| ←2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 → Midterm elections | |
| Election day | November 7 |
|---|---|
| Incumbent president | George W. Bush(Republican) |
| Next Congress | 110th |
| Senate elections | |
| Overall control | Democratic gain |
| Seats contested | 33 of 100 seats |
| Net seat change | Democratic +5 |
 | |
| 2006 Senate election results map Democratic gain Connecticut for Lieberman gain Democratic hold Republican hold Independent hold | |
| House elections | |
| Overall control | Democratic gain |
| Popular vote margin | Democratic +8.0% |
| Net seat change | Democratic +31 |
 | |
| 2006 House election results map Democratic gain Democratic hold Republican hold | |
| Gubernatorial elections | |
| Seats contested | 38 (36 states, 2 territories) |
| Net seat change | Democratic +6 |
 | |
| 2006 gubernatorial election results map Democratic gain Democratic hold Republican hold | |
Elections were held in the United States on November 7, 2006, in the middle ofRepublican PresidentGeorge W. Bush's second term against the backdrop of thewar on terror. In a political revolution that ended more than a decade of Republican rule, theDemocratic Party was swept into majorities of both chambers ofCongress,governorships, andstate legislatures. These elections were widely categorized as aDemocratic wave.
In theSenate, Democrats won a net gain of six seats to secure a narrow majority in that chamber. Democrats also gained 31 seats in theHouse of Representatives, and following the election,Nancy Pelosi became the first femalespeaker of the House. In the gubernatorial elections, Democrats achieved a net gain of six seats. Nationwide, Republicans failed to win any congressional or gubernatorial seat that was held by a Democrat before the election. This was also the first time since 1994 where a party did not lose a single incumbent in a gubernatorial or congressional election.
Reasons for the Democratic Party's victory included the decline of thepublic image of George W. Bush, dissatisfaction of his administration's handling of bothHurricane Katrina and theWar in Iraq, the beginning of the collapse of theUnited States housing bubble, Bush's legislative defeat regardingSocial Security privatization and immigration reform, the Republican-controlled Congress's unprecedented and unpopular involvement in theTerri Schiavo case, and aseries of scandals in 2006 involving Republican politicians.[1]
In March 2003, PresidentGeorge W. Bush ordered an invasion ofIraq, a state which the Bush administration claimed was linked to theSeptember 11 attacks in 2001, and claimed was producingweapons of mass destruction. In May, just two months after the initial invasion, Bush announced theend of major combat operations in Iraq. In the following months, insurgents began resisting the American occupation. Additionally, religious tensions between majorityShiite and minoritySunni Muslims, tensions which had been suppressed under the grip of Saddam's regime, resulted in violence.
By the end of 2003, despite the war's initial popularity, thepost-war occupation was losing support from the American public. A November 2003 Gallup poll showed that Bush's job approval rating had fallen to 50% from a high of 71% at the outset of the war.[2]
The next year,Bush won reelection over Democratic nomineeSenatorJohn Kerry with less than 51% of the popular vote and 286electoral votes (only 16 votes ahead of the 270 votes needed), marking the smallest winning margin for an incumbent president sinceWoodrow Wilson in the1916 election. However, it was the first time since 1988 that a winner garnered a popular majority.
Terrorism and the war in Iraq dominated the election, with domestic issues taking a secondary role. Bush began his second term with a continuation of the occupation and a push to overhaul Social Security with his privatization plan. Both policies proved unpopular, and violence in Iraq continued to increase. Compounding the unpopularity of the war was the fact that no weapons of mass destruction were found. August 2005 was the last time any major public opinion poll recorded majority approval of Bush's job.[3] Negative perceptions of Bush, following the slow governmental response toHurricane Katrina, further weighed on his popularity.
Simultaneously, the popularity of the Republican-controlled109th Congress was also on the decline. A series of notable congressional scandals also took place in Washington, D.C., including the ongoingJack Abramoff lobbying scandal, as well as theMark Foley scandal and theCunningham scandal, both in October 2006. Throughout 2006, sectarian violence persisted in Baghdad and other areas of Iraq; many[4][5] claimed that the conflict was evolving into acivil war.
President Bush's job approval rarely rose above 40%. Perceptions of Congress and Republicans in general, remained highly negative. Additionally, the Congress had a smaller than average list of major accomplishments (considering that the Party in charge of both the House and Senate also had control of the White House) and was not in session for a larger than average number of days. This allowed Democrats and others to characterize it as a "Do-Nothing" Congress and blame the Republican leadership for the lack of progress.
TheDemocratic Party won a majority of the state governorships[6] and the U.S. House and Senate seats, each for the first time since1994, an election-year commonly known as the "Republican Revolution." For the first time since the creation of the Republican Party in 1854, no Republican captured any House, Senate, or gubernatorial seat previously held by a Democrat.[7]
Democrats took a 233–202 advantage in theHouse of Representatives, and achieved a 49–49 tie in theUnited States Senate. The Senate figure is sometimes quoted in the media as 51–49, which includes two members who ran as independent candidates:Bernie Sanders andJoe Lieberman, who promised to caucus with the Democrats.[8] The final Senate result was decided when DemocratJim Webb was declared the winner inVirginia againstincumbentGeorge Allen, as reported by theAssociated Press.[9] On November 9, 2006, Allen and fellow Republican incumbent Sen.Conrad Burns of Montana both conceded defeat, ceding effective control of the Senate to the Democrats.[10][11]
The election madeNancy Pelosi (D-California) the first-ever female, first-ever Italian-American, and first-everCalifornianSpeaker of the House[12] andHarry Reid (D-Nevada) the firstMormonSenate Majority Leader.[13]Keith Ellison (D-Minnesota) became the first Muslim ever elected to the U.S. Congress[14] andMazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) andHank Johnson (D-Georgia) became the first Buddhists in a United States governing body.[15] Although seven states banned recognition ofsame-sex marriage, Arizona became the first state to reject such a ballot initiative.[16]South Dakota rejected a ban onabortion under almost any circumstances, intended to overturn federal constitutional abortion-rights nationwide by setting up a strongtest case that proponents hoped would lead to the overruling ofRoe v. Wade.[17] This result would eventually happen in 2022, with a Mississippi state law that imposed a 15-week ban on abortion leading to the caseDobbs v. Jackson, which then led to Roe's overturning.
Some of the Republican House and Senate seats lost by the Republicans belonged to members of theRepublican Revolution of 1994. SenatorsRick Santorum of Pennsylvania andMike DeWine of Ohio, and RepresentativesCharlie Bass of New Hampshire,John Hostettler of Indiana,Gil Gutknecht of Minnesota, andJ. D. Hayworth of Arizona all won previously Democratic seats in 1994 elections and were defeated in 2006. RepresentativeSue Kelly of New York, also first elected in 1994, was defeated as well. The Democrats also won back the Kansas 2nd and Ohio 18th, both of which they had lost in 1994.
In the 2006 elections, the Democratic Party also claimed a majority of state governorships, gaining control of Republican-held governorships in New York, Massachusetts, Colorado, Arkansas, Maryland, and Ohio, giving the party a 28–22 advantage in governorships.
Various scandals, including theMark Foley congressional page scandal, theJack Abramoff scandal, and various allegations of marital infidelity and abuse, doomed certain candidates, especially incumbents inPA-10 andNY-20, which hosted one of the most negative campaigns in the country. Virginia SenatorGeorge Allen, a potential Republican 2008 Presidential candidate, saw his chances for reelection disappear when he was caught on video using a racial slur to describe a youngIndian-American who worked for his opponent's campaign.[18]
Democrats won control of Congress for the first time since the1994 election, which is commonly known as the "Republican Revolution." For the first time since the creation of the Republican party in 1854, no Republican captured any House, Senate, or Gubernatorial seat previously held by a Democrat.[7]
The 33 seats in theUnited States SenateClass 1 were up for election. The Democrats gained six Senate seats by defeating Republican Senators in the states ofMissouri,Montana,Ohio,Pennsylvania,Rhode Island, andVirginia. IncludingBernie Sanders andJoe Lieberman, two independents who caucused with the Democrats, Democrats won a 51-to-49 majority in the Senate.[8]
Summary of the November 7, 2006, United States Senate election results
| Parties | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | Democratic | Independent | Libertarian | Green | Independence | Constitution | Others | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Before these elections | 55 | 44 | 1[a] | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Not Up | Total | 40 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class 2 (2002→2008) | 21 | 12 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class 3 (2004→2010) | 19 | 15 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Up | Class 1 | 15 | 17 | 1[a] | — | — | — | — | — | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Incumbent retired | Held by same party | 1 | 2 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Replaced by other party | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Incumbent ran | Total before | 14 | 15[b] | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Won re-election | 8 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lost re-election |  6 Republicans replacedby  6 Democrats | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lost renomination, held by same party | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lost renomination, and party lost | — | 1 Democrat re-elected as an Independent[a] | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Result after | 8 | 20 | 1[a] | — | — | — | — | — | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gain/loss | 6 | 5 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total elected | 9 | 22 | 2[a] | — | — | — | — | — | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Result | 49 | 49 | 2[a] | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Popular vote | Votes (turnout: 29.7 %) | 25,437,934 | 32,344,708 | 378,142 | 612,732 | 295,935 | 231,899 | 26,934 | 1,115,432 | 60,839,144 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share | 41.81% | 53.16% | 0.62% | 1.01% | 0.49% | 0.38% | 0.04% | 1.83% | 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources:
All 435 seats in theUnited States House of Representatives were up for election. The Democrats won the national popular vote by a margin of eight percentage points and gained thirty-one seats from the Republicans.[19]
The election madeNancy Pelosi (D-California) the first-ever female, first-ever Italian-American, and first-everCalifornianSpeaker of the House[12]Keith Ellison (D-Minnesota) became the first Muslim ever elected to the U.S. Congress[14] andMazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) andHank Johnson (D-Georgia) became the first Buddhists in a United States governing body.[15]
| Party | Seats | Popular vote | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2006 | Net change | % | Vote | % | +/− | |||
| Democratic Party | 202 | 233 | 31 | 53.6% | 42,338,795 | 52.3% | +5.5% | ||
| Republican Party | 232 | 202 | 30 | 46.4% | 35,857,334 | 44.3% | −5.1% | ||
| Libertarian Party | − | − | − | − | 656,764 | 0.8% | −0.1% | ||
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 | - | 417,895 | 0.5% | −0.1% | ||
| Green Party | − | − | − | − | 243,391 | 0.3% | - | ||
| Constitution Party | − | − | − | − | 91,133 | 0.1% | −0.1% | ||
| Independence Party | − | − | − | − | 85,815 | 0.1% | - | ||
| Reform Party | − | − | − | − | 53,862 | 0.1% | − | ||
| Other parties | − | − | − | − | 1,230,548 | 1.5% | −0.1% | ||
| Totals | 435 | 435 | − | 100.0% | 80,975,537 | 100.0% | − | ||
| Voter turnout: 36.8% | |||||||||
| Sources:Election Statistics - Office of the Clerk | |||||||||
Of the 50United States governors, 36 were up for election. Twenty two of those contested seats were held by Republicans, and the remaining 14 were held by Democrats. Of the 36 state governorships up for election, ten were open due to retirement, term limits, or primary loss. Democrats won open Republican-held seats in New York, Massachusetts, Ohio, Arkansas and Colorado, in addition to defeating incumbentBob Ehrlich in Maryland and holding their sole open seat in Iowa. As a result of the2006 gubernatorial elections, there were 28 Democratic governors and 22 Republican governors, a reversal of the numbers held by the respective parties prior to the elections.
Additionally, governorships were up for election in theU.S. territories ofGuam, held by a Republican, and theU.S. Virgin Islands, where the Democratic governor was retiring. In each location, the incumbent party maintained control of the governorship.
Nearly allstate legislatures were up for election. Prior to the general elections, with the exception of thenonpartisanNebraska Legislature, 21 legislatures were controlled by Republicans, 19 by Democrats, and 9 were split legislatures (where each house is controlled by a different party). As a result of the 2006 elections, 23 legislatures were carried by Democrats, 16 by Republicans, and 10 legislatures were split. In all, Republicans lost, and Democrats gained more than 300 state legislative seats.
Democrats flipped ten legislative chambers, while Republicans gained control of one. In total, Democrats gained or retained control of the state legislatures and governorships of 15 states, thus creating a unified government inArkansas,Colorado,Illinois,Iowa,Louisiana,Maine,Maryland,Massachusetts,New Hampshire,New Jersey,New Mexico,North Carolina,Oregon,Washington andWest Virginia, although the governorship of Louisiana reverted to the Republicans with the October 2007 election ofBobby Jindal. Republicans now control ten state governments, these being,Florida,Georgia,Idaho,Missouri,North Dakota,South Carolina,South Dakota,Texas andUtah.[20]
Democrats flipped ten legislative chambers. Democrats gained control of theOregon House of Representatives, theMinnesota House of Representatives, both houses of theIowa General Assembly, and both houses of theNew Hampshire General Court- for the first time since 1875, giving them complete legislative control over those states. The Iowa Senate was previously tied. Democrats also won majorities in theWisconsin Senate, theMichigan House of Representatives, thePennsylvania House of Representatives, and theIndiana House of Representatives, turning those legislatures into split bodies.[21] Additionally, a Democratic-led coalition was created in theAlaska Senate, which was previously a Republican majority.[22] Democrats won a majority of state legislative chambers for the first time since 1995.
Conversely, Republicans gained control of theMontana House of Representatives with the loneConstitution Party representative voting for Republican control of that body.
Democrats won a veto-proof supermajority in both houses of theConnecticut General Assembly, with Democrats holding a commanding 131–56 majority. The most dramatic change in party control occurred with theNew Hampshire General Court, where Republicans held a 92-seat majority in the House and an eight-seat majority in the Senate prior to the election. Ultimately, Republicans were down 81 seats in the House and five in the Senate, giving control of the General Court to the Democrats. This coincided with the landslide reelection of Democratic GovernorJohn Lynch, the takeover of both of New Hampshire's U.S. House seats by Democrats, and New Hampshire's uniqueExecutive Council gaining a Democratic majority.
Third parties received largely mixed results in the 2006 elections. In theMaine House of Representatives,Green State RepresentativeJohn Eder was narrowly defeated by Democratic rivalJon Hinck in a bitterly contested campaign overPortland's 118th District. Eder's loss deprived the U.S. Green movement's highest elected position in any state office.[23]
In theVermont House of Representatives, theVermont Progressive Party successfully maintained its six seats within the chamber. The Vermont Progressive Party has in recent years become one of the most consistently successful third parties in the U.S. to be elected to higher office.
In Illinois, seemingly out of dissatisfaction with both the candidacies of Democratic GovernorRod Blagojevich and Republican candidateJudy Baar Topinka resulted in 10% of the electorate voting for theGreen Party candidate Rich Whitney, an accomplishment, by all means, considering Whitney did not campaign on television or radio.
In Montana,Rick Jore made history by becoming the first candidate of the right-wingConstitution Party to be elected to a state legislature, elected to the 12th District in theMontana House of Representatives. Jore initially won in 2004 by three votes, only to see the courts throw out enough ballots to give the Democrats the victory. In the 2006 elections, Jore won convincingly, garnering 56.2% of the vote.[24] However, the Montana Constitution Party is no longer chartered under the national party, denying theUnited States Constitution Party the claim of holding a higher office.
Neither theLibertarian nor theReform Parties gained any state legislative seats.
Voters weighed in on various ballot initiatives. These included:
Numerous other elections for local, city, and county public offices were held.
An unusual local election occurred inSouth Dakota;Marie Steichen was elected toJerauld County Commissioner, despite the fact that she died two months before the election. Her name was never replaced on the ballot, and voters who chose her were aware of her death.[26]
InRichmond, California, a city of more than 100,000 residents, the Green Party challenger, City CouncilpersonGayle McLaughlin, unseated Democratic incumbentIrma Anderson and became the first Green Party Mayor of a city of that size.[27]
Two candidates in Nevada's branch of theConstitution Party, called theIndependent American Party (Nevada), were also elected to office. Jackie Berg was electedEureka County Clerk with 54.1% of the vote, easily toppingRepublican andLibertarian opposition. Also, Cel Ochoa will be the new Constable inSearchlight, Nevada by virtue of winning 54.93% of the vote to defeat her Republican rival. Another Nevada Independent Party member, Bill Wilkerson, was elected to theElko, Nevada, School Board, in a non-partisan race.[28]
InMissoula County, Montana, residents passed a measure to encourage the County Sheriff's Department to make marijuana enforcement a last priority.[29]
InDallas County, Texas, Democrats regained control in 41 out of 42 contested GOP judgeships, as well as the district attorney's office and the county judge's seat.[30]
Beginning just after George W. Bush'sreelection, political analysts point to a number of factors and events that led to the eventual Republican defeat in 2006. It is generally agreed that the single most important issue during the 2006 election was thewar in Iraq, and more specifically President Bush's handling of it and the overall public weariness over it.
Public opinion polling conducted during the days just before the election and the weeks just after it showed that the war in Iraq was considered the most important election issue by the largest segment of the public.[31] Exit polling showed that relatively large majorities of voters both fell into the category of disapproving of the war or expressing the desire to withdraw troops in some type of capacity. Both brackets broke extremely heavily for Democrats.[32] The issue of the war seemed to play a large part in the nationalization of the election, a departure from previous midterm elections, which tended to be about local, district-centric issues.[33] The effect of this was a general nationwide advantage for Democrats, who were not seen as being as tied to the war as Republicans, led by George Bush, were.
President Bush himself, seen as the leader and face of the Republican party, was a large factor in the 2006 election. Exit polls showed that a large block of the electorate had voted for Democrats or for third parties specifically because of personal opposition to or dislike for Bush. The size of the segment that said it had voted specifically to support Bush was not as large.[33] Opposition to Bush was based on a number of factors, these not limited to opposition to hisSocial Security privatization plan, the slow response of his administration toHurricane Katrina, his perceived inaction in the face of and association withrising gas prices, and as mentioned above, his continued commitment to the war.[34]
Congressional approval, which had been slightly negative since before the 2004 election, began a steady drop beginning in March 2005. Congress's unprecedented and unpopular involvement in theTerri Schiavo controversy is often pointed to as the catalyst for this drop. Congressional scandals, such as theJack Abramoff lobbying scandal, the sentencing ofDuke Cunningham to over eight years in prison, theindictment of then House majority leader Tom DeLay, the corruption ofWilliam J. Jefferson andBob Ney, the misconduct ofCynthia McKinney, and theMark Foley scandal all continued to pull down congressional popularity. In the months leading up to the election, congressional approval ratings flirted with all-time historical lows. Because congress was controlled by Republicans, this high disapproval affected Republicans much more negatively than it did with Democrats.
Democrats were successful in portraying Congress as a lazy, greedy, egotistical and inefficient "Do-Nothing Congress.", which they contrasted with their "New Direction for America" campaign. Indeed, the congress had been in session much less than previous ones had[35] (including those under Republican control), and numerous public opinion polls showed that large majorities believed that the congress had accomplished less than normal. This too, took a toll on Republicans (as the leaders of the government).
The listed scandals were all dwarfed by the highly publicisedMark Foley scandal, which broke in late September and rapidly metastasized to include the House Republican leadership. Florida RepresentativeMark Foley, who ironically headed theHouse Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, was found to have been making sexually lewd and highly inappropriate contacts online with male congressional pages, and it was soon found that members of the Republican leadership knew in some capacity of Foley's advances, yet took little action. The scandal allowed Democrats to adopt corruption as a campaign issue, and exit polls on election day showed that corruption remained an important issue, one that Democrats held an advantage on.[36] In addition, many (at the time and after the fact) cited the scandal as an event that sealed the fate of the Republican congress.[37][38] After the election, top Republican strategist Karl Rove specifically named the Foley scandal as the cause of the Republicans' loss of congress.[39]
The result was that on election day, many congressional seats had been touched by Republican scandals and were easier to pick up for Democrats than under normal conditions. These include but are not limited to theMontana Senate,Virginia Senate,CA-11,PA-07,PA-10,TX-22,OH-18,FL-16 andNY-20 races.
Almost all of the gains made by Democrats came from large gains among independents, not Republicans. Democrats, Republicans, and independents all accounted for proportions of the electorate similar to what they did in 2004. Democrats and Republicans voted nearly as loyally for their parties in 2006 as they did in 2004, but independents exhibited a large swing towards Democrats. In 2004, independents split 49–46, slightly in favor of Democrats,[40] but in 2006 they voted 57–39 for Democrats, a fifteen-point swing and the largest margin among independents for Democrats since the1986 elections.[33]
There were scattered reports of problems at polling places across the country as new electronic voting systems were introduced in many states. The problems ranged from voter and election official confusion about how to use new voting machines to apparent political dirty tricks designed to keep certain voters from casting their votes to inclement voter suppressing turnout.
Some reported problems:
Many political analysts concluded that the results of the election were based around PresidentGeorge W. Bush's policies in theWar in Iraq and corruption in Congress.[67][68] At a press conference given to address the election results, President Bush called the cumulative results of the election a "thumpin'" by the Democrats.[69]
Democrats promised an agenda that included raising theminimum wage, implementing all of the9/11 Commission recommendations, eliminating subsidies for oil companies, restricting lobbyists, repealing tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, lowering interest rates oncollege loans, expandingstem-cell research, investigating political appointees for actions taken during and leading to thewar in Iraq, allowing current tax cuts to expire,[70] and negotiatingMedicare prescription drug prices. They planned to legislate these issues within their first 100 legislative hours of power in January 2007.[71] According to Brian Wright, president of Democrasource, LLC (an Ohio-based national political consulting group), "There's no question, the administration and Iraq set the tone for this year. This new balance of power can be a true catalyst to get the country back on track."
Prior to the election in July 2006 Democrats unveiled a six-point plan they promised to enact if elected with congressional majorities. The plan was billed the "Six for 06 agenda" and officially called "A New Direction For America"[72] and compared to the 1994 Republican "Contract with America".[73] The six-points of the plan include: "honest leadership and open government, real security, energy independence, economic prosperity and educational excellence, a healthcare system that works for everyone, and retirement security".[74]
With apparent reference to the impact of the Iraq war policy, in a press conference held on November 8, Bush talked about the election and announced the resignation ofSecretary of DefenseDonald Rumsfeld. Bush stated, "I know there's a lot of speculation on what the election means for the battle we're waging in Iraq. I recognize that many Americans voted last night to register their displeasure with the lack of progress being made there." Prior to the election, Bush had stated that he intended to keep Rumsfeld on as Secretary of Defense until the end of his presidency. However, Bush then went on to add Rumsfeld's resignation was not due to the Democratic victories on November 8. Rumsfeld's job reportedly had been on the line for several months prior to the election, and the decision for him to stay until after the election, if he was going to be let go at all, was also reportedly made several months earlier. All this led to his resignation.[75]
On the same day, thenSpeaker of the House, RepresentativeDennis Hastert of the 14th Congressional District ofIllinois, said he would not seek theMinority Leader position for the110th Congress.
In the aftermath of the electionThe Weekly Standard published a number of articles highly critical of how the Republican Party had managed the United States Congress. It called the electoral defeat for the G.O.P. "only a little short" of "devastating" saying the "party of reform ... didn't reform anything" and warned that the Democratic Party has expanded its "geographical sphere of Democratic power" to formerly Republican-held states such as Montana, Colorado, Arizona, Wyoming, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota, while it solidified former swing states likeIllinois as Democratic strongholds. In the New England region, popular Republican SenatorLincoln Chafee ofRhode Island was defeated, despite having approval ratings near 60% and Republicans now only control a single district, the CT-04 seat held byChris Shays, out of 22 congressional districts. The Democrats also became the clear majority in theMid Atlantic region as well. Two Republican incumbent Congressmen were defeated inNew York state and the Democrats picked up a Republican open seat, all from Republican regions upstate, and four Republican Congressmen were defeated inPennsylvania. Democrats picked up seats in all Northeastern state legislatures holding elections, exceptRhode Island, which remained unchanged (and Democrats clearly in the majority), winning asupermajority in both the Connecticut House and Senate, and winning both houses of the New Hampshire legislature for the first time since 1874. Democrats kept both vulnerable Senate seats inMaryland andNew Jersey, winning them by wider margins than predicted, and they won the heavily contested Senate seats inMissouri andVirginia.
The Democratic expansion into Indiana, Virginia and Ohio has "seriously diminished the chances for future Republican success" it claimed. The paper, which has been described as the "quasi-official organ of the Bush Administration"[76] also stated that more people would have to "bendover" to get anywhere in a political office and has called on Republicans to move to the center for the sake of the party's future viability saying "conservatives won't want to hear this, but the Republican who maneuvered his way into the most impressive victory ... won ... after moving to the center" and that "the South is not enough space to build a national governing majority".[77][78]
The government of thePeople's Republic of China was said to be nervous about the effect a Democratic-led Congress might have on its exports to the United States market and the possible controversy that could result because of the country'shuman rights record.Nancy Pelosi, who became the Speaker of the House, is a noted critic of Chinese policy. Concerns likely to be raised include theundervalued Chinese currency, blamed by some for the recent losses in the American manufacturing industry, and issues such asinternet censorship,piracy, limited market access within China itself for companies based in the U.S., andreligious freedom.[79] TheChinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu stated that she hoped the United States would play a "constructive role" in maintaining "sound, healthy and stable relations between China and the U.S.".[80]
BelgianMinister of DefenceAndré Flahaut expressed his approval of Rumsfeld's resignation. He said Rumsfeld was "obstinate", and he hoped that the elections would bring upon a change in the United States' foreign policy.[80]
Danish Prime MinisterAnders Fogh Rasmussen said he hoped that President Bush and the newly elected Congress could find common ground and resolve issues regarding theWar in Afghanistan and theWar in Iraq. Rasmussen also said Denmark would keep its troops inIraq and neither the election nor the resignation ofDonald Rumsfeld would change government foreign policies.[80]
France'sMinister of DefenceMichele Alliot-Marie said that her American counterpart,Donald Rumsfeld, had "taken the consequences" of an election in which voters punished the government over the war in Iraq.[80] The formerSocialistPrime Minister of France,Laurent Fabius, was quoted as saying, ""A lot of Americans have realised that Mr. Bush has lied to them."[81]
The GermanForeign Office's coordinator for German-American cooperation, Karsten D. Voigt, said that he believed that the Democratic-controlled Congress will be more cooperative with the world, but he expects that Europeans will have to carry more influence on such foreign issues of importance, such as the war in Iraq and in Afghanistan, and the nuclear weapon programs ofNorth Korea andIran. Voigt further stated that Europe needed to develop a stronger relationship with the United States, especially with newly elected Congressional politicians. Voigt went on to say that doing so would help "better convey European positions on major international issues and make concerted efforts to find constructive political solutions for the future."[82]
Labour PartyMember of ParliamentJohn McDonnell, a critic of United KingdomPrime MinisterTony Blair, said, "the message of the American people is clear – there needs to be a major change of direction in Iraq. Just as in Britain, people in the U.S. feel that they have been ill advised, misled and ignored."[81] McDonnell, who became the first Labour Party MP to announce that he would stand forleadership in 2007, also said, "These election results have not only damaged Bush, they mean that Blair is now totally isolated in the international community."[81]
Prime Minister of Italy,Romano Prodi, believed that it wasBush's Iraq policy that had led to the complete turnover in the elections. He said that Bush would "have to negotiate with the opposition on all issues."[81]
The rulingSpanish Socialist Workers' Party responded to the elections stating that they hoped the elections "would help to change the course of U.S. foreign policy."[81]
Iran's Supreme Leader AyatollahAli Khamenei on Friday called U.S. President George W. Bush's defeat in congressional elections a victory for Iran. "This issue (the elections) is not a purely domestic issue for America, but it is the defeat of Bush's hawkish policies in the world", Khamenei said in remarks reported byIran's student news agency ISNA on Friday. "Since Washington's hostile and hawkish policies have always been against the Iranian nation, this defeat is actually an obvious victory for the Iranian nation." "The result of this election indicates that the majority of American people are dissatisfied and are fed up with the policies of the American administration", the IRNA state news agency quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.[83]I'd also like to say a word to the winners of the recent elections in the U.S. :
The United States has had many administrations; some who have left a positive legacy, and others that are neither remembered fondly by the American people nor by other nations.
Now that you control an important branch of the U.S. Government, you will also be held to account by the people and by history.
If the U.S. Government meets the current domestic and external challenges with an approach based on truth and Justice, it can remedy some of the past afflictions and alleviate some of the global resentment and hatred of America . But if the approach remains the same, it would not be unexpected that the American people would similarly reject the new electoral winners, although the recent elections, rather than reflecting a victory, in reality point to the failure of the current administration's policies. These issues had been extensively dealt with in myletter to President Bush earlier this year.[84][85]
