Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

208996 Achlys

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Large trans-Neptunian object in the Kuiper belt

208996 Achlys
A black-and-white photograph of Achlys and its moon taken by the Hubble Space Telescope on 2 December 2005. In the black backdrop of space, Achlys appears a large white dot at the center while its moon appears as a small gray dot to the upper right of Achlys.
Achlys andits moon (upper right) imaged by theHubble Space Telescope in December 2005
Discovery[1]
Discovered by
Discovery sitePalomar Obs.
Discovery date13 January 2003
Designations
(208996) Achlys
Pronunciation/ˈækləs/[2]
Named after
Achlys (Ἀχλύς)[3]
2003 AZ84
TNO[4] · plutino[5] · distant[1]
AdjectivesAchlyan
Orbital characteristics (barycentric)[6][a]
Epoch 21 November 2025 (JD 2461000.5)
Uncertainty parameter 1[4]
Observation arc29+yr[4]
Earliestprecovery date19 March 1996
Aphelion46.536AU
Perihelion32.403 AU
39.470 AU[a]
Eccentricity0.1790
247.81yr (90,511 d)
242.166°
0° 0m 14.319s / day
Inclination13.565°
252.029°
≈ 27 March 2107[7]
±0.14 days[4]
15.117°
Knownsatellites1
Physical characteristics
Dimensions(940±40) × (766±20) × (490±16) km[8][b]
772±12 km (area equivalent)[8][b]
Mass2×1020 kg[c]
0.87±0.01 g/cm3[8][b]
6.7874±0.0002h[9]
0.097±0.009[8][b]
20.3[13]
3.760±0.058 (V band)[9]

208996 Achlys (provisional designation2003 AZ84) is a largetrans-Neptunian object orbiting the Sun in theKuiper belt, a region of icy bodies beyondNeptune. It was discovered on 13 January 2003 byChad Trujillo andMichael E. Brown atPalomar Observatory. Achlys has an elongated shape that is believed to be distorted by its rapid 6.8-hour rotation. Its diameter is estimated to be roughly 940 km (580 mi) across its equator to 490 km (300 mi) across its poles. AfterPluto andOrcus, Achlys is the third largest member of theplutinos—a population of Kuiper belt objects following a 2:3orbital resonance with Neptune, in which they complete two orbits for every three orbits completed by Neptune.

The surface of Achlys is dark gray and mostly composed of waterice. Observations ofstellar occultations show that Achlys's surface bears achasm ordepression between 8 and 13 km (5.0 and 8.1 mi) deep, similar to those seen on Pluto and its moonCharon. Achlys has one knownmoon that is about 80 km (50 mi) in diameter. The mass and density of Achlys has not been measured, though predictions based on its shape and rotation suggest that it has a density lower than that of water ice.[8]

History

[edit]

Discovery

[edit]

Achlys was discovered on 13 January 2003 by astronomersChad Trujillo andMichael Brown[d] atPalomar Observatory inSan Diego County, California.[1] At the time, Trujillo and Brown were searching the sky for bright and largetrans-Neptunian objects—Solar System objects beyondNeptune—using the Palomar Observatory's 1.22-meter (48 in)Samuel Oschin telescope, as part of their "Caltech Wide Area Sky Survey" project.[14]: 100, 103  Theirsky survey had been operating jointly with Palomar'sNear Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT) program since 2001 and was responsible for the discovery of several other large trans-Neptunian objects includingQuaoar.[14]: 99–100 

Achlys was found through manual vetting of potential moving objects identified by Trujillo and Brown's automated image-searching software.[14]: 101  It was detected at ared-filterapparent magnitude of 20.2.[15] The discovery of Achlys was announced byMinor Planet Center (MPC) on 26 January 2003.[15] Since then, numerousprecovery observations of Achlys were identified from Palomar Observatory, with observations from 2001–2002 reported in April 2003[16] and a single observation from 19 March 1996 reported in December 2007.[17] This 1996 observation is the earliest known precovery of Achlys, predating its discovery by over six years.[1]

Palomar Observatory's 1.22-meter Samuel Oschin telescope was used to discover Achlys.
The 1.2-meterSamuel Oschin telescope that was used to discover Achlys atPalomar Observatory
The discovery images of Achlys show it as a small gray dot moving slowly against a background of stars.
Discovery images of Achlys from 13 January 2003

Name

[edit]

This object is named afterAchlys, the goddess of sorrow and grief in theancient Greekepic poemShield of Heracles. InHomer'sIliad, "achlys" also refers to the mist that covers the eyes of the dying.[18]: 16  This name follows the theme of mythological figures related to theunderworld, which is required forplutinos by theInternational Astronomical Union (IAU).[19]: 8  The object was officially named Achlys on 30 June 2025 by the IAU'sWorking Group for Small Body Nomenclature.[18]: 24 

Before Achlys was named, it was known by itsprovisional designation2003 AZ84, which was given by the MPC in its discovery announcement.[15] This provisional designation encodes the year and half-month of Achlys's discovery date.[20] Achlys'sminor planet catalog number of 208996 was given by the MPC on 11 March 2009.[21]

Occultations

[edit]

While moving across the sky, Achlys occasionally passes in front of a background star and briefly blocks out its light from Earth, resulting in astellar occultation. When observed at different locations, stellar occultations by Achlys can reveal fine details that are unresolvable to telescope imaging, such as its size, shape, and potential surrounding features such asrings andmoons.[22]: 2 [8]: 2  The first successful detection of a stellar occultation by Achlys was reported by a single observer from Chile on 8 January 2011.[23][8]: 2  Later observations of stellar occultations on 3 February 2012 and 15 November 2014 were successfully detected by multiple observers at different locations, which revealed the elongated shape andtopography of Achlys for the first time.[8]: 2  No rings and moons were detected around Achlys in these observations.[8]: 8 

Orbit

[edit]

Achlys orbits theSun at asemi-major axis or average distance of 39.5 astronomical units (AU),[a] which places it beyond the orbit ofNeptune (30.1 AU) and in the inner reaches of theKuiper belt, where many other small objects reside.[25] The location of Achlys's orbit makes it atrans-Neptunian object (TNO) and a Kuiper belt object.[4][26] Achlys completes one orbit about every 247 years, which puts it in a 2:3mean-motion orbital resonance withNeptune.[5][8]: 2  That is, Achlys completes two orbits around the Sun for every three orbits completed by Neptune.[27] Many other Kuiper belt objects, including thedwarf planetPluto, share Achlys's 2:3 resonance with Neptune—these objects are classified asplutinos.[27] Achlys is the third largest plutino, after Pluto and Orcus.[28]: 2, 7 

The orbit of Achlys iselliptical andinclined with respect to theecliptic by 13.6°.[a] Unlike some plutinos including Pluto,[e] Achlys does not cross Neptune's orbit: its elliptical orbit brings it as close as32.4 AU from the Sun (atperihelion) to as far as46.5 AU from the Sun (ataphelion).[a] Achlys previously passed aphelion in June 1982[30] and will come to perihelion in March 2107.[7] Even though Achlys's orbit isperturbed by the gravitational influence of other planets,[31] the perihelion of Achlys's orbit is not expected to drop below31.6 AU in the next 10 million years, according toN-body simulations by theDeep Ecliptic Survey.[5] Achlys's orbit is stable over several billion years and is unlikely to change significantly over theremaining life of the Solar System.[31]: 7, 11 

Orbit diagram illustrating the orbits of Achlys, Pluto, and the Solar System's four outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune).
The orbits of Achlys (white; shown as2003 AZ84), Pluto (magenta), and the four outer planets. The positions of objects are shown on the date 18 March 2018.

Physical characteristics

[edit]

Size, shape, density

[edit]
An infographic of the largest known trans-Neptunian objects, showing a comparison of their diameters, albedos, and colors. Achlys is the 14th largest trans-Neptunian object shown in this infographic.
Comparison of sizes, albedos, and colors of various large trans-Neptunian objects with diameters greater than 700 km (430 mi). Achlys is shown on the right end of the bottom row. The dark colored arcs represent uncertainties of the object's size.

Observations of stellar occultations from 2012 and 2014 show that Achlys is an elongated object.[8] Under the assumption that Achlys is inhydrostatic equilibrium (that is, its shape is controlled by its own gravity and rotation), its shape can be approximated by a rotationally distortedJacobi ellipsoid with dimensions of 940 km × 766 km × 490 km (584 mi × 476 mi × 304 mi).[8]: 1  With these dimensions, the equatorial diameter of Achlys is roughly twice as long as its polar diameter.[32]: 3  This rotationally distorted shape has been seen in other large Kuiper belt objects, likeHaumea andVaruna.[8]: 13  The approximated dimensions of Achlys translate to anarea-equivalent diameter of 772 km (480 mi),[8]: 10  which is large enough that astronomers consider Achlys likely in hydrostatic equilibrium[f][9]: 10  and therefore apossible dwarf planet.[33]: 245 [34]: 7, 13  Achlys is among the top 30 largest known TNOs.[31]: 2 

The mass and density of Achlys have not been measured, though the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium with its ellipsoidal shape predicts that it should have a density in the range of0.85–1.12 g/cm3, with the most likely value being0.87 g/cm3.[8]: 9–10  This density indicates Achlys has a mass of around2×1020 kg.[c] Achlys falls within the 400–1,000 km (250–620 mi) diameter range where TNOs are typically observed with densities lower than that of water ice (1 g/cm3); these objects are theorized to haveporous interior structures due to a lack of internal melting,differentiation, and gravitational compression.[35]: 1, 8 [36]: 5  Achlys's small size also makes it unlikely to hold much internal heat or possesscryovolcanism.[37]: 10 

Rotation

[edit]
Digital rendering of a dark gray ellipsoid, representing the known shape and color of Achlys.
Animated illustration of Achlys as a rotating ellipsoid, with its rotation axis pointed nearly toward the line of sight.

Achlys has arotation period of about 6.79 hours.[9]: 10  The apparent brightness of Achlys periodically fluctuates with a small peak-to-peakamplitude of 0.07magnitudes as it rotates, which could be monitored by telescopes on Earth.[9]: 10  The rotation period of Achlys was first measured byScott Sheppard andDavid C. Jewitt in 2003, who found a rotation period of either 6.7 and 13.4 hours.[38]: 217 [39]: 7  The rotation period of Achlys remained ambiguous until 2017, when it was found to have an elongated shape that was best explained by the former period.[8]: 9 

Achlys has a highlytilted rotation axis that is pointed somewhat toward Earth, according to observations of Achlys's small rotational brightness variation, constant thermal emission, and variableprojected shape in stellar occultations.[8]: 9–10 [9]: 11  A 2017 analysis of stellar occultation observations from 2012 and 2014 suggested that Achlys's rotational pole could be oriented at an opening angle of roughly50° with respect to the plane of the sky and at aposition angle of78° eastward from thecelestial north pole.[8]: 9–10 

Surface

[edit]
The near-infrared spectrum of Achlys, which plots its relative brightness over wavelength of light, shows absorption features caused by crystalline water ice on its surface.
Thenear-infraredspectrum of Achlys as measured by theJames Webb Space Telescope. The spectrum of Achlys showsabsorption features caused by crystalline water ice on its surface.[40]
This infographic illustrates the two possible shapes of Achlys's topographic feature seen from its 15 November 2014 stellar occultation. If Achlys's topographic feature is a chasm, it would appear as a small notch in its shape. If Achlys's topographic feature is a depression, it would appear as a broad, shallow dent in its shape.
Infographic illustrating the two possible shapes of Achlys's topographic feature seen from its 15 November 2014 stellar occultation

Achlys is a dark, icy object with a likely ancient surface devoid of geological activity.[41]: 1507  Its surface is dominated by waterice and has a low, averagegeometric albedo of about 10%.[9]: 10 Astronomical spectroscopy has shown that bothamorphous and crystalline forms of water ice are present on Achlys's surface, which make it highlyabsorbent innear-infraredwavelengths of light.[42][40][37]: 9  Crystalline water ice is not commonly found on the surfaces of TNOs due to their cold temperatures, so its presence on Achlys suggests that the object had experienced heating, possibly by animpact event.[43]: 946, 953 

Spectroscopic analyses from 2010 and 2011 suggest that Achlys's surface may be darkened byamorphous carbon, which is thought to originate from heavilyirradiatedorganic compounds.[43]: 953  These analyses also suggest that water ice and amorphous carbon each comprise major portions of Achlys's surface, with amorphous water ice likely more abundant than crystalline water ice.[42]: 301 [43]: 949  The surface of Achlys is devoid ofvolatile ices likenitrogen andcarbon monoxide, in contrast to the largest trans-Neptunian objects like Pluto.[37]: 9  This is expected because Achlys's gravity is too weak to hold on anyatmosphere, especially volatiles after they havesublimated intovapor.[41]: 1502, 1507 

Invisible light, Achlys's surface is spectrally neutral with respect to the Sun,[g] which gives it a gray color.[44][11]: 181, 188  Achlys shares its gray color and water ice-rich surface with several TNOs including the large plutino Orcus;[45] these objects are classified asBB ("blue")-type TNOs in terms of visible color[11] and"prominent water" (H
2
O
)-type TNOs
in terms of spectra.[10]: 6  The gray color of Achlys implies that it contains little amounts oftholins—moderately irradiated organic compounds that would otherwise tint the surface red.[43]: 949, 953  Spectroscopic analyses suggest that tholins should make up roughly 10% of Achlys's surface composition.[42]: 301 [43]: 949 

The surface of Achlys is not uniform.[37]: 9  The albedo is suspected to vary across Achlys's surface because the object varies in brightness as it rotates.[8]: 10  Near-infrared spectroscopy of Achlys shows variablespectral absorption of water ice and tentative signs ofmethanol ice.[37]: 9  Visible-light spectroscopy has detected sporadic hints ofhydrated minerals such assilicates, which are suspected to exist in localized deposits on Achlys's surface.[46]: 464 [37]: 9  The color of Achlys has been observed to change as it rotates, with its visiblespectral slope or redness varying between 3.5%/0.1 μm and 8.5%/0.1 μm.[37]: 9  This color variation may hint at localized areas of concentrated tholins on Achlys's surface, which could be explained by various phenomena such as animpact crater left by a red TNO.[37]: 9 

In November 2014, an observation of a stellar occultation fromYunnan, China revealed that Achlys has atopographic feature located at itslimb—the edge of its projected shape.[8]: 1–2  The observation showed a gradual dimming of the occulted star, which has been interpreted as a partial, grazing occultation by Achlys's topographic feature.[8]: 10 [32]: 24  Achlys is the first TNO whose topographic feature has been observed via stellar occultation.[47][8]: 2, 13  The topographic feature on Achlys could either be achasm at least 7.7 km (4.8 mi) deep and roughly 22.6 km (14.0 mi) wide, or a shallow-slopeddepression roughly 13.4 km (8.3 mi) deep and at least 80 km (50 mi) wide.[8]: 12–13  Such features have been seen on Pluto and its moonCharon.[48][8]: 12 

Satellite

[edit]
Satellite
Discovery
Discovered byMichael E. Brown
Terry-Ann Suer[32]: 24 
Discovery date2 December 2005[49]
Orbital characteristics[50]
7200±300 km[50]
or ~10000 km[8]: 2 
~12 days[h]
Satellite of208996 Achlys
Physical characteristics
72±12 km (calculated)[50]
or ~80 km (same albedo as Achlys)[8]: 2 
Massfew 1017 kg[i]
25.1[51]
8.76[j]

Achlys has one knownnatural satellite or moon, which has no official name or designation.[4][50] It was discovered by Michael E. Brown and Terry-Ann Suer in images taken by theHubble Space Telescope on 2 December 2005.[32]: 24  The discovery of Achlys's moon was announced on 22 February 2007 via anInternational Astronomical Union Circular published by theCentral Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams.[50][49]

The moon of Achlys has not been seen since its discovery.[32]: 24  The lack of redetections means that the orbit of Achlys's moon could not be determined, which prevents an accurate determination of Achlys's mass.[8]: 2  Nevertheless, some properties of the moon's orbit have been predicted based on its observed separation distance from Achlys at discovery.

In the discovery images, the moon was seen at anangular separation of0.22±0.01arcseconds from Achlys,[49] which translates to an apparent distance of at least 7,200 ± 300 km (4,470 ± 190 mi).[50][k] If this separation distance is the moon'ssemi-major axis from Achlys, then it would have anorbital period of approximately 12 days.[50] The moon is predicted to have a non-circular orbit due to weaktidal circularization by Achlys.[52]: 10  The moon is5.0±0.3magnitudes fainter than Achlys, which translates to a diameter of roughly 80 km (50 mi) if it has the same albedo as Achlys.[50][8]: 2  If the moon has an icy composition, its mass would be a few times 1017 kg.[8]: 9  Compared to other TNOs with moons, the moon of Achlys is quite small; this suggests that Achlys's moon formed from a collision with another body.[52]: 12 

Proposed exploration

[edit]

Achlys has not been visited by aspace probe, though various studies have found it to be a feasible target for future missions.[53][54]: 1506 Planetary scientists advocate for the exploration of large TNOs like Achlys because they can provide insights into theformation and evolution of the Solar System.[55][56]: 5 

A 2019 study by Amanda Zangari and collaborators identified several possibleflyby trajectories to Achlys, using differentexcess launch energies andgravity assists from planets. A spacecraft launched in 2035–2038 could use a single Jupiter gravity assist to reach Achlys in 8.2–11.6 years.[53]: 922  Alternatively, a spacecraft launched in 2025–2034 could use a single Saturn gravity assist to reach Achlys in 9.2–18.2 years.[53]: 923  A 2037–2038 launch trajectory using gravity assists from both Jupiter and Saturn would be less efficient however, as it would demand higher launch energies with long mission durations of 23.8–23.9 years.[53]: 923 

Flyby missions to Achlys using gravity assists fromUranus are also possible. A 2021 study by Bryan Holler and colleagues for the2023–2032 Planetary Science Decadal Survey identified Achlys as a potential target for a flyby mission to Uranus, which could launch in the 2030s, reach Uranus in 2045, and then reach Achlys in 2049.[56]: 5  Zangari and collaborators found that a spacecraft launched in 2034–2038 could reach Achlys in 13.1–13.2 years via gravity assists from both Jupiter and Uranus, whereas a spacecraft launched in 2027–2033 could reach Achlys in 17.7 years via gravity assists from both Jupiter and Uranus.[53]: 926, 928 

A 2024 study by theUniversity of Tennessee investigated the possibility of sending a small (100–380 kg) orbiter spacecraft to a TNO and found that Achlys could be a feasible option.[54]: 1506  A spacecraft launched in July 2035 or 2047 could make use of a Jupiter gravity assist to reach Achlys in 10–25 years depending on the excess launch energy, though lower launch energies and longer mission durations are required to make it possible for the spacecraft to enterorbit insertion around Achlys.[54]: 1500 

See also

[edit]
  • 28978 Ixion – the fourth largest known plutino, after Pluto, Orcus, and Achlys
  • 120347 Salacia – a large Kuiper belt object with a dark, gray surface rich in water ice, similar to Achlys
  • 307261 Máni – another large, gray-colored Kuiper belt object with abundant water ice and extreme topographic features

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^abcdeThese orbital elements are expressed in terms of theSolar System Barycenter (SSB) as the frame of reference.[6] Due to planetaryperturbations, the Sun revolves around the SSB at non-negligible distances, so heliocentric-frame orbital elements and distances (such as those given inJPL's Small-Body Database[4]) can vary on short timescales.[24]
  2. ^abcdDerived from the assumption ofhydrostatic equilibrium.
  3. ^abThe mass of2.08×1020 kg was calculated by Muñoz-Gutiérrez et al. (2019 & 2021) using Achlys's area-equivalent diameter of772 km and predicted density of0.87 g/cm3.[28]: 2 [31]: 2  Muñoz-Gutiérrez et al. give the mass in terms ofEarth masses (M🜨), which can be converted intokilograms by multiplying by5.9722×1024 kg/M🜨. This calculation does not treat Achlys as an ellipsoid (which would have a volume ofV=43πabc1.85×1017 m3{\displaystyle V={\frac {4}{3}}\pi abc\approx 1.85\times 10^{17}{\text{ m}}^{3}}), though the mass calculated from Achlys's ellipsoid volume and density (M=ρV1.61×1020 kg{\displaystyle M=\rho V\approx 1.61\times 10^{20}{\text{ kg}}}) is equivalent to Muñoz-Gutiérrez et al.'s mass calculation when rounded to a single digit.
  4. ^This is the official order of discoverers according to theMinor Planet Center.[1]
  5. ^Pluto has aperihelion distance of29.6 AU, which lies inside the orbit of Neptune (30.1 AU.[29]: 255 
  6. ^The minimum diameter for hydrostatic equilibrium depends on the object's bulk composition: a rocky body would have to be larger than 500 to 1,200 km (310 to 750 mi), whereas an icy body would have to be larger than 200 to 900 km (120 to 560 mi).[8]: 8 
  7. ^A "spectrally neutral" object reflects similar amounts of light over a range of wavelengths (e.g. the visible spectrum).
  8. ^Wm. Robert Johnston calculates the moon's orbital period with the assumption that its observed separation distance of7200 km is equal to its semi-major axis from Achlys (which has a calculated mass of2×1020 kg).[50]
  9. ^Moon mass estimated by Dias-Oliveira et al. (2017) with the assumption of an icy composition.[8]: 9 
  10. ^The sum of Achlys'sV-band absolute magnitude of 3.76 and its moon's magnitude difference of 5.0 is 8.76.
  11. ^Whereas Wm. Robert Johnston calculates a separation distance of 7,200 ± 300 km (4,470 ± 190 mi),[50] Dias-Oliveira et al. (2017) estimate a separation distance of roughly 10,000 km (6,200 mi) for Achlys's moon.[8]: 2 

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcde"(208996) Achlys = 2003 AZ84". Minor Planet Center. Retrieved26 November 2025.
  2. ^Knowles (1903)An Encyclopedia-dictionary and Reference Handbook of the Ophthalmic Sciences.
  3. ^A Greek–English Lexicon,s.v. ἀχλύς.
  4. ^abcdefg"JPL Small-Body Database Lookup: 208996 Achlys (2003 AZ84)" (2025-03-26 last obs.).Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved26 November 2025.
  5. ^abcMarc W. Buie (18 February 2009)."Orbit Fit and Astrometric record for 208996". Southwest Research Institute. Retrieved29 August 2009.
  6. ^ab"JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris for 208996 Achlys (2003 AZ84) at epoch JD 2461000.5".JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris System. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved19 November 2025. Solution using theSolar System Barycenter. Ephemeris Type: Elements and Center: @0)
  7. ^ab"JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris for 208996 Achlys (2003 AZ84) from 2107-Mar-01 to 1982-May-01".JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris System. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved29 November 2025. (Perihelion occurs when radial velocity or "rdot" changes from negative to positive.)
  8. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacadaeafDias-Oliveira, A.; Sicardy, B.; Ortiz, J. L.; Braga-Ribas, F.; Leiva, R.; Vieira-Martins, R.; et al. (June 2017)."Study of the Plutino Object (208996)2003 AZ84 from Stellar Occultations: Size, Shape, and Topographic Features".The Astronomical Journal.154 (1): 22.arXiv:1705.10895.Bibcode:2017AJ....154...22D.doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa74e9.S2CID 119098862.
  9. ^abcdefgSantos-Sanz, P.; Lellouch, E.; Groussin, O.; Lacerda, P.; Muller, T.G.; Ortiz, J.L.; et al. (August 2017).""TNOs are Cool": A survey of the trans-Neptunian region XII. Thermal light curves of Haumea,2003 VS2 and2003 AZ84 with Herschel/PACS".Astronomy & Astrophysics.604 (A95).arXiv:1705.09117.Bibcode:2017A&A...604A..95S.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630354.S2CID 53621071.
  10. ^abWong, Ian; Holler, Bryan J.; Protopapa, Silvia; Guilbert-Lepoutre, Aurélie; Grundy, William M.; Stansberry, John A.; et al. (December 2025)."JWST/NIRSpec Observations of Salacia-Actaea and Máni: Exploring Population-level Trends among Water-ice-rich Kuiper Belt Objects".The Planetary Science Journal.6 (12): 281.arXiv:2508.17101.Bibcode:2025PSJ.....6..281W.doi:10.3847/PSJ/ae1d63.
  11. ^abcFulchignoni, Marcello; Belskaya, Irina; Barucci, Maria Antonietta; De Sanctis, Maria Cristina; Doressoundiram, Alain (2008)."Transneptunian Object Taxonomy"(PDF).The Solar System Beyond Neptune. University of Arizona Press. pp. 181–192.Bibcode:2008ssbn.book..181F.ISBN 9780816527557.S2CID 54970643.
  12. ^abTegler, S. C.; Romanishin, W.; Consolmagno, G. J. (December 2016)."Two Color Populations of Kuiper Belt and Centaur Objects and the Smaller Orbital Inclinations of Red Centaur Objects".The Astronomical Journal.152 (6): 13.Bibcode:2016AJ....152..210T.doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/210.S2CID 125183388. 210.
  13. ^"AstDys (208996) Achlys Ephemerides".Asteroids - Dynamic Site. Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Italy. Retrieved6 July 2019.
  14. ^abcTrujillo, C. A.; Brown, M. E. (June 2003)."The Caltech Wide Area Sky Survey".Earth, Moon, and Planets.92 (1):99–112.Bibcode:2003EM&P...92...99T.doi:10.1023/B:MOON.0000031929.19729.a1.S2CID 189905639.
  15. ^abcTrujillo, C. A.; Brown, M. E.; Helin, E. F.; Pravdo, S.; Lawrence, K.; Hicks, M.; et al. (26 January 2003). Marsden, Brian G. (ed.)."MPEC 2003-B27 : 2003 AZ84".Minor Planet Electronic Circular. 2003-B27. Minor Planet Center.Bibcode:2003MPEC....B...27T. Retrieved6 January 2010.
  16. ^Helin, E. F.; Pravdo, S.; Lawrence, K.; Hicks, M.; Thicksten, R.; Haver, R.; et al. (6 April 2003). Marsden, Brian G. (ed.)."MPEC 2003-G29 : 2003 AZ84".Minor Planet Electronic Circular. 2003-G29. Minor Planet Center.Bibcode:2003MPEC....G...29H. Retrieved26 November 2025.
  17. ^"M.P.S. 231751"(PDF).Minor Planets and Comets Supplement (231751). Minor Planet Center: 61. 30 December 2007. Retrieved26 November 2025.
  18. ^ab"WGSBN Bulletin 5, #15"(PDF).WGSBN Bulletin.5 (15). International Astronomical Union: 16. 30 June 2025. Retrieved30 June 2025.
  19. ^"Rules and Guidelines for Naming Non-Cometary Small Solar-System Bodies"(PDF). IAU Working Group for Small Bodies Nomenclature. 22 February 2025. Retrieved30 June 2025.
  20. ^"New- And Old-Style Minor Planet Designations". Minor Planet Center. Retrieved26 November 2025.
  21. ^"M.P.C. 65351"(PDF).Minor Planet Circular (65351). Minor Planet Center: 81. 11 March 2009. Retrieved26 November 2025.
  22. ^Assafin, M.; Camargo, J. I. B.; Vieira Martins, R.; Braga-Ribas, F.; Sicardy, B.; Andrei, A. H.; da Silva Neto, D. N. (May 2012)."Candidate stellar occultations by large trans-Neptunian objects up to 2015".Astronomy & Astrophysics.541: A142.arXiv:1004.4841.Bibcode:2012A&A...541A.142A.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118349.S2CID 119113077.
  23. ^Braga-Ribas, F.; Sicardy, B.; Ortiz, J. L.; Jehin, E.; Camargo, J. I. B.; Assafin, M.; et al. (October 2011).Stellar Occultations by TNOs: the January 08, 2011 by (208996) 2003 AZ84 and the May 04, 2011 by (50000) Quaoar(PDF). EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011. Vol. 6. Nantes, France. p. 1060.Bibcode:2011epsc.conf.1060B.
  24. ^"JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris for 208996 Achlys (2003 AZ84) at epochs JD 2460800.5–2461000.5".JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris System. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved29 November 2025. Solution using the Sun. Ephemeris Type: Elements and Center: @sun)
  25. ^Morbidelli, Alessandro (26 June 1998). "New Insights on the Kuiper Belt".Science.280 (5372):2071–2073.Bibcode:1998Sci...280.2071M.doi:10.1126/science.280.5372.2071.S2CID 119843804.
  26. ^Gladman, Brett; Marsden, Brian G.; VanLaerhoven, Christa (2008)."Nomenclature in the Outer Solar System"(PDF).The Solar System Beyond Neptune. University of Arizona Press. pp. 43–57.arXiv:astro-ph/0702538.Bibcode:2008ssbn.book...43G.ISBN 9780816527557.S2CID 14469199. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 1 August 2023.
  27. ^ab"Plutinos".COSMOS - The SAO Encyclopedia of Astronomy.Swinburne University of Technology. Retrieved30 November 2025.
  28. ^abMuñoz-Gutiérrez, Marco A.; Peimbert, A.; Pichardo, B.; Lehner, M.J.; Wang, S.-Y. (October 2019)."The Contribution of Dwarf Planets to the Origin of Jupiter Family Comets".The Astronomical Journal.158 (5): 184.arXiv:1909.04861.Bibcode:2019AJ....158..184M.doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab4399.S2CID 202558837.
  29. ^Jewitt, David; Luu, Jane (1996)."The Plutinos". In Rettig, Terrence W.; Hahn, Joseph M. (eds.).Completing the Inventory of the Solar System. Vol. 107. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Proceedings. pp. 255–258.Bibcode:1996ASPC..107..255J.ISBN 978-1-58381-443-7.
  30. ^"JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris for 208996 Achlys (2003 AZ84) from 1982-Jun-01 to 1982-Jul-01".JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris System. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved29 November 2025. (Aphelion occurs when radial velocity or "rdot" changes from positive to negative.)
  31. ^abcdMuñoz-Gutiérrez, Marco A.; Peimbert, Antoni; Lehner, Matthew J.; Wang, Shiang-Yu (October 2021)."Long-term Dynamical Stability in the Outer Solar System. I. The Regular and Chaotic Evolution of the 34 Largest Trans-Neptunian Objects".The Astronomical Journal.162 (4): 164.arXiv:2107.00240.Bibcode:2021AJ....162..164M.doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac1102.S2CID 235694711.
  32. ^abcdeAndersson, Sven (June 2022)."Beyond Jupiter -(208996) 2003 AZ84"(PDF).Journal for Occultation Astronomy.12 (3):22–25.
  33. ^Pinilla-Alonso, Noemi (August 2015)."Icy Dwarf Planets: Colored Popsicles in the Outer Solar System".Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.11:241–246.Bibcode:2016IAUFM..29A.241P.doi:10.1017/S1743921316002970. A29A.
  34. ^Holler, Bryan J. (December 2021). "Trans-Neptunian Dwarf Planets".Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science.29A.Bibcode:2016IAUFM..29A.241P.doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.013.208.ISBN 978-0-19-064792-6.
  35. ^Grundy, W. M.; Noll, K. S.; Buie, M. W.; Benecchi, S. D.; Ragozzine, D.; Roe, H. G. (December 2019)."The Mutual Orbit, Mass, and Density of Transneptunian Binary Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà ((229762) 2007 UK126)"(PDF).Icarus.334:30–38.Bibcode:2019Icar..334...30G.doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.037.S2CID 126574999.
  36. ^Menten, Stephanie M.; Sori, Michael M.; Bramson, Ali M. (August 2022)."Endogenically sourced volatiles on Charon and other Kuiper belt objects".Nature Communications.13 (1) 4457.Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.4457M.doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31846-8.PMC 9363412.PMID 35945207.S2CID 251469650.
  37. ^abcdefghSeccull, Tom; Fraser, Wesley C.; Kiersz, Dominik A.; Puzia, Thomas H. (February 2024)."Hunting for Hydrated Minerals on Trans-Neptunian Objects".The Planetary Science Journal.5 (2): 42.arXiv:2312.11646.Bibcode:2024PSJ.....5...42S.doi:10.3847/PSJ/ad16dd.S2CID 266362597.
  38. ^Sheppard, Scott S.; Jewitt, David C. (June 2003). "Hawaii Kuiper Belt Variability Project: An Update".Earth, Moon, and Planets.92 (1):207–219.Bibcode:2003EM&P...92..207S.doi:10.1023/B:MOON.0000031943.12968.46.S2CID 189905992.
  39. ^Thirouin, A.; Ortiz, J. L.; Duffard, R.; Santos-Sanz, P.; Aceituno, F. J.; Morales, N. (November 2010)."Short-term variability of a sample of 29 trans-Neptunian objects and Centaurs".Astronomy & Astrophysics.522: 43.arXiv:1004.4841.Bibcode:2010A&A...522A..93T.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912340.S2CID 54039561.
  40. ^abDenneulin, L.; Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.; Langlois, M.; Thé, S.; Thiébaut, E.; Holler, B. J. (November 2023)."An improved spectral extraction method for JWST/NIRSpec fixed slit observations".Astronomy & Astrophysics.679: A63.Bibcode:2023A&A...679A..63D.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346998.S2CID 264057888.
  41. ^abRabinowitz, David L.; Schaefer, Bradley E.; Schaefer, Martha W.; Tourtellotte, Suzanne W. (October 2008)."The Youthful Appearance of the 2003 EL61 Collisional Family".The Astronomical Journal.136 (4):1502–1509.arXiv:0804.2864.Bibcode:2008AJ....136.1502R.doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/4/1502.S2CID 117167835.
  42. ^abcBarucci, M. A.; Alvarez-Candal, A.; Merlin, F.; Belskaya, I. N.; de Bergh, C.; Perna, D.; et al. (July 2011)."New insights on ices in Centaur and Transneptunian populations"(PDF).Icarus.214 (1):297–307.Bibcode:2011Icar..214..297B.doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.04.019.S2CID 120331897.
  43. ^abcdeMerlin, F.; Barucci, M. A.; de Bergh, C.; Fornasier, S.; Doressoundiram, A.; Perna, D.; et al. (August 2010). "Surface composition and physical properties of several trans-neptunian objects from the Hapke scattering theory and Shkuratov model".Icarus.208 (2):945–954.Bibcode:2010Icar..208..945M.doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.03.014.S2CID 122182834.
  44. ^Fornasier, S.; Doressoundiram, A.; Tozzi, G. P.; Barucci, M. A.; Boehnhardt, H.; de Bergh, C. (July 2004)."ESO Large Program on physical studies of Trans-Neptunian objects and Centaurs: Final results of the visible spectrophotometric observations".Astronomy & Astrophysics.434:353–363.Bibcode:2004A&A...421..353F.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041221.S2CID 54983080.
  45. ^Delsanti, A.; Merlin, F.; Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.; Bauer, J.; Yang, B.; Meech, K. J. (28 September 2010). "Methane, ammonia, and their irradiation products at the surface of an intermediate-size KBO? A portrait of Plutino (90482) Orcus".Astronomy & Astrophysics.520 (A40): 15.arXiv:1006.4962.Bibcode:2010A&A...520A..40D.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014296.S2CID 118745903.
  46. ^Fornasier, S.; Barucci, M. A.; de Bergh, C; Alvarez-Candal, A.; DeMeo, F.; Merlin, F. (December 2009)."Visible spectroscopy of the new ESO large programme on trans-Neptunian objects and Centaurs: final results".Astronomy & Astrophysics.508 (1):457–465.arXiv:0910.0450.Bibcode:2009A&A...508..457F.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912582.S2CID 8479334.
  47. ^Dias-Oliveira, Alex; Sicardy, Bruno; Ortiz, Jose-Luis; Braga-Ribas, Felipe; Vieira-Martins, Roberto; Benedetti Rossi, Gustavo; et al. (October 2016).2003 AZ84: Size, shape, albedo and first detection of topographic features. 48th Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting. Vol. 48. American Astronomical Society. p. 106.09.Bibcode:2016DPS....4810609D.hdl:2268/205568.
  48. ^Guilbert-Lepoutre, Aurelie; Ferruit, Pierre (July 2017)."Surface composition of mid-sized TNOs: searching for ammonia"(PDF).JWST Proposal. Space Telescope Science Institute: 1231.Bibcode:2017jwst.prop.1231G. Cycle 1. Retrieved27 November 2025.
  49. ^abcGreen, Daniel W. E. (22 February 2007)."Satellites of 2003 AZ_84, (50000), (55637), and (90482)".IAU Circular (8812). Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams: 1.Bibcode:2007IAUC.8812....1B.Archived from the original on 19 July 2011.
  50. ^abcdefghijJohnston, Wm. Robert (29 September 2025)."(208996) Achlys".Johnston's Archive.Archived from the original on 6 October 2025. Retrieved28 November 2025.
  51. ^Grundy, Will (22 August 2025)."Achlys (208996 2003 AZ84)".Lowell Observatory.Archived from the original on 29 November 2025. Retrieved29 November 2025.
  52. ^abThirouin, A.; Noll, K. S.; Ortiz, J. L.; Morales, N. (September 2014)."Rotational properties of the binary and non-binary populations in the Trans-Neptunian belt".Astronomy & Astrophysics.569: A3.arXiv:1407.1214.Bibcode:2014A&A...569A...3T.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423567.S2CID 119244456.
  53. ^abcdeZangari, Amanda M.; Finley, Tiffany J.; Stern, S. Alan; Tapley, Mark B. (May 2019). "Return to the Kuiper Belt: Launch Opportunities from 2025 to 2040".Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets.56 (3):919–930.arXiv:1810.07811.Bibcode:2019JSpRo..56..919Z.doi:10.2514/1.A34329.S2CID 119033012.
  54. ^abcKreitzman Ethan Cansler, Jordan; Stewart, Charles W.; Cansler, Ethan; Brisby, Jake; Green, Matthew; Lyne, James Evans (August 2024).Mission Opportunities to Trans-Neptunian Objects—Part III, Orbital Capture, Low-Thrust Trajectories and Vehicle Radiation Environment During Jovian Flyby. 2024 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference. Denver, Colorado. pp. 1487–1506. Retrieved19 October 2025.
  55. ^Grundy, W. M.; McKinnon, W. B.; Ammannito, E.; Aung, M.; Bellerose, J; Brenker, F.; et al. (December 2009).Exploration Strategy for the Ice Dwarf Planets 2013-2022(PDF). Small Bodies Assessment Group. Lunar and Planetary Institute.Bibcode:2009AGUFM.P43D1471G.
  56. ^abHoller, Bryan; Bannister, Michele; Singer, Kelsi; Stern, S. Alan; Benecchi, Susan; Ore, Cristina; et al. (May 2021).Prospects for Future Exploration of the Trans-Neptunian Region. Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey 2023-2032. Vol. 53. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society.Bibcode:2021BAAS...53d.228H.doi:10.3847/25c2cfeb.5950ca1c. 228.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to208996 Achlys.
Consensus

Candidate
(for TNOs,
D+1σ ≥ 700 km
or H ≤ 4.0)
Asteroids
Plutinos
Classical
Other
resonances
Scattered disc
objects
Sednoids
Minor planets
Asteroid
Distant minor planet
Comets
Other
TNO classes
Dwarf planets(moons)
Sednoids
Planetary
satellites
of


Dwarf planet
satellites
of
Minor-planet
moons
Ranked
by size
Authority control databasesEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=208996_Achlys&oldid=1337753508"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp