ADM-20 Quail | |
---|---|
![]() ADM-20 Quail in flight | |
Type | Decoy cruise missile |
Place of origin | United States |
Service history | |
In service | September 13, 1960 |
Production history | |
Manufacturer | McDonnell Aircraft |
Produced | November 1957 |
Specifications | |
Mass | 1,198 lb (543 kg) |
Length | 12 ft 9 in (3.88 m) |
Height | 2 ft 1 in (0.66 m) (wings folded); 3 ft 3 in (1.02 m) (wings unfolded). |
Wingspan | 2 ft 4 in (0.71 m) (wings folded); 5 ft 4 in (1.65 m) (wings unfolded). |
Warhead | None |
Engine | General Electric J85-GE-7 turbojet; 2,450 lbf (10.9 kN) thrust. |
Operational range | 445 miles (716 km) |
Flight ceiling | 50,000 ft (15,200 m) |
Flight altitude | 50,000 ft (15,200 m). |
Maximum speed | 0.9 Mach |
Guidance system | Autopilot integrated with aRate integrating gyroscope pre-programmed to turn theADM-20. |
Launch platform | B-52 Stratofortress. |
TheMcDonnell ADM-20 Quail was asubsonic,jet powered,air-launched decoy cruise missile built byMcDonnell Aircraft Corporation. The Quail was designed to be launched by theBoeingB-52 Stratofortress strategic bomber and its originalUnited States Air Force designation was GAM-72 (GAM standing for Guided Aircraft Missile).[1]
Quail contained electronics andradar reflectors intended to make it indistinguishable from a B-52 approaching at low altitude. This would force Soviet defenses to divide their missiles and interceptors between multiple targets, reducing the chance that a bomber would be targeted.
Design of an improved version of Quail began in January 1968, with the system being termed the Subsonic Cruise Aircraft Decoy. This program incorporated several significant changes to the starting design before theAGM-86 ALCM was created.
In 1955 the USAF started a major effort to constructdecoy missiles. The goal of this effort was to improve the ability ofstrategic bombers to penetrateair-defense systems. The projects initiated under this effort included the MX-2223, which produced theXSM-73 Goose, a long range ground-launched jet-powered, decoy cruise missile; and MX-2224, which produced theXGAM-71 Buck Duck, an air-launchedrocket powered decoy missile to equip theConvair B-36.
The USAF was at the same time developing theXQ-4 as asupersonictarget drone to support theBomarc Missile Program. A requirement was established by the USAF Power Plant Laboratory atWright-Patterson Air Force Base to support follow-on production of the XQ-4. This requirement called for a small jet engine in the 2,000 lbf (8.9 kN)thrust class with a highthrust-to-weight ratio of 10:1. On November 28, 1954 General Electric was awarded a USAF developmentcontract to construct theXJ-85-GE-1. The USAF designated the XJ85 project MX-2273.
During April 1955, the USAF began a program to develop a short range air-launched decoy missile tosimulate theradar cross section of a bomber. On January 18, 1956, the USAF released General Operational Requirement (GOR) 139.
McDonnell Aircraft Corporation submitted a design which included a cropped-delta-wing decoy constructed largely offiberglass and carried internally within a B-52. The following month on February 1, 1956, the McDonnell Aircraft Corporation was awarded acontract to develop Weapon System 122A which included the GAM-72Green Quail missile. In June 1956General Electric was selected as the engine contractor for the GAM-72. Guidance components were built by Summers Gyroscope and the countermeasures equipment byRamo-Wooldridge Corporation.
The GAM-72 was designed with a high-mounteddelta wing and nohorizontal stabilizer. A slab-sidedfuselage and two sets ofvertical stabilizers contributed to the GAM-72s ability tosimulate theradar cross section of abomber. Initially the GAM-72 was powered by a YJ85-GE-1. This jet engine produced 1,900-2,100 lbf (8.5-9.3 kN) ofthrust with athrust-to-weight ratio goal of (4.6:1) to (5:1).[2]
The GAM-72s guidance system could be pre-programmed on the ground to execute two turns and one speed change during a flight time of 45 to 55 minutes. Flight duration depended onaltitude. The GAM-72 was designed to operate at altitudes between 35,000 ft (10,668 m) to 50,000 ft (15,240 m) at speeds betweenMach 0.75 to Mach 0.9. Range varied between 357 nm and 445 nm (661 to 716 km), also depending on altitude.
Two GAM-72s with folded wings and stabilizers were packaged together for mounting in the bomberweapons bay. Before launch the bomber'sradarnavigator lowered the GAM-72 using a retractable arm from the airplane's weapons bay into theslipstream below the aircraft. The wings and stabilizers of the GAM-72 were unfolded, the jet engine was started, and the missile was launched.
Flight testing of the XGAM-72 began in July 1957 atHolloman Air Force Base and the adjacentWhite Sands Missile Range. Initially testing involved the XGAM-72 being captively carried by a B-52. The first glide flight of the XGAM-72 occurred in November 1957. Three testlaunches were completed in 1957. The first successful powered flight of the XGAM-72 occurred in August 1958. This flight lasted 14 minutes and covered 103 nautical miles (191 km). A total of ten test flights occurred in 1958, seventeen flights in 1959, with the final four flights being completed in 1960. Operational testing then moved toEglin Air Force Base,Florida, United States where the 4135th StrategicWing launched a GAM-72 on June 8, 1960.
McDonnell Aircraft received a production contract for the GAM-72A on December 31, 1958. Reliability problems encountered during testing resulted in McDonnell replacing the J85-GE-3 with the J85-GE-7 engine in the production GAM-72A. The GAM-72A was also about 200 lb (90 kg) heavier than the GAM-72. This increase in weight when combined with a slightly smaller wing area reduced the maximum range of the GAM-72A to 402 statute miles (647 km). The first production GAM-72A flight was in March 1960. The final GAM-72A was delivered by McDonnell Aircraft on May 28, 1962. A total of 585[3] GAM-72A missiles were produced by McDonnell Aircraft. The inventory of GAM-72As in the USAF peaked at 492 in 1963.
During 1963 all remaining GAM-72A missiles were modified to the GAM-72B configuration.
In 1963 the GAM-72 was re-designated theADM-20
Old Designation | New Designation |
---|---|
GAM-72 | ADM-20A |
GAM-72A | ADM-20B |
GAM-72B | ADM-20C |
Although originally planned for deployment with theB-47 and the B-52, the GAM-72A was only deployed with the B-52.
The first production GAM-72A was delivered to the 4135th StrategicWing, atEglin Air Force Base, Florida, on September 13, 1960. Initial operational capability was reached on February 1, 1961, when the first squadron of the 4135th Strategic Wing was equipped with the GAM-72A. On January 1, 1962 B-52 aircraft carried the GAM-72A decoy on airborne alert for the first time. Full operational capability was reached when the GAM-72A was deployed with the fourteenth and final B-52squadron on April 15, 1962.
The operational version of the GAM-72 carried internal radar reflectors facing forward and to each side of the aircraft. Up to 100 lb (45 kg) of payload could be accommodated internally by the GAM-72. This internal space could be used to house a radarrepeater or achaff dispenser. An infrared burner in the tail could produce intense heat to simulate the heat signature of a bomber. The GAM-72 was not armed.
Eight GAM-72A decoys could be accommodated in the B-52'sweapons bay but the normal decoy load was two.
Ground radar continued to improve, and the effectiveness of the GAM-72B, redesignated in 1963 as the ADM-20C, decreased over time. TheAGM-69 Short Range Attack Missile (SRAM) allowed bombers to attack air-defense systems from a distance. By 1971, the USAF no longer considered the ADM-20C a credible decoy. The commander of theStrategic Air Command wrote theChief of Staff of the United States Air Force "that the Quail was only slightly better than nothing." The last ADM-20C operational test was flown at Eglin Air Force Base on July 13, 1972. On June 30, 1978, the last ADM-20C came off alert status. The last ADM-20C was removed from the United States Air Force inventory on December 15, 1978.
The number ofGAM-72As in service, by year:
Year | 1960 | 1961 | 1962 | 1963 | 1964 | 1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | 1969 | 1970 | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. in Service | 93 | 397 | 436 | 492 | 477 | 465 | 457 | 448 | 445 | 430 | 430 | 430 | 417 | 417 | 415 | 355 | 355 | 354 |
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
Related lists