Thisminor planet's name may have been inspired by the two letters of its provisional designation, "1909 HD". However, any reference to a person or occurrence is unknown.[2] It is speculated that the name comes from a list created in 1913 by theAstronomisches Rechen-Institut (ARI) containing suggestions of female names from history and mythology for the naming of minor planets (AN 196, 137). At the time, the naming process was not well developed and the ARI feared inconsistencies and potential confusion. The list was sent to several German astronomers, including Kopff, with the invitation to name all of their made discoveries up to number 700.[13] It is therefore unlikely that this asteroid's name refers to a known person such as Austrian actressStephanie Hildburg [de] (1862–1942).
In March 2014, a rotationallightcurve ofHildburg was obtained fromphotometric observations by Italian astronomer Andrea Ferrero at the Bigmuskie Observatory (B88) in Mombercelli, Italy. Lightcurve analysis gave arotation period of15.89±0.01 hours with a brightness variation of0.22±0.02magnitude (U=2). However, the result is ambiguous and allows for an alternative period solution of 11.92 hours.[11] In April 2008, French amateur astronomerRené Roy determined a period of14.2±1.0 hours with a low amplitude of0.07±0.02 magnitude (U=2−).[15] In May 1984, the object's first measurement by Richard Binzel gave a period of11.92 h and an amplitude of 0.23 magnitude (U=2).[12]
According to the surveys carried out by the JapaneseAkari satellite and theNEOWISE mission of NASA'sWide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE),Hildburg measures (16.28±0.34) and (19.040±0.188) kilometers in diameter and its surface has analbedo of (0.186±0.009) and (0.238±0.043), respectively.[8][9][10]
TheCollaborative Asteroid Lightcurve Link assumes a standard albedo for astony asteroid of 0.20 and derives a diameter of 19.28 kilometers based on anabsolute magnitude of 10.94.[4] The WISE team also published an alternative mean-diameter (22.386±0.080 km) and an albedo of (0.1485±0.0159).[4] On 23 August 2004, anasteroid occultation gave a best-fit ellipse dimension of (17.0 km × 17.0 km) with a low quality rating of 1.[6] These timed observations are taken when the asteroid passes in front of a distant star.[6]
^abZappalà, V.; Bendjoya, Ph.; Cellino, A.; Farinella, P.; Froeschle, C. (1997)."Asteroid Dynamical Families".NASA Planetary Data System: EAR-A-5-DDR-FAMILY-V4.1. Retrieved21 July 2020. (PDS main page)
^abcdUsui, Fumihiko; Kuroda, Daisuke; Müller, Thomas G.; Hasegawa, Sunao; Ishiguro, Masateru; Ootsubo, Takafumi; et al. (October 2011). "Asteroid Catalog Using Akari: AKARI/IRC Mid-Infrared Asteroid Survey".Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan.63 (5):1117–1138.Bibcode:2011PASJ...63.1117U.doi:10.1093/pasj/63.5.1117. (online,AcuA catalog p. 153)
^abcMasiero, Joseph R.; Grav, T.; Mainzer, A. K.; Nugent, C. R.; Bauer, J. M.; Stevenson, R.; et al. (August 2014). "Main-belt Asteroids with WISE/NEOWISE: Near-infrared Albedos".The Astrophysical Journal.791 (2): 11.arXiv:1406.6645.Bibcode:2014ApJ...791..121M.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/121.
^Schmadel, Lutz D. (2007). "Appendix 11 – Minor Planet Names with Unknown Meaning".Dictionary of Minor Planet Names – Fifth Revised and Enlarged revision. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 927–929.ISBN978-3-540-00238-3.