| Alma Mater | |
|---|---|
 Alma Mater in 2014 | |
 | |
| Artist | Daniel Chester French |
| Year | 1903 |
| Medium | Bronze |
| Dimensions | 2.6 m × 1.7 m × 1.9 m (8.5 ft × 5.7 ft × 6.2 ft)[1] |
| Location | Manhattan,New York City, U.S. |
| Coordinates | 40°48′28.2″N73°57′43.7″W / 40.807833°N 73.962139°W /40.807833; -73.962139 |
| Owner | Columbia University |
Alma Mater is a bronze sculpture byDaniel Chester French which is located on the steps of theLow Memorial Library on the campus ofColumbia University, in theMorningside Heights neighborhood ofManhattan,New York City. French designed the statue in 1901, and it was installed in September 1903. It is a personification of thealma mater, which represents Columbia in its role as an educational institution; since its installation, the statue has become closely associated with the image of the university.
Plans for a statue in front ofLow Memorial Library began upon the completion of the building in 1897. WhenCharles Follen McKim, the building's main architect, designed a set of stairs that would lead up to the building, he included an empty granite pedestal in the middle on which a statue might sit.[2] Only three years later, Harriette W. Goelet offeredthe Trustees of Columbia, on behalf of herself and her children, up to $25,000 ($944,900 in2024) to install "a bronze statue representing 'Alma Mater,' to be placed upon [said] pedestal" in memory of her husband,Columbia College alumnusRobert Goelet, who had died in 1899.[3][4]
The Trustees accepted her proposition, and with McKim's recommendation commissionedDaniel Chester French to create the statue. Until this point, notable works of French's had includedThe Minute Man (1874) inConcord, Massachusetts andJohn Harvard (1884) atHarvard University. He also sculptedThe Republic for theWorld's Columbian Exposition, a statue which would come to bear a strong resemblance toAlma Mater. It has been speculated thatAudrey Munson, who was a prolificartist's model during the early 20th century, may have been the basis for the statue,[5] though it is more likely that the model forAlma Mater was actually Mary Lawton, an actress and a friend of French.[6] Given the commission, French's stated aim was to create "a figure that should be gracious in the impression that it should make, with an attitude of welcome to the youths who should choose Columbia as their College."[7]
French went through several designs: the original plaster model he made forAlma Mater showed her with her hands in her lap, with her left hand holding the book that lay on it, and her heels touching. Though Goelet and PresidentSeth Low were "greatly delighted" by French's first draft, their critiques led French to change her arms to be outstretched and holding a scepter.[6] His final design for the statue was approved on March 4, 1901, by the Trustees, and the price to be paid by the Goelets was determined to be $20,000 ($755,920 in2024).[8] McKim, who was greatly worried about the quality of the statue given its prominent location in front of Low Library, was reportedly "delighted", describing the statue as "dignified, classic and stately... exhibiting as much perception of the spirit and freedom of the Greek as any modern can."[9]
Despite expectations that the statue might be completed in time for the university's 1902 commencement ceremony, delays in French's work (in part due to critiques fromAugustus Saint-Gaudens, but largely due to strikes at theJno. Williams, Inc. foundry) postponed the unveiling until September 23, 1903, the first day of classes for the 1903–1904 school year.[10] At the ceremony, a prayer was given byHenry C. Potter, the7th Bishop of New York and a trustee of the university, before the statue was formally presented to PresidentNicholas Murray Butler by DeanJohn Howard Van Amringe.[11] The Goelets were not in attendance, having departed for Europe earlier.[11]
In 1904, a four-foot plaster reproduction ofAlma Mater was borrowed by the university from French to be displayed at the Grand Sculpture Court of theSt. Louis World's Fair. However, the university neglected to return it until it was rediscovered in the basement of Low Library and sent to French's daughter,Margaret French Cresson, in 1950.[12][13]
Alma Mater, given its symbolic connection with the university, has been at the center of manyprotests at Columbia. During the student protests in 1970 in reaction to theCambodian campaign and theKent State shootings, the statue came to represent the failures of the university's administration, which included the continued gentrification of theMorningside Heights neighborhood.[7] In the early morning hours of May 15, 1970, a bomb was planted on the statue. The resulting explosion caused significant damage toAlma Mater's throne.[14] The damage remained until 1978, when the statue was removed from Columbia, the throne was recast, and the sculpture was cleaned, refinished with a newpatina, and returned to the Low steps.[7]
Other noteworthy instances of protest involvingAlma Mater include during theColumbia University protests of 1968, when the statue was routinely vandalized and a sign which read "Raped by the cops" was placed onAlma Mater's lap,[15] and during the protests against theIraq War, when students draped a black shroud overAlma Mater's head and connected wires from her hands to the ground in reference to theAbu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse scandal.[6][16]
Alma Mater has also been at the center of many pranks, including one instance in 1928 when the crown atop her scepter was stolen (and later returned),[17] as well as in October 1984, when the scepter was removed in its entirety byCornell students.[18] It appeared on the doorstep of the Dean of Students of Cornell in a shoebox two months later, and was returned to the university by hand by a Cornell professor the next day. In retaliation for the theft, theEzra Cornell statue on Cornell's campus was doused inColumbia blue paint soon after the return of the scepter.[19]
On September 3, 2024, on the first day of classes after a semester of historicGaza Solidarity Encampment of 2023 and the ongoingprotests movement during theGaza war andgenocide, theAlma Mater statue was doused with red paint.[20]
Alma Mater was largely praised upon its unveiling. TheColumbia Daily Spectator described the statue as "characterized by a queenly dignity and repose", and stated that it "expresses the highest type of intellectual womanhood. In pose and gesture she invites the student of the University and gives him the welcome of Alma Mater."[10]The New York Times, though it did not comment directly on the artistic merits of the work, recognized that the sculpture was "for technical reasons an extraordinarily difficult piece of work."[21]Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper called the work "French's masterpiece of sculpture", whileThe Catholic Union compared the figure ofAlma Mater to theVirgin Mary, incorrectly claiming that the work was an imitation of a "Mother of Christ" statue inBonn,Germany, exclaiming, "How closely is not the Catholic Church associated with all that is noble and tender in the mind and heart of man!"[6] However, French was reportedly unsatisfied with the amount of attention the sculpture initially received, stating that it did not make a "ripple on the surface of New York".[22]
In 1903,Charles Henry Caffin praisedAlma Mater as "beautiful... unquestionably", though not necessarily one of French's best works. He described her as follows:
The face is of a familiar type of American beauty, corresponding with the very modern suggestion of the whole figure. Yet the sculptor has invested the head with an air of dispassionate refinement which gives it a certain aloofness; scarcely more, however, than the self-possession, consciously unconscious, with which the American woman can carry her beauty. It is almost as if one of them had mounted the pedestal and, with a ready wit embracing the situation, were enacting the part of patroness to the university. Every student will love her and her influence will be altogether one of sweet nobility... [Alma Mater] is distinguished by a pure and poignant serenity, by a monumental feeling penetrated with a sort of gentle sprightliness; for the expression which he puts into the modeling of the limbs can scarcely be characterized by a word of more sensitive application.[23]
More recently,The New York Times has dubbedAlma Mater the "grand old lady" of Columbia University, who "reigns in queenly splendor in front of Low Library."[24] TheAIA Guide to New York City described it as "an evocative statue" where "the enthroned figure extends her hand in welcome as she looks up from the mighty tome of knowledge lying open in her lap."[25]Alma Mater's placement in front of Low Library in particular has been praised for its role in welcoming students to the university and highlighting the university's relationship with the city of New York. As Professor of Historic PreservationAndrew Dolkart notes:
After passingAlma Mater and reaching the campus level, the seeker must climb an even longer stairway, symbolically a "stairway to knowledge," to reach the entrance to the library. From the top of the stairs, members of the select Columbia community could turn and look out over New York, secure in the belief that they were contributing to the rapid transformation of their city into a world center of intellectual and professional endeavor.[9]
The statue represents a personification of the traditional image of the university as analma mater, or "nourishing mother", draped in an academic gown and seated on a throne. She wears alaurel wreath on her head and holds in her right hand a scepter made of four sprays of wheat which are capped by a King's Crown, a traditional symbol of the university. A book, representing learning, rests on her lap. The arms of her throne end in lamps, representing "Sapientia et Doctrina", or "Wisdom and Learning"; on the back of the throne is embossed an image ofthe seal of the university.[7]
An owl, a symbol of knowledge and learning, is hidden in the folds ofAlma Mater's cloak near her left leg.[26] There has been some speculation on the exact meaning of the owl, including by history professorDwight C. Miner, who believed that the owl was a reference to thePsi Upsilon fraternity, of which Miner believed French to have been a member.[27] In 1953, French's daughter, Margaret French Cresson, clarified in a letter toThe New York Times that it "represents no fraternity and poses no labyrinthine riddle. The owl is the age-old symbol of wisdom and was used by the sculptor to convey that interpretation." She also clarified that the statue was not a depiction ofPallas Athena orMinerva, but simply a personification of the university.[28]
WhenAlma Mater was originally installed it was gilded, although the original gilding wore away with time.[29] In the late 1920s, French suggested re-gilding the statue, though this was not done; the few remaining flakes of gold were removed in 1950 in order to catalyze the statue's patina.[6][30] In 1962, the university made the decision to apply a new bronze veneer.[24] However, after protests, including by PresidentGrayson L. Kirk, the new finish was removed and the patina restored.[25][31] In 2002, the statue was restored again, changing her more uniform green patina hue to the green and brown mix that is seen today.[32][33]
The design ofAlma Mater inspired a 1919 statue of the same name at theUniversity of Havana inCuba byMario Korbel, who had lived in New York City from 1913 to 1917.[34][35] Additionally, theAlma Mater statue at theUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign may have been inspired by Columbia'sAlma Mater, according to its sculptor,Lorado Taft.[36]
{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help){{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
Media related toAlma Mater by Daniel Chester French at Wikimedia Commons
| |||||||||
| Schools |
|  | |||||||
| Centers | |||||||||
| Libraries | |||||||||
| Campus |
| ||||||||
| Athletics |
| ||||||||
| Student life |
| ||||||||
| Journals |
| ||||||||
| People | |||||||||
| Related | |||||||||
