68F
        • SMS 70F
      • 5th Torpedo Group
        • SMS 61T
        • SMS 65F
        • SMS 66F
      • 6th Torpedo Group
        • SMS 64F
        • SMS 69F
        • SMS 72F
    • 6th Torpedo Division
      • 7th Torpedo Group
        • SMS 52T
        • SMS 58T
        • SMS 59T
      • 8th Torpedo Group
        • SMS 60T
        • SMS 62T
        • SMS 63T
      • 9th Torpedo Group
        • SMS 57F
        • SMS 67F
        • SMS 72F

Local Defence Forces

  • Pola
    • 11th Torpedo Boat Group
      • SMS Tb1
      • SMS Tb2
      • SMS Tb7
      • SMS Tb9
    • 13th Torpedo Boat Group
      • SMS 21
      • SMS 24
      • SMS 32
      • SMS 39
    • Minesweeping Flotilla
      • SMSTb18
      • SMS 27
      • SMS 30
      • SMS 33
      • SMS 34
      • SMS 37
      • SMS 40
    • Other vessels
  • Trieste
    • 15th/16th Torpedo Boat Group
      • SMS 20
      • SMS 23
      • SMS 26
  • Lussin
    • 17th/18th Torpedo Boat Group
      • SMS Tb3
      • SMS Tb4
      • SMS Tb5
      • SMS Tb6
  • Sebencio
  • Cattaro

Submarine FlotillaSubmarine Station, Pola (subordinated to the Harbour Admiralty in peacetime, with the outbreak of WWI the station expanded into the Submarine Flotilla and transferred to the island ofBrioni where the Imperial and Royal Base for Submarines was built)

Danube Flotilla
In addition to the seagoing force stationed in the Adriatic, the navy also had units stationed for operations on theRiver Danube and its tributaries.

  • River Danube
    • Monitor Group 1
      • SMS Temes
      • SMS Bodrog
      • Patrouillenboot 'B'
      • Patrouillenboot 'F'
    • Monitor Group 2
    • Patrol Boat Station Pancsova
      • Patrouillenboot 'D'
      • Patrouillenboot 'G'
  • River Sava

Naval aviation: the k.u.k. Seefliegerkorps

[edit]
k.u.k hydroaircraft salvaged atGrado, Italy

In August 1916, the Imperial and Royal Naval Air Corps or k.u.k. Seeflugwesen was established. In 1917 it was rechristened the k.u.k. Seefliegerkorps. Its first aviators were naval officers who received their initial pilot training at the airfields ofWiener Neustadt inLower Austria, where theTheresian Military Academy is also located. They were first assigned for tours aboard theTegetthoff-class battleships. Later, the k.u.k. Seefliegerkorps also served at the following airfields in Albania and southernDalmatia:Berat,Kavaja,Tirana,Scutari andIgalo. They also had airfields atPodgorica inMontenegro.

  • Flik 1 - Igalo from June - November 1918
  • Flik 6 - Igalo from November 1915 - January 1916
    • - Scutari from January 1916 - June 1917
    • - Tirana from July 1917 - June 1918
    • - Banja from June - July 1918
    • - Tirana from July - September 1918
    • - Podgorica from September - November 1918
  • Flik 13 - Berat from August - September 1918
    • - Kavaja from September - October 1918

The following Austrian squadrons served atFeltre also:

  • Flik 11 - from February 1918
  • Flik 14 - from June 1918 to November 1918
  • Flik 16 - from November 1917 - October 1918
  • Flik 31 - from June - July 1918
  • Flik 36 - from June - July 1918
  • Flik 39 - from January - May 1918
  • Flik 45 - during April 1918
  • Flik 56 - during December 1917
  • Flik 60J - from March - September 1918
  • Flik 66 - from January 1918 - November 1918
  • Flik 101 - during May 1918

Feltre was captured by Austrian forces on 12 November 1917 after theBattle of Caporetto. There were two other military airfields nearby, atArsie andFonzaso. It was the main station for the Austrian naval aviators in that area. The k.u.k. Seeflugwesen used mostly modified German aircraft, but produced several variations of its own. Notable aircraft for the service were the following:

Problems affecting the navy

[edit]

For most of the period of its existence the Austrian (and later Austro-Hungarian) Navy was never a high financial or political priority for the Empire.

Sea power was never an important consideration in Austrian foreign policy. In addition, the Navy was relatively little known to the public, and did not enjoy widespread support or popular enthusiasm. Activities such as open days and naval clubs were unable to change the sentiment that the Navy was just something "expensive but far away". Another point was that naval expenditures were for most of the time overseen by the Austrian War Ministry, which was largely controlled by theArmy, the only exception being the period preceding theBattle of Lissa.

The Navy was only able to secure significant public attention and funds during the three short periods it was actively supported by a member of theImperial Family. The ArchdukesFriedrich (1821–1847),Ferdinand Maximilian (1832–1867), andFranz Ferdinand (1863–1914), each with a keen private interest in the fleet, held senior naval ranks and were energetic campaigners for naval matters. However, none lasted long, as Archduke Friedrich died early, Ferdinand Maximilian left Austria to becomeEmperor of Mexico and Franz Ferdinand was assassinated before he acceded the throne.

The Navy's problems were exacerbated by tenethnic groups each constitututing more than 5% of the population of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Officers had to speak at least four of the languages found in the Empire.Germans andCzechs generally were in signals and engine room duties,Hungarians became gunners, whileCroats andItalians were seamen or stokers. This multiethnic, polyglot composition gave rise to problems in communication.

A further problem for the Navy was that the Empire's battleship designs were generally of a smaller tonnage than those of other European powers.

TheAustro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867 aimed to calm political dissatisfaction by creating theDual Monarchy, in which theEmperor of Austria was also theKing of Hungary. This constitutional change was also reflected in the navy's title, which changed to "Imperial and Royal Navy" (kaiserlich und königliche Kriegsmarine, short form K. u K. Kriegsmarine).

Notable personnel

[edit]

Ranks and rates of the Navy

[edit]
Main article:Ranks in the Austro-Hungarian Navy

Commissioned officer ranks

[edit]

The rank insignia ofcommissioned officers.

Rank groupGeneral / flag officersSenior officersJunior officers
 Austro-Hungarian Navy[99][100]
Großadmiral
Főtengernagy
Admiral
Tengernagy
Vizeadmiral
Altengernagy
Kontreadmiral
Ellentengernagy
Linienschiffkapitän
Sorhajókapitány
Fregattenkapitän
Fregattkapitány
Korvettenkapitän
Korvettkapitány
Linienschiffsleutnant
Sorhajóhadnagy
Fregattenleutnant
Fregatthadnagy
Korvettenleutnant
Korvetthadnagy

Other ranks

[edit]

The rank insignia ofnon-commissioned officers andenlisted personnel.

Rank groupNCOsEnlisted
 Austro-Hungarian Navy[101][102]
OberstabsbootsmannStabsbootsmannUnterbootsmannBootsmannsmaatQuartiermeisterMatrose 1. KlasseMatrose 2. Klasse

Senior leadership

[edit]

Commanders-in-Chief of the Navy

[edit]
Austro-Hungarian Navy flag officer uniform hat,Museum of Military History, Vienna
PortraitName
(Birth–Death)
Term of officeRef.
Took officeLeft officeTime in office
Oberkommandant der Marine
Vice admiral
Hans Dahlerup [da]
(1790–1872)
February 1849August 18512 years, 6 months
Vice admiral
Franz Graf von Wimpffen
(1797–1870)
August 1851September 18543 years, 1 month
Vice admiral
ArchdukeFerdinand Maximilian
(1832–1867)
September 185418605–6 years
Vice admiral
Ludwig von Fautz
(1811–1880)
1860March 18654–5 years
Marinekommandant
Vice admiral
Wilhelm von Tegetthoff
(1827–1871)
March 1868April 18713 years, 1 month
Vice admiral
Friedrich von Pöck
(1825–1884)
April 1871November 188312 years, 7 months
Admiral
Maximilian Daublebsky von Sterneck
(1829–1897)
November 18835 December 1897 †14 years, 1 month
Admiral
Hermann von Spaun
(1833–1919)
December 1897October 19046 years, 10 months
Admiral
GrafRudolf Montecuccoli
(1843–1922)
October 1904February 19138 years, 4 months
Grand admiral
Anton Haus
(1851–1917)
February 19138 February 1917 †4 years
Admiral
Maximilian Njegovan
(1858–1930)
April 1917February 191810 months

Commanders-in-Chief of the Fleet (1914–1918)

[edit]

(in GermanFlottenkommandant)

Heads of the Naval Section at the War Ministry

[edit]

(in GermanChef der Marinesektion at theKriegsministerium)

Constructors General

[edit]

(in GermanGeneralschiffbauingenieur)

Naval ensign

[edit]
Austro-Hungarian naval ensign, 1786-1915

UntilEmperor Joseph II authorized a naval ensign on 20 March 1786, Austrian naval vessels used the yellow and black imperial flag. The flag, formally adopted asMarineflagge (naval ensign) was based on the colours of the Archduchy of Austria. It served as the official flag also after theAusgleich in 1867, when the Austrian navy became the Austro-Hungarian Navy.[103] During World War I,Emperor Franz Joseph approved of a new design, which also contained the Hungarian arms. This flag, officially instituted in 1915, was however little used, and ships continued displaying the old Ensign until the end of the war. Photographs of Austro-Hungarian ships flying the post-1915 form of the Naval Ensign are therefore relatively rare.

In popular culture

[edit]

British authorJohn Biggins wrote a series of four historical novels concerning the Austro-Hungarian Navy and a fictional hero named Ottokar Prohaska, although genuinely historical individuals, such asGeorg Ludwig von Trapp andArchduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria make appearances. Published by McBooks Press, the novels are:

  • A Sailor of Austria: In Which, Without Really Intending to, Otto Prohaska Becomes Official War Hero No. 27 of the Habsburg Empire
  • The Emperor's Coloured Coat: In Which Otto Prohaska, Hero of the Habsburg Empire, Has an Interesting Time While Not Quite Managing to Avert the First World War
  • The Two-Headed Eagle: In Which Otto Prohaska Takes a Break as the Habsburg Empire's Leading U-boat Ace and Does Something Even More Thanklessly Dangerous
  • Tomorrow the World: In which Cadet Otto Prohaska Carries the Habsburg Empire's Civilizing Mission to the Entirely Unreceptive Peoples of Africa and Oceania

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Explanatory notes

[edit]
  1. ^16 years later, the torpedo was invented by former Austrian naval officerGiovanni Luppis and British engineerRobert Whitehead.
  2. ^The first attempt in history to conduct anaerial bombardment took place during the siege of Venice. Lieutenants Josef and Franz von Uchatius suggested that the Austrian Navy employ hot air balloons carrying bombs which would be dropped on the city. The Austrians ultimately launched some 200incendiary balloons, each carrying a 11-to-13-kilogram (24 to 29 lb) bomb that was to be dropped from the balloon with a time fuse over the besieged city. The balloons were launched from land-based forces as well as from the Austrian warshipSMS Vulcano, which acted as aballoon carrier.
  3. ^Szent István was commissioned in December 1915
  4. ^Viribis Unitis was the fleet flagship
  5. ^The 5th Heavy Division fell under the Ship-of-the-Line Fleet only administratively, as its ships were obsolete and could not take part in a naval engagement next to their more modern counterparts. The ships of the division were used for harbour guard duty
  6. ^The 2nd Cruiser Division was nominally under the Cruiser Flotilla, but its outdated cruisers were used as harbour guard duty
  7. ^Kaiserin Elisabeth was the station ship of the East Asia station, and was deployed toQingdao. The ship was scuttled in November 1914
  8. ^Kaiserin und Königin Maria Theresia was nominally part of the 1st Cruiser Division

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^abSokol 1968, pp. 7, 9.
  2. ^Thaller 2009, p. 191.
  3. ^abcdeSokol 1968, p. 3.
  4. ^Wedgwood 2005, p. 219.
  5. ^Wedgwood 2005, p. 220.
  6. ^Frey 1995, pp. 374–375.
  7. ^Anderson 1995, pp. 7–11.
  8. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 3–4.
  9. ^abcdSokol 1968, p. 4.
  10. ^McKay 1977, p. 180.
  11. ^Butel 1997, p. 197.
  12. ^abcdefghSokol 1968, p. 6.
  13. ^abButel 1997, p. 198.
  14. ^Lavery 1983, p. 130.
  15. ^Anderson 1995, pp. 7–9.
  16. ^Anderson 1995, p. 59.
  17. ^Bolts 1787, pp. 45–49.
  18. ^Sokol 1968, p. 7.
  19. ^Sokol 1968, p. 9.
  20. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 9–10.
  21. ^Salcher 1902, p. 8.
  22. ^Salcher 1902, pp. 18–22.
  23. ^Reich 1905, p. 622.
  24. ^abcdSokol 1968, p. 10.
  25. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 10–11.
  26. ^abSokol 1968, p. 12.
  27. ^Sondhaus 2002, p. 7.
  28. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 12–13.
  29. ^Sokol 1968, p. 13.
  30. ^Sokol 1968, p. 14.
  31. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 14–15.
  32. ^Sokol 1968, p. 15.
  33. ^Sokol 1968, p. 17.
  34. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 18–19.
  35. ^abcdefSokol 1968, p. 19.
  36. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 19–20.
  37. ^abSokol 1968, p. 20.
  38. ^abGiglio 1948, p. 179.
  39. ^abPieri 1962, p. 451.
  40. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 20–21.
  41. ^Sokol 1968, p. 21.
  42. ^Pieri 1962, pp. 246–247.
  43. ^Clark 2013, p. 55.
  44. ^abcSokol 1968, p. 23.
  45. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 25–26.
  46. ^Sondhaus 1989, pp. 180–181.
  47. ^Sondhaus 1989, p. 181.
  48. ^abcSokol 1968, p. 26.
  49. ^Wagner 1961, pp. 29, 32.
  50. ^abSondhaus 1989, p. 182.
  51. ^Lambert 1984, p. 114.
  52. ^Handel-Mazzetti & Sokol 1952, pp. 14–15, 217–219.
  53. ^Gardiner 1979, p. 270.
  54. ^Sondhaus 1989, p. 184.
  55. ^Lambert 1984, pp. 44–45.
  56. ^Baratelli 1983, p. 41.
  57. ^Sokol 1968, pp. 26–27.
  58. ^Trevelyan 1909, p. 76-77.
  59. ^Trevelyan 1909, p. 169.
  60. ^Sokol 1968, p. 27.
  61. ^Trevelyan 1909, pp. 108–110.
  62. ^Sondhaus 1989, p. 201.
  63. ^abSondhaus 1989, p. 200.
  64. ^Sondhaus 1989, pp. 185–186.
  65. ^Ordovini, Petronio & Sullivan 2014, p. 328.
  66. ^Gardiner 1979, p. 335.
  67. ^Sondhaus 1989, pp. 200, 206.
  68. ^Gabriele & Fritz 1982, pp. 12–15.
  69. ^Trevelyan 1909, p. 312.
  70. ^Sondhaus 1989, p. 205.
  71. ^Gabriele & Fritz 1982, pp. 117–118, 123–124.
  72. ^Gabriele & Fritz 1982, p. 89.
  73. ^Sondhaus 1989, pp. 206, 219.
  74. ^Sondhaus 1989, pp. 200–203.
  75. ^Tamborra 1957, pp. 813–814.
  76. ^Sondhaus 1989, p. 209.
  77. ^Sondhaus 1989, p. 225.
  78. ^Gabriele & Fritz 1982, pp. 139–140.
  79. ^abcdeHubmann, Franz, & Wheatcroft, Andrew (editor),The Habsburg Empire, 1840–1916, London, 1972,ISBN 0-7100-7230-9
  80. ^Haslip, Joan,Imperial Adventurer - Emperor Maximilian of Mexico, London, 1971,ISBN 0-297-00363-1
  81. ^Marinac, Bogdana; Konte, Ivan (2007)."In Searching for Nickel Ore for the Austro-hungarian Navy on the Expedition of the Ship Albatros to Salomon Islands in 1896".Kronika.55 (3).
  82. ^abcdeWagner, Walter, & Gabriel, Erich,Die 'Tegetthoff' Klasse, Vienna, January 1979.
  83. ^Greger, René; & Watts, A. J. (1972).The Russian fleet, 1914-1917. London: Ian Allan.ISBN 0-7110-0255-X
  84. ^Vego, Milan N (1996).Austro-Hungarian Naval Policy 1904-1914. London: Frank Cass. pp. 35–46.ISBN 0-7146-4209-6.
  85. ^abGardiner, p. 340.
  86. ^abGibson and Prendergast, p. 384.
  87. ^abcdefgGardiner, p.342.
  88. ^abSieche, p. 19.
  89. ^abFontenoy, Paul E. (2007).Submarines: an illustrated history of their impact. ABC-CLIO. p. 156.ISBN 978-1-85109-563-6.
  90. ^Sieche, p. 21.
  91. ^Vego 1996, p. 185.
  92. ^Warhola, Brian (January 1998)."Assault on the Viribus Unitis". Old News. Retrieved23 April 2010.
  93. ^Dario Petković: Ratna mornarica austro-ugarske monarhije, Pula 2004, Page 86,ISBN 953-6250-80-2
  94. ^Angus Konstam,Gunboats of World War I, p. 29
  95. ^René Greger,Austro-Hungarian warships of World War I, p. 142
  96. ^Mark Axworthy, Cornel I. Scafeș, Cristian Crăciunoiu,Third Axis, Fourth Ally: Romanian Armed Forces in the European War, 1941-1945, p. 327
  97. ^"Naval cemetery - a walk through the history of Pula". Archived fromthe original on 2009-02-20. Retrieved2009-01-02.
  98. ^Seidel (1914).Seidels kleines Armeeschema. Dislokation und Einteilung des k.u.k Heeres, der k.u.k. Kriegsmarine, der k.k. Landwehr und der k.u. Landwehr., Nr. 76 (in German). Vienna: Seidel & Sohn, on behalf of the War Ministry.
  99. ^Bunkley, Joel William (1918).Military And Naval Recognition Book: A Handbook On The Organization, Uniforms And Insignia Of Rank Of The World's Armed Forces (2nd ed.). New York: D. Van Nostrand Company. pp. 190–192. Retrieved29 June 2022.
  100. ^Williams, Dion (1918)."XI: Uniforms and Insignia of Foreign Armies and Navies".Army and Navy Uniforms and Insignia. New York, N.Y.: Frederick A. Stokes Company. p. 268. Retrieved5 July 2022.
  101. ^Bunkley 1918, pp. 192–194.
  102. ^Williams 1918, p. 270.
  103. ^Alfred Freiherr von Koudelka:Unsere Kriegs-Marine. Vienna, 1899, pp.60-2

General and cited references

[edit]
  • Anderson, M. S. (1995).The War of the Austrian Succession 1740–1748 (1st ed.). London: Longman.ISBN 058205950X.
  • Baratelli, Franco (1983).La marina militare italiana nella vita nazionale (1860–1914) (in Italian). Milan: Ugo Mursia Editore.OCLC 799197000.
  • Bolts, Guillaume (1787).Recueil de pièces authentiques, relatives aux affaires de la ci-devant Société impériale asiatique de Trieste, gérées à Anvers (in French). Antwerp.
  • Butel, Paul (1997).Européens et espaces maritimes : (vers 1690 - vers 1790) (in French) (2. réimpr. ed.). Talence: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.ISBN 2867811945.
  • Clark, Martin (2013).The Italian Risorgimento (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.ISBN 9781317862642.
  • Donko, Wilhelm M. (2012).A Brief History of the Austrian Navy (in German). Berlin: E-publi Verlag.ISBN 978-3-8442-2129-9.
  • De Biasio, Stefano; Freivogel, Zvonimir; Johnson, Harold; Sieche, Erwin; Wetherhorn, Aryeh (1998). "Question 6/97: Disposition of ex-Austro-Hungarian Warships".Warship International.XXXV (1):94–104.ISSN 0043-0374.
  • Frey, Marsha (1995). Frey, Linda (ed.).The Treaties of the War of the Spanish Succession: An Historical and Critical Dictionary (1st ed.). Westport, CT: Greenwood.ISBN 0313278849.
  • Gabriele, Mariano; Fritz, Giuliano (1982).La Politica Navale Italiana Dal 1885 Al 1915 (in Italian). Rome: Ufficio Storico della Marina Militare.
  • Gardiner, Robert, ed. (1979).Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. London: Conway Maritime Press.ISBN 0-85177-133-5.
  • Giglio, Vittorio (1948).Il Risorgimento nelle sue fasi di guerra (in Italian). Milan: Vallardi.
  • Handel-Mazzetti, Peter; Sokol, Hans Hugo (1952).Wilhelm von Tegetthoff, ein grosser Österreicher (in German). Linz: Oberösterreichischer Landesverlag.OCLC 6688034.
  • Hauke, Erwin; Schroeder, Walter; Tötschinger, Bernhard (1988).Die Flugzeuge der k.u.k. Luftfahrtruppe und Seeflieger, 1914–1918 (in German) (1. Aufl. ed.). Graz: H. Weishaupt.ISBN 978-3900310462.
  • Kemp, Peter (1971). "The Otranto Barrage".History of the First World War.6 (1). Bristol: BPC Publishing:2265–2272.
  • Lambert, Andrew (1984).Battleships in Transition: The Creation of the Steam Battlefleet, 1815–1860. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.ISBN 978-0870210907.
  • Lavery, Brian (1983).The Ship of the Line (1st ed.). London: Conway Maritime Press.ISBN 0851772528.
  • McKay, Derek (1977).Prince Eugene of Savoy. London: Thames and Hudson.ISBN 0500870071.
  • Ordovini, Aldo F.; Petronio, Fulvio; Sullivan, David M. (December 2014). "Capital Ships of the Royal Italian Navy, 1860–1918: Part I: TheFormidabile, Principe di Carignano, Re d'Italia, Regina Maria Pia, Affondatore, Roma andPrincipe Amedeo Classes".Warship International. Vol. 51, no. 4. pp. 323–360.
  • Pieri, Piero (1962).Storia militare del Risorgimento (in Italian). Torino: Einaudi.
  • Reich, Emil (1905). "Abidcation of Francis the Second".Select Documents Illustrating Mediæval and Modern History. Londong: P.S. King & Son. p. 622.OCLC 4426595 – viaInternet Archive.
  • Salcher, Peter (1902).Geschichte der K. U. K. Marine-akademie (in German). Fiume:Sine nomine.
  • Schupita, Peter (1983).Die k.u.k. Seeflieger: Chronik und Dokumentation der österreichisch-ungarischen Marineluftwaffe, 1911–1918 (in German). Koblenz: Bernard und Grafe.
  • Sokol, Anthony (1968).The Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian Navy. Annapolis: United States Naval Institute.OCLC 462208412.
  • Sondhaus, Lawrence (1989).The Habsburg Empire and the Sea: Austrian Naval Policy, 1797–1866. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.ISBN 978-0911198973.
  • Sondhaus, Lawrence (2002).Navies of Europe: 1815-2002. Harlow: Routledge.ISBN 0582506131.
  • Tamborra, Angelo (October–December 1957). "Balcani, Italia ed Europa nel problema della Venezia (1859–1861)".Rassegna Storica del Risorgimento (in Italian).44:813–818.
  • Thaller, Anja (2009)."Graz 1382 – Ein Wendepunkt der Triestiner Geschichte?".Historisches Jahrbuch der Stadt Graz (in German). 38/39:191–221. Retrieved6 May 2016.
  • Trevelyan, George (1909).Garibaldi and the Thousand. New York: Logmans, Green and Co.
  • Wagner, Walter (1961).Die obersten Behörden der k.u.k. Kriegsmarine 1856-1918 (in German). Vienna: Druck und Verlag Ferdinand Berger Horn.
  • Wedgwood, C. V. (2005).The Thirty Years War. New York: New York Review Books.ISBN 1590171462.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related tok.u.k. Kriegsmarine.
Army



Navy
Air Force
Leadership
Emperors
Ministers for War
Supreme Commander of the Imperial
and Royal Armed Forces
Chiefs of the
General Staff
Commanders-in-Chief
of the Navy
Heads of the
Naval Section
Commanders
German Navies
Pre–unification German states
German Confederation
North German Confederation
German Empire
Weimar Republic
Nazi Germany
Allied–occupied Germany
Post WWII German Navy
Navies in Europe
Sovereign states
States with limited
recognition
Historical states
International
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Austro-Hungarian_Navy&oldid=1277072832"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp