Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Ancient church orders

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromAncient Church Orders)
Christian literary genre, 1st-5th centuries
This article includes alist of references,related reading, orexternal links,but its sources remain unclear because it lacksinline citations. Please helpimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(October 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Scale of justice
Part ofa series on the
Canon law of the Catholic Church
Jus antiquum (c. 33–1140)
Jus novum (c. 1140–1563)
Jus novissimum (c. 1563–1918)
Jus codicis (1918-present)
Other
Sacraments
Sacramentals
Sacred places
Sacred times
Supreme authority,particular churches, and canonical structures
Supreme authority of the Church
Supra-diocesan/eparchal structures
Particular churches
Juridic persons
Procedural law
Pars statica (tribunals & ministers/parties)
Pars dynamica (trial procedure)
Canonization
Election of the Roman Pontiff
iconCatholicism portal

Theancient church orders form agenre ofearly Christian literature, ranging from 1st to 5th century, which has the purpose of offering authoritative "apostolic" prescriptions on matters of moral conduct,liturgy andChurch organization.[1] These texts are extremely important in the study of early liturgy and served as the basis for much ancientecclesiastical legislation.[2]

A characteristic of this genre is theirpseudepigraphic form. Many of them profess to have been handed down by theTwelve Apostles, in some cases purporting to have been gathered byClement of Rome or byHippolytus of Rome. In the earliest of them, theDidache, extends to the title:The teaching of the Lord to the Gentiles by the Twelve Apostles. The laterTestamentum Domini declares itself to be the legacy left byJesus Christ himself to his Apostles before theAscension, and to give his own words and commands as to the government of theChurch.[3] Apart from theApostolic Constitutions, which was printed before 1563, all other texts have been discovered and published in the 19th or early 20th century.

Texts and their relationship

[edit]

Church orders were mutually interrelated documents and often circulated in collections.[4] It is easy to point out many direct literal relationships among sections of them. Different scholars since the early 20th century have suggested extremely different historical orders of interrelation. Nowadays the usually accepted family tree contains different roots, and can be so summarized according to Bradshaw:[1]

There are other minor texts belonging to the genre of the ancient church orders: theCoptic Canons of Basil (an Egyptian 4th-century text based mainly on the Canons of Hippolytus) and the WesternStatuta Eccesiae Antiqua (about 490 AD, probably composed byGennadius of Massilia and based on both Apostolic Tradition and Apostolic Constitutions).[1]

Usually the church orders were transmitted in collections with the same order of materials, even if sometimes free rendered and mixed with additional material. The more ancient collection is formed byDidascalia - Didache - Apostolic Tradition. Later the Apostolic Church-Ordinance took the place of the Didache in the second position and in even later manuscripts the Testamentum Domini took the place of the Didascalia in the first position and the book 8 of the Apostolic Constitutions took the place of the Apostolic Tradition in the last position, thus we findTestamentum Domini - Apostolic Church-Ordinance - book 8 of the Apostolic Constitutions.[1]

The main collections of church orders are the following:[6]

  • theApostolic Constitutions (about 380 AD,Syria) is a collection of eight books depending mainly from theDidascalia Apostolorum (books 1–6), from theDidache (book 7) and from theApostolic Tradition (book 8). The seventh and eighth books of the Apostolic Constitutions include so much additional material that they can be considered as separated stand-alone texts. The final chapter of the eighth book is known as theCanons of the Apostles and had a wider circulation than the rest of the Apostolic Constitutions
  • theVerona Palimpsest, orFragmentum Veronese, first published in 1900 byEdmund Hauler, containsLatin free and incomplete versions of theDidascalia Apostolorum,Apostolic Church-Ordinance and theEgyptian Church Order
  • theAlexandrine Sinodos is extant inGe'ez,Bohairic Coptic,Sahidic Coptic andArabic versions and is a collection based on theApostolic Church-Ordinance, theApostolic Tradition and theeighth book of the Apostolic Constitutions. It was particularly used in the ancientCoptic andEthiopian Christianity. The Bohairic version was published in 1848 byHenry Tattam and the Sahidic text was published in 1883 byPaul de Lagarde
  • theClementine Octateuch is extant inSyriac,Bohairic Coptic andArabic versions, and it is a collection based on theTestamentum Domini, theApostolic Church-Ordinance, theApostolic Tradition (included only in the Arabic version) and theeighth book of the Apostolic Constitutions. It was particularly used in the ancientOriental Orthodoxy andChurch of the East.

Living literature

[edit]

To indicate the way of development of the ancient church orders the term"living literature"[7] has been proposed byBruce M. Metzger andPaul F. Bradshaw (and others) in order to note that these texts, of which only a part survived, were updated and amended generation after generation, mixing ancient parts with materials from the contemporary uses and tradition of the copyists and removing what was no more in line with the current understanding. Moreover, it is probable also that in many cases the copyists were not describing their current or more ancient uses, but what they considered to be the best practice,[4] thus for example describing liturgies never performed. This kind of literature allows the scholars, after a process of evaluation, to look at the liturgies of the 3rd and 4th century, but it makes difficult to use these texts to describe more ancient liturgies.

It is possible to outline also some development patterns for the content of this literature: the more ancient texts, such as Didache, are mainly concerned about moral conduct, giving very little room to liturgy and to Church organization. Later on the interest in moral issues waned and liturgy became prominent. In the last documents, the focus moved mainly on the Church organization and to the canon law. Starting since the 5th century, the ancient church orders ceased to be regarded as authoritative,[1] in spite of their higher and higher claimed level ofpseudepigraphy, and were substituted by the canons ofcouncils andsynods and bysacramentaries of famous bishops.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^abcdeBradshaw, Paul F. (2002).The Search for the Origins of Christian Worship. Oxford University Press. pp. 73ss.ISBN 978-0-19-521732-2.
  2. ^Peterson 1907.
  3. ^Maclean, Arthur John (1910).The Ancient Church Orders. Cambridge University Press. p. 3.
  4. ^abWoolfenden, Gregory W. (2004).Daily liturgical prayer: origins and theology. Ashgate Publishing. p. 23.ISBN 978-0-7546-1601-6.
  5. ^Johnson, Lawrence J. (2009).Worship in the Early Church: An Anthology of Historical Sources. Vol 1. Liturgical Press. p. 193.ISBN 978-0-8146-6197-0.
  6. ^abcSteimer, Bruno (1992).Vertex traditionis: die Gattung der altchristlichen Kirchenordnungen. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 6–7.ISBN 978-3-11-013460-5.
  7. ^Ernst, Allie M. (2009).Martha from the Margins: The Authority of Martha in Early Christian Tradition. Brill. p. 225.ISBN 978-90-04-17490-0.

Sources

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ancient_church_orders&oldid=1225445661"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp