This discourse, promoted by the governments of Hungary and Poland, alleges thatLGBTQ rights movements are controlled by foreign forces (such as theEuropean Union) and are a threat to national independence and Western civilization.[9][10][11][12] Anti-government protests in Russia and theEuromaidan have also been portrayed by the Russian government as the work of an LGBTQ conspiracy.[12] Furthermore, although Russia considers itself to be a European country, its government also considers its values as entirely different from those of the European Union. More specifically, Russia has distanced itself from the values of the EU by propagating its own anti-LGBTQ values.[13]
In 2013, the conservative blogAmerican Thinker published several articles using the phrase "LGBT ideology".[14] The Italian Catholic philosopherRoberto Marchesini [it] used the phrase in a 2015 article, equating it with the earlier concept of "gender ideology". In his article, he does not define either "LGBT ideology" or "gender ideology".[14][15] In 2017, several conservative Islamic politicians in Malaysia and Indonesia denounced "LGBT ideology".[14][16]
During a sermon on 1 August 2019, Polish ArchbishopMarek Jędraszewski called "LGBT ideology" a "rainbow plague" and compared it to the "Red Plague" ofCommunism.[17][18] Following this, the Czech cardinalDominik Duka also commented on "LGBT ideology". However, becauseCzech society is secular and the Catholic Church has little influence on Czech politics, his comments had little impact.[14] In September 2019, Stanley Bill, a lecturer atCambridge University who studies Poland, stated "Scaremongering about 'LGBT ideology' has almost become official policy in Poland with often nasty insinuations from members of the government and public media now the norm".[19]
In June 2020, Polish PresidentAndrzej Duda drew international attention when he calledLGBTQ an "ideology" and a form of "Neo-Bolshevism".[20][21]Agreement Party MPJacek Żalek stated in an interview that the LGBT community "are not people" and "it's an ideology", which led to the journalistKatarzyna Kolenda-Zaleska [pl] asking him to leave the studio; the row caused controversy.[22] The next day, Duda said at a rally in Silesia: "They are trying to convince us that [LGBT] is people, but it is just an ideology."[23] He promised to "ban the propagation of LGBT ideology in public institutions", including schools, similar to theRussian gay propaganda law.[24] On the same day, PiS MPPrzemysław Czarnek said on aTVP Info talk show, regarding a photo of a naked person in a gay bar, "Let's defend ourselves against LGBT ideology and stop listening to those idiocies about human rights or equality. These people are not equal to normal people."[24][25]
In July 2020, theEuropean Union announced that it would not provide funding to six Polish towns that have declared themselves "LGBT-free zones", after nearly 100 local governments, a third of Poland's territory, declared themselves "free from LGBT ideology."[26] On 1 August 2020, the anniversary of theWarsaw Uprising, ultranationalistRobert Winnicki compared LGBT to communist and Nazi ideology. He stated, "Every plague passes at some point. The German plague passed, which was consuming Poland for six years, the red plague passed, the rainbow plague is also going to pass."[27]
In August 2020, Justice MinisterZbigniew Ziobro announced a new program for "counteracting crimes related to the violation of freedom of conscience committed under the influence of LGBT ideology". From a government fund intended to help victims of crime, PLN 613,698 was awarded to a foundation to combat the alleged crimes of "LGBT ideology".[28][29][30] The project, among other things, explores a supposed connection between LGBT ideology and theFrankfurt School.[31] At the 16 August "Stop LGBT aggression" rally that year,Krzysztof Bosak said that even irreligious people are among opponents of "LGBT ideology" because it is "contrary to common sense and rational thinking". He also said that the LGBT community is "a lower form of social life".[32]
According toKrakow Post, a Polish newspaper, "LGBT is not an ideology ... The phrase 'LGBT ideology' makes about as much sense as 'redhead ideology' or 'left-handed ideology.'" While the support of manyLGBT people andtheir allies improvedLGBT rights, they have differing political views.[20] According to Notes from Poland, "attacks on 'LGBT ideology' – which often rely on exaggerated, distorted or invented claims – result in the marginalisation and demonisation of such people."[33] Center-right presidential candidateSzymon Hołownia, who is a practicing Catholic, stated, "there is no such thing as LGBT ideology, there are [LGBT] people". He said that anti-LGBT rhetoric from politicians could lead vulnerable people to suicide.[33] In protest at the comments made by the president and Żalek, LGBT people have held pickets in various towns and cities in Poland, opposing the idea that LGBT is an ideology.[34][35][36][37] Activists also created a film, "Ludzie, nie ideologia" (People, not ideology), showcasing the families of LGBT people.[38]
An article inOKO.press compared the anti-LGBT campaign to the1968 "anti-Zionist" campaign: the anti-Zionist campaign ostensibly targetedZionism as an ideology, but actually targeted Jews as people. Many Jews were forced out of the country in 1968, and many LGBT people have been pressured to emigrate from Poland in 2020.[24] According to Polish historianAdam Leszczyński, "LGBT ideology" is
a bag into which the right wing throws societal changes that do not suit it (eg. calls for equal rights for same-sex couples, which have been implemented in many countries, from theUnited States toSouth Africa). In the language of right-wing propaganda... 'LGBT ideology' serves to dehumanize minorities and create an enemy – and thus build political support for the right, which presents itself as the only defender of the traditional family, religion and social order. 'Ideology' also fits the right-wing perception of the world in terms of a conspiracy – ideology is 'promoted', someone disseminates it, someone is 'behind it' (eg.George Soros, a Jewish-American financier who supports, among others, LGBT organizations).[39]
Dehumanization is a frequent feature of anti-LGBT rhetoric, which may take the form of comparing LGBT people to animals or equating homosexual relationships withbestiality.[40][41]
