Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1991 adopted multilateral agreement
Arctic landscape

TheArctic Environmental Protection Strategy (AEPS) (sometimes referred to as theFinnish Initiative orRovaniemi Process)[1][2] is a multilateral, non-binding agreement[3] amongArctic states onenvironmental protection in the Arctic. Discussions began in 1989, with the AEPS adopted in June 1991 byCanada,Denmark,Finland,Iceland,Norway,Sweden, theSoviet Union, and theUnited States. The AEPS deals with monitoring, assessment, protection, emergency preparedness/response, and conservation of the Arctic zone.[4] It has been called a major political accomplishment of thepost–Cold War era.[5]

Background

[edit]

In January 1989, Finland sent a letter to the other Arctic states proposing a conference on protection of the Arcticenvironment.[6] TheRovaniemi Meeting of September 1989 established two working groups. This was followed by the second consultative meeting inYellowknife,Northwest Territories,Canada in April 1990 where a thirdad hoc group was established to develop the strategy. It also resulted in the preparation of a draft document.Kiruna, Sweden was the site of the third meeting, held in January 1991, where one group worked on the drafting the AEPS while another dealt with specificenvironmental issues.

Adoption

[edit]

Government officials from all the Arctic nations convened in Rovaniemi in June 1991 for the last consultative meeting. The first three days included meetings, followed by a ministerial-level meeting on 13–14 June observed by representatives fromGermany,Poland, theUnited Kingdom, and theUnited Nations.

Threeindigenous peoples' organizations observed, participated, assisted in developing the strategy, and later became Permanent Participants in the Arctic Council: theSaami Council, theInuit Circumpolar Conference, and theAssociation of Indigenous Minorities of the North, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Federation (RAIPON).[3] They considered the Rovaniemi ministerial meeting to be "historic" as it represented the first time that Arctic indigenous peoples participated in an international declaration's preparation process.[7]

On 14 June 1991, the AEPS and the Declaration on the Protection of the Arctic Environment ("Rovaniemi Declaration") were formally adopted.[8] The main objectives were listed as,

"Preserving environmental quality and natural resources, accommodating environmental protection principals with the needs and traditions of Arctic Native peoples, monitoring environmental conditions, and reducing and eventually eliminating pollution in the Arctic Environment."[1]

Follow-up

[edit]

The AEPS outlined five objectives and six pollution issues.[9] Legal issues included its jurisdictional reach and extent of obligations for the member states.[10] Data-gathering, information compilation, and assessment tasks were organized around these issues.[11]

In their 1993 follow-up meeting inNuuk,Greenland, ministers endorsed expanding the AEPS in order to deal with sustainable development,[4] and issued the Nuuk Declaration.[12] Another meeting occurred in 1996 inOttawa,Canada, resulting in the Ottawa Declaration (1996) and the establishment of theArctic Council.[13] The last meeting, held in 1997 inAlta[11] following the AEPS's 1996 absorption into theArctic Council resulted in the Alta Declaration.[14]

The AEPS remains a strategy for the council's working groups,[15] including:[3]

Criticism

[edit]

Critics of the Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy argue that it:

  1. Lacks ongoing political attention and direction, along with financial commitment.[4]
  2. Lacks the legal authority of a treaty.[16]
  3. Involves studies and talks but lacks concrete action.[17]
  4. Does not address specific problems, for example,Arctic haze.[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abOffice of Technology Assessment Washington DC (1995).Nuclear Wastes in the Arctic: An Analysis of Arctic and Other Regional Impacts from Soviet Nuclear Contamination. Ft. Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center SEP. p. 196.ISBN 978-1-4289-2035-4.OCLC 227865174.
  2. ^Tahkolahti, Jaakko (12 June 2001)."Rovaniemi-prosessi".Helsingin Sanomat (in Finnish). Retrieved26 December 2024.
  3. ^abcRussell, Bruce A."The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy & the New Arctic Council".Archived from the original on 11 October 2008. Retrieved2008-09-23.
  4. ^abc"The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy". carc.org. Archived fromthe original on 2006-10-07. Retrieved2008-09-23.
  5. ^Broadus, J.M.; Vartanov, R.V., eds. (1994).The Oceans and Environmental Security: Shared Us and Russian Perspectives. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. pp. 176.ISBN 1-55963-235-6.Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy .
  6. ^Rothwell, p. 231
  7. ^Tennberg, Monica (December 1996)."CONTRIBUTING TO THE AEPS: INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE".Northern Notes.IV. uconn.edu:21–32.Archived from the original on 11 October 2008. Retrieved2008-09-23.
  8. ^Rothwell, Donald (1996).The Polar Regions and the Development of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 231–233.ISBN 0-521-56182-5.
  9. ^Rothwell, p. 234
  10. ^Rothwell, p. 238
  11. ^abVidas, Davor Vidas (2000).Protecting the Polar Marine Environment: Law and Policy for Pollution Prevention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 84.ISBN 0-521-66311-3.
  12. ^Ministers of the Arctic Countries (1993-09-16)."The Nuuk Declaration". npolar.no. Archived fromthe original on 2012-07-07. Retrieved2008-09-23.
  13. ^Global Environment Outlook-1 (1997)."Chapter 3: Policy Responses and Directions".United Nations Environment Programme, Global State of the Environment Report. nies.go.jp. Archived fromthe original on 2005-03-10. Retrieved2008-09-23.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  14. ^Ministers of the Arctic countries (1997-06-13)."The Alta Declaration". npolar.no. Archived fromthe original on 2012-07-08. Retrieved2008-09-23.
  15. ^Nowlan, Linda (2001).Arctic Legal Regime for Environmental Protection. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, The World Conservation Union. p. 5.ISBN 2-8317-0637-8.
  16. ^Pfirman, S.L.; Hajost, S.A.; Crane, K. (1992-12-29)."We Have to Protect No-Longer-Pristine Arctic".The New York Times. Retrieved2008-09-23.
  17. ^Elferink, A.G.O.; Rothwell, D.; VanderZwagg, D.; Huebert, R.; Ferrara, S. (2001).The Law of the Sea and Polar Maritime Delimitation and Jurisdiction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. pp. Chapter 12, p. 226.ISBN 90-411-1648-6.
  18. ^Young, O.R.; Osherenko, G. (1993).Polar Politics: Creating International Environmental Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 187.ISBN 0-8014-8069-8.

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arctic_Environmental_Protection_Strategy&oldid=1314433927"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp