Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Argumentum ad crumenam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Informal fallacy

Anargumentum ad crumenamargument, also known asan argument to the purse, is theinformal fallacy of drawing conclusions based on the speaker's financial status.[1][2]The term generally refers to the assumption that having wealth is indicative of insight or virtue, and that poverty denotes the opposite.[1]

The opposite is theargumentum ad lazarum.

Examples

[edit]
  • "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?"
  • "This new law is a good idea. Most of the people against it are riff-raff who make less than $20,000 a year."
  • "Warren Buffett is hosting a seminar. This seminar is better than others, because Warren Buffett is richer than most people."

References

[edit]
  1. ^abFellmeth, Aaron X.; Horwitz, Maurice (2021). "Argumentum ad crumenam".Guide to Latin in International Law.Oxford University Press.ISBN 9780197583104.
  2. ^"Argument to the Purse".Logically Fallacious.
Commonfallacies (list)
Formal
Inpropositional logic
Inquantificational logic
Syllogistic fallacy
Informal
Equivocation
Question-begging
Correlative-based
Illicit transference
Secundum quid
Faulty generalization
Ambiguity
Questionable cause
Appeals
Consequences
Emotion
Genetic fallacy
Ad hominem
Otherfallacies
of relevance
Arguments
Highwealth
Concepts
People
Wealth
Lists
People
Organizations
Other
Related
Philanthropy
Sayings
Media
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argumentum_ad_crumenam&oldid=1327536491"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp