In the recall election, 55% of voters supported Boudin's removal, successfully removing him from office.[3] MayorLondon Breed, who had backed a more moderate Democrat in the 2019 district attorney race, appointedBrooke Jenkins as Boudin's replacement on July 8, 2022.[4][5]
The successful recall reflected voter frustration with quality of life street conditions such ashomelessness,substance abuse, property crime, violence against Asian Americans, and mental illness.[6][7] Journalists and opinion writers speculated that voters nationwide had become less supportive ofcriminal justice reform and wanted more focus on public safety, with implications for theNovember midterm elections.[8]
In the following year, during theCOVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, there was significant media coverage of the increased visibility ofhomelessness and drug use, increased car burglaries, and videos of brazen thefts of high end stores andWalgreens drugstores shared on social media.[12][13] Walgreens shut down a number of stores citing organized theft.[14][15] Media put a spotlight on crime in San Francisco as crime patterns shifted drastically with increases in auto theft and burglary.[16] SeveralAsian seniors were also attacked and there were fears ofanti-Asian crime.[17][18]
Boudin was accused of being soft on prosecuting criminals and not keeping potentially harmful people in jail. Boudin was also criticized in several high-profile cases for releasing suspects with a history of previous convictions who then went on to commit further crimes.[19][20][21][22] By May 2021, Boudin had become the target of two recall campaigns.[23][24][25]
In the summer of 2021, there were two separate campaigns that sought to gather the necessary signatures in order to force a recall election against Boudin. The first campaign was spearheaded by formermayoral candidate Richie Greenberg, a member of theRepublican Party, but narrowly fell short of the 51,325 signatures needed before the August 11 deadline.[28] The second campaign was led byMary Jung and Andrea Shorter, both members of theDemocratic Party, and had a deadline of October 25 to collect the same number of signatures.[29] Jung is a former chair of the San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee.[30] The second campaign submitted 83,484 signatures to the Board of Elections, which announced on November 9 that via a review of a representative 5% sample of signatures they determined that the number of valid signatures exceeded the required 51,325 and thus that a recall election would take place on June 7, 2022.[1]
Despite Boudin's claims, the recall campaign was publicly led by Democrats.[36] 83% of donors to the campaign were from Democratic-registered voters or no-party-preference voters, with over 80% of donations coming from local San Franciscans.[37] A February 2022 poll commissioned by the recall campaign indicated that two-thirds of Democrats were in favor of the recall.[38] Meanwhile, on February 24, 2022, the San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee voted by a margin of 20–2 to oppose the recall effort.[39] The two committee members supporting the recall wereSuzy Loftus and Nancy Tung; both were candidates inthe 2019 district attorney election won by Boudin.[39]
A few Democratic Clubs of San Francisco (such as the Chinese American Democratic Club,[40] the District 2 Democratic Club,[41] the United Democratic Club,[42] the Eastern Neighborhood Democratic Club,[43] and theEdwin M. Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club[44]) were in favor of the recall.[45][46][47]
In a May 2022 poll sponsored by theSan Francisco Standard, 53% of San Franciscans strongly disapproved of Boudin's job performance, 18% somewhat disapproved, 22% somewhat approved and 8% strongly approved.[50] Among all groups, Asian Americans were the most likely to vote in favor of the recall. The San Francisco Standard Voter Poll found that 67% ofAsian American and Pacific Islander voters were in favor of the recall, compared with 52% ofHispanic voters, 51% ofWhite voters, and 34% ofBlack voters.[51]
TheSan Francisco Chronicle investigated Boudin's office's prosecution data from 2020 to 2021 and found that his office's charging rates increased for homicide, rape, and narcotics, while it decreased for burglary, petty theft, and weapons cases.[52] Boudin claimed that many cases brought to his office by San Francisco police lacked evidence to meet the standard required to prosecute some cases, leading to his office's lower charge rates.[52]
Local San Francisco news media endorsements were nearly unanimous in opposing the recall.[53][54] The race was watched nationally as other DAs championing criminal justice reform faced similar challenges.[55][56][57][58]
The pro-recall campaign raised over $7.2 million, while the anti-recall campaign raised over $3.3 million.[59]
The pro-recall campaigns relied primarily on local donations, with 78% of donating entities based in San Francisco. One of its biggest donors was billionaireWilliam Oberndorf.[60][61][37]
The anti-recall campaign was funded in large part by out of state donations, with 49% of donating entities based in San Francisco. Its largest donors were theACLU of Northern California, unions, and billionaireChris Larsen.[61][60]
In August 2024, the San Francisco Standard reported that Jay Cheng negotiated a $54,000 settlement with theSan Francisco Ethics Commission. The commission found thatNeighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy, a 501(c)(4) which Cheng runs, and largely coordinated the campaign to recall Boudin, failed to disclose payments of nearly $200,000 to public relations firm Riff City Strategies.[105]
The successful recall election reflected a change in mood from voters between Boudin's election in 2019 and the recall election in 2022. Stories of burglaries, shoplifting, and violent attacks onAsian Americans fomented voter anger.[106] San Francisco SupervisorRafael Mandelman noted, "The voters have risen up and expressed tremendous frustration with the state of the city and a feeling that leaders are not taking us in the direction the people want to go."[107] The voter frustration combined with heavy fundraising, particularly from San Francisco businessmen likeBill Oberndorf andGarry Tan,[106][108] allowed the recall effort to create a campaign which resonated with the voters, despite wide support for Boudin from newspaper editorials, elected officials and political clubs.[107]
The case of Troy McAlister, who was onparole when he allegedly killed two people in a crosswalk, electrified recall proponents. McAlister had been arrested multiple times in the months leading up to the deaths, but Boudin declined to file charges, relying on the state parole system. Recall proponents used the case to show that Boudin was not holding lawbreakers accountable, while Boudin supporters called the deaths tragic and unforeseeable.[106]
Some former District Attorney's office staff, who were fired or resigned, became vocal proponents of the recall.[106]
Although voters became more concerned for their personal safety during the COVID-19 pandemic, Boudin continued to focus on his campaign promises including expansion ofdiversion programs, reducing the jail population, and prosecute police officers. This invited criticism that Boudin cared more for offenders than for victims.[106][108] While other local politicians like San Francisco MayorLondon Breed changed their focus to public safety, Boudin did not adjust his messaging.[106][109][110]
Journalists and opinion writers speculated on what the election meant forcriminal justice reform efforts nationwide. The successful recall reflected voter frustration with quality of life street conditions such ashomelessness,substance abuse, property crime, violence against Asian Americans, and mental illness.[6][7] Democratic strategists suggested that the electorate in the Novembermidterms would be shifting rightwards on police, crime, and public safety; and candidates and politicians should change their messaging accordingly.[8]
In the June primary election, progressive candidates for law enforcement positions in the extended Bay Area had a mixed performance, neither a sweep nor a blowout. While progressive District Attorneys lost inSan Joaquin,Sacramento, andSanta Clara Counties, some progressive candidates succeeded.Contra Costa County District AttorneyDiana Becton, who prosecuted a sheriff's deputy for killing a person while on duty, handily won re-election against law enforcement opposition. InAlameda County, progressive District Attorney candidatePamela Price advanced to the runoff, while reformerSheriff candidateYesenia Sanchez defeated four-term incumbentGreg Ahern. Statewide in theCalifornia Attorney General race,Rob Bonta received 54% of the vote on a criminal justice reform platform.[111][112][113]
Mayor London Breed appointedBrooke Jenkins to replace Boudin as District Attorney. Jenkins was a former employee of Boudin who left the office and became a vocal proponent and surrogate of the recall campaign.[5] Jenkins assumed office on Friday, July 8, 2022.[114] Jenkins pledged to enforce drug crime laws, take a harder line on property crime, and address safety concerns of Asian residents. Jenkins pledged to balance reform and public safety, echoing messaging from the recall campaign.
Jenkins won the followingNovember 2022 special election. The next regular election for a full term for District Attorney is November 2024.[115]
^As of April 2022. Donors can be individuals or entities like a political action committee. Only donors contributing at least $100 to either campaign are included.
^Key: A – all adults RV – registered voters LV – likely voters V – unclear
^ab"District 2 Democratic Club Twitter".Twitter. RetrievedMay 7, 2022.The votes are in! Our membership has voted on our endorsements for the April 19th election + June recall:- Assembly District 17: No Endorsement- Recall of Chesa Boudin: YES
_(cropped).png)
.jpg)
Yes
