Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Accretionary wedge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sediments at a convergent plate boundary

Diagram of the geological process of subduction

Anaccretionary wedge oraccretionary prism forms fromsedimentsaccreted onto the non-subductingtectonic plate at aconvergent plate boundary. Most of the material in the accretionary wedge consists of marine sediments scraped off from the downgoingslab ofoceanic crust, but in some cases the wedge includes the erosional products of volcanicisland arcs formed on the overriding plate.

Anaccretionary complex is a current (in modern use) or former accretionary wedge. Accretionary complexes are typically made up of a mix ofturbidites of terrestrial material,basalts from theocean floor, andpelagic andhemipelagicsediments. For example, most of thegeological basement ofJapan is made up of accretionary complexes.[1]

Materials within an accretionary wedge

[edit]

Accretionary wedges and accretedterranes are not equivalent to tectonic plates, but rather are associated with tectonic plates and accrete as a result of tectonic collision. Materials incorporated in accretionary wedges include:

  • Ocean-floor basalts – typically seamounts scraped off the subducting plate
  • Pelagic sediments – typically immediately overlying oceanic crust of the subducting plate
  • Trench sediments – typicallyturbidites that may be derived from:
  • Oceanic, volcanic island arc
  • Continental volcanic arc and cordilleran orogen
  • Adjacent continental masses located along strike (such asBarbados).
  • Material transported into the trench by gravity sliding and debris flow from theforearc ridge (olistostrome)
  • Piggy-back basins, which are small basins located in surface depression on the accretionary prism.
  • Material exposed in the forearc ridge may include fragments of oceanic crust or high pressure metamorphic rocks thrust from deeper in the subduction zone.

Elevated regions within theocean basins such as linear island chains,ocean ridges, and smallcrustal fragments (such as Madagascar or Japan), known asterranes, are transported toward the subduction zone and accreted to the continental margin. Since the Late Devonian and Early Carboniferous periods, some 360 million years ago, subduction beneath the western margin of North America has resulted in several collisions with terranes, each producing amountain-building event. The piecemeal addition of these accreted terranes has added an average of 600 km (370 mi) in width along the western margin of theNorth American continent.[2]

Geometry

[edit]
icon
This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(August 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The topographic expression of the accretionary wedge forms a lip, which may dam basins of accumulated materials that, otherwise, would be transported into the trench from the overriding plate. Accretionary wedges are the home ofmélange, intensely deformed packages of rocks that lack coherent internal layering and coherent internal order.[3]

The internal structure of an accretionary wedge is similar to that found in a thin-skinned forelandthrust belt. A series of thrustsverging towards thetrench are formed with the youngest most outboard structures progressively uplifting the older more inboard thrusts.

The shape of the wedge is determined by how readily the wedge will fail along its basaldecollement and in its interior; this is highly sensitive topore fluid pressure. This failure will result in a mature wedge that has an equilibrium triangular cross-sectional shape of acritical taper. Once the wedge reaches a critical taper, it will maintain that geometry and grow only into a largersimilar triangle.

Significance

[edit]
Accretionary wedge (USGS Visual Glossary)

The small sections of oceanic crust that are thrust over the overriding plate are said to beobducted. Where this occurs, rare slices of ocean crust, known asophiolites, are preserved on land. They provide a valuable natural laboratory for studying the composition and character of the oceanic crust and the mechanisms of their emplacement and preservation on land. A classic example is theCoast Range ophiolite of California, which is one of the most extensive ophiolite terranes in North America. This oceanic crust likely formed during the middleJurassic Period, roughly 170 million years ago, in an extensional regime within either a back-arc or a forearc basin. It was later accreted to the continental margin of Laurasia.[4]

Longitudinal sedimentary tapering of pre-orogenic sediments correlates strongly with curvature of the submarine frontal accretionary belt in theSouth China Sea margin, suggesting that pre-orogenic sediment thickness is the major control on the geometry of frontal structures. The preexisting South China Sea slope that lies obliquely in front of the advancing accretionary wedge has impeded the advancing of frontal folds resulting in a successive termination of folds against and alongstrike of the South China Sea slope. The existence of the South China Sea slope also leads the strike of impinging folds with NNW-trend to turn more sharply to a NE-strike, parallel to strike of the South China Sea slope. Analysis shows that the pre-orogenic mechanical/crustal heterogeneities and seafloor morphology exert strong controls on the thrust-belt development in the incipient Taiwanarc-continent collision zone.[5]

In accretionary wedges, seismicity activating superimposed thrusts may drive methane and oil upraising from the upper crust.[6]

Mechanical models that treataccretionary complexes as critically tapered wedges of sediment demonstrate that pore pressure controls their taper angle by modifying basal and internal shear strength. Results from some studies show that pore pressure in accretionary wedges can be viewed as a dynamically maintained response to factors which drive pore pressure (source terms) and those that limit flow (permeability and drainage path length). Sediment permeability and incoming sediment thickness are the most important factors, whereas fault permeability and the partitioning of sediment have a small effect. In one such study, it was found that as sediment permeability is increased, pore pressure decreases from near-lithostatic to hydrostatic values and allows stable taper angles to increase from ~2.5° to 8°–12.5°. With increased sediment thickness (from 100–8,000 m (330–26,250 ft)), increased pore pressure drives a decrease in stable taper angle from 8.4°–12.5° to <2.5–5°. In general, low-permeability and thick incoming sediment sustain high pore pressures consistent with shallowly tapered geometry, whereas high-permeability and thin incoming sediment should result in steep geometry. Active margins characterized by a significant proportion of fine-grained sediment within the incoming section, such as northernAntilles and easternNankai, exhibit thin taper angles, whereas those characterized by a higher proportion of sandy turbidites, such asCascadia,Chile, andMexico, have steep taper angles. Observations from active margins also indicate a strong trend of decreasing taper angle (from >15° to <4°) with increased sediment thickness (from <1 to 7 km).[7]

Rapid tectonic loading of wet sediment in accretionary wedges is likely to cause the fluid pressure to rise until it is sufficient to cause dilatant fracturing. Dewatering of sediment that has been underthrust and accreted beneath the wedge can produce a large steady supply of such highly overpressured fluid. Dilatant fracturing will create escape routes, so the fluid pressure is likely to be buffered at the value required for the transition between shear and oblique tensile (dilatant) fracture, which is slightly in excess of the load pressure if the maximum compression is nearly horizontal. This in turn buffers the strength of the wedge at the cohesive strength, which is not pressure-dependent, and will not vary greatly throughout the wedge. Near the wedge front the strength is likely to be that of the cohesion on existing thrust faults in the wedge. The shear resistance on the base of the wedge will also be fairly constant and related to the cohesive strength of the weak sediment layer that acts as the basal detachment. These assumptions allow the application of a simple plastic continuum model, which successfully predicts the observed gently convex taper of accretionary wedges.[8]

Pelayo and Weins have postulated that sometsunami events have resulted from rupture through the sedimentary rock along the basal decollement of an accretionary wedge.[9]

Backthrusting of the rear of the accretionary wedge, arcward over the rocks of the forearc basin, is a common aspect of accretionary tectonics. An older assumption thatbackstops of accretionary wedges dip back toward the arc, and that accreted material is emplaced below such backstops, is contradicted by observations from many active forearcs that indicate (1) backthrusting is common, (2) forearc basins are nearly ubiquitous associates of accretionary wedges, and (3) forearc basement, where imaged, appears to diverge from the sedimentary package, dipping under the wedge while the overlying sediments are often lifted up against it. Backthrusting may be favored where relief is high between the crest of the wedge and the surface of the forearc basin because the relief must be supported byshear stress along the backthrust.[10]

Examples

[edit]

Currently active wedges

[edit]

Exhumed ancient wedges

[edit]
  • Chilean Coast Range between 38°S and 43°S (Bahía Mansa Metamorphic Complex).
  • Calabrian Accretionary Wedge in the Central Mediterranean – TheNeogene tectonics of the centralMediterranean are related to thesubduction and trench rollback of the Ionian basin under Eurasia, causing the opening of the Liguro-Provençal and Tyrrhenian back-arc basins and the formation of the Calabrian accretionary wedge. The Calabrian accretionary wedge is a partially submerged accretionary complex located in the Ionian offshore and laterally bounded by the Apulia andMalta escarpments.[13]
  • TheOlympic Mountains located in Washington State. The mountains began to form about 35 million years ago when theJuan de Fuca plate collided with and was forced (subducted) under theNorth American plate.[14]
  • Kodiak Shelf in theGulf of Alaska – The geology of theChugach National Forest is dominated by two major lithologic units, the Valdez Group (Late Cretaceous) and the Orca Group (Paleocene and Eocene).[15] The Valdez Group is part of a 2,200-km-long by 100-km-wide belt of Mesozoic accretionary complex rocks called the Chugach terrane.[16] This terrane extends along the Alaska coastal margin from Baranof Island in southeasternAlaska toSanak Island insouthwestern Alaska. The Orca Group is part of an accretionary complex of Paleogene age called the Prince William terrane that extends acrossPrince William Sound westward through theKodiak Island area, underlying much of thecontinental shelf to the west[17]
  • Neogene accretionary wedge offKenai Peninsula, Alaska – Subduction accretion and repeated terrane collision shaped the Alaskan convergent margin. The Yakutat Terrane is currently colliding with the continental margin below the centralGulf of Alaska. During the Neogene the terrane's western part was subducted after which a sediment wedge accreted along the northeastAleutian Trench. This wedge incorporates sediment eroded from the continental margin and marine sediments carried into the subduction zone on the Pacific plate.[18]
  • TheFranciscan Formation of California – Franciscan rocks in theBay Area range in age from about 200 million to 80 million years old. The Franciscan Complex is composed of a complex amalgamation of semi-coherent blocks, called tectonostratigraphic terranes, that were episodically scraped from the subducting oceanic plate, thrust eastward, and shingled against the western margin of North America. This process formed a stacking sequence in which the structurally highest rocks (on the east) are the oldest, and in which each major thrust wedge to the west becomes younger. Within each of the terrane blocks, however, the rocks become younger upsection, but the sequence may be repeated multiple times by thrust faults.[19]
  • TheApennines in Italy are largely an accretionary wedge formed as a consequence of subduction. This region is tectonically and geologically complex, involving both subduction of the Adria micro-plate beneath the Apennines from east to west, continental collision between the Eurasia and Africa plates building the Alpine mountain belt further to the north and the opening of the Tyrrhenian basin to the west.[20]
  • Carpathian Flysch Belt inBohemia,Slovakia,Poland,Ukraine andRomania representCretaceous toNeogene thin-skinned zone of Carpathian thrustbelt, which is thrust over theBohemian Massif andEast European Platform.[21] Represents a continuation of Alpine Rhenodanubian Flysch ofPenninic Unit.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Introduction to the Landforms and Geology of Japan: Japan in a subduction zone". Archived fromthe original on September 16, 2016. RetrievedAugust 12, 2016.
  2. ^"Deep-sea Trench".Encyclopædia Britannica. January 22, 2014. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2016.
  3. ^Davis, George H. Structural Geology of Rocks and Regions. (1996). pp583.
  4. ^van Andel, Tjeerd H. (December 2, 2015)."Plate Tectonics".Encyclopædia Britannica. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2016.
  5. ^Lin, Andrew T.; Liu, Char-Shine; Lin, Che-Chuan; et al. (December 5, 2008)."Tectonic Features Associated with the Overriding of an Accretionary Wedge on top of a Rifted Continental Margin: An Example from Taiwan".Marine Geology.255 (3–4):186–203.Bibcode:2008MGeol.255..186L.doi:10.1016/j.margeo.2008.10.002.
  6. ^Calderoni, Giovanna et al. Earth and Planetary Science Letters.A Seismic Sequence from Northern Apennines (Italy) Provides New Insight on the Role of Fluids in the Active Tectonics of Accretionary Wedges. Volume 281, Issues 1-2, April 30, 2009, pages 99–109.
  7. ^Saffer, D. M., and B. A. Bekins (2006), An evaluation of factors influencing pore pressure in accretionary complexes: Implications for taper angle and wedge mechanics, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B04101,doi:10.1029/2005JB003990.
  8. ^Platt, J. (1990), Thrust Mechanics in Highly Overpressured Accretionary Wedges, J. Geophys. Res., 95(B6), 9025–9034.
  9. ^Pelayo, A., and D. Wiens (1992), Tsunami Earthquakes: Slow Thrust-Faulting Events in the Accretionary Wedge, J. Geophys. Res., 97(B11), 15321–15337.
  10. ^Silver, E., and D. Reed (1988), Backthrusting in Accretionary Wedges, J. Geophys. Res., 93(B4), 3116–3126.
  11. ^Heuer; et al. (November 23, 2017).Temperature Limit of the Deep Biosphere off Muroto. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program. International Ocean Discovery Program.doi:10.14379/iodp.proc.370.2017.
  12. ^Tsang, Man-Yin; Bowden, Stephen A.; Wang, Zhibin; Mohammed, Abdalla; Tonai, Satoshi; Muirhead, David; Yang, Kiho; Yamamoto, Yuzuru; Kamiya, Nana; Okutsu, Natsumi; Hirose, Takehiro (February 1, 2020)."Hot fluids, burial metamorphism and thermal histories in the underthrust sediments at IODP 370 site C0023, Nankai Accretionary Complex".Marine and Petroleum Geology.112 104080.Bibcode:2020MarPG.11204080T.doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104080.hdl:2164/13157.ISSN 0264-8172.
  13. ^Minelli, L. and C. Faccenna (2010), Evolution of the Calabrian accretionary wedge (central Mediterranean),Tectonics, 29, TC4004,doi:10.1029/2009TC002562.
  14. ^"Olympic Mountains".Encyclopædia Britannica. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2016.
  15. ^Schrader, F.C., 1900, A reconnaissance of a part of Prince William Sound and the Copper River District, Alaska, in 1898: U.S. Geological 20th Anniversary Report, pt. 7, p. 341–423.
  16. ^Jones, D.L., Siberling, N.J., Coney, P.J., and Monger, J.W.H., 1987, Lithotectonic terrane map of Alaska (west of the 141st meridian): U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF 1847-A.
  17. ^Plafker, George, and Campbell R.B., 1979, The Border Ranges fault in the Saint Elias Mountains in Johnson, K.M., and Williams, J.L., eds., Geologic Studies in Alaska by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1978: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 804-B, p. 102–104.
  18. ^Fruehn, J., R. von Huene, and M. Fisher (1999), Accretion in the wake of terrane collision: The Neogene accretionary wedge off Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, Tectonics, 18(2), 263–277.
  19. ^Elder, William P."Geology of the Golden Gate Headlands"(PDF). National Park Service. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on February 16, 2008. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2016.
  20. ^"Magnitude 6.3 – CENTRAL ITALY". United States Geological Survey. Archived fromthe original on April 14, 2010. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2016.
  21. ^Nemcok, M., Coward, M. P., Sercombe, W. J. and Klecker, R. A., 1999: Structure of the West Carpathian Accretionary Wedge: Insights from Cross Section Construction and Sandbox Validation. Phys. Chem. Earth (A), 24, 8, pp. 659-665

External links

[edit]
Underlying theory
Measurement conventions
Large-scaletectonics
Fracturing
Faulting
Foliation andlineation
Folding
Boudinage
Kinematic analysis
Shear zone
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Accretionary_wedge&oldid=1316146880"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp