The termAngevin Empire is ahistoriographic retronym defining the lands of theHouse of Plantagenet:Henry II and his sonsRichard I andJohn. Another son,Geoffrey, ruledBrittany and established a separate line there. As far as historians know, there was no contemporary term for the region under Angevin control; however, descriptions such as "our kingdom and everything subject to our rule whatever it may be" were used.[6] The termAngevin Empire was coined byKate Norgate in her 1887 publicationEngland under the Angevin Kings.[7] In France, the termespace Plantagenet (French for "Plantagenet area") is sometimes used to describe thefiefdoms the Plantagenets had acquired.[8]
The adoption of theAngevin Empire label marked a re-evaluation of the times, considering that both English and French influence spread throughout the dominion in the half-century during which the union lasted. The termAngevin is thedemonym for the residents ofAnjou and its historic capital,Angers; the Plantagenets were descended fromGeoffrey I, Count of Anjou, hence the term.[9] The demonym, according to theOxford English Dictionary, has been in use since 1511.[9]
The use of the termempire has engendered controversy among some historians over whether the term is accurate for the actual state of affairs at the time. The area was a collection of the lands inherited and acquired by Henry. The continental lands in question were fully part of the medievalKingdom of France, and the lands in England were part of theKingdom of England. Henry did not rule the lands he held in France as a king but ruled under the relevant local title such as "duje". There is no evidence that the lands owned or ruled by Henry shared any common identity relating to the Plantagenets and so should be labelled with the termempire in the context of a unified state. Referring to the shared lands as an empire of property real estate may be more accurate.[10]
Some historians argue that the term should be reserved solely for theHoly Roman Empire, the only Western European political structure actually named an empire at that time,[11] althoughAlfonso VII of León and Castile had taken the title"Emperor of all Spain" in 1135.[12] Other historians argue that Henry II's empire was not powerful,centralised or large enough to be seriously called an empire.[11] Furthermore, the Plantagenets never claimed any sort of imperial title as implied by the termAngevin Empire.[13] However, even if the Plantagenets themselves did not claim an imperial title, some chroniclers, often working for Henry II, used the termempire to describe the assemblage of lands.[11] The highest title was "king of England"; the other titles of dukes and counts of different areas held in France were independent from the royal title and were not subject to English royal law.[8] Because of this, some historians, such asW. L. Warren, prefer the termcommonwealth toempire, emphasising that the Angevin Empire was more of an assemblage of seven independent, sovereign states loosely bound to each other, onlyunited in the person of the king of England.[14]
The frontiers of the empire were sometimes well known and therefore easy to mark, such as thelevees constructed between thecrown lands of France and the Duchy of Normandy. In other places, the borders were not so clear, particularly the eastern border of Aquitaine, where there was often a difference between the frontier that Henry and Richard claimed and the frontier where their effective power ended.[19] Scotland was an independent kingdom, but after a disastrous campaign led byWilliam the Lion, English garrisons were established in the castles ofEdinburgh,Roxburgh,Jedburgh andBerwick in southern Scotland as defined in theTreaty of Falaise.[20]
Rather than being administered directly by the ruling monarch, power was delegated to specially appointed subjects in different areas.[21] Supported by what Warren calls a "self-regulating administrative machine", these subjects had varied political and military powers.[22]
England was under the firmest control of all the lands in the Angevin Empire due to the age of many of the offices that governed the country and the established traditions and customs. England was divided inshires, withsheriffs in each enforcing thecommon law. Ajusticiar was appointed by the king to stand in his absence when he was on the continent. As the kings of England were more often in France than England, they used writs more frequently than did theAnglo-Saxon kings, which actually proved beneficial to England.[23] UnderWilliam I's rule,Anglo-Saxon nobles had been largely replaced byAnglo-Norman settlers whose lands were split between England and France. This made it much harder for them to revolt against the king and defend all their lands simultaneously. The power of the Englishearls had grown duringthe Anarchy betweenEmpress Matilda andKing Stephen, as she and he vied for support by granting earldoms to variousbarons, but this reversed beginning with Henry II, whose reign saw the number of earls halve from 24 to 12.[24] England instead saw a reliance on theexchequer to provide both financial and administrative control on behalf of the ruling monarch.[25]
Wales obtained good terms provided it paid homage to the Plantagenets and recognised them as lords.[26] However, it remained almost self-ruling. It supplied the Plantagenets withinfantry and longbowmen.[27]
Ireland was ruled by the Lord of Ireland, who at first had great difficulty imposing his rule.Dublin andLeinster were Angevin strongholds, andCork,Limerick and parts of easternUlster were taken by Anglo-Norman nobles.[28]
All of the continental domains ruled by the Angevin kings were governed by aseneschal at the top of the hierarchical system, with lesser government officials such asbaillis,vicomtes, andprévôts.[29] However, all counties and duchies would differ to an extent.
Greater Anjou is a modern term to describe the area consisting of Anjou, Maine, Touraine, Vendôme, and Saintonge.[30] Here, prévôts, theseneschal of Anjou, and other seneschals governed. However, the constituent counties, such asMaine, were often administered by the officials of the local lords, rather than their Angevinsuzerains. Maine was initially largely self-governing and lacked centralized administration until the Angevin kings made efforts to improve governance by installing new officials, such as the seneschal of Le Mans. These reforms came too late for the Angevins, however, and only theCapetians saw the beneficial effects of this reform after they annexed the area.[31]
Aquitaine differed in the level of administration in its different constituent regions. Gascony was a very loosely administered region. Officials were stationed mostly inEntre-Deux-Mers,Bayonne,Dax, but some were found on the pilgrimage route toSantiago de Compostela and also on the riverGaronne up toAgen. The rest of Gascony was not administered, despite being a significantly larger area compared to other, smaller, well-administered provinces. This difficulty when it came to administering the region was not new – it had been just as difficult for the previous dukes to cement their authority over this area.[32] A similar state of affairs was found in the eastern provinces of Périgord and Limousin, where there was not much of a royal administrative system and practically no officials were stationed. Indeed, there were lords that ruled these regions as if they were "sovereign princes" and they had extra powers, such as the ability to mint their own coins, something English lords had been unable to do for decades. TheLusignans, for example, became rivals to the Angevins during John's rule as he attempted to consolidate his power. Officials could be stationed in Poitou, however, as there was a large concentration of castles compared to the rest of Aquitaine.[33]
Normandy was the most consistently administered state within the continental Angevin Empire.[34] UnderAngevin rule, ducal government was regularised and strengthened, with theseneschal of Normandy becoming the pre-eminent figure in Norman government.[35] The seneschals' administrative and judicial power peaked withWilliam FitzRalph.[36] Below them were the baillis, who held executive, judicial, and financial powers. Theoe officials were introduced underGeoffrey of Anjou, replacing the weaker prévôts and vicomtes in response to the unrest that followed Henry I's death and Geoffrey's invasion.[37] Ducal authority was the strongest on the frontier near theCapetian royal demesne.[34]
Toulouse was held through weak vassalage by thecount of Toulouse, but it was rare for him to comply with Angevin rule. Only Quercy was directly administered by the Angevins after Henry II's conquest in 1159, but it did remain a contested area.[38] Brittany, a region in which the nobles were traditionally very independent, was under Angevin control during Henry II and Richard I's reigns. The county of Nantes was under the firmest control. The Angevins often involved themselves in Breton affairs, such as when Henry II arrangedConan of Brittany's marriage and installed thearchbishop of Dol.[39]
Chinon Castle, the administrative centre and location of the main treasury in the Angevin Empire.[40]
The economy of the Angevin Empire was complex with varying political structures of the different fiefdoms. England and Normandy were well administered and therefore would be able to generate larger revenues than areas such as Aquitaine. This is because England and Normandy were home to more officials to collect taxes and, unlike Aquitaine, local lords were unable to mint their own coins, allowing the Angevin kings to control the economy from their administrative base ofChinon. Chinon's importance was shown by Richard's seizure of Chinon first when he rebelled against his father in 1187 and then when John rushed to Chinon after his brother's death.[41]
Money raised in England was used mostly for continental issues,[23] although historianJohn Gillingham argues that although areas like Normandy, Anjou, and Aquitaine are recorded to have brought in less revenue compared to England, much of this is due to poor financial accounts for these continental possessions. Gillingham argues that by the end of Richard's reign, Normandy may have been generating even more revenue for the royal treasury than England.[42]
When financial records begin in 1155 to 1156, the annual income of England was £10,500, or around half what the revenue had been under Henry I.[43] This was caused by the Anarchy and King Stephen's loose rule resulting in the reduction of royal authority. As time went on, royal authority improved, and the revenue consequently went up to an average of £22,000 per year. During preparation for theThird Crusade, revenue increased to over £31,000 in 1190 under Richard. The number fell again to £11,000 per year whilst Richard was abroad. Between 1194 and 1198, the average annual revenue was £25,000. Under John, income fluctuated between £22,000 and £25,000 from 1199 to 1203. In order to fund the reconquest of France, income increased to £50,000 in 1210 but then rose to over £83,000 in 1211 before falling back down to £50,000 in 1212. Revenue then fell below £26,000 in 1214 and further to £18,500 in 1215. The first three years ofHenry III's reign brought in £8,000 on average due to the fragility thecivil war had brought to England.[44]
In Ireland, the revenue was fairly low at £2,000 for 1212; however, all other records did not survive. For Normandy, there were many fluctuations relative to the politics of the duchy. The Norman revenues were £6,750 in 1180; then, they reached £25,000 per year by 1198, higher than in England.[45] What was more impressive was that the Norman population was considerably smaller than England's, an estimated 1.5 million as opposed to England's 3.5 million.[46] This period has become known as the 'Norman Fiscal Revolution' due to this increase in revenue.[45]
For Aquitaine and Anjou, no records remain. However, it is not because those regions were poor; there were large vineyards, important cities and iron mines. For example, English chroniclerRalph of Diceto writes:[47]
Aquitaine overflows with riches of many kinds, excelling other parts of the western world to such an extent that historians consider it to be one of the most fortunate and flourishing of the provinces ofGaul. Its fields are fertile, its vineyards productive and its forests teem with wild life. From thePyrenees northwards the whole countryside is irrigated by the RiverGaronne and other streams, indeed it is from these life-giving waters that the province takes its name.
The Capetian kings did not record such incomes, although the royal principality was more centralized underLouis VII and Philip II than it had been underHugh Capet orRobert the Pious.[48] The wealth of the Plantagenet kings was definitely regarded as greater;Gerald of Wales comments on this wealth:[49]
One may therefore ask how King Henry II and his sons, in spite of their many wars, possessed so much treasure. The reason is that as their fixed returns yielded less they took care to make up the total by extraordinary levies, relying more and more on these than on the ordinary sources of revenue.
Petit Dutailli had commented: "Richard maintained a superiority in resources which would have given him the opportunity, had he lived, to crush his rival." There is another interpretation, not widely followed and proven wrong, that the king of France could have raised a stronger income, that the royal principality of the king of France generated alone more incomes than all the Angevin Empire combined.[48]
Thecounts of Anjou had been vying for power in northwestern France since the 10th century. The counts were recurrent enemies of thedukes of Normandy andof Brittany and often theFrench king.Fulk IV, Count of Anjou, claimed rule over Touraine, Maine and Nantes; however, of these only Touraine proved to be effectively ruled, as the construction of the castles of Chinon,Loches andLoudun exemplify. Fulk married his son and namesake, called "Fulk the Younger", toErmengarde, heiress of the province of Maine, thus unifying it with Anjou throughpersonal union.[50]
While the dynasty of the Angevins was successfully consolidating their power in France, their rivals theNormans hadconquered England in the 11th century. Meanwhile in the rest of France, theRamnulfids had becomedukes of Aquitaine and of Gascony, andStephen, Count of Blois (the father of the next king of England, Stephen) became thecount of Champagne. France was being split between only a few noble families.[51]
In 1106, Henry I of Englandhad defeated his brotherRobert Curthose and angered Robert's son,William Clito,Count of Flanders. Henry used his paternal inheritance to take the Duchy of Normandy and the Kingdom of England and then tried to establish an alliance with Anjou by marrying his only legitimate son,William, to Fulk the Younger's daughter,Matilda. However, William died in theWhite Ship disaster in 1120.[52] As a result, Henry then married his daughterMatilda toGeoffrey "Plantagenet", Fulk's son and successor; however, Henry's subjects had to accept Matilda's inheritance to thethrone of England. There had been only one occurrence of a medieval Europeanqueen regnant before,Urraca of León and Castile, and it was not an encouraging precedent; nevertheless, in January 1127 the Anglo-Normans barons andprelates recognized Matilda as heiress to the throne in an oath.[53] On 17 June 1128, the wedding between Matilda and Geoffrey was celebrated inLe Mans.
