Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

2017 al-Jinah airstrike

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Airstrike by the United States Armed Forces
2017 al-Jinah airstrike
Part of theSyrian Civil War and theAmerican-led intervention in Syria
Location36°06′28″N36°47′13″E / 36.1079°N 36.7870°E /36.1079; 36.7870[1]
Date16 March 2017
Executed byUnited StatesUnited States[2]
Casualties38–49[3][4][5] killed
26–100+[3][6] injured
Al-Jinah is located in Syria
Al-Jinah
Al-Jinah
Civil uprising in Syria (March–August 2011)
Start of insurgency in Syria (Sept. 2011 – April 2012)
UN ceasefire;Rebel advances (May 2012 – Dec. 2013)
U.S.-led intervention,Rebel andISIL advances (Sept. 2014 – Sept. 2015)
Russian intervention (Sept. 2015 – March 2016)
Aleppo escalation andEuphrates Shield (March 2016 – February 2017)
Collapse of theIslamic State in Syria (Feb. – Nov. 2017)
Rebels in retreat andOperation Olive Branch
(Nov. 2017 – Sep. 2018)
Idlib demilitarization
(Sep. 2018 – April 2019)
Idlib ceasefire (March 2020 – Nov. 2024)
Opposition offensives andAssad overthrown (Nov. – Dec. 2024)

On 16 March 2017, anairstrike by theUnited States Armed Forces killed up to 49 people in therebel-held village of al-Jinah nearAleppo,Syria.[7] TheSyrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) and local officials reported that the building struck was a mosque filled with worshipers.[8][9] Rami Abdel Rahman, head of SOHR, said the structure was a mosque which held over 300 people[4] at the time of the strike.[10] In May 2017, aUS Central Command investigation determined that the building was indeed part of a mosque-complex.[11] The US military had originally said the structure bombed was an al-Qaeda meeting place that was not a mosque itself but was next to a mosque, which was undamaged.[2] In September 2017, theUnited Nations Commission of Inquiry on Syria concluded that "United States forces failed to take all feasible precautions to avoid or minimize incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects, in violation of international humanitarian law."[3] The UN commission's findings did not support the U.S. claim that an al-Qaeda meeting was taking place.[3] Investigations byHuman Rights Watch andForensic Architecture also did not find any evidence of an al-Qaeda meeting.[12][13]

Casualties

[edit]

Forty-two people were initially reported by the SOHR to have been killed,[10][14] though the group said that by March 17 the death toll had increased to 49,[5] whileThe Guardian reported that 46 people had died.[15] The SOHR said that most of the casualties were civilians, and more than 100 people were injured.[15] TheSyrian Civil Defence said that "dozens" of people had been buried in rubble following the strike.[4] According to a September 2017 report from the UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria, 38 people were killed, including five children, and 26 people were wounded.[3]

According to a spokesman forthe Pentagon, "dozens" ofal-Qaeda fighters, including "senior al Qaeda terrorists, some of these were likely high value individuals", were among those killed.[5] Another spokesman stated that initial assessments indicated no civilian casualties.[9]

U.S. involvement

[edit]

A missile fragment was reportedly found at the attack scene which had Latin alphabet letters corresponding with script found on missiles used by US forces, according to British investigative groupBellingcat.[16][17] The Syrian Institute for Justice released photographs showing fragments of American weapons at the site of the bombing, which British newspaperThe Telegraph cited as evidence that the US was responsible for civilian casualties.[18]

A United States Central Command spokesman, Josh Jacques, confirmed that the United States had carried out an airstrike, but said that the area was "assessed to be a meeting place foral-Qaeda" and denied both that the mosque had been the target and that it had been the building that was destroyed.[2] "We did not target a mosque, but the building that we did target – which was where the meeting [of militants] took place – is about 50 feet [15 m] from a mosque that is still standing," spokesperson Colonel John Thomas said.[6] Pentagon spokesman Jeff Davis later clarified that the target had been identified as a "partially constructed community center."[19] The photo released bythe Pentagon showed the mosque was "relatively unscathed," Davis added.[8]

The Washington Post reported that twoReaper drones fired at least fourHellfire missiles and dropped a 500-pound (230 kg) bomb in the attack.[19] Within a week of the attack, US Central Command began two internal investigations, one into whether civilians had been killed and another to find additional information about the type of building hit and its occupants.[20] On May 5, 2017, the investigation determined that the building was indeed part of a mosque-complex.[11]

According toForensic Architecture, witness testimonies and photographs of the building taken before the strike suggested few of the rooms had doors separating them from one another.[13] A large number of local residents visited regularly and the building was open to the public.[13] Forensic Architecture concluded that "[a]ll of this makes it unlikely that a meeting of senior al-Qaeda operatives would have been taking place at the time of the strike."[13]

In a report released 18 April 2017,Human Rights Watch stated that they had "not found evidence to support the allegation that members of al-Qaeda or any other armed group were meeting in the mosque." Local residents in the area reported that there were no members of armed groups at the mosque or in the area at the time of the attack and that the victims were all civilians and local residents. First responders to the initial strike said the dead and injured wore civilian clothes and that they saw no weapons at the site. Human Rights Watch also noted that "U.S. authorities have so far released no information to support their claims."[12]

In June 2017, a United States military investigation found the airstrike was legal and caused one civilian casualty.[21][22] U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Paul Bontrager said the investigation into the attack did not involve any interviews with people on the ground and no U.S. personnel visited the site.[21]

In September 2017, a report from the UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria said that three days before striking the mosque compound, the U.S. team knew about the target but did not do enough to verify it.[3] The Commission therefore concluded that "United States forces failed to take all feasible precautions to avoid or minimize incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects, in violation of international humanitarian law."[3] The UN commission said its findings did not support the U.S. claim that an al-Qaeda meeting was taking place there and the U.S. had not released evidence that such a meeting took place.[3] The report noted that theUnited States Central Command investigation included interviews with dozens of people, none of whom were in al-Jinah at the time of the attack.[3] The investigators said the U.S. had sought to limit collateral damage using ten bombs that produced minimal blast and fragmentation to hit the building, before following up with two missiles fired by a drone at people fleeing.[22]

Reactions

[edit]
  • Human Rights Watch considered the attack as unlawful and condemned the US for failing to take necessary precautions to avoid civilian casualties in the strike.[23]
  • RussiaRussiaDefense MinisterSergey Shoygu urged a comment from the United States after photos of a reported US missile fragment found at the site of the bombed Syrian mosque appeared on the Internet.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^al-Jinah mosque.Forensic Architecture
  2. ^abcOakford, Samuel (16 March 2017)."Exclusive: US Says it Carried Out Deadly Strike that Hit an Aleppo Mosque".Airwars.
  3. ^abcdefghiMasri, Lena (September 7, 2017)"US airstrikes on Syria mosque compound violated international law, UN says"ABC News.
  4. ^abcBethan, McKernan (17 March 2017)."US 'bombed mosque during evening prayers, killing 46 people'".The Independent.Archived from the original on 2022-05-01. Retrieved17 March 2017.
  5. ^abc"Pentagon denies striking mosque in Syria, says it killed al Qaeda militants".Reuters. 17 March 2017.
  6. ^abStaff and agencies (17 March 2017)."US admits Syria airstrike that killed 46 but denies targeting mosque".The Guardian. Retrieved17 March 2017.
  7. ^Staff writers (17 March 2017)."Air strike on mosque near Aleppo in Syria kills 42: monitor".Reuters. Retrieved17 March 2017.
  8. ^abHennigan, W. J. (17 March 2017)."U.S. military denies airstrike hit mosque in Syria, following reports of dozens killed".Los Angeles Times. Retrieved26 March 2017.
  9. ^ab"US insists Al Jinah raid targeted al-Qaeda, not mosque".Al Jazeera. 17 March 2017.
  10. ^abStaff writers."Air raid on mosque near Aleppo 'kills dozens'".www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved17 March 2017.
  11. ^abStarr, Barbara (4 May 2017)."Pentagon investigation: US hit mosque complex".CNN. Retrieved2017-05-05.
  12. ^ab"Attack on the Omar Ibn al-Khatab Mosque".Human Rights Watch. 18 April 2017. Retrieved21 April 2017.
  13. ^abcd"Airstrikes on the al-Jinah Mosque"Forensic Architecture. April 17, 2017.
  14. ^Staff."Airstrike on mosque near Aleppo in Syria 'kills 42'".The Telegraph. Retrieved17 March 2017.
  15. ^abStaff (17 March 2017)."US admits Syria airstrike that killed 46 but denies targeting mosque".The Guardian. Retrieved17 March 2017.
  16. ^MEE staff."US denies hitting Syrian mosque in attack that killed dozens".Middle East Eye. Retrieved18 March 2017.
  17. ^Triebert, Christiaan (16 March 2017)."CONFIRMED: US Responsible for Aleppo Mosque Bombing - bellingcat".bellingcat. Retrieved18 March 2017.
  18. ^Williams, Sara Elizabeth (18 March 2017)."US denies targeting Syrian mosque where dozens of people died in airstrike".The Telegraph. Retrieved18 March 2017.
  19. ^ab"Mounting claims of civilian deaths after U.S. targets al-Qaeda in Syria".The Washington Post. 17 March 2017. Retrieved22 March 2017.
  20. ^"U.S. Military Investigating Reports of Civilian Deaths in Syria Airstrike".The New York Times. 21 March 2017. Retrieved22 March 2017.
  21. ^abGibbons-Neff, Thomas (June 7, 2017)"U.S. finds that March airstrike that struck building described as mosque was legal"The Washington Post.
  22. ^abCumming-Bruce, Nick (September 6, 2017)"U.N. Panel Faults Syria’s Military for Chemical Attack"The New York Times.
  23. ^"Syria: US Mosque Attack Likely Unlawful".Human Rights Watch. 18 April 2017. Retrieved31 January 2026.
General topics
Factions
Key figures
Military
operations
2017
2018
2019
2020
2022
2024
Overviews
Main overviews
Effects and ongoing concerns
Phases and processes
World reaction
Specific groups and countries
Agreements and dialogues
Transitional phase
Background
2011
Jan–Apr
May–Aug
Sep–Dec
2012
Jan–Apr
May–Aug
Sep–Dec
2013
Jan–Apr
May–Dec
2014
Jan–Jul
Aug–Dec
2015
Jan–Jul
Aug–Dec
2016
Jan–Apr
May–Aug
Sep–Dec
2017
Jan–Apr
May–Aug
Sep–Dec
2018
Jan–Apr
May–Aug
Sep–Dec
2019
Jan–Apr
May–Aug
Sep–Dec
2020
Jan–Dec
2021
Jan–Dec
2022
Jan–Dec
2023
Jan–Dec
2024
Jan–Oct
Nov–present
2025
Nov 2024
–present
2026
Nov 2024
–present
Spillover
Israel and Golan Heights:
Iraq:
Jordanian border incidents
Lebanon:
Turkey:
Elsewhere:
Belligerents
Ba'athist regime
Politics of Ba'athist Syria
Military and militias
Foreign support
Opposition
Interim government
Opposition militias
Foreign support
Autonomous Administration
of North and East Syria
DFNS Government
SDF militias
Support
Islamists
Islamic State
al-Qaeda and allies
People
Pro-Government
Dissidents
DAANES
Related
Elections
Issues
Peace process
Investigations/legal cases
Related topics
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2017_al-Jinah_airstrike&oldid=1335776432"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp