Al-Radd 'ala Ashab al-Hawa[1] (Arabic:الرد على أصحاب الهوى,Refutation of Those Holding Heretical Views), better known asal-Sawad al-A'zam 'ala Madhhab al-Imam al-A'zamAbi Hanifa (Arabic:السواد الأعظم على مذهب الإمام الأعظم أبى حنيفة,The Vast Majority of People Who Follow the Teaching of the Greatest ImamAbu Hanifa), is a book written byal-Hakim al-Samarqandi, and is considered as the oldesttheological work in accordance with theMaturidite school, afterKitab al-Tawhid (The Book of Monotheism) byAbu Mansur al-Maturidi.[Note 1]
In it al-Hakim al-Samarqandi has developed sixty-two credal statements, and states that the failure to observe them means that one cannot be regarded among the majority of Muslims (al-Sawad al-A'zam), an idea which he based on theHadith containing al-Sawad al-A'zam (the great majority).[Note 2]
The text is a particularly important work in the development ofHanafi-Maturidi theology, as it attempts to faithfully represent the theological beliefs ofAbu Hanifa two centuries after his death to aPersian/Central Asian audience then wrestling with the rise ofMu'tazili thought. The text was well-circulated in the centuries after its composition, both in the originalArabic and aPersian translation, along with a laterTurkish translation during theOttoman era.[3]
Al-Sawad al-A'zam had been commissioned in the early part of the tenth century byIsma'il b. Ahmad (r. 279/892–295/907), the real founder of theSamanid polity inTransoxiana andKhurasan, in order to define the parameters of theSunni 'orthodoxy' the Samanids were committed to upholding. Blunt in style and authoritarian in tone, al-Sawad al-A'zam was in effect a Hanafite catechism consisting of responses to a large number of doctrinal questions. LikeTafsir al-Tabari, it was translated anonymously, indicating that its contents were not tied to any individual authorial view but rather represented the collective position of the Hanafite theologians of Transoxiana.
According to the introduction, the purpose of al-Sawad al-A'zam was to counter the growth of sectarianism in theSamanid realm by setting out clearly theconsensus of the theologians of Central Asia regarding specific points of Hanafite doctrine. In the process of doing so, it condemned the beliefs of groups it deemed heretical. These included not just the usualIsma'ilis – but alsoMu'tazilites,Kharijites,Murji'ites,Jabarites,Qadarites, andKarramites.[4]
Kitab al-Sawad al-A'zam (The Book of the Great Masses) enshrinedHanafism inTransoxiana during the reign of the influentialSamanids. As a result of the acceptance and influence of this statement of belief, theTurkic tribes north of Transoxiana were converted to Hanafism, including theOghuz Turks, who would eventually become theSeljuk rulers ofIran,Iraq,Syria, andAnatolia during the 11th to 13th centuries.[5]
^According to Aiyub Palmer in his book (Sainthood and Authority in Early Islam): al-Sawad al-A'zam shows no signs of al-Maturidi's influence. There is no mention ofhikma as an overarching principle, nor does al-Sawad al-A'zam align to the new creedal structure that al-Maturidi inaugurates that distinguished between ilahiyyat (points of doctrine on Godhood), and nubuwwat (doctrines relating to prophecy). If al-Sawad al-A'zam was indeed part of al-Maturidi's School, it would surely have incorporated at least some of these elements. Finally, the date of authorship of al-Sawad al-A'zam suggested by Lewinstein makes it more probably that it was authored either before or at nearly the same time as al-Maturidi's Kitab al-Tawhid. It seems that the motivation to place al-Sawad al-A'zam after Kitab al-Tawhid may derive from the death date of al-Hakim al-Samarqandi falling after that of al-Maturidi; however, death dates are notoriously difficult to prove accurately, especially when dealing with contemporaries or near contemporaries in this time period.[2]
^Numerous narrations of this hadith are found in the collections ofAbu Dawud,al-Tirmidhi,Ibn Majah,al-Hakim Nishapuri,Ahmad ibn Hanbal and others: they vary in beingsahih,hasan, orda'if, but the hadith is established. Among those who have authenticated this hadith are al-Tirmidhi, al-Hakim, al-Shatibi,al-Dhahabi,Ibn Kathir,Ibn Hajar andal-'Iraqi. Most narrations mention the splitting-up of theJews and the Christians into seventy-one or seventy-two sects, all being in the Fire except one, prior to mention of the Muslims dividing even more. In some of the narrations,Muhammad describes the Saved Sect variously as "the Jama'ah (community, congregation, main body)", "al-Sawad al-A'zam (the largest body)" and "that which follows what I and my Companions are upon." The hadith does not mean that the majority of Muslim will be in the Hellfire, for most of them ("the masses") are not involved in intentional, divisive innovation; further, mention of the Fire does not necessarily imply that the seventy-two sects will remain there forever, or that those sects are disbelievers.