In order to secure Matilda's succession to the royal throne, she and Geoffrey needed castles and supporters in both England and Normandy, but if they succeeded there would be two authorities in England: the king and Matilda. Henry prevented the conflict by refusing to hand over any castles to Matilda as well as confiscating the lands of the nobles he suspected of supporting her. By 1135, major disputes between Henry and Matilda drove the nobles previously loyal to Henry against Matilda. In November, Henry was dying; Matilda was with her husband in Maine and Anjou while Stephen—brother ofTheobald, Count of Blois and Champagne, who was Matilda's cousin and another contender for the English and Norman thrones—was in Boulogne. Stephen rushed to England upon the news of Henry's death and was crowned king of England in December 1135.[54]
Geoffrey first sent Matilda alone to Normandy in a diplomatic mission to be recognized duchess of Normandy and replace Stephen. Geoffrey followed at the head of his army and quickly captured several fortresses in southern Normandy.[55] It was then that a noble in Anjou,Robert II of Sablé, rebelled, forcing Geoffrey to withdraw and prevent an attack on his rear. When Geoffrey returned to Normandy in September 1136, the region had become plagued with internal, baronial infighting. Stephen was not able to travel to Normandy and so the situation remained. Geoffrey had found new allies with thecount of Vendôme and, most importantly,William X, Duke of Aquitaine. However, Geoffrey was wounded and was forced to return to Anjou again. Furthermore, an outbreak of dysentery plagued his army. ChroniclerOrderic Vitalis states "the invaders had to run for home leaving a trail of filth behind them". Stephen finally arrived in Normandy in 1137 and restored order but had lost much credibility in the eyes of his main supporter,Robert of Gloucester and so Robert changed sides and supported Geoffrey and Matilda instead. Geoffrey tookCaen andArgentan without resistance but now had to defend Robert's possessions in England against Stephen. In 1139 Robert and Matilda crossed the channel and arrived in England while Geoffrey kept the pressure on Normandy. Stephen was captured in February 1141 at theBattle of Lincoln, which prompted the collapse of his authority in both England and Normandy.[56]
Geoffrey controlled almost all of Normandy but no longer had the support of Aquitaine after William X was succeeded by his daughterEleanor, who had marriedLouis VII of France in 1137. Louis was not concerned with the events in Normandy and England. While Geoffrey consolidated his Norman power, Matilda suffered defeats in England.[57] AtWinchester, Robert of Gloucester was captured while covering Matilda's retreat, so Matilda freed Stephen in exchange for Robert.[58]
In 1142, Geoffrey was asked by Matilda for assistance but refused; he had become more interested in Normandy. Following the capture ofAvranches,Mortain andCherbourg,Rouen surrendered to him in 1144 and he anointed himself duke of Normandy. In exchange forGisors, he was formally recognised byLouis VII.[55] However, Geoffrey still did not assist Matilda even as she was on the verge of defeat. Further rebellion occurred in Anjou, including Geoffrey's younger brother,Helie, demanding Maine. It was during this period of Angevin unrest that Geoffrey dropped the title of duke of Normandy and formally invested his son Henry as duke in 1150, though both Geoffrey and Matilda would continue to dominate Norman affairs.[59] The following six decades of Angevin rule over Normandy would see the establishment of Norman customs and institutions that would last until theFrench Revolution.[60]
Stephen continued to claim Normandy, believing an alliance with Louis was possible.[61] Louis VII had recognised Henry as duke of Normandy in August 1151 in exchange for concessions in the NormanVexin[62] but remained angered by Henry and Geoffrey's treatment ofGiraud II of Montreuil-Berlay following Giraud's failed rebellion against Angevin rule the year before.[61] In September the situation shifted when Geoffrey died and Henry inherited his position as count of Anjou, with rule also over Touraine and Maine.[63] Geoffrey had planned to leave Anjou to his son,Geoffrey FitzEmpress, but this would have hampered Henry's ability to succeed in conquering England.[63] Geoffrey instead asked his vassals to swear that his body would be left unburied until Henry promised to abide by his wishes.[64] Warren suggests that this story was spread purely to justify his son's later rebellion against Henry, and that the Angevin nobles supported the story as it gave them an opportunity to reclaim their lost autonomy.[65]
In March 1152, Louis VII and Eleanor of Aquitaine had their marriageannulled under the pretext ofconsanguinity at the council ofBeaugency.[66] The terms of the annulment left Eleanor as duchess of Aquitaine but still a vassal of Louis. She left Beaugency forPoitiers, narrowly escaping an ambush by Geoffrey FitzEmpress on route, and there, eight weeks later, she married Henry.[67] Thus Henry became duke of Aquitaine and Gascony and count of Poitou. Louis responded with a furious attack on Normandy.[67]
In July 1152, Capetian troops attacked Aquitaine while Louis, Eustace, Henry of Champagne, and Robert attacked Normandy. Geoffrey raised a revolt in Anjou while Stephen attacked Angevin loyalists in England. Several Anglo-Norman nobles switched allegiance, sensing an impending disaster. Henry was about to sail for England to pursue his claim when his lands were attacked. He first reached Anjou and compelled Geoffrey to surrender. He then sailed to England in January 1153 to meet Stephen. Louis fell ill and had to retire from the conflict while Henry's defences held against his enemies. After seven months of battles and politics, Henry failed to get rid of Stephen, but then Eustace died in dubious circumstances, "struck by the wrath of god." Stephen gave up the struggle by ratifying theTreaty of Winchester, making Henry his heir on condition that the landed possessions of his family were guaranteed in England and France—the same terms Matilda had previously refused after her victory at Lincoln.
Henry became King Henry II of England upon Stephen's death on 25 October 1154. Subsequently, the question was again raised of Henry's oath to cede Anjou to his brother Geoffrey. Henry received a dispensation fromPope Adrian IV under the pretext the oath had been forced upon him,[69] and he proposed compensations to Geoffrey at Rouen in 1156. Geoffrey refused and returned to Anjou to rebel against Henry. Geoffrey may have had a strong claim, but his position was weak. Louis would not interfere since Henry paid homage to him for his continental possessions. Henry crushed Geoffrey's revolt, and Geoffrey had to be satisfied with an annual pension. The Angevin Empire had now been formed.[70]
In the earlier years of his reign, Henry claimed further lands and worked on the creation of a ring of vassal states as buffers, especially around England and Normandy. The most obvious areas to expand, where large claims were held, were Scotland, Wales, Brittany, and, as an ally rather than a new dominion, Flanders.[53]
Henry showed himself to be an audacious and daring king as well as being active and mobile; 12th century historianRoger of Howden states that Henry travelled across his dominions so fast that Louis VII once exclaimed "The king of England is now in Ireland, now in England, now in Normandy, he seems rather to fly than to go by horse or ship."[72] Henry was often more present in France than in England;[73] ChroniclerRalph de Diceto said with irony:[74]
There is nothing left to send to bring the king back to England but theTower of London.
Henry boughtVernon andNeuf-Marché back from Louis in 1154.[75] This strategy regulated the Plantagenet-Capetian relationship. Louis had been unsuccessful in his attempt to break Henry down. Because of the Angevin control of England in 1154, it was pointless to object to the superiority of the overall Angevin forces over the Capetian ones. However, Henry refused to back down despite Louis' apparent change of policy until the Norman Vexin was entirely recovered. Chancellor of EnglandThomas Becket was sent as ambassador to Paris in the summer of 1158 to lead negotiations.[76] He displayed all the wealth the Angevins could provide and, according toWilliam Fitzstephen, a clerk and companion of Becket, a Frenchman exclaimed "If the Chancellor of England travels in such splendor, what must the king be?"[77] Louis' daughterMargaret, who was still a baby, was betrothed to Henry's heir, his eldest sonHenry the Young King with adowry of the Norman Vexin.[76] Henry was given back the castles of Moulins-la-Marche and Bonmoulins.[78]Theobald V, Count of Blois handedAmboise andFréteval back to him.[39]
Thecounts of Flanders had long been powerful but capricious allies of the kings of France.[79]Count Thierry had taken part in Louis' early assaults against Henry,[53] and Henry had expelled all Flemish mercenaries in England at the time of his accession,[80] but much of Flanders' prosperity relied on English trade and England traded much of its wool via the Flemish port of Boulogne.[81] Henry therefore was able to re-establish friendly relations to the extent that Thierry appointed Henry guardian of his eldest son and regentPhilip when Thierry undertook his pilgrimage to Jerusalem in 1157.[39]
WhenWilliam of Blois died without an heir in 1159, the titles ofcount of Boulogne andcount of Mortain fell vacant. Henry absorbed Mortain into his Duchy of Normandy and granted Boulogne and William's sisterMary to Thierry's sonMatthew.[82] Through this marriage, and the 1163 renewal of a previous treaty between Henry andRobert II of Flanders, Henry was assured of Flemish neutrality if war broke out with the king of France again.[83] Flanders would provide Henry with knights in exchange of an annual tribute in money, known as a "money-fief".[83]
In 1148Conan III, Duke of Brittany, died, leaving behind two children. Although his sonHoël was the natural choice to succeed to the duchy, evidence suggests that Hoël was illegitimate and instead he was only recognised ascount of Nantes.[84] Hoël's sisterBertha became duchess of Brittany, ruling alongside her husbandEudo of Porhoët.[84] However Bertha had a son,Conan, from her previous marriage to the lateAlan de Bretagne.[85] Conan had been too young to succeed his grandfather in 1148, but he became Henry's candidate to become duke of Brittany upon Bertha's death, as his English holdings asearl of Richmond meant he would be easier to control.[86]
In Nantes, possibly because Hoël recognized Bertha's suzerainty over the county,[87] the citizens rose up against Hoël in 1156 and installed Henry's brother Geoffrey in Hoël's place as count, at Henry's suggestion.[88] In September this was followed up with a successful invasion of the duchy by Conan against Eudo, ending in Conan's accession as duke of Brittany, albeit with Nantes remaining under direct Angevin control.[89] However, by 1158 Geoffrey died, and Conan seized Nantes.[88] Nantes was especially important to Henry as it sat at the mouth of theLoire and threatened trade fromAngers andTours.[90] Henry responded to this seizure by mustering an army inAvranches,[91] as well as threatening Conan's English estates.[92] Conan submitted, ceding Nantes back to Henry and in return was recognised as duke.[93] During Conan's rule, Henry continued to intervene—he arranged Conan's marriage toMargaret of Scotland and appointed thearchbishop of Dol,[94] despite attempts by thearchbishop of Tours, Engelbald, to subsume Dol into his archdiocese.[95]
By 1166, it became apparent that Conan was unable to independently maintain order in Brittany, and in response Henry seized control.[96] He betrothed Conan's daughter and heirConstance to his sonGeoffrey and took possession of the duchy in Geoffrey's name.[97] AtThouars, Henry received homage from most of the Breton nobles, and then went on toRennes where the Breton dukes had historically been invested in thecity's cathedral.[98] Over the following years, some nobles continued to rebel against Angevin rule, but Henry responded to each rebellion with confiscations of territory and castles.[99] By 1169, the duchy was firmly under Angevin control,[100] with Geoffrey receiving homage from the Breton nobles at Rennes.[101]
Henry met KingMalcolm IV in 1157 to discuss Cumberland, Westmorland and Northumberland, which had previously been seized by Malcolm's grandfather David I of Scotland. In 1149, before Henry became powerful, he made an oath to David that the lands north ofNewcastle should belong to the king of Scotland forever. Malcolm reminded him of this oath, but Henry did not comply. There is no evidence that Henry recedived a dispensation from the pope this time, as 12th centuryWilliam of Newburgh puts it, "prudently considering it was the king of England who had the better of the argument by reason of his much greater power."[102] Malcolm gave up and paid homage in return forHuntingdon, which he had inherited from his father.[103]
William the Lion, the next king of Scotland, was unhappy with Henry since he was given Northumberland by David in 1152 and therefore lost it to Henry when Malcolm handed it back in 1157. As a part of the coalition set by Louis VII, William the Lion first invaded Northumberland in 1173 and then again in 1174; as a result he was captured at theBattle of Alnwick and had to sign the toughTreaty of Falaise. Garrisons were to be set in the castles of Edinburgh, Roxburgh, Jedburgh and Berwick.[20] Southern Scotland was from then under firm control just as Brittany was. On 5 December 1189, Richard I annulled the treaty, returned of Roxburgh and Berwick and a formal acknowledgment of Scotland's independence in return for money to fundRichard's crusade in what Warren calls a "diplomatic triumph," protecting England's northern flank during John's later rebellion of 1193–1194.[104]
Rhys of Deheubarth, also called Lord Rhys, and Owain Gwynedd were closed to negotiations. Henry attacked Wales three times, in 1157, 1158 and 1163 to have them answer his summons to the court. The Welsh found his terms too harsh and largely revolted against him. Henry undertook a fourth invasion in 1164, this time with a massive army. According to Welsh chronicleBrut y Tywysogion, Henry raised "a mighty host of the picked warriors of England and Normandy and Flanders and Anjou and Gascony and Scotland" to "carry into bondage and to destroy all theBritons".[105]
Bad weather, rains, floods, and constant harassment from the Welsh armies slowed the Angevin army and prevented the capture of Wales; a furious Henry had Welsh hostages mutilated following theBattle of Crogen. Wales would remain safe for a while, but the invasion of Ireland in 1171 pressured Henry to end the issue through negotiations with Lord Rhys.[26]
There were plans of expansion considered, as Henry's brotherWilliam Fitzempress had no fiefdom. TheHoly See was most likely to support a campaign in Ireland to bring its church into the Christian Latin world of Rome. Henry was given Rome's blessing in 1155 under the form of apapal bull, but he had to postpone the invasion of Ireland because of all the problems in his domains and around them. In the terms of the BullLaudabiliter, "Laudably and profitably does your magnificence contemplate extending your glorious name on earth."[106]
William died in 1164 without being installed in Ireland, but Henry did not give up on the conquest of Ireland. In 1167 Irish KingDermot of Leinster was recognised as "prince ofLeinster" by Henry and was allowed to recruit soldiers in England and Wales to use in Ireland against the other kings. The knights first met great success in carving themselves lands in Ireland, and Henry landed in Ireland in October 1171 nearWaterford and confronted to such demonstration of power most native kings of Ireland recognised him as their lord. EvenRory O' Connor, the king ofConnacht andHigh King of Ireland paid homage to Henry. Henry installed some of his men in strongholds likeDublin and Leinster (as Dermot had dies). He also gave unconquered kingdoms such asCork,Limerick andUlster to his men and left the Normans carving their lands in Ireland.[106]
In 1177 Henry made his son John the firstLord of Ireland, but John's youth meant it wasn't until 1185 that he departed with 300 knights to cement his rule. John almost immediately failed, uniting Irish chieftains and Anglo-Norman settlers alike against him.[107] He returned within the year to his father—he would not return for 25 years, while other Anglo-Normans such asJohn de Courcy andHugh de Lacy built castles and installed their interests.[108]
Much less tenable was the claim over Toulouse, the fortified seat of the County of Toulouse. Eleanor's ancestors claimed the large county, as it had been the central power of the ancient Duchy of Aquitaine in the times ofOdo the Great.[15] However Henry and possibly Eleanor were likely not related to this ancient line of dukes; Eleanor was aRamnulfid, while Henry was an Angevin.
Toulouse was larger, more heavily fortified, and much richer than many cities of the time.[109] It was strategically important, sitting between the Atlantic Ocean and theMediterranean, dominating regional trade and road networks that included significant towns such asNarbonne,Cahors,Albi,Nîmes andCarcassonne.[110] The recurrent conflicts by the Angevins with Toulouse was called theForty Years War by William of Newburgh.[111]
In June 1159 Henry's forces gathered inPoitiers. They included troops from all of his fiefdoms from Gascony to England, as well as reinforcements sent by Thierry and King Malcolm IV of Scotland. Even a Welsh prince joined the fray. The only larger armies of the time were those raised for majorcrusades.[112] Henry attacked from the north; his allies theTrencavels andRamon Berenguer opened a second front. Henry could not capture Toulouse proper since King Louis VII was part of the defence, Henry and did not want to set an example to his vassals or have to deal with keeping his sovereign prisoner.[112] Henry did captureCahors along with castles in theGaronne valley in theQuercy region. Henry returned in 1161, but too busy with conflicts elsewhere in his fiefdom, he left his allies fighting against Toulouse. KingAlfonso II of Aragon had interests there and joined the war. In 1171, Henry's alliance was bolstered by another of Raymond's enemies,Humbert of Maurienne. In 1173 inLimoges, Raymond finally gave up after over a decade of constant fights. He paid homage to Henry and to Henry's sons:Henry and Richard, Duke of Aquitaine.[113]
The attacks on Toulouse made clear that peace between Louis and Henry was not peace at all but just an opportunity for Henry to make war elsewhere. Louis was in an awkward position: his subject Henry was largely more powerful than he was, and Louis had no male heir.Constance, his second wife, died in childbirth in 1160, and Louis announced he would remarry at once, in the urgent need of a male heir, withAdèle of Champagne. Louis' daughter Margaret was betrothed to Henry's son Henry the Young King on 2 November 1160. Henry the Young King was five years old at the time of this agreement while Margaret was about two. Margaret'sdowry was the vital and much disputed territory of Vexin. Thus, if Louis died without a male heir, Henry would have been a strong candidate for the French throne.[114]
Earliest known portrayal of Thomas Becket's murder inCanterbury Cathedral, where he was archbishop.
In 1164 Louis found a dangerous ally in Archbishop of CanterburyThomas Becket.[115] Louis and Becket had met previously in 1158, but now the circumstances were different; France was already a refuge to a few clerical refugees, and Louis was known asRex Christianisimus (most Christian king), called so byJohn of Salisbury.[115] Becket took refuge in France, and following this there weregrowing conflicts between Henry and Becket. Henry finally provoked Becket's murder in 1170 by announcing, "What miserable traitors have I nourished in my household who led their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born clerk!"[116] Christendom blamed Henry,[117] whereas Louis gained widespread approval through his protection of Becket. Louis' secular power was much weaker than Henry's, but Louis now had the moral advantage.[118]
In 1165 hopes of Henry the Young King's future accession to the French throne were dashed when Adèle gave birth to a son,Philip. Following this, the fragile Anglo-French peace ended. In 1167, Henry II marched into Auvergne, and in 1170 he attacked Bourges. Louis answered by raiding Vexin, forcing Henry to move his troops north, giving Louis the opportunity to free Bourges. At this point, Gillingham mentions inThe Angevin Empire that he believes Louis "must have wondered whether there was ever going to be an end to Henry's aggressively expansionist policies".[119]
Henry did not treat his territories as a coherent empire, as the term "Angevin Empire" would suggest, but as private, individual possessions that he planned to distribute to his children. Henry The Young King was crowned king of England in 1170 (though he never ruled); Richard became Duke of Aquitaine in 1172; Geoffrey became Duke of Brittany in 1181; John became Lord of Ireland in 1185;Eleanor was promised toAlfonso VII with Gascony as dowry during the campaign against Toulouse in 1170. This partition of the lands between his children made it much harder for him to control them, as now they could fund their own ventures with their estates and attempt to overrule their father in their respective dominions.[120]
Following his coronation in 1173, Henry the Young King asked for part of his inheritance, at least England, Normandy, or Anjou, but his father refused. Young Henry then joined Louis at the French court to otherthrow his father together, and his mother Eleanor joined the newrevolt against Henry II. Both Richard and Geoffrey soon joined Henry II. Enemies that Henry II had made joined the conflict with Louis, includingKing William of Scotland,Count Philip of Flanders,Count Matthew of Boulogne andCount Theobald of Blois. Henry II emerged victorious; his wealth meant he could recruit large numbers of mercenaries. He had captured and imprisoned Eleanor early on, and the capture of King William allowed him to force Scotland into theTreaty of Falaise. Henry bought the County of Marche, then he asserted that Vexin and Bourges should be given back at once. However, this time there was no invasion to back the claim.[121]
Louis died in 1180 and was succeeded by his 15-year-old son, crowned as Philip II. The man who would later become Philip's main rival, the future Richard I, had administered Aquitaine since 1175 but his policy of centralisation of the Aquitanian government had grown unpopular in the eastern part of the duchy, notablyPérigord andLimousin. Richard was further disliked in Aquitaine because of his apparent disregard for Aquitaine's customs of inheritance, as shown by events inAngoulême in 1181.[122] If Richard was unpopular in Aquitaine though, Philip was equally disliked by his contemporaries with comments describing him as:astute, manipulative, calculating, penurious and ungallant ruler.[123]
In 1183 Henry the Young King joined a revolt to overthrow the unpopular Duke Richard, led by theviscount of Limoges andGeoffrey of Lusignan, where Henry would take Richard's place. Joined by Philip, CountRaymond V of Toulouse, and DukeHugh III of Burgundy, Henry died suddenly of a fatal illness in 1183, and Richard thus became the next in line for the English throne.[124] Henry ordered Richard to hand Aquitaine to his brother John, but Richard refused. Henry was busy with Welsh princes contesting his authority, William the Lion was asking for his castles to be given back that had been taken in the Treaty of Falaise, and Philip wanted Vexin back. Henry decided instead to insist Richard to nominally surrender Aquitaine to his mother whilst Richard would retain actual control. Still, in 1183, Count Raymond had takenCahors back and so Henry asked Richard to mount an expedition to retake the city. At the time,Geoffrey of Brittany had been quarrelling violently with Richard, and Philip planned to use this, but Geoffrey's death in 1186 in a tournament killed the plot. The next year, Philip and Richard had become strong allies:
The King of England was struck with great astonishment, and wondered what [this alliance] could mean, and, taking precautions for the future, frequently sent messengers into France for the purpose of recalling his son Richard; who, pretending that he was peaceably inclined and ready to come to his father, made his way to Chinon, and, in spite of the person who had the custody thereof, carried off the greater part of his father's treasures, and fortified his castles in Poitou with the same, refusing to go to his father.
In 1188 Raymond attacked again, joined by the Lusignans, vassals of Richard. It was rumoured that Henry had financed the revolts. Philip attacked Henry in Normandy and captured strongholds inBerry, then they met to discuss peace again. Henry refused to make Richard his heir, with one story reporting that Richard said "Now at last, I must believe what I had always thought impossible."[125]
Henry's plans collapsed. Richard paid homage to Philip for the continental lands his father held, then they attacked Henry together. The Aquitanians refused to help whilst the Bretons seized the opportunity to attack him too. Henry was encircled at Chinon and was compelled to surrender. He gave a large tribute in money to Philip and swore that all his subjects in France and England would recognise Richard as their lord. Henry died two days later after learning that his son John had joined Richard and Philip. He was buried inFontevraud Abbey.[126]
Eleanor, who had been Henry's hostage since the revolt, was freed while Rhys ap Gruffydd, ruler ofDeheubarth in South Wales, began to reconquer the parts of Wales that Henry had annexed. Richard was crowned King Richard I of England inWestminster Abbey in November 1189, and had already been installed as Duke of Normandy, Count of Anjou and Duke of Aquitaine. Richard demanded Philip surrender the Vexin, but then the issue was settled when Richard announced he would marry Philip's sisterAlys. Richard also recognised Auvergne as being inPhilip's royal demesne and not as part of the Duchy of Aquitaine, as Henry had claimed. King William of Scotland and Richard opened negotiations to revoke the Treaty of Falaise, and an agreement was reached.[127]
The next priority for Richard was theThird Crusade;[128] it had been delayed since Richard had taken the cross in 1187.[129] This was not just a religious pilgrimage, however; his great-grandfather,Fulk had beenKing of Jerusalem, and the current pretender to the throne,Guy de Lusignan, was a Poitevin noble, related to many of Richard's vassals, while Guy's wifeSybilla was Richard's cousin.[128] The crusade, excluding disputes in France, would be the main reason for Richard's absence from England; he would spend less than six months of his reign in England.[130]
Before leaving, Richard consolidated his reign over the empire. He suspected Count Raymond would expand his lands into Aquitaine so he allied withSancho VI the Wise, theking of Navarre, by marrying his daughterBerengaria to counter the threat.[131] On the way to the Holy Land,the ruler of Cyprus offended Richard's bride, and Richard's armyconquered the island. They married in 1191 inLimassol, Cyprus, therefore repudiating Alys, but the issue had been settled earlier inMessina: to placate Philip, Richard had given him 10,000 marks and agreed that if he had two sons, they would both hold lands in France directly under Philip.[132] The administration Richard left behind worked considerably well, as an attack from Raymond was repelled with the help of Navarre.[133]
Thesiege of Acre, which had been the last Christian stronghold inHoly Land, was over by July 1191, and Philip decided to return to France. It is unclear whether Philip returned due to dysentery, anger towards Richard, or that he thought he could gainArtois following the death of theCount of Flanders, as he had married the count's daughter.[134] Whilst back at France, Philip boasted he was "going to devastate the king of England's lands," and in January 1192 he demanded the Vexin fromWilliam FitzRalph, Seneschal of Normandy, claiming that the treaty he had signed with Richard in Messina contained the intention of Richard that—as the Vexin had been Alys' dowry and since Richard had married Berengaria—he was entitled to the land.[135] Although Philip threatened invasion, Eleanor of Aquitaine intervened in stopping her son John from promising to concede the land. Philip's nobles refused to attack the lands of an absent crusader, though Philip instead gained lands in Artois. Philip's return resulted in castles throughout the empire being in a "state of readiness".[136] The alliance with Navarre helped again when Philip attempted to incite revolt in Aquitaine but failed.[137]
Richard yielded Cyprus and left the Holy Land over a year later than Philip in October 1192, and he possibly could have retrieved his empire intact had he reached France soon after. However, during the crusadeLeopold V, Duke of Austria, had been insulted by Richard, and so he arrested Richard nearVienna on his journey home. Richard had been forced to go through Austria as the path throughProvence was blocked by Raymond in Toulouse. Leopold also accused Richard of sending assassins to murder his cousinConrad, and then handed Richard over to his overlord,Emperor Henry VI.[138]
In January 1193, Richard's brother John was summoned to Paris, where he did homage to Philip for all of Richard's lands and promised to marry Alys with Artois as her dowry. In return, the Vexin and thecastle of Gisors would be given to Philip. With the help of Philip, John went to invade England and incite rebellion against Richard's justiciars. John failed and then had worse luck when it was discovered Richard was alive, which was unknown until this point.[139] At theimperial court inSpeyer, Richard was put on trial where he spoke very well for himself:
When Richard replied [to the charges against him] he spoke so eloquently and regally, in so lionhearted a manner, that it was as though he had forgotten where he was and the undignified circumstances in which he had been captured and imagined himself to be seated on the throne of his ancestors at Lincoln or Caen.
— William the Breton, Phillipidos, iv, 393-6, in Oeuvres de Rigord et de Guillaume le Breton, ed. H. F. Delaborde, ii (Paris, 1885)
Richard was to be set free after a deal was finalised in June 1193. However, whilst the discussions had been going on, Philip and John had created war in three different areas of the Angevin Empire. John had attempted to take over England, asserting that Richard would never return. The justiciars pushed his forces back to the castles ofTickhill andWindsor, which were besieged. A deal was made that allowed John to keep Tickhill andNottingham but return his other possessions.[140] In Aquitaine,Ademar of Angoulême claimed that he held his county directly as a fief of Philip's, not as a vassal of the duke of Aquitaine. He raided Poitou but was stopped by the local officials and captured.[141] In Normandy, Philip had taken Gisors and Neaufles, and the lords ofAumâle,Eu, and other smaller lordships, as well as the counts ofMeulan andPerche, had surrendered to Philip.[142] Philip failed to take Rouen in April but gained other castles; Gillingham summarises "April and May 1193 were wonderfully good months for Philip".[142]
When Philip heard of Richard's deal with Emperor Henry, he decided to consolidate his gains by forcing Richard's regents to concede with a treaty atMantes in July 1193. Firstly, John was handed back his estates in both England and France. Secondly, Count Ademar was to be released and no Aquitanian vassals were to be charged or penalised. Thirdly, Richard was to give four major castles to Philip and pay the cost of garrisoning them, along with other compensation.[143]
Richard failed to be reconciled with John, so John went to Philip and created a new treaty in January 1194, surrendering all of Normandy east of theSeine except Rouen and Tours and the other castles of Touraine to Philip,Vendôme toLouis of Blois, andMoulins andBonsmoulins toCount Geoffrey of Perche. The county of Angoulême was to be independent of the Duchy of Aquitaine. The Angevin Empire was being split by John's actions.[144] Philip continued to bargain with Emperor Henry, and the emperor cut a new deal with Richard after being offered large sums of money by Philip and John. Richard would surrender the kingdom of England to Henry, who would then give it back as a fief of theHoly Roman Empire. Richard had become a vassal of Henry. Richard was released, and whilst still in Germany he paid for the homage of the archbishops ofMainz andCologne, thebishop of Liège, theduke of Brabant, theduke of Limburg, thecount of Holland, and other lesser lords. These allies were the beginning of a coalition against Philip.[145]
Although Philip had been granted many Norman territories, it was only nominally. In February, he capturedÉvreux,Neubourg,Vaudreuil, and other towns. He also received the homage of two of Richard's vassals, Geoffrey de Rancon and Bernard of Brosse. Philip and his allies were now in control of all the ports of Flanders, Boulogne, and eastern Normandy. Richard finally returned to England and landed atSandwich on 13 March 1194.[146]
Richard was in a difficult position; Philip II had taken over large parts of his continental domains and had inheritedAmiens and Artois. England was Richard's most secure possession;Hubert Walter, who had been to the crusade with Richard, was appointed his justiciar.[147] Richard besieged the remaining castle that had declared allegiance to John and not capitulated:Nottingham Castle.[147] He then met with William the Lion in April and rejected William the Lion's offer to purchase Northumbria, to which William possessed a claim.[148] Later, he took over John'sLordship of Ireland and replaced his justiciar.[149]
The construction ofChâteau Gaillard began under Richard's rule, but he died before it could be seen finished.
Richard I had merely crossed theEnglish Channel to claim back his territories that John Lackland betrayed Philip II by murdering the garrison ofÉvreux and handing the town down to Richard I. "He had first betrayed hisfather, then hisbrother and now ourKing" saidWilliam the Breton.Sancho the Strong, the future King of Navarre, joined the conflict and attacked Aquitaine, capturing Angoulème and Tours. Richard himself was known to be a great military commander.[150] The first part of this war was difficult for Richard who suffered several setbacks, as Philip II was, as described by John Gillingham, "a shrewd politician and a competent soldier."[137] But by October the new Count of Toulouse,Raymond VI, left the Capetian side and joined Richard's. He was followed byBaldwin IV of Flanders, the futureLatin Emperor, as this one was contesting Artois to Philip II. In 1197, Henry VI died and was replaced byOtto IV, Richard I's own nephew.Renaud de Dammartin, the Count of Boulogne and a skilled commander, also deserted Philip II. Baldwin IV was invading Artois and capturedSaint-Omer while Richard I was campaigning in Berry and inflicted a severe defeat on Philip II atGisors, close to Paris. A truce was accepted, and Richard I had almost recovered all Normandy and now held more territories in Aquitaine than he had before. Richard I had to deal with a revolt once again, but this time fromLimousin. He was struck by a bolt in April 1199 atChâlus-Chabrol and died of a subsequent infection. His body was buried atFontevraud like his father.[126]
Following the news of King Richard I's death in 1199, John attempted to seize the Angevin treasury at Chinon in order to impose his control of the Angevin government.[151] Angevin custom, however, gave John's nephewDuke Arthur, son ofGeoffrey of Brittany, a stronger claim on Richard's throne, and the nobles of Anjou, Maine, and Touraine declared in favour of Arthur on 18 April 1199.[152] Philip II had taken Évreux and the Vexin,[153] and a Breton army had seizedAngers by this point. Le Mans refused to declare allegiance to John, so John ran to Normandy, where he was invested as duke in Rouen on 25 April. He returned to Le Mans with an army where he punished its citizens and then left for England. England had declared its support for John thanks to William Marshal and Archbishop of CanterburyHubert Walter's support.[154] He was crowned on 27 May in Westminster Abbey.[155]
With his mother's support, Aquitaine and Poitou also supported John, while Anjou, Maine, Touraine, and Brittany remained disputed. In MayAimery VII of Thouars, who was chosen by John to be hisseneschal in Anjou, attacked Tours in an attempt to capture Arthur.[156] Aimeri failed, and John was forced to return to the continent in order to secure his rule through a truce with Philip, after Philip had launched attacks on Normandy.[157] Philip was forced into the truce because John had support from 15 French counts and from counts in the Lower Rhine, such as CountBaldwin IX of Flanders.[158] From a position of strength, John was able to go on the offensive, and he won to his causeWilliam des Roches, Arthur's candidate for the Angevin seneschal, following an incident with Philip.[159] Des Roches brought Arthur and his motherConstance as prisoners to Le Mans in September, and the succession appeared to have been secured in favour of John.[160]
John was able to make peace with Philip that secured his accession to his brother's throne.[18] John met with Philip and signed theTreaty of Le Goulet in May 1200, where Philip accepted John's succession and Arthur became his vassal; John's concessions were to break with his German alliances, accept Philip's gains in Normandy, and cede lands in Auvergne and Berry.[161] John was also to accept Philip as his suzerain overlord and pay Philip 20,000 marks.[18] As Warren notes, this treaty began the practical dominance of the French king over France, and the ruler of the Angevin Empire was no longer the dominating noble in France.[162] In June 1200 John visited Anjou, Maine, and Touraine, taking hostages from those he distrusted. In Aquitaine he received homage from his mother's vassals, and he returned to Poitiers in August.[163]
Following the annulment of John's first marriage toIsabelle of Gloucester, John marriedIsabella, the daughter and heiress ofCount Aymer of Angoulême, on 24 August 1200.[164] Angoulême had considerable strategic significance, and the marriage made "very good political sense", according to Warren.[164] However, Isabella had been betrothed toHugh of Lusignan, and John's treatment of Hugh following the marriage, including the seizure of La Marche, led Hugh to appeal to Philip.[165] Philip summoned John to his court, and John's refusal resulted in the confiscation of John's continental possessions excluding Normandy in April 1202 and Philip accepting Arthur's homage for the lands in July.[165] Philip went on to invade Normandy as far asArques in May, taking several castles.[166]
Following a message from his mother Eleanor, John rushed from Le Mans to Mirebeau, attacking the town on 1 August 1202, with William des Roches.[167] William promised to direct the attack on condition he was consulted on the fate of Arthur,[167] and he successfully captured the town along with over 200 knights, including three Lusignans.[168] John captured Arthur and his sisterEleanor.[169] John failed to consult William on Arthur's fate causing him to desert John with Aimeri and besiegeAngers.[170] Under the control ofHubert de Burgh inFalaise, Arthur disappeared and John was seen as responsible for his murder. Eleanor remained in custody until her death in 1241.[171] The Angevin Empire was under attack in all areas, with the following year, 1203, being described as that "of shame" by Warren.[172] In December 1203 John left Normandy never to return, and in June 1204 Normandy capitulated with the surrender of Arques, Rouen, and Verneuil.[173] Tours, Chinon, and Loches had fallen by 1205.[171]
On 31 March 1204 John's mother, Eleanor of Aquitaine, died, causing a rush of "most of Poitou...to do homage to the king of France".[174]King Alfonso of Castile invaded Gascony, using the claim of his wife, John's sisterEleanor.[175] When John went to the continent in June 1206, only the resistance led by Hélie de Malemort,Archbishop of Bordeaux had prevented Alfonso's success.[174] By the end of John's expedition in October, most of Aquitaine was secure.[176] A truce was made between John and Philip to last for two years.[176] The Angevin Empire had been reduced to England, Gascony, Ireland, and parts of Poitou.[177]
By the end of 1212, Philip was preparing an invasion of England.[178] Philip aimed to crown his sonLouis as king of England, and at a council atSoissons in April 1213, he drafted a possible relationship between the future France and England.[178] On 30 MayWilliam Longespée, Earl of Salisbury, succeeded in crushing the French invasion fleet in theBattle of Damme and preventing French invasion.[177] In February 1214, John landed inLa Rochelle after creating alliances headed byOtto IV, Holy Roman Emperor.[179] The aim was for William Longespée and John's German allies to attack Philip from the north, whilst John attacked from the south.[180]
By June 1214, John had the support of the houses of Lusignan, Mauléon, and Thouars,[181] but when John advanced into Anjou, capturing Angers, the desertion of his Poitevin allies forced a retreat back to La Rochelle.[180] On 27 July, John's German allies lost theBattle of Bouvines with many prisoners taken, including Longespée.[182] On 18 September John and Philip agreed to theTruce of Chinon that was intended to last until Easter 1220.[183] John returned to England in October.[184]
Following the agreement atRunnymede in June 1215, rebel English barons felt that John would not observe the terms ofMagna Carta, and offered the English crown to Philip's son Louis.[185] Louis accepted, landing in Kent on 21 May 1216 with 1,200 knights.[186] Louis seizedRochester, London, andWinchester, whilst John was deserted by several nobles, including Longespée.[186] By August onlyDover,Lincoln, andWindsor remained loyal to John in the east, andAlexander II of Scotland travelled toCanterbury to pay homage to Louis.[185]
In September John began his attack, marching from theCotswolds, feigning an offensive to relieve the besieged Windsor Castle and attacking eastwards around London to Cambridge to separate the rebel-held areas of Lincolnshire and East Anglia.[187] InKing's Lynn, John contracteddysentery[187] and died on 18 October 1216.[186] Louis was defeated twice following John's death in 1217, in Lincoln in May and at Sandwich in August, resulting in his withdrawal from the claim on the throne and England with theTreaty of Lambeth in September.[188]
The hypothetical continuation and expansion of the Angevin Empire over several centuries has been the subject of several tales ofalternate history. English and French historians had viewed the juxtaposition of England and French lands under Angevin control as something of an aberration and an offence to national identity. To English historians, the lands in France were an encumbrance, but French historians considered the union to be an English empire.[189]
The 12th century brought aboutGothic architecture, first known asopus francigenum, from the work of AbbotSuger atSaint Denis in 1140. TheEarly English Period began around 1180 or 1190,[190] but this religious architecture was independent of the Angevin Empire. Gillingham suggests that it was only "perhaps in kitchen design" that there was a distinctively Angevin style.[191]
Richard I's personal arms—three golden lionspassant guardant on a red field—continue to appear in most subsequentEnglish royal heraldry and in variations on the flags of both Normandy and Aquitaine.[c] Politically, continental issues were given more attention by the Angevin kings of England than British issues had been given by the Normans.[193] Under Angevin rule, the balance of power had dramatically shifted to France, with Angevin kings often spending more time in France than England.[194] With the loss of Normandy and Anjou, the empire was cut in two, leaving Plantagenet descendants to be solely English kings with additional rule over Gascony.[195]
^The termimperium is used at least once in the 12th century, in theDialogus de Scaccari (c. 1179),Per longa terrarum spatia triumphali victoria suum dilataverit imperium.[1] Some 20th-century historians have avoided the termempire, Robert-Henri Bautier (1984) usedespace Plantagenêt, Jean Favier usedcomplexe féodal. Empire Plantagenêt nevertheless remains current in French historiography.[2]
^Wood, Michael."William the Conqueror: A Thorough Revolutionary".BBC History.Archived from the original on 23 January 2015. Retrieved20 January 2015.Robert of Gloucester: 'TheNormans could then speak nothing but their own language, and spoke French as they did at home and also taught their children. So that the upper class of the country that is descended from them stick to the language they got from home, therefore unless a person knows French he is little thought of. But the lower class stick to English and their own language even now.'
^Elliott (2018), p. 10: "Another such composite monarchy was that inherited by James VI of Scotland from Elizabeth I in 1603, although, until James succeeded to the English throne, this was a composite monarchy made up of conquered rather than inherited lands. Twelfth-century England itself formed part of a composite state, straddling the British Isles and France, that was later to be known as the Angevin Empire, but the French connection did not prevent Henry II (r.1154–89) from asserting, or more correctly reasserting, the claims of his predecessors to English overlordship over all of Britain".
^Hallam (1983), p. 221: "Closer investigation suggests that several of these assumptions are unfounded. One is that the Angevin dominions ever formed an empire in any sense of the word";Carpenter (2003),p. 226;Gillingham (2001), p. 3: "Unquestionably if used in conjunction with atlases in which Henry II's lands are coloured red, it is a dangerous term, for then overtones of the British Empire are unavoidable and politically crass. But in ordinary English usage 'empire' can mean nothing more specific than an extensive territory, especially an aggregate of many states, ruled over by a single ruler. When coupled with 'Angevin', it should, if anything, imply a French rather than a 'British' Empire"
^Hallam (1983), p. 64: "Then in 1151 Henry Plantagenet paid homage for the duchy to Louis VII in Paris, homage he repeated as king of England in 1156".
^abCarpenter (2003),p. 91: "But this absenteeism solidified rather than sapped royal government since it engendered structures both to maintain peace and extract money in the King's absence, money which was above all needed across the Channel".
^Gillingham (2001), p. 17: "It is in the context of his overriding concern for the problems of Anjou proper that we have to see Geoffrey's transfer of Normandy, early in 1150, to his eldest son. We should not, however, make too much of this transfer. Geoffrey...continued to play a dominant role in Norman affairs after this date";Power (2007), p. 65
^Carpenter (2003),p. 193: "Henry spent 43 per cent of his reign in Normandy, 20 per cent elsewhere in France (mostly in Anjou, Maine and Touraine) and only 37 per cent in Britain".
^Carpenter (2003),p. 208: "No single event in the central Middle Ages, apart perhaps from the fall of Jerusalem in 1187, so profoundly shocked western Christendom. As the news spread, Henry was hit by great waves of revulsion".
^France, John (1999). "Commanders".Western Warfare in the Age of the Crusades, 1000–1300. Cornell University Press.ISBN978-0-8014-8607-4.There were many successful warriors, notably William the Conqueror, but the greatest commander within this period was undoubtedly Richard I.
^Boussard, Jacques (1956).Le Gouvernement d'Henri II Plantegenêt. Librairie D'Argences. pp. 527–532.ASINB001PKQDSC.JSTOR557270.
^Ute, Engel (2005). "L'architecture Gothique en Angleterre".L'Art gothique: Architecture, sculpture, peinture. Place Des Victoires.ISBN978-2-84459-091-6.L'Angleterre fut l'une des premieres régions à adopter, dans la deuxième moitié du XIIeme siècle, la nouvelle architecture gothique née en France. Les relations historiques entre les deux pays jouèrent un rôle prépondérant: en 1154, Henri II (1154–89), de la dynastie Française des Plantagenêt, accéda au thrône d'Angleterre.(English: England was one of the first regions to adopt, during the first half of the 12th century, the new Gothic architecture born in France. Historic relationships between the two countries played a determining role: in 1154, Henry II (1154–1189) became the first of the Anjou Plantagenet kings to ascend to the throne of England).
^Gillingham (2001), p. 1: "Then the political centre of gravity had been in France; the Angevins were French princes who numbered England amongst their possessions".
^Gillingham (2001), p. 1: "But from the 1220s and onwards the centre of gravity was clearly in England; the Plantagenets had become kings of England who occasionally visited Gascony".
Empey, Adrian (2005)."Butler-Ormond". In Duffy, Sean (ed.).Medieval Ireland: An Encyclopedia. Routledge.ISBN978-0-415-94052-8.Archived from the original on 24 May 2022. Retrieved24 May 2022.
Moss, Vincent (1999). "The Norman fiscal revolution, 1193–8". InOrmrod, Mark; Bonney, Margaret; Bonney, Richard (eds.).Crises, Revolutions and Self-sustained Growth: Essays in European Fiscal History, 1130–1830. Paul Watkins Publishing.ISBN978-1-871615-93-7.
Noblesse de l'espace Plantagenêt (1154–1224), editions Civilisations Medievales; it's a collection of essays by various French and English historians on the Angevin ruling class. It's a bilingual sourcebook which articles in French or English (but not both at a time).
The Plantagenet Chronicles by Elizabeth Hallam. This book tells the history of the Angevin Dynasty and it is written in English.
L'idéologie Plantagenêt : royauté arthurienne et monarchie politique dans l'espace Plantagenêt (XIIe–XIIIe siècles), Amaury Chauou (in French), Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes, coll. « Histoire », 2001, 324 p.ISBN2-86847-583-3.