In 2025, the social media conglomerateMeta updated itshate speech policies to allow "allegations of mental illness or abnormality" based on sexual orientation or gender identity,[42][43] which the LGBTQ magazineThe Advocate said would allow "hateful and dehumanizing rhetoric" on Meta's platforms such asFacebook andInstagram.[44]
According to one study, "homophobic epithets foster dehumanization and avoidance of gay people, in ways that other insults or labels do not."[45] Another study found thathomophobia "results in substantial health and welfare effects".[46]
In Serbia, members ofObraz chanted "Death to faggots" (Serbian:Смрт педерима). They posted posters stating "we are waiting for you" (Serbian:чекамо вас) next to an image of a baseball bat. In 2012, the organization was banned by theConstitutional Court of Serbia due to extremism.[55][56]
Anti-gay activists claim that homosexuality goes against traditionalfamily values, that homosexuality is aTrojan Horse, or that it destroys families and humankind[57] through homosexualrecruitment which will lead to the extinction of humanity.[58]
The argument that homosexuals causenatural disasters has been around for more than a thousand years, even beforeJustinian blamed earthquakes on "unchecked homosexual behavior" in the sixth century.[59] This trope was common inearly modern Christian literature;[60] homosexuals were blamed for earthquakes, floods, famines, plagues, invasions ofSaracens, and field mice. This discourse was revived byAnita Bryant in 1976 when she blamed homosexuals for droughts in California.[59] In the U.S., right-wing religious groups including theWestboro Baptist Church continue to claim that homosexuals are responsible for disasters.[61] Homosexuals have been blamed for hurricanes, includingIsaac,Katrina, andSandy.[62] In 2020, various religious figures including Israeli rabbiMeir Mazuz have argued that theCOVID-19 pandemic is divine retribution for same-sex activity orpride parades.[63]
Following theSeptember 2001 attacks, televangelistJerry Falwell blamed "the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that analternative lifestyle, theACLU, People for the American Way" for provoking the aggression ofIslamic fundamentalists and causing God to withdraw his protection for America.[64] On the broadcast of the Christian television programThe 700 Club, Falwell said, "You helped this happen". He later apologized and said, "I would never blame any human being except the terrorists".[65][66]
In 2012, Chilean politicianIgnacio Urrutia claimed that allowing homosexuals to serve in theChilean military would cause Perú and Bolivia to invade and destroy his country.[67]
An outgrowth of the discourse on homosexualitycausing disasters argues thatHIV/AIDS is divine punishment for homosexuality.[68][59][69] During the early years of the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s, mainstream newspapers labeled it a "gay plague".[70][71][72] For a few years, the misleading technical name for the disease wasgay-related immune deficiency.[73]
The slogan "AIDS Kills Fags Dead" (a pun on the commercial slogan forRaid insecticide "Raid Kills Bugs Dead") appeared during the early years of AIDS in the United States, when the disease was mainly diagnosed among male homosexuals and was almost invariably fatal. The slogan caught on quickly as a catchytruism, achant, or simply something written asgraffiti. It is reported that the slogan first appeared in public in the early 1990s, whenSebastian Bach, the former lead singer of theheavy metal bandSkid Row, wore it on at-shirt thrown to him by an audience member.[74] The slogan "AIDS cures fags" is used by the Westboro Baptist Church.[75][76]
During an anti-gay neo-Nazi rally in the German city ofGörlitz in 2024, participants chanted "HIV, hilf uns doch, Schwule gibt es immer noch" ("HIV, help us, there are still gays").[77]
Graffiti inPoznań, Poland: "Boy–girl is the normal family". This has, in turn, been graffitied to add the word "not" inPolish, andtwo female symbols.
Describing homosexuality as unnatural dates back toPlato,Aristotle, andThomas Aquinas. However, there is no single definition of "unnatural". Some of those who argue that homosexuality is unnatural in the sense of being absent from nature, an argument refuted by the presence ofhomosexuality in animals. Others mean that the genitals were created for reproduction (either by God or natural selection) and are not intended to be used for purposes they deem "unnatural". Proponents of this idea often argue that homosexuality is immoral because it is unnatural, but opponents argue that this argument makes anis–ought conflation. Some proponents of the "unnaturalness" thesis argue that homosexual behavior is the result of "recruitment" or willful sinfulness.[78]
Nazi propaganda described homosexuality as a contagious disease[79] but not in the medical sense. Rather, homosexuality was a disease of theVolkskörper (national body), a metaphor for the desired national or racial community (Volksgemeinschaft). According to Nazi ideology, individuals' lives were to be subordinated to theVolkskörper like cells in the human body. Homosexuality was seen as a virus or cancer in theVolkskörper because it was seen as a threat to the German nation.[80] The SS newspaperDas Schwarze Korps argued that 40,000 homosexuals were capable of "poisoning" two million men if left to roam free.[81]
Some of those who called homosexualityunnatural, such asTraditional Values Coalition head andChristian right activistLouis Sheldon, said that if it were proven to be a biologically based phenomenon, it would still be diseased.[78] The psychiatric establishment in the west oncemedicalized same-sex desire. In the United States, homosexuality was removed in 1973 as amental disorder from theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) as it did not meet the criteria for a mental disorder.[82][83][84] The Catholic Church stillofficially teaches that "homosexual tendencies" are "objectively disordered".[85] In 2016, anti-LGBT rhetoric was increasing in Indonesia under the Twitter hashtag #TolakLGBT (#RejectLGBT), stating that LGBT is a disease.[86] In 2019, ArchbishopMarek Jędraszewski said that a "rainbow plague" was threatening Poland.[87] In 2020, the education minister defended an official who warned that "LGBT virus" was threatening Polish schools, and was more dangerous thanCOVID-19.[88]
"Gay lifestyle" redirects here. For the culture of gay people, seeLGBT culture.
Along with the idea of "homosexual recruitment", the idea of a "gay lifestyle" or "homosexual lifestyle" is used by social and religious conservatives in the United States to argue that non-heterosexualsexual orientations are consciously chosen.[89][90] However, scientists favorbiological explanations for sexual orientation, arguing that people typically feel no sense of control over their sexual orientation or attractions.[91]The term "gay lifestyle" may also be used disparagingly for a series of stereotyped behaviours.[92]
Christian right activists may worry that increasingLGBT rights will make the "gay lifestyle" more attractive to young people.[93]US media in the 1970s frequently used the term "alternative lifestyle" as a euphemism for homosexuality. The term was employed in an anti-gay context by opponents of theEqual Rights Amendment, as well as supporters of California'sProposition 6, which would have barred openly gay teachers in public schools.[94]In 1977, while campaigning against a local ordinance protecting gay teachers againstemployment discrimination, anti-gay activistAnita Bryant stated, "A homosexual is not born, they are made".[95]US presidentRonald Reagan described thegay rights movement in opposition to American culture, saying the movement was "asking for a recognition and acceptance of an alternative lifestyle which I do not believe society can condone".[94]
Many conservative Christians consider homosexual acts to be inherently sinful based on common interpretations of scriptural passages such asLeviticus 18:22 ("You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination"),Leviticus 20:13 ("If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them"), and1 Corinthians 6:9–10 ("Do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! Fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers—none of these will inherit the kingdom of God.")[96] The story ofSodom and Gomorrah, two biblical cities which were burned down due to the sins of its inhabitants, is mostly portrayed as divine retribution for homosexual behavior.[97][96]
Various inflammatory and controversial slogans have been used by opponent congregations and individuals, particularly byFred Phelps, founder of theWestboro Baptist Church. These slogans have included "God Hates Fags", "Fear God Not Fags", and "Matthew Shepard Burns In Hell".[98]
Posters inTel Aviv prior to the city's Pride Parade: "God hates lechery"
Homosexuality is also frequently considered sinful inIslam. In some Middle Eastern countries, acts of homosexuality are punishable by death. Anti-LGBT rhetoric and political homophobia are growing in some Muslim countries.[99]
Other religious leaders, including Christians, Muslims, and Jews, have denounced anti-LGBT rhetoric.[100]
Counter-protester at an anti-LGBTQ demonstration inSeoul, 2017
The slogan "God madeAdam and Eve, notAdam and Steve" alludes to a Bible-based argument that homosexuality is sinful and unnatural.[101][102]A 1970 editorial inChristianity Today quoted agraffito in San Francisco that read, "If God had wanted homosexuals, he would have created Adam and Freddy."[103] In 1977, anti-gay activistAnita Bryant made a similar comment using the phrase "Adam and Bruce".[103][104] The version with "Adam and Steve" first appeared on a protest sign at a 1977 anti-gay rally in Houston, Texas, featuringChristian right figures such asPhyllis Schlafly and National Right to Life Committee founderMildred Jefferson.[105][106] The slogan was also used in "The Gay Bar," a 1977 episode of the sitcomMaude.[citation needed] In 1979,Jerry Falwell used the "Adam and Steve" slogan in a press conference cited inChristianity Today.[103][105] During the initial outbreak ofHIV/AIDS in the United States in 1985, conservative congressmanWilliam E. Dannemeyer used the slogan to argue that gay men were a threat to public health.[107]
The phrase later acquired a certain notoriety, and, when used to name a pair of characters in a work of fiction, helps to identify them as members of a homosexual pair (as inPaul Rudnick's playThe Most Fabulous Story Ever Told[105][108] and the 2005 filmAdam & Steve).[105] The phrase was used by Democratic Unionist MPDavid Simpson during a debate on theMarriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 in the British House of Commons, although his slip of the tongue saying "in the Garden of Eden, it was Adam and Steve" initially caused laughter in the chamber.[109][105] Zimbabwean presidential candidateNelson Chamisa said in a 2019 interview that "[w]e must be able to respect what God ordained and how we are created as a people, there are a male and a female, there are Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve".[110] The phrase has been reclaimed by LGBT people and used in blogs, comics, and other media mocking the anti-gay message.[105]
Homosexuality is sometimes claimed to be non-existent in some non-Western countries, or to be an evil influence imported from the West.
Prime MinisterMahathir Mohamad of Malaysia employed anti-gay rhetoric as part of his "Asian values" program, describing homosexuality as one of several Western ills.[111]Mohamad used it for political advantage in the 1998 scandal involving the sacking and jailing of MP and formerDeputy Prime MinisterAnwar Ibrahim by Mohamad amidst accusations of sodomy that theSydney Morning Herald termed a "blatantly political fix-up".[112] Anwar was subsequently subjected to two trials and sentenced to nine years imprisonment for corruption and sodomy.[113]
While in New York for a meeting of the United Nations, Iranian PresidentMahmoud Ahmadinejad was invited to speak at Columbia University in New York to give a lecture. When responding to a student's question afterward, he said, speaking through an interpreter: "In Iran, we don't have homosexuals like in your country."[114] In his nativeFarsi, he used the slang equivalent offaggot, not the neutral term for a "homosexual".[115]
Claims that homosexuality is a Western disease have been observed in Vietnam,[116] China,[117] India,[118] Ethiopia[119] and other African nations,[120] as well as among manyMuslims worldwide.[121]
"Stop Pedofilii" van belonging toFundacja Pro [pl], who claim that pedophilia is advocated by the "LGBT lobby"
Theclaim that homosexuals sexually abuse children predates the current era, as it was leveled againstpederasts even duringantiquity.[122] Lawmakers and social commentators have sometimes expressed a concern that normalizing homosexuality would also lead to normalizing pedophilia, if it were determined that pedophilia too were a sexual orientation.[123] A related claim is thatLGBT adoption is done for the purpose ofgrooming children for sexual exploitation.[124] The empirical research shows that sexual orientation does not affect the likelihood that people will abuse children.[125][126][127]
Others have made hoaxes intending to falsely associate pedophilia with the LGBT community by rebranding it as a sexual orientation, including claims that the "+" in "LGBT+" refers to "pedophiles,zoophiles, [and]necrophiles",[128][129] as well as the invented terms "agefluid", "clovergender" (a hoax executed by users of theimageboard4chan, whose logo is a stylizedfour-leaf clover), and "pedosexual".[130][131][132]
Starting in 2022, some conservatives, including Chaya Raichik ofLibs of TikTok, started using the terms "grooming", "groomer" and "pro-pedophile" against their opponents and LGBT people over anti-LGBT legislation, such as laws restricting and banning discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools. Critics say that these usages of the terms diminish the experiences of sexual assault survivors, smear the LGBT community, and are dangerous in general.[133]
The charge of "homosexual recruitment" is an allegation by social conservatives that LGBT people engage in concerted efforts toindoctrinate children into homosexuality. In the United States, this dates back to the earlypost-war era.[138]: 91 Proponents were found especially among theNew Right, as epitomized byAnita Bryant. In herSave Our Children campaign, she promoted a view of homosexuals recruiting youth.[138]: 115–116 A common slogan is "Homosexuals cannot reproduce — so they must recruit" or its variants.[139][140] Supporters of recruitment allegations point at "deviant"[141] and "prurient"sex education as evidence. They express concern that anti-bullying efforts teach that "homosexuality is normal, and that students shouldn't harass their classmates because they're gay", suggesting recruitment as the primary motivation.[142] Supporters of this myth cite the inability forsame-sex couples to reproduce as a motivation for recruitment.[142][143][144][145]
In 1977, Anita Bryant successfully campaigned to repeal an ordinance inMiami-Dade County that prohibited discrimination based onsexual orientation. Her campaign was based on allegations of homosexual recruitment.[144] Writing about Bryant's efforts to repeal a Florida anti-discrimination law in theJournal of Social History, Michel Boucai wrote that "Bryant's organization,Save Our Children, framed the law as an endorsement of immorality and a license for 'recruitment'."[151]
Oregon's proposed 1992Ballot Measure 9 contained language that would have added anti-LGBT rhetoric to thestate Constitution. U.S. writerJudith Reisman justified her support for the measure, citing "a clear avenue for the recruitment of children" by gays and lesbians.[152]
In a 1998 debate in the British House of Lords on lowering the same-sex age of consent to 16 (equalising it with the opposite-sex age of consent), former Labour cabinet minister Lord Longford opposed the change by stating that "If some elderly, or not so elderly, schoolmaster seduced one of my sons and taught him to be a homosexual, he would ruin him for life." The age of consent was equalised in the UK in 2001.[153]
Asmall newspaper in Uganda's capital attracted international attention in 2010 when it outed 100 gay people alongside a banner that said, "Hang them", and claimed that homosexuals aimed to "recruit" Ugandan children, and that schools had "been penetrated by gay activists to recruit kids."[54] According to gay rights activists, many Ugandans were attacked afterward as a result of their real or perceived sexual orientation.[154] Minorities activistDavid Kato, who was outed in the article and a co-plaintiff in the lawsuit against the paper, was subsequently murdered at home by an intruder[155] and an international outcry resulted.[156][157]
In 1998,The Onion parodied the idea of "homosexual recruitment" in an article titled "'98 Homosexual-Recruitment Drive Nearing Goal", saying "Spokespersons for the National Gay & Lesbian Recruitment Task Force announced Monday that more than 288,000 straights have been converted to homosexuality since January 1, 1998, putting the group well on pace to reach its goal of 350,000 conversions by the end of the year."[158][159] According to Mimi Marinucci, most US adults who support gay rights would recognize the story as satire due to unrealistic details.[158] TheWestboro Baptist Church passed along the story as fact,[160][161] citing it as evidence of a gay conspiracy.[162]
During theCold War, anti-queer commentators in the United States sought to link homosexuality andCommunism, using the terms "homintern" and "homosexual mafia" as shorthand for a purported homosexual conspiracy in the arts. "Homintern" is a reference to the "Comintern", the Soviet-sponsored international organization of communist political parties.[163] According to historianMichael S. Sherry, the term was probably used jokingly among artists and writers in England in the 1930s to mock the idea of a powerfulcabal of queer artists.[163] Coining of the term has been attributed to various writers, includingW. H. Auden,Cyril Connolly,Jocelyn Brooke,Harold Norse, andMaurice Bowra.[164][165]
Sherry coined the phrase "homintern discourse" to refer tomid-20th-century American conspiracy theories targeting gay artists, many of whose works were prominently used as propaganda in theCultural Cold War against the Soviet Union.[166] During thesecond Red Scare in the 1950s, the "homintern" was invoked by American SenatorJoseph McCarthy, who used it to claim that the administrations ofFranklin D. Roosevelt andHarry S. Truman were set on destroying America from within.[167][better source needed] According to Sherry, the "homintern discourse" began to decline with the growth of1960s counterculture and skepticism about the United States' role in the Cold War andVietnam War.[166][168]
English theater criticKenneth Tynan wrote toPlayboy editor Auguste Comte Spectorsky in 1967, proposing an article on "The Homosexual Mafia" in the arts. Inspired by this idea,Playboy would subsequently publish a panel discussion on gay issues in April 1971.[171][non-primary source needed]
While the term "Lavender Mafia" has occasionally been used to refer to informal networks of gay executives in the USentertainment industry,[177] more generally it refers to Church politics. For example, a faction within theleadership and clergy of theRoman Catholic Church that allegedly advocates the acceptance ofhomosexuality within the Church and its teachings.[178]
Marchers at Prague Pride 2017 carry a satirical "Homo Lobby" sign, a phrase used as a slur by right-wing populist movements in the Czech Republic.
The term "homo lobby" or "gay lobby" is often used by opponents of LGBT rights in Europe. For example, the Swedish neo-Nazi partyNordic Resistance Movement runs a "crush the homo lobby" campaign.[179] According to the German newspaperDer Tagesspiegel, advocating for LGBT rights could accurately be calledlobbying. The termSchwulen-Lobby ('gay lobby') is insulting because it is used to suggest a powerful conspiracy that does not actually exist.[180]
In 2013,Pope Francis spoke about a "gay lobby" within theVatican, and promised to see what could be done.[181] In July 2013, Francis went on to distinguish the problem oflobbying and thesexual orientation of people: "If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?" "The problem", he said, "is not having this orientation. We must be brothers. The problem is lobbying by this orientation, or lobbies of greedy people, political lobbies,Masonic lobbies, so many lobbies. This is the worse problem."[182][183]
Misgendering is the act of labelling others with a gender that does not match theirgender identity.[184] Misgendering can be deliberate or accidental. It can involve using pronouns to describe someone that are not the ones they use,[185] calling a person "ma'am" or "sir" in contradiction to the person's gender identity,[186] and using a pre-transition name for someone instead of a post-transition one[187] (deadnaming).[188][189]
There is a fear that people pretend to be transgender or pretend to be the opposite sex. Brunei and Oman have laws that criminalize transgender people, using phrases such as "posing as [the opposite sex]" and "imitating" members of the opposite sex.[190] There is also rhetoric that male perverts will pretend to be transgender to enter women's restrooms.[191] Another common claim is that men will pretend to be transgender women to gain an advantage playing on women's teams, despite the lack of evidence for this occurring.[192]
Transgender individuals are often perceived as more deceptive than sexual minorities.[193]Passing, or being perceived as the gender one identifies as, is seen as a deceptive or predatory act.[194] Not passing is also seen as a poor attempt at deception.[194] One study sought to compare the perceived deception of transgender people to another marginalized and concealable identity, atheism, by having non-LGBT, non-atheist participants read hypothetical date situations.[195] The transgender dates were perceived as more deceptive than atheists, regardless of whether they intentionally disclosed that they are transgender or if it was accidentally revealed.[195]
The idea of deception extends to cisgender men's attraction to transgender women. The word 'trap' is used to imply that a transgender woman tricked a man into having gay sex.[196] Thetrans panic defense also leans into this perceived deception. The trans panic defense is used as a defense strategy in court, claiming the defendant killed the victim due to the emotional provocation of realizing the victim was transgender.[197] According to Professor of Law Cynthia Lee, "Instead of admitting that what he did was wrong, a murder defendant claiming trans panic blames the victim for his actions, arguing that the transgender victim’s deceit caused him to lose self-control."[197] After the murder of trans womanGwen Araujo, the defense lawyer said, "This is the case... about... the tragic results when that deception and betrayal were discovered.”[197] This idea of deception on the part of transgender victims implies they deserved to be killed.[197]
Abathroom bill is the common name for legislation or a statute that defines access topublic toilets bygender ortransgender identity. Bathroom bills affect access to sex-segregated public facilities for an individual based on a determination of their sex as defined in some specific way, such as their sex asassigned at birth, their sex as listed on theirbirth certificate, or the sex that corresponds to theirgender identity.[198] A bathroom bill can either be inclusive or exclusive of transgender individuals, depending on the aforementioned definition of their sex.
Proponents of the bills argue that such legislation is necessary to maintain privacy, protect modesty held by mostcisgender people, prevent voyeurism, assault, molestation, and rape,[199] and ensure psychological comfort.[200][201] Critics of the bills, including advocacy groups and researchers, argue that such legislation does not enhance safety for cisgender people and may increase risks for transgender andgender non-conforming cisgender people.[202][203][204] The UCLA'sWilliams Institute has tracked prevalence of crimes in bathrooms since the passage of various protections for the transgender population and has found that there has been no significant change in the number of crimes.[205][206] Organizations such as theAmerican Medical Association, theAmerican Psychological Association, and theAmerican Academy of Pediatrics have expressed opposition to trans-exclusive bathroom bills, citing concerns about their impact on public health and safety.[207][208][209][210]
Some positions within feminist theory have used denialist rhetoric viewed as transphobic. Those that hold these positions are known astrans-exclusionary radical feminists, or "TERF" for short. This term was coined by feminist blogger Viv Smythe in 2008 as a value-neutral descriptor of feminists who engage in denialism.
In 1979, American radical feminist Janice Raymond publishedThe Transsexual Empire: The Making of the She-Male. In it, she wrote that, "All transsexuals rape women's bodies by reducing the real female form to an artifact, appropriating this body for themselves."[211] A common position in radical feminism maintain that trans women are not women in a literal sense and should not be in women-only spaces.[212]
Somesecond-wave feminists perceive trans men and women respectively as "traitors" and "infiltrators" to womanhood.[213] In a 1997 article, Australian lesbian feministSheila Jeffreys wrote that"[T]ranssexualism should be seen as a violation of human rights." Jeffreys also argued that bytransitioning medically and socially, trans women are "constructing a conservative fantasy of what women should be. They are inventing an essence of womanhood which is deeply insulting and restrictive."[214]
Some anti-transgender rhetoric centers on the idea of transgender identity being due to indoctrination orsocial contagion. According toGLAAD, "Another prominent anti-LGBTQ trope includes the use of anti-trans buzzwords like 'gender ideology' and 'transgenderism' to claim that the LGBTQ+ community and its allies aim to indoctrinate or brainwash kids into identifying as transgender."[215] Some conservative publications have argued that peer pressure and social media causes teens, especially thoseassigned female at birth, to be influenced into becoming transgender; they argue this results in harm to youth by leading them to undergo transition.[216][217]
Social contagion rhetoric has seen use in the TERF and transmedicalism community with the termtranstrender.[218] This is a pejorative term that implies some people, especially transgender youth and non-binary people, choose to be transgender due to a trend or social contagion.[218]
A scientifically unsupported hypothesis calledrapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD) also incorporates the idea of social contagion.[219] The hypothesis is that people who identify as transgender in adolescence rather than before puberty do so as a result of social contagion.[219] It is believed that that people assigned female at birth as well as people with mental health issues, neurodevelopmental disorders, or maladaptive coping mechanisms are particularly susceptible to ROGD.[219][220] Clinical data from transgender adolescents does not support an association between recent/rapid knowledge of one's gender and mental health issues, neurodevelopmental disorders, self-harm, depression symptoms, or social support.[220]
The term rapid-onset gender dysphoria was created in 2016 on 4thWaveNow, a blog against gender-affirming care.[221] Through 4thWaveNow,TransgenderTrend, and Youth Trans Critical Professionals, Lisa Littman found parents to participate in her study on ROGD.[221] The study ended up being corrected after publication to make it clear it established a hypothesis, but did not prove it.[221] Despite the correction, ROGD increased in use following the study.[221]
ROGD has been used to argue against gender affirming care for minors and positive LGBT representation in schools.[222] According to a study in Pediatrics, "The deleterious effect of unfounded hypotheses stigmatizing TGD youth, particularly the ROGD hypothesis, cannot be overstated, especially in current and longstanding public policy debates. Indeed, the notion of ROGD has been used by legislators to prohibit TGD youth from accessing gender-affirming medical care".[219] The Coalition for the Advancement and Application of Psychological Science calls for the elimination of the term due to its potential to limit and stigmatize gender-affirming care.[223]
Conservative groups and governments have classified transgender identities as a mental disorder or caused by mental illness. Peru passed a short-lived insurance law in 2024 categorizing transgender identities as a mental disorder.[224] TheAmerican College of Pediatricians, described as an anti-LGBT group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, says that "adolescents can embrace their bodies through counseling alone when it is directed toward underlying psychological issues."[225][226] The belief that non-cisgender identities are mental disorders is an underlying assumption ofconversion therapy.[227]
The transgender desistance myth is the idea that most transgender youth are confused, and 80 percent will eventually return to being cisgender.[228] This is based off a series of papers from 2008 to 2013 which have been scrutinized for the following: using outdated diagnostic criteria for gender identity disorder (now gender dysphoria) that conflate gender identity and expression, including children who did not meet the criteria for a gender identity disorder diagnosis, including children who did not assert that they were transgender, disregarding non-binary gender identities, counting children who did not follow-up years later as desisting, and assuming that transgender people who persist must desire medical transition.[229][228]
As of 2022, most papers about transgender youth desistance are editorials rather than studies.[230] The studies which do exist are considered poor quality.[230] Many do not explicitly define what counts as desistance, and those that do tend to conflate the disappearance of gender dysphoria with returning to a cisgender identity.[230]
Transgender desistance and regret are often used to justify gender affirming care bans for transition.[231][232] Research shows detransition due to regret is rare. A study of binary transgender youth found that 7.3 percent of retransitioned after their first social transition. This includes temporary retransition and transition from binary trans identities (transgender man or transgender woman) to nonbinary. After 5 years, 2.5 percent of the participants identified as cisgender, while 94 percent lived as binary transgender identities and 3.5 percent identified as nonbinary.[233]
After pursuing transition/gender affirmation, 13.1 percent of transgender and gender diverse adults detransition. This includes temporary detransition such as presenting as one's gender assigned at birth during family visits.[234] Most adults detransition due to outside factors such as stigma from their families or society, rather than realizing they are not transgender.[231] 2.1 percent of transgender adults have a history of detransition due to internal factors.[234] Of transgender people who have received gender affirming surgery, 1 percent regret it.[231]
^Herdt, Gilbert (2009). "Gay Marriage: The Panic and the Right". In Herdt, Gilbert (ed.).Moral Panics, Sex Panics: Fear and the Fight Over Sexual Rights. New York University Press. pp. 163–164.ISBN978-0-8147-3723-1.During the heyday of rising anti-homosexual rhetoric, communism was frequently mentioned in the same narratives as sexual perversion. [...] The accusation of homosexuality was a de facto accusation of Communism pure and simple [...] It is remarkable that earlier capitalist and fascist rhetoric shared the common enemy of Communist/homosexual/Jew.
^Klosowska, Anna (2011). "Trouble in the Global Village: A Snapshot of LGBT Community in Eastern Europe". In Román-Odio, C.; Sierra, M. (eds.).Transnational Borderlands in Women's Global Networks: The Making of Cultural Resistance. Comparative Feminist Studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 188.doi:10.1057/9780230119475_9.ISBN978-0-230-11947-5.In the nation-states of Eastern Europe twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the discursive structures of paranoia and conspiracy theory applied to the LGBT community seem directly transferred from the anti-Semitic tradition of Jewish conspiracy strongly present in these countries.
^Sherry, Michael S. (2007).Gay Artists in Modern American Culture: An Imagined Conspiracy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 56–57.ISBN978-0-8078-3121-2.Just when World War II raised the stature of psychiatry, they sought respectability, patriotic credentials, and professional power in their new land by attacking a despised group and linking it to erstwhile fascist or newfound communist enemies. [...] That [some psychoanalysts] attached to homosexuals the stereotypes inflicted on Jews was a grim irony compounded by the fact that many queer artists were Jewish. Their 'frequent ignorant portrayal of the sad and desperate lives of practicing homosexuals,' [Kenneth] Lewes asserts, derived from 'vicious stereotypes' that 'found their models in anti-Semitic and racist propaganda.'
^Madsen, Mikael Rask (2019). "Resistance to the European Court of Human Rights: The Institutional and Sociological Consequences of Principled Resistance".Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments - A New Paradigm?. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. Vol. 285. Springer. pp. 35–52.doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_2.ISBN978-3-662-58986-1.S2CID210655765.
^Ayoub, Phillip; Paternotte, David (20 October 2014).LGBT Activism and the Making of Europe: A Rainbow Europe?. Springer.ISBN978-1-137-39176-6.
^Ayoub, Phillip M. (2014). "With Arms Wide Shut: Threat Perception, Norm Reception, and Mobilized Resistance to LGBT Rights".Journal of Human Rights.13 (3):337–362.doi:10.1080/14754835.2014.919213.S2CID145577747.
^Marchesini, Roberto (2018). "The Church and Same-Sex Attraction". In Brambilla, Giorgia; Tham, Joseph (eds.).Sexuality, Gender & Education. Rome: IF Press. p. 206.ISBN978-88-6788-141-3.
^Bosia, Michael J.; McEvoy, Sandra M.; Rahman, Momin (2020).The Oxford Handbook of Global Lgbt and Sexual Diversity Politics. Oxford University Press. p. 455.ISBN978-0-19-067374-1.
^Leszczyński, Adam (5 August 2020)."Intelektualiści prawicy o LGBT: nihilizm, bolszewia, hitleryzm. O co chodzi? Tłumaczymy ten obłęd" [Right-wing intellectuals about LGBT: nihilism, Bolshevik, Nazism. What is it about? We translate this madness].OKO.press (in Polish). Retrieved20 August 2020.'Ideologia LGBT' to pojęcie–worek, do którego prawica wrzuca te zmiany cywilizacyjne, które jej nie odpowiadają (np. postulaty równouprawnienia związków jednopłciowych, w wielu krajach — od USA po RPA — zrealizowane). W języku propagandy prawicowej, jak pisał w OKO.press Stanisław Krawczyk, 'ideologia LGBT' służy odczłowieczaniu mniejszości oraz kreowaniu wroga — a więc budowaniu politycznego poparcia dla prawicy, która przedstawia się jako jedyna obrończyni tradycyjnej rodziny, religii i ładu społecznego. 'Ideologia' pasuje także do częstego na prawicy postrzegania świata w kategoriach spisku — ideologię ktoś 'promuje', ktoś upowszechnia, ktoś 'za nią stoi' (np. George Soros, żydowsko–amerykański finansista, wspierający m.in. organizacje LGBT).
^Bender, Steven W. (2015). "Sexuality and Dehumanization: Homophobia in U.S. Law and Life".Mea Culpa: Lessons on Law and Regret from U.S. History. New York University Press. pp. 93–100.doi:10.18574/nyu/9781479899623.003.0007.
^Duyvendak, Jan Willem; Geschiere, Peter; Tonkens, Evelien (30 June 2016).The Culturalization of Citizenship: Belonging and Polarization in a Globalizing World. Springer. p. 123.ISBN978-1-137-53410-1.
^Baider, Fabienne (2018). ""Go to hell fucking faggots, may you die!" framing the LGBT subject in online comments".Lodz Papers in Pragmatics.14 (1):69–92.doi:10.1515/lpp-2018-0004.S2CID158928585.
^abcDynes, Wayne R. (2016). "Myths & Fabrications".Encyclopedia of Homosexuality: Volume II. Routledge. p. 870.ISBN978-1-317-36812-0.
^Greenberg, David F. (15 August 1990).The Construction of Homosexuality. University of Chicago Press. p. 168.ISBN978-0-226-30628-5.
^Dominey-Howes, Dale; Gorman-Murray, Andrew; McKinnon, Scott (2014). "Queering disasters: on the need to account for LGBTI experiences in natural disaster contexts".Gender, Place & Culture.21 (7):905–918.doi:10.1080/0966369X.2013.802673.S2CID146478126.
^Dowsett, Gary (2009). "The "gay plague" revisited: AIDS and its enduring moral panic". In Herdt, Gilbert (ed.).Moral Panics, Sex Panics: Fear and the Fight over Sexual Rights. New York University Press. pp. 130–.ISBN978-0-8147-3732-3.
^abHopkins, Patrick D. (2012). "Naturalizing homosexuality: biology, sexual orientation, and the nature/culture distinction".Queer Philosophy. Brill | Rodopi. pp. 1–9.doi:10.1163/9789401208352_002.ISBN978-94-012-0835-2.
^Giles, Geoffrey J. (2010). "The Persecution of Gay Men and Lesbians During the Third Reich".The Routledge History of the Holocaust.Routledge. pp. 385–396.ISBN978-0-203-83744-3.
^Mutz, Larry (Spring 2006). "A Fairy Tale: The Myth of the Homosexual Lifestyle in Anti-Gay-and-Lesbian Rhetoric".Women's Rights Law Reporter.27 (2): 69–.ISSN0085-8269.
^Barton, Bernadette (2012).Pray the Gay Away: The Extraordinary Lives of Bible Belt Gays. New York University Press. p. 194.ISBN978-0-8147-2442-2.
^abRyan, Maureen E. (2018).Lifestyle Media in American Culture: Gender, Class, and the Politics of Ordinariness. New York: Routledge. pp. 43–44.ISBN978-1-315-46495-4.
^Spitko, E. Gary (2017).Antigay Bias in Role-Model Occupations. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 89.ISBN978-0-8122-4870-8.
^Pitt, Richard N. (2010). ""Killing the Messenger": Religious Black Gay Men's Neutralization of Anti-Gay Religious Messages".Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.49 (1):56–72.doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01492.x.
Hamdi, Nassim; Lachheb, Monia; Anderson, Eric (2017). "Masculinity, homosexuality and sport in an Islamic state of increasing homohysteria".Journal of Gender Studies.26 (6):688–701.doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1155979.ISSN1465-3869.S2CID147347384.
Thoreson, Ryan Richard (2014). "Troubling the waters of a 'wave of homophobia': Political economies of anti-queer animus in sub-Saharan Africa".Sexualities.17 (1–2):23–42.doi:10.1177/1363460713511098.ISSN1461-7382.S2CID144030716.
Wieringa, Saskia E. (2019). "Is the Recent Wave of Homophobia in Indonesia Unexpected?". In Fealy, Greg; Ricci, Ronit (eds.).Contentious Belonging: Contentious Belonging. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.ISBN978-981-4843-49-2.
Jones, Ian; Thorpe, Kirsty; Wootton, Janet (2011).Women and Ordination in the Christian Churches: International Perspectives. Bloomsbury Publishing.ISBN978-0-567-23910-5.
Santos, A. (2012).Social Movements and Sexual Citizenship in Southern Europe. Springer. p. 201.ISBN978-1-137-29640-5.
^Smith, Ralph R.; Windes, Russel R. (2000).Progay/Antigay: The Rhetorical War Over Sexuality. Rhetoric & Society. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications. p. 63.ISBN978-1-4522-6372-4.
^Clarke, Victoria (September–October 2001). "What about the children? arguments against lesbian and gay parenting".Women's Studies International Forum.24 (5):555–570.doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(01)00193-5.ISSN0148-0685.
^abcToulouse, Mark G. (2000). "Muddling Through: The Church and Sexuality/Homosexuality". In Balch, David L. (ed.).Homosexuality, Science, and the "Plain Sense" of Scripture. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 22.ISBN978-0-8028-4698-3.
^Carroll, Peter N. (2000) [first published 1982].It Seemed Like Nothing Happened: America in the 1970s. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. p. 291.ISBN978-0-8135-1538-0.OCLC183352949.
^Clendinen, Dudley; Nagourney, Adam (2001).Out For Good: The Struggle to Build a Gay Rights Movement in America. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 519.ISBN978-0-684-86743-4.
^Shah, Shanon (17 October 2017).The Making of a Gay Muslim: Religion, Sexuality and Identity in Malaysia and Britain. Palgrave Studies in Lived Religion and Societal Challenges. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. p. 130.ISBN978-3-319-63130-1.OCLC1027079609.
^Martel, Frédéric; Bronski, Michael (9 April 2019) [1st pub.Flammarian, Paris 2013]. "8. "In Iran, There Are No Homosexuals"".Global Gay: How Gay Culture is Changing the World. Translated by Baudoin, Patsy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. pp. 203–.ISBN978-0-262-53705-6.OCLC1001431180.The former President of Iran evaded an American student's question on the execution of homosexuals by saying, 'In Iran, we don't have homosexuals like in your country. This does not exist in our country. In Iran, we do not have this phenomenon. I do not know who told you that we have.' (Note that in this speech, Ahmadinejad used the Farsi termhamjensbaz, 'faggot', not the more neutral termhamjensgara, 'homosexual'.)
^Huang, Wen (4 January 2001)."Gayness as a Western disease".Bay Area Reporter. Vol. 31, no. 1. Center for Bibliographical Studies and Research. Retrieved31 August 2020.
^Luirink, Bart; Maurick, Madeleine; Chambers, Christopher (2016).Homosexuality in Africa: A Disturbing Love. Soesterberg: Aspekt.ISBN978-94-6338-082-9.OCLC1148475814.
^Brindle, Andrew (2016).The Language of Hate: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of White Supremacist Language. Routledge Advances in Corpus Linguistics.Routledge. p. 20.ISBN978-1-317-55260-4.
^Alvarado, Cheney; Churchill, Lindsey (2019). "Radical Gay Agenda". In Pierceson, Jason (ed.).LGBTQ Americans in the U.S. Political System: An Encyclopedia of Activists, Voters, Candidates, and Officeholders, Volume 2. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO. p. 351.ISBN978-1-4408-5277-0.The Radical Gay Agenda is a term introduced by right-wing Christian conservatives in the United States [...] The term primarily functioned as a demonization of advocacy and activists who pushed for LGBTQ rights. The conservative idea of the 'gay agenda' was primarily rooted in the belief that the LGBTQ community actively recruited and demoralized heterosexual individuals into a gay or bisexual 'lifestyle.' [...] More recently, the 'radical gay agenda' still exists among the Religious Right to condemn all efforts to change or introduce legislation on LGBTQ issues.
^abMurray, Heather (10 February 2012).Not in This Family: Gays and the Meaning of Kinship in Postwar North America. University of Pennsylvania Press.ISBN978-0-8122-0740-8.
^abAndreeva, Nellie; Kit, Borys (2 February 2010)."HBO eyes biopic about anti-gay activist Bryant".Reuters. Retrieved2 June 2022.As a mother, I know that homosexuals cannot biologically reproduce children; therefore, they must recruit our children.
^Witt, Lynn; Thomas, Sherry; Marcus, Eric (1 September 1995).Out in All Directions: The Almanac of Gay and Lesbian America. Hachette Digital, Inc. pp. 353–.ISBN978-0-446-51822-2.
^Peddicord, Richard (1996).Gay and lesbian rights: a question: sexual ethics or social justice?. Kansas City: Sheed & Ward. p. 73.ISBN978-1-55612-759-5.
^Sears, James T. (2001).Rebels, rubyfruit, and rhinestones: queering space in the Stonewall South. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. p. 239.ISBN978-0-8135-2964-6.
^Baker, Paul (2006). "Unnatural Acts: the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform".Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge. p. 51.doi:10.4324/9780203643532.ISBN978-1-134-27157-3.
^abMarinucci, Mimi (1 December 2010). Kaye, Sharon M. (ed.).The Onion and Philosophy: Fake News Story True Alleges Indignant Area Professor. Open Court Publishing. p. 102.ISBN978-0-8126-9687-5.
^Sherry (2007), p. 42: "Notions of queer power in the arts were common in Europe by the 1930s, and invention of the word 'homintern' has been claimed by or attributed to W. H. Auden, Cyril Connelly [sic], Harold Norse, Maurice Bowra, and others [...]"
^Higgins, Patrick, ed. (1993).A Queer Reader: 2500 Years of Male Homosexuality. New York: The New Press. p. 287.ISBN978-1-56584-210-6.Anthony Powell suggested that his friend Jocelyn Brooke invented the term that Harold Norse tells us Auden stole from him. Whoever invented it provided us with a splendid word to explain the social and cultural power of homosexuality, the ability of this sexual allegiance to create networks and establish loyalties that do much to shape the imagination of the West.
^Perreau, Bruno (2016).Queer Theory: The French Response. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.ISBN978-1-5036-0046-1.[page needed]
^Tin, Louis-Georges, ed. (2008).The Dictionary of Homophobia: A Global History of Gay & Lesbian Experience. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.ISBN978-1-55152-314-9.[page needed]
^Serano, Julia (20 May 2009).Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity. Seal Press.ISBN978-0-7867-4791-7.
^Ansara, Gavriel (2013). "Misgendering in English language contexts: Applying non-cisgenderist methods to feminist research".International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches.7 (2):160–177.doi:10.5172/mra.2013.7.2.160.ISSN1834-0814.S2CID145494832.
^DeCecco, John (2012).Looking Queer: Body Image and Identity in Lesbian, Bisexual, Gay, and Transgender Communities (Haworth Gay & Lesbian Studies). New Jersey: Routledge.ISBN978-0-7890-0463-5.
^Bender-Baird, Kyla (2011).Transgender Employment Experiences: Gendered Perceptions and the Law. State University of New York Press. pp. 5–24.ISBN978-1-4384-3676-0.[page range too broad]
^Totton, Rebecca; Rios, Kimberly (19 May 2021). "Predictors of anti-transgender attitudes: Identity-confusion and deception as aspects of distrust".Self and Identity.20 (4):496–514.doi:10.1080/15298868.2019.1621928.ISSN1529-8868.
^abBillard, Thomas. (2019). “Passing” and the Politics of Deception: Transgender Bodies, Cisgender Aesthetics, and the Policing of Inconspicuous Marginal Identities.
^Erickson-Schroth, Laura (12 May 2014).Trans Bodies, Trans Selves: A Resource for the Transgender Community.Oxford University Press. pp. 568–569.ISBN978-0-19-932535-1.Some feminists have perceived transmasculine people as traitors—that is, as women who identify politically with men. When inclusive of trans men, these feminists have often gendered them as women. Conversely, these feminists have tended to perceive transfeminine people as infiltrators of womanhood and of women's space.
^Jeffreys, Sheila (May 1997). "Transgender activism: a lesbian feminist perspective".Journal of Lesbian Studies.1 (3–4):55–74.doi:10.1300/J155v01n03_03.Pdf.
^abcdTurban, Jack L.; Dolotina, Brett; King, Dana; Keuroghlian, Alex S. (1 September 2022). "Sex Assigned at Birth Ratio Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Adolescents in the United States".Pediatrics.150 (3) e2022056567.doi:10.1542/peds.2022-056567.ISSN0031-4005.PMID35918512.
^abcSalvetti, Bianca; Gallagher, Mary; Schapiro, Naomi A.; Daley, Alison Moriarty (1 March 2024). "Prioritizing Gender-Affirming Care for Youth: The Role of Pediatric-Focused Clinicians".Journal of Pediatric Health Care. A Closer Look at Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Pediatric Healthcare.38 (2):253–259.doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2023.12.006.ISSN0891-5245.PMID38429038.
Brummett, Barry (1979). "A pentadic analysis of ideologies in two gay rights controversies".Central States Speech Journal.30 (3):250–261.doi:10.1080/10510977909368018.
Burack, Cynthia (2006). "From Doom Town to Sin City: Chick Tracts and Anti-gay Political Rhetoric".New Political Science.28 (2):163–179.doi:10.1080/07393140600679843.S2CID144985657.
Burack, Cynthia (17 April 2008).Sin, Sex, and Democracy: Antigay Rhetoric and the Christian Right. State University of New York Press.ISBN978-0-7914-7406-8.
Dugan, Kimberly B. (2004). "Strategy and "Spin": Opposing Movement Frames in an Anti-Gay Voter Initiative".Sociological Focus.37 (3):213–233.doi:10.1080/00380237.2004.10571243.S2CID143775320.
Eskridge, William N. Jr (2000). "No Promo Homo: The Sedimentation of Antigay Discourse and the Channeling Effect of Judicial Review".New York University Law Review.75: 1327–.
Harris, W. C. (2006). ""In My Day It Used to Be Called a Limp Wrist": Flip-Floppers, Nelly Boys, and Homophobic Rhetoric in the 2004 US Presidential Campaign".The Journal of American Culture.29 (3):278–295.doi:10.1111/j.1542-734X.2006.00371.x.
Schwartz, Michael (2019).Homosexuelle, Seilschaften, Verrat: Ein transnationales Stereotyp im 20. Jahrhundert (in German). De Gruyter.ISBN978-3-11-063650-5.
Smith, Ralph R.; Windes, Russel R. (2000).Progay/Antigay. SAGE.ISBN978-0-7619-1647-5.
Stewart, Craig O. (2008). "Social cognition and discourse processing goals in the analysis of 'ex-gay' rhetoric".Discourse & Society.19 (1):63–83.doi:10.1177/0957926507083689.S2CID144039300.
.jpg)
