![]() | You can helpexpand this article with text translated fromthe corresponding article in French. (November 2021)Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
![]() | You can helpexpand this article with text translated fromthe corresponding article in Spanish. (November 2021)Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
Apoliticism isapathy orantipathy towards all political affiliations.[1] A person may be described as apolitical if they are uninterested or uninvolved in politics.[2] Being apolitical can also refer to situations in which people take anunbiased position in regard to political matters.[3] TheCollins English Dictionary definesapolitical as "politically neutral; without political attitudes, content, or bias."[4]
Duringclassical antiquity, theEpicureans assumed disengagement from the life of the city as a doctrinal position. Seekingpleasure in the absence ofsuffering for the body and trouble forthe soul, they saw political activity as a source of unnecessary stress that would not lead to these ends.[5] However, they were not strictly apolitical and participated when political activity would bring them pleasure or aid in the avoidance of their suffering.[6]
TheProtestantAnabaptists adopted apolitical beliefs and practices: Anabaptist radicalism resulted in a sharpseparation of Christian communities from the state.[citation needed] With the progression of time,peace church traditions andevangelical socialreformism have led to greater engagement.[citation needed] Moreascetic traditions have tended to adopt a minimalistic approach to political engagement,personal salvation and church mission being preoccupations instead.[citation needed]
Apoliticism as anideology is criticised for its claim that it is possible to remain impartial. Manyprogressive theorists argue that by ignoring the political nature of everyday life, "neutral" individuals make a choice to ignore oppressive regimes and practises, which manifests as an acceptance and passive approval of them. The following instance is indicative of this rhetoric:
"all men are political beings […] Every man, in as much as he is active, i.e. living, contributes to modifying the social environment in which he develops (to modifying certain of its characteristics or to preserving others); in other words, he tends to establish 'norms', rules of living and behaviour."[7]
—Antonio Gramsci Selections from Prison Notebooks: State and Civil Society 1971
Another example of this is the political slogan:The personal is political. The phrase was popularised by radical feministCarol Hanisch in her essay of the same name, which analyses the ways in which the personal problems of women are actually political ones.[8]
My colleagues and I come to this task with open minds. We are apolitical and independent of any political party. We want to examine the evidence. We will approach our task in a way that is thorough, rigorous, fair and frank.