Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Abu Ubayda ibn al-Jarrah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Companion of Muhammad and military leader (583–639)
"Abu Ubaidah" redirects here. For other uses, seeAbu Ubaidah (disambiguation).

icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Abu Ubayda ibn al-Jarrah" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(January 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Abu Ubayda ibn al-Jarrah
أبي عبيدة بن الجراح
Amin ul-Ummah[a]
Governor of theLevant
In office
634–639
Preceded byPosition established[b]
Succeeded byYazid ibn Abi Sufyan
Commander-in-chief of the
Rashidun Army
In office
634–639
MonarchUmar
Preceded byKhalid ibn al-Walid
Personal details
Bornc. 583
Diedc. 639(639-00-00) (aged 55–56)
Resting placeAmmata, Jordan
Parent
  • Abdullah ibn al-Jarrah (father)
Known forCompanion of Muhammad; one ofthe ten to whom Paradise was promised
ReligionIslam
TribeQuraysh
Military service
AllegianceMuhammad (624–630)
Rashidun Caliphate (632–639)
ServiceRashidun army
Years632–639
RankField Commander(632–634)
Commander-in-chief(634–639)
Wars / battles
Campaigns of Abu Ubayda ibn al-Jarrah
Uhud –Battle of Yarmouk –Iron Bridge –Ajnadayn –Badr –Hunayn –Uhud –Mecca –Ta'if –Tabuk –Khaybar –Trench –Qaynuqa –Nadir –Qurayza –Autas –Aleppo –Bosra

ʿĀmir ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Jarrāḥ (Arabic:عامر بن عبدالله بن الجراح‎; 583–639), better known asAbū ʿUbayda (Arabic:أبو عبيدة‎) was a Muslim commander and one of theCompanions of the Prophet. He is mostly known for being one ofthe ten to whom Paradise was promised. He was commander of a large section of theRashidun Army during the time of the secondRashidun CaliphUmar and was on the list of Umar's appointed successors to the Caliphate, but died during thePlague of Amwas in 639 before Umar.

Ancestry and early life

[edit]

Abu Ubayda belonged to the al-Harith ibn Fihr clan, also called the Balharith, of theQuraysh tribe. The clan was settled in the lower quarter ofMecca, a town in theHejaz (western Arabia) and home of the Quraysh. During thepre-Islamic period (pre-620s), the Balharith were allied to theBanu Abd Manaf (the ancestral clan of the Islamic prophetMuhammad) in the Mutayyabun faction, against the other Qurayshite clans headed by theBanu Abd al-Dar.[1] Abu Ubayda's father Abd Allah was among the chiefs of the Quraysh in theFijar War against theHawazin nomads in the late 6th century. His mother was also a Qurayshite.[2]

Abu Ubayda was born around 583.[3] Before embracing Islam, he was considered to be one of the nobles of the Quraysh and had a reputation among his tribesmen for modesty and bravery.[citation needed]

Companion of The prophet

[edit]

By 611, Muhammad was preaching the oneness ofGod to the people of Mecca. He began by inviting his closest companions and relatives in private to the way of Islam. Abu Ubayda embraced Islam a day afterAbu Bakr in the year 611 at the age of 28.

Abu Ubayda lived through the harsh experience that the Muslims went through in Mecca. With other early Muslims, he endured the insults and the oppression of the Quraysh.

In 623, when Muhammadmigrated from Mecca toMedina, Abu Ubayda joined the migration. When Muhammad arrived in Medina, he paired off each immigrant (Muhajir) with one of the Muslim residents of Medina (Ansari), joiningMuhammad ibn Maslamah with Abu Ubayda thus making them brothers in faith.

Military career under Muhammad

[edit]

In 624, Abu Ubayda participated in the first major battle between the Muslims and the Quraysh of Mecca, at theBattle of Badr. In this battle, he fought his own father Abdullah ibn al-Jarrah, who was fighting alongside the army of Quraysh. Abdullah ibn al Jarrah attacked his son with his sword and Ubaydah killed him.

In 625, Abu Ubayda participated in theBattle of Uhud. In the second phase of the battle, whenKhalid ibn al-Walid's cavalry attacked the Muslims from the rear, changing an Islamic victory into defeat, the bulk of the Muslim soldiers were driven from the battlefield, and few remained steadfast. Abu Ubayda was one of those who remained and he guarded Muhammad from the attacks of the Qurayshi soldiers. On that day, Abu Ubayda lost two of his front teeth while trying to extract two links of Muhammad's armour that had penetrated into his cheeks.[4]

In 627, Abu Ubayda took part in theBattle of the Trench and also in theInvasion of Banu Qurayza. He was also made commander of a small expedition that set out to attack and destroy the tribes ofTha'libah andAnmar, who were plundering nearby villages.

In 628, Abu Ubayda participated in the discussions leading to theTreaty of Hudaybiyyah and was made one of the witnesses of the pact.[4] Later in the same year, he was part of the Muslim campaign toKhaybar.[4]

In 629, Muhammad sent'Amr ibn al-'As to Daat al-Salaasil from where he called for reinforcements. This action became known as theExpedition of Abu Ubayda ibn al-Jarrah. Muhammad sent Abu Ubayda in command of an army that included Abu Bakr and Umar. They attacked and defeated the enemy. Later in the same year, another expedition was sent under his command to locate the routes of Qurayshi caravans.[5]

In 630, when the Muslim armyconquered Mecca, Abu Ubayda commanded one of the four divisions that entered the city from four different routes. Later that year, he participated in theBattle of Hunayn and theSiege of Ta'if. He was also part of theTabuk campaign under the command of Muhammad. On their return from theBattle of Tabuk, aChristian delegation fromNajran arrived in Medina and showed interest in Islam and asked Muhammad to send them a person to guide them in the matters of religion and in other tribal affairs according toIslamic laws. Abu Ubayda was appointed by Muhammad to go with them. He was also sent as the tax collector ('aamil) toBahrain by Muhammad.

Role in the succession of Abu Bakr

[edit]
Main article:Saqifa

When Muhammad died in 632 Abu Ubayda was in Mecca. The Muslim leaders were in disagreement over who would succeed him as leader of their nascent community. On the same day of the Islamic prophet's death, the Ansar convened in a controversial meeting that became known as theSaqifa. They chose one of their own as caliph. Their principal aim was to prevent a Meccan, especially the new converts among the Qurayshi aristocracy, from gaining power over them.[6]

Opinions among the Muhajirun were split, with one side favouring a person closer to Muhammad in kinship, namelyAli, who they held was favoured by Muhammad to succeed him. The other faction of the Muhajirun, mostly backedAbu Bakr due to his seniority, closeness to Muhammad, and the increasingly important role he had attained in the prophet's last years.[7] The bulk of the Qurayshite new converts, with the prominent exception ofAbu Sufyan, backed Abu Bakr.[8]

The Islamic tradition generally portrays Abu Bakr, Umar and Abu Ubayda as operating in concert and decisively intervening against the Ansar at Saqifa.[9] After a debate, the triumvirate obtained the allegiance of the Ansar to Abu Bakr despite their reservations. There are indications, according to the modern historianElias Shoufani, that Umar initially favoured Abu Ubayda but that he lacked sufficient support against Abu Bakr, who he consequently supported against other potential candidates.[10] A report in the history ofal-Baladhuri holds that after Muhammad died, Umar told Abu Ubayda, "Stretch your hand and let us give you thebay'ah [oath of allegiance], for you are the custodian (Amīn) of thisummah (the Muslim community), as the prophet called you".[9] Abu Ubayda is then said to have declined the approach in favour of Abu Bakr. Another report in the history ofal-Tabari holds that Abu Bakr offered the caliphate to Umar or Abu Ubayda at the Saqifa, but both insisted on Abu Bakr's succession.[11]

Commander in Syria

[edit]

Deployment and appointment of Abu Ubayda to supreme command

[edit]

As theRidda wars came to an end, Abu Bakr dispatched three or four armies at different intervals towardByzantine Syria to conquer that region. Though there are several versions in the early Islamic tradition, including in the works ofIbn Hubaysh al-Asadi (fl. 12th century),al-Mas'udi (d. 956),al-Azdi (d. 944), as well as the 10th-century-compiledKitab al-Aghani, that place Abu Ubayda as one of these commanders, modern research, including by historiansH. A. R. Gibb,C. H. Becker,Philip K. Hitti,Andreas Stratos,D. R. Hill and Khalil Athamina, date Abu Ubayda's dispatch to after Abu Bakr's death.[12] In the comprehensive 9th-century history of theearly Muslim conquests by al-Baladhuri, the latter states "there is no truth" to the claim that Abu Ubayda was sent by Abu Bakr. Rather, the caliph "intended to send Abu ʿUbayda at the head of one of the armies, but the latter asked the caliph to relieve him of this mission".[13] Athamina assesses that "certain allusions" in the Islamic sources offer context to the notion that Abu Ubayda, despite his participation in several expeditions under Muhammad and his high-standing among the Muslims, did not have the desire nor the necessary military experience and merit to accept the post Abu Bakr offered him.[13]

Modern research indicates that Abu Ubayda was dispatched to the Syrian front by Abu Bakr's successor, Umar, and early Muslim authors al-Baladhuri,al-Fasawi (d. 890) andIbn Asakir (d. 1175) mention that it was in the capacity as commander of an army of reinforcements. His arrival most likely dated to around 636, shortly after the first Muslimcapture of Damascus in late 635 or during the preparation for the subsequentBattle of the Yarmuk. At the time, supreme command of the Muslim armies in Syria was held byKhalid ibn al-Walid with Abu Ubayda playing a supportive role to Khalid. Umar may have sent Abu Ubayda to assume the supreme command. Several accounts in the Islamic tradition claim Abu Ubayda concealed the caliph's order from the rest of the army to avoid potentially insulting Khalid or provoking a mutiny while the Muslims were on the cusp of a major confrontation with the Byzantines.[14] Athamina dismisses the reliability of these claims, considering them militarily illogical and meant to dramatise the change in command and emphasise Abu Ubayda's "moral superiority and unselfishness".[15] Instead, Athamina maintains Abu Ubayda's appointment to the supreme command was made by Umar, who had kept in constant contact with Abu Ubayda through letters and emissaries, after the decisive Muslim victory at the Yarmuk.[15]

Abu Ubayda may have been chosen to lead at that time, when the Byzantine defence of Syria had taken an enormous blow, as the circumstances called for an able administrator to take the helm from a military commander like Khalid.[16] The Islamic tradition provides a host of moral and personal reasons why Khalid was demoted in favour of Abu Ubayda, but most modern historians view these as either partially valid or literary innovations. Athamina holds Abu Ubayda was likely installed because Khalid and his large force of tribesmen from Arabia and Iraq, along with their families, presented a threat to the old-established, formerly Byzantine-allied, and militarily experienced Arab tribes of Syria, whose defection was considered vital by Umar to form a network of defences against the Byzantines. This motivated him to demote Khalid and disband his army, the remnants of which were transferred to theSasanian front in Iraq.[17]

Ajnadayn and Damascus

[edit]

During 634, the Muslims heard that 90,000 strongByzantine army had gathered at Ajnadayn, about 15 mi (24 km) southwest ofJerusalem. All the divisions of the Muslim army, about 32,000 in number, joined Khalid at Ajnadayn on 24 July 634. Under the command of Khalid ibn al-Walid the Muslims defeated theByzantine army there on 30 July 634 at theBattle of Ajnadayn. One week later, Khalid, along with Abu Ubayda, moved towardsDamascus. On their way to Damascus, they defeated another Byzantine army at the Battle of Yaqusa in mid-August 634. Caloiis and Azrail, the governor of Damascus, led another army to stop Khalid's corps but they were also defeated in theBattle of Marj al-Saffar on 19 August 634.

The next day the Muslims reached Damascus andbesieged the city. The siege continued for 30 days. After defeating the Byzantine reinforcements sent byEmperorHeraclius at theBattle of Sanita-al-Uqab, 20 mi (32 km) from Damascus, Khalid's forces attacked and entered the city. With Khalid's divisionsinvesting the city from the northeast, Thomas, the purported son-in-law of the Emperor Heraclius, surrendered the city to Abu Ubayda, who was besieging theBab al-Jabiya (Jabiya Gate), on 19 September 634.

Abu Ubayda had been appointed by Khalid ibn al-Walid to lay siege the Jabiya Gate of Damascus. Abu Ubayda, Shurahbil ibn Hasana and 'Amr ibn al-'As put forward a peace proposal to the citizens of Damascus after Khalid ibn al-Walid attacked the city and conquered it by force, as they were unaware of Khalid's attack from theEastern Gate. The peace proposal was reluctantly endorsed by Khalid. The Byzantine army was given a cease fire of three days and allowed to go as far as they could with their families and treasure. Others residents simply agreed to stay in Damascus and pay tribute. The Muslims controlled the road to Emesa, so the Byzantines went west and then north up theBeqaa Valley. After the three-day truce was over, the Muslim cavalry, under Khalid's command, pursued the Byzantine column via the shorter Emesa road and caught up with them in the northwest Beqaa Valley, just before they entered the mountains en route toAntioch at theBattle of Maraj-al-Debaj.[18]

Conquest of central Syria

[edit]
Map detailing the route of Khalid ibn al-Walid's invasion of central Syria.

Soon after the appointment of Abu-Ubayda as commander in chief, he sent a small detachment to the annual fair held at Abu-al-Quds, modern day Abla, nearZahlé; east ofBeirut. There was a Byzantine andChristian Arab garrison guarding that fair, the size of the garrison was miscalculated by the Muslim informants and they quickly encircled the small Muslim detachment. Before the detachment could be destroyed, Abu Ubayda, having received new intelligence, sent Khalid to rescue the Muslim army. Khalid reached there in time and defeated the garrison in theBattle of Abu-al-Quds on 15 October 634 and returned with tons of looted booty from the fair and hundreds of Byzantine prisoners.

With central Syria captured, the Muslims had given the Byzantines a decisive blow. For the Byzantines, communications between northern Syria andPalestine were now cut off. Abu Ubayda decided to march to Fahl (Pella), which is about 500 ft (150 m) belowsea level, and where a strong Byzantine garrison and survivors of the Battle of Ajnadayn were present. The region was crucial because from there the Byzantine army could strike eastwards and cut communications lines withArabia. Moreover, with this large garrison at the rear, Palestine could not be invaded. Thus the Muslim army moved to Fahl. The Byzantine army was defeated at theBattle of Fahl on 23 January 635.

Battles for Emesa and the second battle of Damascus

[edit]

After the battle, which would prove to be a key to Palestine andJordan, the Muslim armies split up. Shurahbeel and Amr's corps moved south to capture Palestine. Meanwhile, Abu Ubayda and Khalid, with a relatively larger corps, moved north to conquerLebanon and northern Syria.

While the Muslims were occupied at Fahl, Heraclius, sensing the opportunity, quickly sent an army under GeneralTheodore Trithyrius to recapture Damascus, where a small Muslim garrison had been left. Shortly after Heraclius dispatched this new army, the Muslims, having finished the business at Fahl, were on their way to Emesa. The Byzantine army met the Muslims halfway to Emesa, at Maraj al-Rome. During the night, Theodras sent half of his army towards Damascus to launch a surprise attack on the Muslim garrison.

Khalid's spy informed him about the move. Khalid, having received permission from Abu Ubayda, galloped towards Damascus with hismobile guard. While Abu Ubayda fought and defeated the Byzantine army in theBattle of Marj ar-Rum, Khalid moved to Damascus with hislight cavalry and attacked and defeated Theodras in thesecond battle of Damascus.

A week later, Abu Ubayda moved towardsHeliopolis (Baalbek), where the greatTemple of Jupiter stood. Heliopolis surrendered to Muslim rule after little resistance and agreed to pay tribute. Abu Ubayda sent Khalid towards Emesa.

Emesa andChalcis sued for peace for a year. Abu Ubayda accepted the offer. So rather than invading the districts of Emesa and Chalcis, he consolidated his rule in conquered land and capturedHama,Maarrat al-Nu'man. The peace treaties were, however, on Heraclius's instructions, to slow down the Muslim advance and to secure time for the preparation of the defences across northern Syria (present-day Lebanon, Syria and southernTurkey). Having mustered sizeable armies at Antioch, Heraclius sent them to reinforce strategically important areas of northern Syria, such asEmesa and Chalcis. With the arrival of Byzantine army in the city, the peace treaty was violated. So Abu Ubadiah and Khalid marched to Emesa, and the Byzantine army that had halted Khalid's advance guard was defeated. The Muslimsbesieged Emesa, which was finally conquered in March 636 after a six months' siege.

Battle of Yarmouk

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Yarmouk
Muslim and Byzantine Troop Movements before the battle of Yarmouk.
Topographical and strategic map of the Battle of Yarmouk (636 CE), depicting key locations, Roman and Muslim troop positions, roads, rivers, and terrain features. Based on historical sources, including Syvänne (2019), Kaegi (1992), and GIS data.
  Current boundary

After capturing Emesa, the Muslims moved north to capture the whole of the northern Syria. Khalid, acting as an advance guard raided northern Syria. At Shaizer, Khalid intercepted a convoy taking provisions for Chalcis. The prisoners were interrogated and informed him about Emperor Heraclius' ambitious plan to take back Syria. They told him that an army, possibly 200,000 strong, would soon emerge to recapture their territory. After his past experience fighting the Muslim armies, Heraclius, was avoiding pitch battles with the Muslims. He planned to send massive reinforcements to all the major cities and isolate the Muslim corps from each other, and thus separately encircle and destroy the Muslim armies. In June 636, five massive armies were sent by Heraclius to recapture Syria.

Khalid, sensing Heraclius's plan, feared that the Muslim armies would be isolated and destroyed. In acouncil of war he suggested that Abu Ubayda draw all the Muslim armies to one place so as to fight a decisive battle with the Byzantines. Agreeing with Khalid's suggestion, Abu Ubayda ordered all the Muslim armies in Syria to evacuate the lands they had conquered and meet atJabiya. This manoeuvre turned out to be a decisive blow to the Heraclius's plan, as he did not wish engage his troops in an open battle with the Muslims, where their light cavalry could be effectively used. On Khalid's suggestion, Abu Ubayda ordered the Muslim army to withdraw from Jabiya to the plain on theYarmouk River, where cavalry could be used. While the Muslim armies were gathering at Yarmouk, Khalid intercepted and routed the Byzantine advance guard. This was to ensure the safe retreat of the Muslims to Yarmouk.

The Muslim armies reached Yarmouk in July 636. Around mid July, the Byzantine army arrived. The Byzantine commander in chief, Vahan, sent Christian Arab troops of the Ghassanid king,Jabalah ibn al-Aiham, to check the strength of the Muslims. Khalid's mobile guard defeated and routed the Christian Arabs; this was the last action before the battle started. For the next month negotiations continued between the two armies, and Khalid went to meet Vahan in person at Byzantine camp. Meanwhile, the Muslims received reinforcements sent by Caliph Umar.

Finally on 15 August, the Battle of Yarmouk was fought. It lasted for 6 days and ended in a devastating defeat for the Byzantines. The Battle of Yarmouk is considered to be a historic defeat that sealed the fate of Byzantines in the Middle East. The magnitude of defeat was so intense that Byzantine would never recover from it. It potentially left the whole of the Byzantine Empire vulnerable to Muslim attack.

Siege of Jerusalem

[edit]

With the Byzantine army shattered and routed, the Muslims quickly recaptured the territory that they conquered prior to Yarmouk. Abu Ubayda held a meeting with his high command, including Khalid, to decide on future conquests. They decided to conquer Jerusalem. The Siege of Jerusalem lasted four months after which the city agreed to surrender, but only to caliph Umar in person. 'Amr ibn al-'As suggested that Khalid should be sent as if he was the caliph, because of his very strong resemblance to Umar. However, Khalid was recognized. So the surrender of Jerusalem was delayed until Umar arrived withJerusalem formally surrendering on April 637. After capture of Jerusalem, the Muslim armies separated once again. Yazid's corps went to Damascus and captured Beirut. Amr and Shurahbil's corps went on to conquer the rest of Palestine, while Abu Ubayda and Khalid, at the head of a 17,000 strong army moved north to conquer whole of the northern Syria.

Abu Ubayda sent the commanders 'Amr ibn al-'As,Yazid ibn Abi Sufyan, and Shurahbil ibn Hassana back to their areas to reconquer them. Most of the areas submitted without a fight. Abu Ubayda, along with Khalid, moved to northern Syria to reconquer that area with a 17,000 strong army. Khalid along with his cavalry was sent to Hazir and Abu Ubayda moved to Chalcis.

Conquest of northern Syria

[edit]
Further information:Muslim conquest of Syria
Map detailing the route of Khalid ibn al-Walid's invasion of northern Syria.

Defence of Emesa

[edit]

After the devastating defeat in the Battle of Yarmouk, the remainder of the Byzantine empire was left vulnerable. With few military resources left, it was no longer in a position to attempt a military comeback in Syria. To gain time to prepare a defence of the rest of his empire, Heraclius needed to keep the Muslims occupied in Syria. Heraclius thus sought help from the Christian Arab tribes based in Jazirah and were mainly from Circesium and Hīt. The tribes mustered a large army and marched tobesiege Emesa.[19] Abu Ubayda withdrew all his forces from northern Syria to Emesa as a part of complex strategy which he devised to repel the invasion of the Christian Arab forces against Emesa. CaliphUmar instructed Abu Ubaydah to send field commanders outside Emesa with sufficient forces to lay counter siege to cities inJazira, homeland of enemy Arab Christian tribes, in order to divert the focus of enemy concentration in Emesa.[20] So in 638 the Muslim forces underIyadh ibn Ghanm attacked Hīt, which they found to be well fortified. So they left some of the army to lay siege to the city, while the rest of the army went on to Circesium.[21] Khalid was in favour of an open battle outside the fort, but Abu Ubayda sought Umar's advice, who handled the situation brilliantly. Umar sent detachments of the Muslim army from Iraq to invade Al-Jazira, homeland of the invading Christian Arabs, from three different routes. Moreover, another detachment was sent to Emesa from Iraq under Qa'qa ibn Amr, a veteran of Yarmouk who had been sent to Iraq for theBattle of al-Qādisiyyah. Umar himself marched from Medina at the head of 1,000 men. The Christian Arabs, when they received the news of the Muslim invasion of their homeland, abandoned the siege and hastily withdrew to Al-Jazira. At this point Khalid and his mobile guard came out of the fort and devastated the army, attacking them from the rear.

After Emesa

[edit]

Abu Ubayda sent Khalid, with his elite cavalry, the mobile guard, towards Chalcis. The fort was guarded by the Greek troops under their commander,Menas, who was reported to be of high prestige, second only to the emperor himself. Menas, diverting from conventional Byzantine tactics, decided to face Khalid and destroy the leading elements of the Muslim army before the main body could join them at Hazir, 5 km (3.1 mi) east of Chalcis. This resulted in theBattle of Hazir, which led to Umar praising Khalid's military genius. Umar is reported to have said:

Battle against the Byzantines for Aleppo in 637.Rawdat al-safa (Garden of felicity) by Mirkhwand (d. 1498), Shiraz, 1571-72 (Arthur M. Sackler Collection, S1986.241).[22]

Khalid is truly the commander, May Allah have mercy upon Abu Bakr. He was a better judge of men than I have been.[23]

Abu Ubayda soon joined Khalid at the virtually impregnable fort of Chalcis, which surrendered in June 637. With this strategic victory, the territory north of Chalcis lay open to the Muslims. Khalid and Abu Ubayda continued their march northward and laidsiege to Aleppo, which was captured after fierce resistance from desperate Byzantine troops in October 637. The next objective was the splendid city of Antioch, the capital of the Asian zone of the Byzantine Empire.

Before marching towards Antioch, Khalid and Abu Ubayda decided to isolate the city. Accordingly, they sent detachments north to eliminate all possible Byzantine forces and captured the garrison town ofAzaz, 50 km (31 mi) fromAleppo. From there the Muslims attacked Antioch on the eastern side. A desperate battle was fought between the Muslim army and the defenders of Antioch, popularly known asBattle of Iron Bridge. The Byzantine army was composed of the survivors of Yarmouk and other Syrian campaigns. After being defeated, the Byzantines retreated to Antioch and the Muslims besieged the city. Having little hope of help from Emperor Heraclius, Antioch surrendered on 30 October 637, with the terms that all Byzantine troops would be given safe passage toConstantinople.

Abu Ubayda sent Khalid northwards, while he marched south and captured Lazkia, Jabla,Tartus and the coastal areas west ofAnti-Lebanon Mountains. Khalid moved north and raided territory up to theKızıl River (Kızılırmak) in Anatolia. Emperor Heraclius had already left Antioch forEdessa before the arrival of the Muslims. He arranged for the necessary defences inAl-Jazira and Armenia and left for his capital, Constantinople. On his way to Constantinople he had a narrow escape when Khalid, after the capturing Marash, was heading south towardsMunbij. Heraclius hastily took the mountainous path and, passing through theCilician Gates, is reported to have said:

Farewell, a long farewell to Syria, my fair province. Thou art an infidel's (enemy's) now. Peace be with you, O' Syria – what a beautiful land you will be for the enemy hands.[24]

Campaigns in Armenia and Anatolia

[edit]
Map detailing the route of Khalid ibn al-Walid's invasion of Syria.

After the battle Umar ordered the conquest of Al-Jazira, which was completed by late summer 638. Following the victory, Abu Ubayda sent Khalid andIyad ibn Ghanm (conqueror of Al-Jazira) to invade the Byzantine territory north of Al-Jazira. They marched independently and captured Edessa,Amida (Diyarbakır),Malatya and whole of Armenia up toArarat and raided northern and central Anatolia. Heraclius had already abandoned all the forts between Antioch and Tartus to create abuffer zone orno man's land between Muslim controlled areas and mainland Anatolia.

Umar for the time being stopped his armies from invading invasion deeper into Anatolia. Rather, he ordered Abu Ubayda, now the governor of Syria, to consolidate his rule in Syria. At this point, Umar is reported to have said:

I wish there was a wall of fire between us and Romans, so that they could not enter our territory nor we could enter theirs.

The expedition to Anatolia and Armenia marked the end of the military career of Khalid. Due to the dismissal of Khalid from the army and a famine and plague the next year, the Muslim armies were kept from invading Anatolia.

Relief efforts during the 638 famine

[edit]

During 638 Arabia fell into a severe drought, with many people perishing from hunger and epidemic diseases. A large number of people from throughout Arabia gathered in Medina as food was being rationed. Soon, Medina's food reserves declined to alarming levels. Caliph Umar wrote to the governors of his provinces requesting aid. One such letter was rushed to Abu Ubayda, who responded promptly:

I am sending you the Caravans whose one end will be here at Syria and the other will be at Madinah.

True to his assurance, Abu Ubayda'scaravans of food supplies were the first to reach Medina, with 4,000 camels arriving loaded with food. To handle the distribution of all the food, Umar appointed Abu Ubayda to distribute the food among the thousands of people living in the outskirts of Medina. Following Abu Ubayda's generous aid and coordination of the relief efforts, Umar provided 4,000dinars as a modest stipend or token of appreciation which Abu Ubayda refused on the grounds that the deed was done for the sake of God.

Death

[edit]
Main article:Plague of Amwas

Abu Ubayda died of the plague in 639 and left no descendants.[25]

Tomb

[edit]
Courtyard of theMausoleum of Abu Ubaydah in Jordan

Beginning in the 13th century, Abu Ubayda's tomb was held to be in the village of Ammata in theJordan Valley area of Transjordan.[26] That part of the valley became known 'Ghawr Abi Ubayda'.[27] Earlier places where Abu Ubayda and his wife were said to have been buried wereTiberias andBeisan in the Jordan district (corresponding to theGalilee and its environs). The traveller al-Harawi, who visited the tomb in Ammata at the beginning of the 13th century, mentions that his tomb was shown to be in all three places.[26]

The Jarrahs, the family that traditionally maintained the tomb, claimed descent from Abu Ubayda, and were exempt by theOttoman authorities from paying taxes. They had awaqf on the property and collected donations to Abu Ubayda's memory from farmers and traders at the market nearest the tomb.[27]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^English: The Custodian of Ummah
  2. ^Established by theConquest of the Levant from theByzantine Empire.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Athamina, Khalil (2007). "Abū ʿUbayda b. al-Jarrāḥ". In Kate Fleet; Gudrun Krämer; Denis Matringe; John Nawas; Everett Rowson (eds.).Encyclopaedia of Islam Three.doi:10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_SIM_0036.
  2. ^Tehrani, Hamid (2015). "Abū ʿUbayda b. al-Jarrāḥ". InWilferd Madelung,Farhad Daftary (ed.).Encyclopaedia Islamica.doi:10.1163/1875-9831_isla_SIM_0229.
  3. ^Gibb 1960, p. 158.
  4. ^abcTabqat ibn al-Saad book of Maghazi, page no:62
  5. ^Sahih al-Bukhari book of Maghazi, Ghazwa Saif-al-Jara
  6. ^Shoufani 1973, pp. 51–52, 54.
  7. ^Shoufani 1973, pp. 49, 53–54, 58.
  8. ^Shoufani 1973, pp. 60–62.
  9. ^abShoufani 1973, p. 56.
  10. ^Shoufani 1973, pp. 53, 56.
  11. ^Shoufani 1973, pp. 56–57.
  12. ^Athamina 1994, pp. 257–258.
  13. ^abAthamina 1994, p. 258.
  14. ^Athamina 1994, pp. 258–259.
  15. ^abAthamina 1994, p. 259.
  16. ^Athamina 1994, p. 260.
  17. ^Athamina 1994, pp. 262–268.
  18. ^Kathir 2017, chpt. 27–30.
  19. ^Martasyabana, Ilham (6 August 2017)."Abu Ubaidah Memperlemah Pemberontak Romawi Di Syam". Warta Pilihan news agency. Retrieved10 October 2021.
  20. ^Tibbetts, Jann (30 July 2016).50 Great Military Leaders of All Time. Vij Books India Pvt Ltd. p. 548.ISBN 978-93-85505-66-9.
  21. ^Kathir 2017, p. 310.
  22. ^"Folio from a Rawdat al-safa (Garden of felicity) by Mirkhwand (d. 1498)".National Museum of Asian Art.
  23. ^Tafsir al-Tabari: Vol. 3, p. 98.
  24. ^Regan 2003, p. 167
  25. ^Gibb 1960, p. 159.
  26. ^abSharon 2018, pp. 105–106.
  27. ^abFischbach 2000, p. 13.

Bibliography

[edit]

External links

[edit]
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abu_Ubayda_ibn_al-Jarrah&oldid=1323901792"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp