Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Asymptotic giant branch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromAGB star)
Grouping of evolved cool luminous stars
H–R diagram forglobular clusterM5, with known AGB stars marked in blue, flanked by some of the more luminous red-giant branch stars, shown in orange
  Asymptotic giant branch (AGB)
  Upperred-giant branch (RGB)
  End ofmain sequence,subgiant branch, and lower RGB

Theasymptotic giant branch (AGB) is a region of theHertzsprung–Russell diagram populated by evolved cool luminousstars. This is a period ofstellar evolution undertaken by all low- to intermediate-mass stars (about 0.5 to 8 solar masses[1]) late in their lives.

Observationally, an asymptotic-giant-branch star will appear as a brightred giant with aluminosity ranging up to thousands of times greater than the Sun. Its interior structure is characterized by a central and largely inert core of carbon and oxygen, a shell where helium is undergoing fusion to form carbon (known ashelium burning), another shell where hydrogen is undergoing fusion forming helium (known ashydrogen burning), and a very large envelope of material of composition similar to main-sequence stars (except in the case ofcarbon stars).[2]

Stellar evolution

[edit]
A sun-like star moves onto the AGB from the Horizontal Branch after core helium exhaustion
A 5 M star moves onto the AGB after ablue loop when helium is exhausted in its core

When a star exhausts the supply ofhydrogen bynuclear fusion processes in its core, the core contracts and its temperature increases, causing the outer layers of the star to expand and cool. The star becomes a red giant, following a track towards the upper-right hand corner of the HR diagram.[3] Eventually, once thetemperature in the core has reached approximately3×108 K,helium burning (fusion ofhelium nuclei) begins. The onset of helium burning in the core halts the star's cooling and increase in luminosity, and the star instead moves down and leftwards in the HR diagram. This is thehorizontal branch (forpopulation II stars) or ablue loop for stars more massive than about 2.3 M.[4]

After the completion of helium burning in the core, the star again moves to the right and upwards on the diagram, cooling and expanding as its luminosity increases. Its path is almost aligned with its previous red-giant track, hence the nameasymptotic giant branch, although the star will become more luminous on the AGB than it did at the tip of the red-giant branch. Stars at this stage of stellar evolution are known as AGB stars.[4]

AGB stage

[edit]

The AGB phase is divided into two parts, the early AGB (E-AGB) and the thermally pulsing AGB (TP-AGB). During the E-AGB phase, the main source of energy is helium fusion in a shell around a core consisting mostly ofcarbon andoxygen. During this phase, the star swells up to giant proportions to become a red giant again. The star's radius may become as large as oneastronomical unit (~215 R).[4]

After the helium shell runs out of fuel, the TP-AGB starts. Now the star derives its energy from fusion of hydrogen in a thin shell, which restricts the innerhelium shell to a very thin layer and prevents it fusing stably. However, over periods of 10,000 to 100,000 years, helium from the hydrogen shell burning builds up and eventually the helium shell ignites explosively, a process known as ahelium shell flash. The power of the shell flash peaks at thousands of times the observed luminosity of the star, but decreases exponentially over just a few years. The shell flash causes the star to expand and cool which shuts off the hydrogen shell burning and causes strong convection in the zone between the two shells.[4] When the helium shell burning nears the base of the hydrogen shell, the increased temperature reignites hydrogen fusion and the cycle begins again. The large but brief increase in luminosity from the helium shell flash produces an increase in the visible brightness of the star of a few tenths of a magnitude for several hundred years. These changes are unrelated to the brightness variations on periods of tens to hundreds of days that are common in this type of star.[5]

Evolution of a 2 M star on the TP-AGB

During the thermal pulses, which last only a few hundred years, material from the core region may be mixed into the outer layers, changing the surface composition, in a process referred to asdredge-up. Because of this dredge-up, AGB stars may showS-process elements in their spectra and strong dredge-ups can lead to the formation ofcarbon stars. All dredge-ups following thermal pulses are referred to as third dredge-ups, after the first dredge-up, which occurs on the red-giant branch, and the second dredge up, which occurs during the E-AGB. In some cases there may not be a second dredge-up but dredge-ups following thermal pulses will still be called a third dredge-up. Thermal pulses increase rapidly in strength after the first few, so third dredge-ups are generally the deepest and most likely to circulate core material to the surface.[6][7]

AGB stars are typicallylong-period variables, and suffermass loss in the form of astellar wind. For M-type AGB stars, the stellar winds are most efficiently driven by micron-sized grains.[8] Thermal pulses produce periods of even higher mass loss and may result in detached shells of circumstellar material. A star may lose 50 to 70% of its mass during the AGB phase.[9] The mass-loss rates typically range between 10−8 and 10−5 M year−1, and can even reach as high as 10−4 M year−1;[10] while wind velocities are typically between 5 and 30 km/s.[11]

Circumstellar envelopes of AGB stars

[edit]
See also:List of interstellar and circumstellar molecules
Formation of a planetary nebula at the end of the asymptotic giant branch phase

The extensive mass loss of AGB stars means that they are surrounded by an extendedcircumstellar envelope (CSE). Given a mean AGB lifetime of oneMyr and an outer velocity of10 km/s, its maximum radius can be estimated to be roughly3×1014 km (30light years). This is a maximum value since the wind material will start to mix with theinterstellar medium at very large radii, and it also assumes that there is no velocity difference between the star and theinterstellar gas.

These envelopes have a dynamic and interestingchemistry, much of which is difficult to reproduce in a laboratory environment because of the low densities involved. The nature of the chemical reactions in the envelope changes as the material moves away from the star, expands and cools. Near the star the envelope density is high enough that reactions approach thermodynamic equilibrium. As the material passes beyond about5×109 km the density falls to the point wherekinetics, rather than thermodynamics, becomes the dominant feature. Some energetically favorable reactions can no longer take place in the gas, because thereaction mechanism requires a third body to remove the energy released when a chemical bond is formed. In this region many of the reactions that do take place involveradicals such asOH (in oxygen rich envelopes) orCN (in the envelopes surrounding carbon stars). In the outermost region of the envelope, beyond about5×1011 km, the density drops to the point where the dust no longer completely shields the envelope from interstellarUV radiation and the gas becomes partially ionized. These ions then participate in reactions with neutral atoms and molecules. Finally as the envelope merges with the interstellar medium, most of the molecules are destroyed by UV radiation.[12][13]

The temperature of the CSE is determined by heating and cooling properties of the gas and dust, but drops with radial distance from thephotosphere of the stars which are2,0003,000 K. Chemical peculiarities of an AGB CSE outwards include:[14]

The dichotomy betweenoxygen-rich andcarbon-rich stars has an initial role in determining whether the first condensates are oxides or carbides, since the least abundant of these two elements will likely remain in the gas phase as COx.

In the dust formation zone,refractory elements and compounds (Fe,Si,MgO, etc.) are removed from the gas phase and end up indust grains. The newly formed dust will immediately assist insurface catalyzed reactions. The stellar winds from AGB stars are sites ofcosmic dust formation, and are believed to be the main production sites of dust in the universe.[15]

The stellar winds of AGB stars (Mira variables andOH/IR stars) are also often the site ofmaser emission. The molecules that account for this areSiO,H2O,OH,HCN, andSiS.[16][17][18][19][20] SiO, H2O, and OH masers are typically found in oxygen-rich M-type AGB stars such asR Cassiopeiae andU Orionis,[21] while HCN and SiS masers are generally found in carbon stars such asIRC +10216.S-type stars with masers are uncommon.[21]

After these stars have lost nearly all of their envelopes, and only the core regions remain, they evolve further into short-livedprotoplanetary nebula. The final fate of the AGB envelopes are represented byplanetary nebulae (PNe).[22]

Physical samples

[edit]
Main article:Presolar grains

Physical samples, known as presolar grains, of mineral grains from AGB stars are available for laboratory analysis in the form of individual refractorypresolar grains. These formed in the circumstellar dust envelopes and were transported to the earlySolar System bystellar wind. A majority of presolarsilicon carbide grains have their origin in 1–3 Mcarbon stars in the late thermally-pulsing AGB phase of their stellar evolution.[23][24]

Late thermal pulse

[edit]

As many as a quarter of all post-AGB stars undergo what is dubbed a "born-again" episode. The carbon–oxygen core is now surrounded by helium with an outer shell of hydrogen. If the helium is re-ignited a thermal pulse occurs and the star quickly returns to the AGB, becoming a helium-burning, hydrogen-deficient stellar object.[25] If the star still has a hydrogen-burning shell when this thermal pulse occurs, it is termed a "late thermal pulse". Otherwise it is called a "very late thermal pulse".[26]

The outer atmosphere of the born-again star develops a stellar wind and the star once more follows anevolutionary track across theHertzsprung–Russell diagram. However, this phase is very brief, lasting only about 200 years before the star again heads toward thewhite dwarf stage. Observationally, this late thermal pulse phase appears almost identical to aWolf–Rayet star in the midst of its ownplanetary nebula.[25]

Stars such asSakurai's Object andFG Sagittae are being observed as they rapidly evolve through this phase.

Mapping the circumstellar magnetic fields of thermal-pulsating (TP-) AGB stars has recently been reported[27] using the so-calledGoldreich-Kylafis effect.

Super-AGB stars

[edit]
Main article:Super-AGB star

Stars close to the upper mass limit to still qualify as AGB stars show some peculiar properties and have been dubbed super-AGB stars. They have masses above 7 M and up to 9 or 10 M (or more[28]). They represent a transition to the more massive supergiant stars that undergo full fusion of elements heavier than helium. During thetriple-alpha process, some elements heavier than carbon are also produced: mostly oxygen, but also some magnesium, neon, and even heavier elements. Super-AGB stars develop partially degenerate carbon–oxygen cores that are large enough to ignite carbon in a flash analogous to the earlier helium flash. The second dredge-up is very strong in this mass range and that keeps the core size below the level required for burning of neon as occurs in higher-mass supergiants. The size of the thermal pulses and third dredge-ups are reduced compared to lower-mass stars, while the frequency of the thermal pulses increases dramatically. Some super-AGB stars may explode as an electron capture supernova, but most will end as oxygen–neon white dwarfs.[29] Since these stars are much more common than higher-mass supergiants, they could form a high proportion of observed supernovae. Detecting examples of these supernovae would provide valuable confirmation of models that are highly dependent on assumptions.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Höfner, Susanne; Olofsson, Hans (2018-01-09)."Mass loss of stars on the asymptotic giant branch".The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review.26 (1): 1.doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0106-5.ISSN 1432-0754.
  2. ^Lattanzio, J.; Forestini, M. (1999). "Nucleosynthesis in AGB Stars". In Le Bertre, T.; Lebre, A.; Waelkens, C. (eds.).Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars. IAU Symposium 191. p. 31.Bibcode:1999IAUS..191...31L.ISBN 978-1-886733-90-9.
  3. ^Iben, I. (1967). "Stellar Evolution.VI. Evolution from the Main Sequence to the Red-Giant Branch for Stars of Mass 1 M, 1.25 M, and 1.5  M".The Astrophysical Journal.147: 624.Bibcode:1967ApJ...147..624I.doi:10.1086/149040.
  4. ^abcdVassiliadis, E.; Wood, P. R. (1993)."Evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars to the end of the asymptotic giant branch with mass loss".The Astrophysical Journal.413 (2): 641.Bibcode:1993ApJ...413..641V.doi:10.1086/173033.
  5. ^Marigo, P.; et al. (2008). "Evolution of asymptotic giant branch stars. II. Optical to far-infrared isochrones with improved TP-AGB models".Astronomy and Astrophysics.482 (3):883–905.arXiv:0711.4922.Bibcode:2008A&A...482..883M.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078467.S2CID 15076538.
  6. ^Gallino, R.; et al. (1998)."Evolution and Nucleosynthesis in Low-Mass Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars. II. Neutron Capture and thes-Process".The Astrophysical Journal.497 (1):388–403.Bibcode:1998ApJ...497..388G.doi:10.1086/305437.
  7. ^Mowlavi, N. (1999). "On the third dredge-up phenomenon in asymptotic giant branch stars".Astronomy and Astrophysics.344: 617.arXiv:astro-ph/9903473.Bibcode:1999A&A...344..617M.
  8. ^Höfner, S. (2008-11-01)."Winds of M-type AGB stars driven by micron-sized grains".Astronomy & Astrophysics.491 (2):L1–L4.Bibcode:2008A&A...491L...1H.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810641.ISSN 0004-6361.
  9. ^Wood, P. R.; Olivier, E. A.; Kawaler, S. D. (2004)."Long Secondary Periods in Pulsating Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars: An Investigation of Their Origin".The Astrophysical Journal.604 (2): 800.Bibcode:2004ApJ...604..800W.doi:10.1086/382123.
  10. ^Höfner, Susanne; Olofsson, Hans (2018-01-09)."Mass loss of stars on the asymptotic giant branch".The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review.26 (1) 1.doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0106-5.ISSN 1432-0754.
  11. ^Höfner, Susanne; Freytag, Bernd (November 2020). "Explaining the winds of AGB stars: Recent progress".Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.16 (S366):165–172.arXiv:2204.09728.doi:10.1017/S1743921322000199.ISSN 1743-9213.
  12. ^Omont, A. (1984).Mass Loss from Red Giants (Morris & Zuckerman Eds). Springer. p. 269.ISBN 978-94-009-5428-1. Retrieved21 November 2020.
  13. ^Habing, H. J. (1996). "Circumstellar envelopes and Asymptotic Giant Branch stars".The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review.7 (2):97–207.Bibcode:1996A&ARv...7...97H.doi:10.1007/PL00013287.S2CID 120797516.
  14. ^Klochkova, V. G. (2014). "Circumstellar envelope manifestations in the optical spectra of evolved stars".Astrophysical Bulletin.69 (3):279–295.arXiv:1408.0599.Bibcode:2014AstBu..69..279K.doi:10.1134/S1990341314030031.S2CID 119265398.
  15. ^Sugerman, Ben E. K.;Ercolano, Barbara; Barlow, M. J.; Tielens, A. G. G. M.; Clayton, Geoffrey C.; Zijlstra, Albert A.; Meixner, Margaret; Speck, Angela; Gledhill, Tim M.; Panagia, Nino; Cohen, Martin; Gordon, Karl D.; Meyer, Martin; Fabbri, Joanna; Bowey, Janet. E.; Welch, Douglas L.; Regan, Michael W.; Kennicutt, Robert C. (2006). "Massive-Star Supernovae as Major Dust Factories".Science.313 (5784):196–200.arXiv:astro-ph/0606132.Bibcode:2006Sci...313..196S.doi:10.1126/science.1128131.PMID 16763110.S2CID 41628158.
  16. ^Deacon, R. M.; Chapman, J. M.; Green, A. J.; Sevenster, M. N. (2007). "H2O Maser Observations of Candidate Post-AGB Stars and Discovery of Three High-Velocity Water Sources".The Astrophysical Journal.658 (2): 1096.arXiv:astro-ph/0702086.Bibcode:2007ApJ...658.1096D.doi:10.1086/511383.S2CID 7776074.
  17. ^Humphreys, E. M. L. (2007). "Submillimeter and millimeter masers".Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.242 (1):471–480.arXiv:0705.4456.Bibcode:2007IAUS..242..471H.doi:10.1017/S1743921307013622.S2CID 119600748.
  18. ^Fonfría Expósito, J. P.; Agúndez, M.; Tercero, B.; Pardo, J. R.; Cernicharo, J. (2006). "High-J v=0 SiS maser emission in IRC+10216: A new case of infrared overlaps".The Astrophysical Journal.646 (1): L127.arXiv:0710.1836.Bibcode:2006ApJ...646L.127F.doi:10.1086/507104.S2CID 17803905.
  19. ^Schilke, P.; Mehringer, D. M.; Menten, K. M. (2000). "A submillimeter HCN laser in IRC+10216".The Astrophysical Journal.528 (1):L37–L40.arXiv:astro-ph/9911377.Bibcode:2000ApJ...528L..37S.doi:10.1086/312416.PMID 10587490.S2CID 17990217.
  20. ^Schilke, P.; Menten, K. M. (2003)."Detection of a second, strong submillimeter HCN laser line towards carbon stars".The Astrophysical Journal.583 (1): 446.Bibcode:2003ApJ...583..446S.doi:10.1086/345099.S2CID 122549795.
  21. ^abEngels, D. (1979). "Catalogue of late-type stars with OH, H2O or SiO maser emission".Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series.36: 337.Bibcode:1979A&AS...36..337E.
  22. ^Werner, K.; Herwig, F. (2006). "The Elemental Abundances in Bare Planetary Nebula Central Stars and the Shell Burning in AGB Stars".Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.118 (840):183–204.arXiv:astro-ph/0512320.Bibcode:2006PASP..118..183W.doi:10.1086/500443.S2CID 119475536.
  23. ^Zinner, E. (1 January 2014). "1.4 – Presolar Grains".Treatise on Geochemistry (Second Edition):181–213.doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00101-7.ISBN 978-0-08-098300-4.
  24. ^Iben, Icko; Renzini, Alvio (September 1983). "Asymptotic Giant Branch Evolution and Beyond".Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics.21 (1):271–342.Bibcode:1983ARA&A..21..271I.doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.21.090183.001415.
  25. ^abAerts, C.; Christensen-Dalsgaard, J.; Kurtz, D. W. (2010).Asteroseismology.Springer. pp. 37–38.ISBN 978-1-4020-5178-4.
  26. ^Duerbeck, H. W. (2002). "The final helium flash object V4334 Sgr (Sakurai's Object) – an overview". In Sterken, C.; Kurtz, D. W. (eds.).Observational aspects of pulsating B and A stars.ASP Conference Series. Vol. 256. San Francisco:Astronomical Society of the Pacific. pp. 237–248.Bibcode:2002ASPC..256..237D.ISBN 1-58381-096-X.
  27. ^Huang, K.-Y.; Kemball, A. J.; Vlemmings, W. H. T.; Lai, S.-P.; Yang, L.; Agudo, I. (July 2020)."Mapping circumstellar magnetic fields of late-type evolved stars with the Goldreich-Kylafis effect: CARMA observations at $\lambda 1.3$ mm of R Crt and R Leo".The Astrophysical Journal.899 (2): 152.arXiv:2007.00215.Bibcode:2020ApJ...899..152H.doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba122.S2CID 220280728.
  28. ^Siess, L. (2006)."Evolution of massive AGB stars".Astronomy and Astrophysics.448 (2):717–729.Bibcode:2006A&A...448..717S.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053043.
  29. ^Eldridge, J. J.; Tout, C. A. (2004). "Exploring the divisions and overlap between AGB and super-AGB stars and supernovae".Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana.75: 694.arXiv:astro-ph/0409583.Bibcode:2004MmSAI..75..694E.

Further reading

[edit]
Formation
Evolution
Classification
Remnants
Hypothetical
Nucleosynthesis
Structure
Properties
Star systems
Earth-centric
observations
Lists
Related
Portals:
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asymptotic_giant_branch&oldid=1326840612"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp