Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Australian Classification Board

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Classification agency of films, video games and literary works in Australia

Not to be confused withAustralian Classification Review Board.
Classification Board
Agency overview
Formed1917; 109 years ago (1917) (as Commonwealth Film Censorship Board)
JurisdictionCommonwealth of Australia
Minister responsible
Parent agencyDepartment of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts (current parent agency),Department of Communications and the Arts (until 2020), OFLC (until 2006),Australian Classification Review Board (sister agency)
Websitewww.classification.gov.au

TheAustralian Classification Board (ACB orCB) is an Australiangovernmentstatutory body responsible for the classification and censorship of films,television programmes,video games andpublications for exhibition, sale or hire in Australia. The ACB is located in Sydney.

The ACB was established in 1917 as the Commonwealth Film Censorship Board. In 1988 it wasincorporated for administrative purposes into the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC),[1] until its dissolution in 2006. Following thelegislative changes enacted in theCommonwealth Classification Act 1995, it became known as theClassification Board.

The ACB is made up of adirector, a deputy director, and three otherboard members, appointed by the government for three- or four-year terms, and temporary board members.[2] The ACB does not directlycensor material by ordering cuts or changes. However, it is able to effectively censor media by refusing classification and making the media illegal for hire, exhibition and importation to Australia.

The classification system has several levels of "restricted" categories, prohibiting sale, exhibition or use of some materials to those who are under a prescribed age. Somedocumentaries and films (those made foreducational ortraining purposes, for instance) are exempt from classification under certain conditions.

History

[edit]

Early film classification

[edit]

The Commonwealth Film Censorship Board was created in 1917 to view, classify, and censor films imported from overseas. In the early years of the system there were 3 ratings:[3]

  • G for "general audiences"
  • A for "not suitable for children"
  • SOA for "suitable for adults only"

All ratings were advisory in nature and while distributors were required to display them on advertising, there were no restrictions on children's attendance. As such, films with adult ratings were still routinely censored.

1970s–1980s classifications reform

[edit]

Customs MinisterDon Chipp announced significant classification reform in 1970, including published decision registrars and the requirement of cinemas to legally restrict attendees. This ushered in a new era of film classification rather than censorship, and was enacted in 1971. The new ratings introduced were:

  • G for "general exhibition; suitable for everyone"
  • NRC for "not recommended for children under 12"
  • M for "mature audiences; suitable for persons 15 years and over"
  • R for "restricted exhibition; children aged 3-17 are not admitted"[4]

In 1984, theNRC rating was renamedPG, due to confusion from parents about whether its content was stronger thanM.

1990s; Modifications and computer game classifications

[edit]

In 1993, theMA 15+ rating was introduced to flag content that was too strong for theM classification, but not so much so that the content should be restricted only to persons over the age of 18.[4] Until 1997, the prescribed marking for the MA15+ rating was, "Restrictions apply to persons under 15 years", before it was later changed to "Persons under 15 years must be accompanied by a parent or adult guardian" onceDVD became prevalent.[5] The Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC) was reorganised in 1994, and oversaw the ACB.

A separate classification system was introduced in 1994 for computer and video games. Despite its use of similar ratings names, these were backed by a distinct and stricter set of guidelines. TheOFLC Annual Report for 1993-94 cited ministerial concern that "games, because of the “interactive” nature, may have greater impact, and therefore greater potential for harm or detriment, on young minds than film or videotape".

The four ratings were:

  • G for "general; suitable for all ages"
  • G 8+ for "general; suitable for children 8 years and over"
  • M 15+ for "mature; suitable for children 15 years and over"
  • MA 15+ for "mature - restricted; restricted to persons 15 years and over"

2000s–present

[edit]

In 2005 the OFLC was dissolved and supervision of the ACB transferred to theattorney-general's department. The current colour-coded classification markings for films and computer games were introduced in May 2005. Moreover, the age descriptors and markers for the advisory ratings such as PG and M15+ were removed. As such, on the descriptors of posters, streaming and home video, the PG rating now only has the signifier, "Parental guidance recommended", and the M rating has "Recommended for mature audiences", without any reference to 15 years.[6]

In 2005, video and computer games became subject to the same classification ratings and restrictions as films, such as G 8+ being replaced by PG (with the exception of theR 18+ andX 18+ ratings), in response to confusion by parents.[7] Despite a line in theNational Classification Code stating that "adults should be able to read, hear and see what they want", the adults-onlyR 18+ classification was not applied to video games in Australia until 1 January 2013.[8] The Department of Communications and the Arts provided administrative support to the ACB from 2006 until 2020, when it was merged into the 'mega department' of theDepartment of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications. Decisions made by the ACB may be reviewed by theAustralian Classification Review Board.[9]

In August 2014, the ACB introduced amendments to allow for the automated classification process employed by theInternational Age Rating Coalition (IARC). This new process reduces the costs of video game developers as they seek to obtain ratings for their products that are distributed digitally online.[10] In January 2019, for the first time,Netflix was given the go-ahead to self-regulate film and television classification on its streaming platform, allowing the company to rank content betweenG andR 18+.[11]

Overview

[edit]

The board operates on a procedure that primarily involvesdecision-making. The members must communicate their views clearly and appreciate the views of others. Board members would be exposed to a wide range of material, including content that is confronting and offensive. Every film and computer game has to be classified before it can be legally made available to the public. Somepublications also need to be classified. Failure to give classification (especially for unclassified material that is likely to be classifiedRC) is an implicitban (except for exempt films, games, and publications). It is an offence "to display, demonstrate, sell, hire, publicly exhibit or advertise a film or computer game" without having it classified. Some films and documentaries (such ascurrent affairs and those created for business, scientific andeducation purposes) are exempt from classification unless, if classified, they would beM or above.[12]

There are legal age restrictions for the ratings ofMA 15+ andR 18+.X 18+ is a special restriction rating for pornographic content.X 18+ is limited only to films, and the highest rating for video games remainsR 18+.[13] Should a game contain content not suitable for or exceeding the boundaries of anR 18+ rating (often explicit sexual content or nudity), that game is usually eithermodified (censored) or, rarely,refused classification (banned) (an exception to this was made forThe Last of Us Part II, where the game was not censored despite containing nudity).[14] The other classification categories (G,PG andM) are merely recommendations and they are not submitted to legal age restrictions.RC (banned) material cannot be sold, hired or distributed to anyone. A film or video game's context is crucial in determining whether a classifiable element is justified by the story-line or themes.

The ACB decides what consumer advice accompanies each classification. They indicate the elements in films and computer games which caused the classification and help consumers make choices about what they read, view or play. There are six classifiable elements for films:themes (rape, suicide, racism, etc.),violence (the level of violence and how threatening it is in its context),sex (intercourse and references to sex),language (the level of coarse language),drug use (the use of, and references to, drugs) andnudity (the explicitness of nudity). Consumer advice appears with the classification symbol on products, packaging and in advertisements. Consumer advice is not given if the element in question would be acceptable at a lower classification.[15] By August 2020, the ACB added another category for video games related tomicrotransactions, with any game including them listingin-game purchases alongside these other themes.[16]

Film festivals and institutions such asAustralian Centre for the Moving Image (ACMI) may apply to the ACB for an exemption from classification for the purpose of screening at a particular film festival or event. If the ACB believes an unclassified work, in their estimation, would receive an X 18+ classification if it were to be classified they would not grant an exemption for public screening, as an X 18+ cannot be exhibited. The ACB may require film festivals to have age-restricted entrance to a festival or screening. The ACB also classifies material submitted by the police, theAustralian Customs and Border Protection Service and theAustralian Communications and Media Authority. The board does not classify live performances, audio CDs and television shows. Television is regulated by the Australian Communications and Media Authority.[17] Film classification also normally applies to Internet streaming services. The ACB now operates under theCommonwealth Classification Act 1995.

Film and video game classifications

[edit]

Unrestricted/Advisory

[edit]

The classifications below areunrestricted and may suggestparental advisory, but do not otherwise impose any legal restrictions on access to or distribution of material.[18][19]

ClassificationDescription

Exempt (E)
Only very specific types of material (including educational material and artistic performances) can be exempted from classification, and the material cannot contain anything that exceeds the constraints of thePG classification.[20] The assessment of exemption may be made by the distributor or exhibitor (self-assessed) without needing to submit the product for certification by the ACB. Self-assessed exempt films cannot use the official marking, although it is advised that films and computer games that are self-assessed as exempt display, "This film/computer game is exempt from classification".

General (G)
Contains material available for general viewing, i.e. suitable for viewing by persons of all ages. This category does not necessarily designate a children's film or game. Although not mandatory at this category, the board may provide consumer information, usually in relation to impacts on very young children. The content is very mild in impact.
  • Themes should have a very low sense of threat or menace, and be justified by context.
  • Violence should have only a low sense of threat or menace, and be justified by context.
  • Sexual activity should be very mild and very discreetly implied, and be justified by context.
  • Coarse language should be very mild and infrequent, and be justified by context.
  • Drug use should be implied only very discreetly, and be justified by context.
  • Nudity should be justified by context.

Parental Guidance (PG)
Contains material that is not recommended for viewing by persons under the age of 15 without guidance from parents or guardians. This category includes material that younger viewers may find confusing or upsetting. The content is mild in impact.
  • Themes should have a very low sense of threat or menace, and be justified by context.
  • Violence should be mild and infrequent, and be justified by context. Sexual violence is not permitted.
  • Sexual activity should be mild and discreetly implied, and be justified by context.
  • Coarse language should be mild and infrequent, and be justified by context.
  • Sex, nudity and drug use should be mild, infrequent, "discreetly implied" and "justified by context".
  • Drug use and nudity should be justified by context.

Mature (M)
Contains material that is recommended for viewing by persons aged 15 years and over. However, people under 15 may legally access such material since this category carries no legal restrictions. This category includes material that may require a mature perspective, but is not deemed too strong for younger viewers. The content is moderate in impact, although in recent years, the "moderate" indicator prefix is omitted from the consumer advice, e.g. "moderate violence" is referred to as "violence".
  • Themes may have a moderate sense of threat or menace, if justified by context.
  • Moderate violence is permitted, if "justified by context". Sexual violence should be very limited and justified by context.
  • Sexual activity should be discreetly implied, if "justified by context".
  • Coarse language may be used. Aggressive or strong coarse language should be infrequent and justified by context.
  • Drug use and nudity should be justified by context.

Restricted

[edit]

By contrast, the classifications below are legallyrestricted, as explicitly indicated by the black banner at the bottom of the classification label. It is illegal to sell or exhibit material with these classifications to anyone younger than the stated minimum age and is punishable by fines under state laws.[18][19]

ClassificationDescription

Mature Accompanied (MA 15+)
Contains material that is considered unsuitable for exhibition to persons under the age of 15. People under 15 may legally purchase, rent, exhibit or view such content, but only under the supervision of a parent or adult guardian. A person may be asked to show proof of age before purchasing or hiring anMA 15+ film or computer game at a retail store or cinema. The content is strong in impact.
  • Realistic violence of medium intensity is permitted. Violent depictions with a "high degree or realism" is accepted only if "justified by context". Stylised violence, however, can be "more detailed".
  • Strong violence is permitted, although if it is bloody and strong, it should be "infrequent" or "justified by context".
  • Sexual violence is permitted only if it is "not frequent, gratuitous or exploitative".
  • Sexual activity may be "discreetly implied" or "simulated".
  • Nudity is permitted, but in a sexual context, it should "not be exploitative".
  • Frightening or intense scenes should "not disturb a reasonable adult".
  • Aggressive and very strong coarse language may be used, but it should "not be exploitative".
  • Drug use may be depicted, but not in an "advocatory manner".
  • Themes, if strong, should be justified by context.

Restricted (R 18+)
Contains material that is considered unsuitable for exhibition to persons under the age of 18. People under 18 may not legally purchase, rent, exhibit or viewR 18+ classified content. A person may be asked for proof of age before purchasing, hiring or viewing anR 18+ film or computer game at a retail store or cinema. Some material classifiedR 18+ may be offensive to sections of the adult community. The content is high in impact. This rating is the highest that can be given to computer games.
  • Realistic and explicit depictions of violence are permitted, but violence that is "frequently gratuitous, cruel, exploitative and offensive to a reasonable adult" is not.
  • Themes can have a "very high degree of intensity" but should not be "exploitative".
  • Sexual violence is permitted only to the extent that it is "necessary to the narrative" and "not exploitative" or "not shown in detail".
  • Sexual activity can be "realistically simulated", but depictions of "actual sexual activity" are not permitted. However, several films containing artistic depictions of real sexual activity such asRomance andNymphomaniac have been passed with the R 18+ classification.
  • Drug use can be shown, but "not gratuitously detailed", and should also "not be promoted or encouraged". For computer games, drug use related to "incentives and rewards" is not permitted.
  • Nudity in a sexual context should "not include obvious genital contact".
  • Coarse language is virtually unrestricted.

Restricted (X 18+)
Contains material that ispornographic in nature. People under 18 may not legally purchase, rent, possess, exhibit or view these films. The exhibition or sale of these films to people under the age of 18 years is a criminal offence carrying a maximum fine of $13,750. Films classified asX 18+ are banned (via state government legislation) from being sold or rented in all Australian states, but are legal to possess (except in prescribed parts of theNorthern Territory) and are legally available to purchase only in theAustralian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. ImportingX 18+ material from these territories to the states is legal (as theAustralian Constitution forbids any restrictions on trade between the states and territories). The content is sexually explicit and is therefore very high in impact.
  • This rating applies to films that "depict unsimulated sexual content only". Depictions of sexual violence, coercion and "sexually assaultive" language are not permitted in the category. Fetishes such as body piercing,urolagnia,bondage,spanking orfisting are also not permitted.

Other labels

[edit]
ClassificationDescription

Refused Classification (RC)
Contains material that, while being (in most cases) legal to possess, is considered offensive to the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by a "reasonable adult" to such an extent that it should not be classified. In Australia, all films and video games must be classified by law, and works that are refused classification by the ACB are legally banned from sale, hire or public exhibition, carrying a maximumfine of $782,500 and/or 10 years imprisonment if an individual or organisation is found to be in breach of this. It is legal for people over 18 to possessRC films and games, except inWestern Australia and prescribed areas of the Northern Territory and/or if they contain illegal content (such aschild abuse material). The content is very high in impact.
  • Films and games that exceed theX 18+ andR 18+ ratings (respectively) are refused classification by the ACB. Content that may be refused classification includes, but is not limited to:
    • Detailed instruction or promotion in matters of crime or violence
    • Promotion or provision of instruction in paedophile activity
    • Descriptions or depictions of child sexual abuse or any other exploitative or offensive descriptions or depictions involving a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 years
    • Gratuitous, exploitative or offensive depictions of:
      • violence with a very high degree of impact or which are excessively frequent, prolonged or detailed
      • cruelty or real violence which are very detailed or which have an extremely high impact
      • sexual violence
    • Depictions of practices such as bestiality, necrophilia or other practices that are considered revolting or abhorrent
    • Gratuitous, exploitative or offensive depictions of:
      • activity accompanied by fetishes or practices that are offensive or abhorrent
      • incest fantasies or other fantasies that are offensive or abhorrent

Check the Classification (CTC)
The content has been assessed and approved for advertising unclassified films and computer games. "This film has advertising approval. Check the classification closer to the released date" is usually written on the marking.
  • Any advertising of unclassified films and games must display theCTC message on posters, trailers, on the Internet, and any other types of advertising.
  • Once the content is classified, the classification marking replaces theCTC marking on all advertising material.

Literature ratings

[edit]

Publications such as books and magazines (though they would also include other printed media such as calendars, cards and catalogues) are required to be classified if they contain depictions or descriptions of sexuality, drugs, nudity or violence that are unsuitable for aminor or an adult who would take offence if sold as an unrestricted publication.

Publication classifications are most commonly applied to magazines with visual depictions of nudity or sexual activity, such as manymen's magazines. It is uncommon for these ratings to appear on books, even those dealing with adult themes, except in the most controversial cases.

ClassificationDescription
Unrestricted
Unrestricted


Unrestricted M (mature)
Unrestricted with the consumer advice M (Mature)

These publications have no legal restrictions and are therefore available to persons of all ages, although content may or may not be suitable for readers under 15 years.
Category 1 restricted
Category 1 Restricted (CAT 1)
These publications are not available to persons under 18 years. These may contain images of sexualised nudity. They must be distributed in a sealed wrapper. Their covers must be suitable for public display.
Category 2 restricted
Category 2 Restricted (CAT 2)
Just likeCategory 1 Restricted restricted publications, they are not available to persons under 18 years. However, they contain explicit images of actual sexual activity which are not permissible underCategory 1 Restricted, and may only be displayed in sites that are restricted to adults. Therefore, no publications that are likely to be classifiedCategory 2 Restricted may be displayed in any public registered event.

Refused Classification (RC)
RC publications are banned and cannot be sold or displayed anywhere in Australia.

Therestricted publications are for adults and they are not to be sold to people under 18 (and inQueensland under state law). They have content, such as nudity or explicit sexual content, that could offend some sections of the adult community. Therestricted categories are subject to various restrictions in different states; for example, one or both categories may only be sold in adults-only premises in certain states. For this reason, some adult magazines are published in two editions in Australia, or just one edited edition which can be sold anywhere with a warning, asunrestricted mature.

Proposals

[edit]

Age reference removal

[edit]

In February 2020, the board proposed to remove the reference to 15 years forPG andM classifications and simply just refer to the severity of the material. This is due to a confusion that is caused by each of the categories citing to a 15-year-old, in addition to both thePG andM content not being recommended for persons under 15 years. The age reference created confusion for parents and guardians, creating some questions, such as why anM level film can still be accessed by a person under 15 without guidance because it is not a legally restricted category, when the impact of its material is higher than that ofPG material. There is a confusion for people that comes from knowing the suited audience forPG,M andMA 15+ films and games due to their definitions that revolve around 15 years of age. The notes in the guidelines that come with thePG,M andMA ratings should be read like this:[21]

  • PG: "Content classifiedPG may not be of interest to a child or young person. Some content may contain material which some children and young people may find confusing or upsetting and parental guidance is recommended."
  • M: "Content classified M is not suitable for children. Parental guidance may be required for young people."
  • MA 15+: "Content classifiedMA 15+ is legally restricted to people aged 15 years and over. However, young people aged under 15 years can legally access this content when accompanied by an adult who may need to provide guidance. "

New rating category

[edit]

In February 2020, the board had suggested the adoption of aPG-13-type classification category, which is a rating aimed at young teens (betweenPG andM), that addresses the mild+ impact level material. Its adoption was suggested because many films in recent years surpass what conforms to thePG rating and are, consequentially, pushed up into anM ("moderate impact") rating category due to their dark themes and peril, despite being films aimed at younger teens. Themild+ category, if introduced, could excel the mild impact level (PG), but not so as to require a mature perspective (M classification) and it could be relevant for films with a more significant amount of action or fantasy violence. If the rating is implemented, the non-restricted classifications would read like this:[21]

  • G – General (very mild impact)
  • PG – Parental guidance (mild impact)
  • Young person (mild+ impact)
  • M – Mature (moderate impact)

This would mean the age restrictive numbers (15 and 18) would only be present for the legally-restricted categories ofMA 15+,R 18+ andX 18+. The ACB is not suggesting that the newPG-13 rating would be applied retrospectively, but rather prospectively, as was the case when theMA 15+ category was initiated and whenR 18+ was adopted for video games. The ACB is also not planning to use thePG-13 title for the new classification category, but a title that does not reference any age, such asYP for "young person" (or, likely,T for "teenager").[21]

Literature classification

[edit]

The ACB considers the present classification categories for publications to be redundant, complex, and inappropriate for the digital world. Therefore, the board has proposed the creation of the equivalent film and games classifications ofM,R 18+ andX 18+ for publications, like:[21]

  • Unrestricted publication classification –M
  • Category 1 Restricted publication classification –R 18+
  • Category 2 Restricted publication classification –X 18+

Controversies

[edit]
See also:Australian Classification Review Board

Film

[edit]
See also:List of films banned in Australia
  • Pasolini'sSalò, or the 120 Days of Sodom has twice been banned in Australia. The Home Affairs Minister,Brendan O'Connor, asked the Classification Review Board to reassess the decision;[22] however, the review failed to find any fault in the classification. The film was banned in 1998, and was released after two failed attempts in September 2010, when theACB classified an uncut version ofSalòR 18+, mainly due to extra material providing greater context.
  • In 1992, Island World Communications Ltd andManga Entertainment Australia Ltd hadUrotsukidoji: Legend of the Overfiend submitted to theOFLC. It was the first animated feature to be banned in Australia and the feature was banned outright, similar toViolence Jack.Urotsukidoji was then censored to meet the OFLC's standards. The Australian version is the most censored in the Western world. Many fans ofanime imported uncensored versions ofUrotsukidoji: Legend of the Overfiend from the UK. The rest of theUrotsukidoji series was censored in Australia, with many still importing or downloading the American versions.
  • Ninja Scroll was originally released in 1994 in Australia by Manga Entertainment Ltd. It originally had theMA 15+ rating on the VHS, but this was overturned in 1997 whenPhillip Ruddock had the anime reviewed after an uncut screening of the movie on theSBS. A few months later it was given anR 18+ rating and was uncut, then edited again, eventually using theBBFC cut of it. This was overturned in 2003 whenMadman Entertainment and Manga Entertainment Ltd. released the uncut version.
  • Romance, a new crop within thearthouse genre, which features short scenes ofactual sex began to attract closer scrutiny. The film was initially refused classification in Australia, before it was awarded anR 18+ on appeal.[23] It single-handedly paved the way for actual sex to be accommodated in theR 18+ classification in Australia.[23]
  • Baise-moi, a French film about two prostitutes who take violent revenge after being raped.[24] In 2000, the film was classified asR 18+. On 10 May 2002, the film was subsequently banned and pulled from cinemas and still remains prohibited in Australia to this day due to exploitative and offensive depictions of sexual violence, extreme violence and depictions of behavior and fetishes that are considered offensive or abhorrent.[25]
  • Ken Park, an American film about teenagers that features a scene ofautoerotic asphyxiation, among other sexually explicit scenes.[26] The ban, however, is actually due to exploitative sexual depiction of minors, which is a criminal offence in Australia. In response to the ban, a protest screening was held which was shut down by the police.[27]
    • Prominent movie reviewerMargaret Pomeranz, then host ofThe Movie Show on the SBS, was arrested (and later cautioned and released) along with several others after attempting to screen at a hall what she described as "a wonderful film".[28]Tom Gleisner, host ofThe Panel (a prime-time comedy show), openly stated on the show that he had downloaded and watched the film.
    • FormerNew South Wales PremierBob Carr stated that he thought the banning ofKen Park and other films was inappropriate, and that his attorney-general,Bob Debus, would discuss changing the laws with other state attorneys-general at an upcoming meeting.[29]
  • In October 2017 the classification board was described as homophobic by Luke Buckmaster on flicks.com.au for classifying the filmTom of Finland asR 18+ for high impact sexualised imagery and nudity. The board disputed the allegation, stating that it had classified the film in accordance with its published guidelines and that the distributor had soughtR 18+ conditions for its screenings at the 2017 Scandinavian Film Festival. Buckmaster also compared what he perceived to be the board's heavy-handed approach unfavorably toNetflix, which he argued was permitted to regulate its own content. The board disagreed with this comparison, noting that it was piloting a scheme to streamline the classification of Netflix content in Australia.[30]

Video games

[edit]
See also:List of banned video games in Australia

Video gaming censorship in Australia is considered to be one of the strictest in the Western world.[31] Such controversial and noteworthy cases include:

  • Grand Theft Auto III was withdrawn from sale for allowing players to have sexual intercourse with prostitutes; the game was later reinstated when this action was removed. Specifically, the player could solicit intercourse from a prostitute, and then kill her. The ability to solicit sex from prostitutes in the game was the action that was removed, but in-game characters and pedestrians could still violently murder them.Grand Theft Auto: Vice City was also pre-censored for the same reasons. Though, in 2010Vice City was classified uncut again receiving anMA 15+ and an uncensored version ofGTA 3 was given anR 18+ in 2019.[32]
  • Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas was withdrawn from sale in July 2005 following the revelation that an interactive sex minigame was included in the content files on the game's disc; one could not ordinarily access this, but a third party modification, known as theHot Coffee mod, allowed the player to access the minigame and the inclusion of the scenes on the game disc took the game outside theMA 15+ category. TheMA 15+ rating was re-instated after a modified version was released worldwide byRockstar Games, removing the content files for the sex scenes.
  • Grand Theft Auto IV was also pre-censored prior to classification and release in the Australian region. In the American release, sexual encounters with prostitutes occur inside the player's vehicle and the player has the ability to rotate the camera for a clearer view of what transpires. In the censored Australian version, the camera is fixed behind the vehicle, which rocks from side to side with accompanying audio effects. It is impossible for the player to view the inside of the car.[33] Rockstar later submitted the uncut version of the game, which went on to receive the sameMA 15+ rating as its censored counterpart, and a patch was released for the PS3, PC and Xbox 360 to uncensor the game.
  • 50 Cent: Bulletproof was banned for encouraging gang violence. A version removing the game's arcade mode, cutting down on gore, and with an automatic game over for killing innocents was given anMA 15+ rating.
  • Fallout 3 was refused classification by theOFLC[34][35] due to the "realistic visual representations of drugs and their delivery method (bringing) the 'science-fiction' drugs in line with 'real-world' drugs." A revised version of the game was resubmitted to the OFLC and reclassified asMA 15+ on 7 August 2008 after drug names were changed.[36] It was later clarified that the only change done to the final version of the game was the name "morphine" changed to "Med-x". This change was done to all versions worldwide; thus, Australia got the same version of the game as other countries uncut with anMA 15+.
  • Atelier Totori Plus: The Adventurer of Arland was given an R 18+ rating onPlayStation Vita, a huge jump from thePS3 version's PG rating, with the reason being "references to sexual violence".[37] Comparatively, in North America, the game received a T for Teen (ages 13+) rating, a 12+ rating in Japan (CERO B), and a PEGI 12 rating. Its strict rating resulted in the creation of aninternet meme captioned "High Impact Violence" that satirizes the Classification Board for labeling mildly sensual animation as having "high impact".[38]

Adult (18+) ratings for video games

[edit]

Many games were banned before 2011 on the basis that theR 18+ rating did not apply to video games at the time. This was the subject of complaint in the gaming community, who argued that there is no reason why adults should be prevented from seeing content in games that they could see in a film. One of the main opponents to the introduction of anR 18+ rating for video games was the former South Australian Attorney-General,Michael Atkinson, who vetoed every attempt to include one.[39]

On 11 August 2010, at a public forum, opposition leaderTony Abbott was asked a question about his views on the absence of anR 18+ rating for video games and whether he had any policies relating to the subject, saying, "if what happens with video games is not roughly analogous to what happens in other areas, that seems silly ... Instinctively I'm with you, and it's something I'd be happy to look at, if we are in Government."[40][41][42][43] In December 2010, Attorney GeneralRobert McClelland appeared to be moving on this issue following the release of telephone poll results conducted by the Minister for Home Affairs Brendan O'Connor, showing roughly 80% in support of anR 18+ classification.[44]

On 22 July 2011, at a meeting of state and territories' attorneys general, an agreement was reached for the introduction of anR 18+ classification. It was planned to introduce the rating towards the end of 2011.[45]On 22 July 2011, a meeting of attorneys-general produced an in-principle agreement to introduce theR 18+ classification for video games; however, NSW Attorney-GeneralGreg Smith abstained from the vote. The Home Affairs Minister,Brendan O'Connor, said the federal government would over-ride NSW and implement theR 18+ rating regardless of its decision and would be officially available before the end of 2011.[46] On 10 August the NSW Attorney General agreed on theR 18+; thus, the rating would be accepted and available to all states before the end of 2011.[47][48]

As of 1 January 2013, theR 18+ rating has been officially implemented for video games although it is apparently not being used to full effect as many games are still beingrefused classification.[49]

The first game to be released with anR 18+ rating wasNinja Gaiden Sigma 2 Plus. The gameSaints Row IV became the first game to be refused classification under the new standard on 25 June 2013.[50][51]State of Decay became the second game to be refused classification less than 24 hours after the first (Saints Row IV) was banned. Both were refused classification on the grounds of "illicit or proscribed drug use related to incentives and rewards".[52]

Video games classified from 22 September 2024 containing "simulated gambling" will now be classified, at minimum, as R 18+.[53]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Griffith, Gareth (March 2002).Censorship in Australia: Regulating the Internet and other recent developments.ISBN 0-7313-17076.Archived from the original on 19 August 2024. Retrieved19 August 2024.
  2. ^"Classification Board".Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved7 April 2021.
  3. ^Rebecca Boyle (24 October 2022)."Exit the ghouls".National Archives of Australia.Archived from the original on 6 August 2024. Retrieved19 August 2024.
  4. ^abCole, R., Driscoll, C., & Grealy, L. (2018). Classifying adulthood: A history of governing minority in media classification. In Youth, Technology, Governance, Experience (p. 74). Routledge.
  5. ^J. P. Hannaford (24 March 1995)."FILM AND COMPUTER GAME CLASSIFICATION ACT 1984—REGULATION"(PDF).Australasian Legal Information Institute. Retrieved16 October 2025.
  6. ^"Annual Report 2004–2005"(PDF).Australian Classification Board. 2005. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 21 March 2019. Retrieved7 March 2021.
  7. ^"Games get film ratings".The Daily Telegraph (1 – State ed.). 6 July 2005. p. 11. Archived fromthe original on 9 June 2005.
  8. ^"The Classification Code; May 2005". January 2013.Archived from the original on 7 November 2015. Retrieved24 May 2014.
  9. ^"Review Board".www.classification.gov.au.Archived from the original on 19 April 2020. Retrieved30 April 2016.
  10. ^"Getting Digitally-Distributed Games Classified in Australia to be Cost-Free – IGN". September 2014.Archived from the original on 1 September 2014. Retrieved1 September 2014.
  11. ^"Netflix gets approval to classify own shows after two-year trial".Archived from the original on 20 March 2021. Retrieved6 October 2019.
  12. ^"Classification and censorship". 20 June 2019.
  13. ^Classification, The Australian (9 August 2019)."What do the ratings mean?".www.classification.gov.au.Archived from the original on 21 September 2024. Retrieved26 June 2020.
  14. ^Classification, The Australian (30 May 2020)."THE LAST OF US PART II".www.classification.gov.au.Archived from the original on 7 June 2020. Retrieved26 June 2020.
  15. ^"What's ok for children?". 9 August 2019.Archived from the original on 29 October 2019. Retrieved23 May 2014.
  16. ^Maher, Cian (17 August 2020)."Australian government rules that games with microtransactions must address them in box art".VG247.Archived from the original on 19 April 2021. Retrieved17 August 2020.
  17. ^Canna, Xavier La (6 June 2005)."New classifications pave way for R-rated games".The Age. Australia. p. 7.Archived from the original on 17 October 2015. Retrieved5 August 2012.
  18. ^ab"What do the ratings mean?". Australian Classification Board.Archived from the original on 21 September 2024. Retrieved30 July 2022.
  19. ^abClare, Jason (Minister for Justice) (10 December 2012)."Guidelines for the Classification of Films 2012". Commonwealth of Australia.Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved10 May 2015.
  20. ^"Films and computer games exempt from classification".Australian Classification.Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved9 May 2015.
  21. ^abcdREVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN CLASSIFICATION REGULATION Classification Board Submission (Archived 20 December 2021 at theWayback Machine) by the ACB. February 2020. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
  22. ^Minister asks censors to reassess approval of sadistic filmArchived 7 September 2013 at theWayback Machine. SMH (17 April 2010).
  23. ^ab"Romance (1999)". Refused-Classification.com.Archived from the original on 20 March 2021. Retrieved9 December 2011.
  24. ^OFLC Classification Review Board Report re Baisez-Moi.Archived 16 April 2007 at theWayback Machine
  25. ^OFLC Classifies Baise-Moi R18+.[permanent dead link]
  26. ^"Archived copy"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 8 October 2006. Retrieved8 February 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  27. ^Needham, Kirsty (7 April 2003)."Police quiz critic after raid".The Sydney Morning Herald. p. 5.Archived from the original on 3 July 2016. Retrieved30 May 2007.
  28. ^World Socialist Web Site report into the screening of Ken ParkArchived 28 October 2012 at theWayback Machine. Wsws.org (10 July 2003)
  29. ^Maddox, Garry (18 June 2003)."Debus wants festival film rethink".The Sydney Morning Herald. p. 9.ISSN 0312-6315.Archived from the original on 11 September 2016. Retrieved5 August 2012.
  30. ^"Media release—Classification of the film Tom of Finland and allegations that the Classification Board is "homophobic"". Australian Classification Board. 19 October 2017.Archived from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved8 June 2020.
  31. ^Abjorensen, Docherty, Norman, James C. (5 December 2014).Historical Dictionary of Australia. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 93.ISBN 9781442245020.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  32. ^Grand Theft Auto III. classification.gov.au
  33. ^IGN: Aussie GTA IV Censorship UpdateArchived 13 July 2011 at theWayback Machine. Au.xbox360.ign.com.
  34. ^OFLC listingArchived 2 March 2009 at theWayback Machine forFallout 3. Retrieved 12 July 2008.
  35. ^Fallout 3 Officially Refused Classification in AustraliaArchived 26 January 2012 at theWayback Machine. Xbox360.ign.com.
  36. ^"Fallout 3 Censorship Report". IGN. 13 August 2008. Retrieved6 May 2015.
  37. ^"Australian Classification – Atelier Totori Plus: The Adventurer of Arland". Australian Classification Board. Archived fromthe original on 10 April 2013. Retrieved20 March 2013.
  38. ^ATELIER TOTORI: THE ADVENTURER OF ARLAND – HIGH IMPACT SEXUAL VIOLENCE?Archived 23 October 2021 at theWayback Machine Pete Davison from Moegamer.net, 25 September 2020
  39. ^Lake, Chloe (27 February 2008)."Attorney-general opposes R rating for games".News.com.au. News Limited. Archived fromthe original on 2 March 2008. Retrieved27 February 2008.
  40. ^Madigan, Michael; Packham, Ben (11 August 2010)."Tony Abbott Q&A from Rooty Hill".The Courier Mail. News Limited.Archived from the original on 3 June 2012. Retrieved23 May 2014.
  41. ^Wildgoose, David (12 August 2010)."Tony Abbott: 'Happy To Look At' R18+ Rating".Kotaku. Archived fromthe original on 15 August 2010.
  42. ^LeMay, Renai (11 August 2010)."Abbott pledges R18+ gaming review".iTWire. Archived fromthe original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved23 May 2014.
  43. ^LeMay, Renai (11 August 2010)."Abbott pledges R18+ gaming review".Delimiter. LeMay & Galt Media.
  44. ^"An R 18+ Classification for Computer Games".Attorney-General's Department. Commonwealth of Australia. 8 December 2010. Archived fromthe original on 3 April 2011. Retrieved23 May 2014.
  45. ^"'Historic agreement' on R18+ video games".The Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax Media. 22 July 2011.Archived from the original on 22 September 2011. Retrieved24 February 2012.
  46. ^Asher Moses, Ben Grubb (22 July 2011)."'Historic agreement' on R18+ video games".The Sydney Morning Herald.Archived from the original on 22 September 2011. Retrieved22 July 2011.
  47. ^Laura Parker (9 August 2011),"NSW backs R18+ for games",GameSpot
  48. ^"Governments agree on R18+ games rating".ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Company. 22 July 2011.Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved3 November 2011.
  49. ^"Gamers get adults-only R18+ classification". Australian Associated Press. 18 June 2012. Archived fromthe original on 10 September 2016. Retrieved18 June 2012.
  50. ^Reilly, Luke (25 June 2013)."Saints Row IV banned in Australia".IGN.Ziff Davis. Archived fromthe original on 3 April 2015. Retrieved15 March 2015.
  51. ^25 June 2013:Saints Row IV first computer game Refused ClassificationArchived 25 October 2024 at theWayback Machine . Australian Classification Board, 25 June 2013. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  52. ^26 June 2013: "Second video game – State of Decay – banned in Australia"Archived 8 February 2014 at theWayback Machine. News.com.au, 26 June 2013. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  53. ^"New classifications for gambling-like content in video games".Australian Classification. 18 September 2024.Archived from the original on 22 September 2024. Retrieved22 September 2024.

External links

[edit]
Films
By decade
By year
Production companies
and studios
Organisations
Awards
Theatres
Topics
Active
Former/Defunct
Related
Active
Former/Defunct
Related
  • *Not all of Europe uses the PEGI rating system.
  • **The 3DO Rating System only applied to games released on the3DO.
  • ***The BBFC and KMRB still exist as motion picture rating systems. Additionally, the BBFC continues to rate video games containing pornographic content or external video material.
  • ****ELSPA (now the Association for UK Interactive Entertainment or Ukie) still exists as a video game trade association.
  • *****V.R.C. ratings only applied to games released onSega consoles.

Category·Motion picture content rating systems template·Television content rating systems template

Laws
Africa
Americas
US
Asia
Europe
UK
Oceania
Cases
Other
By country
Other
International
National
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Classification_Board&oldid=1337244333"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp