
A referendum on a new constitution was held inSouth Africa on 2 November 1983 in which thewhite population was given the opportunity to approve or reject theConstitution of 1983. This constitution introduced theTricameral Parliament, in whichColoured andIndian South Africans would be represented in separate parliamentary chambers, whileblack Africans, who were the majority of South Africa's population, would remain unrepresented. The referendum passed with 66.3% of voters voting "Yes"; consequently the new constitution came into force on 3 September 1984.
In 1981 theSenate was abolished and replaced with thePresident's Council, which was an advisory body consisting of sixty nominated members from the white, coloured, Indian and Chinese population groups. Following a request by Prime MinisterP.W. Botha, the President's Council presented a set of proposals in 1982 forconstitutional and political reform. This proposal called for the implementation of "power sharing" between the white, coloured and Indian communities.
The right wing of the rulingNational Party (NP) rejected this proposal and a group of itsMPs, led by Dr.Andries Treurnicht, acabinet minister and the leader of the NP in theTransvaal province, broke away to form theConservative Party (CP) in order to fight for a return toapartheid in its original form. However, Botha continued to be in favour of implementing the President's Council proposal and in 1983 the NP government introduced a new constitutional framework. A referendum was called for in order to determine public support for the reforms amongst white voters. TheNew Republic Party led byVause Raw supported the new constitution, although it continued to call for black representation in Parliament.
Both theProgressive Federal Party (PFP), which objected to the exclusion of blacks, as well as the CP, which objected to the participation of coloureds and Indians, campaigned for a "No" vote. However, many PFP followers and parts of the anti-governmentEnglish languagepress supported the new constitution as "a step in the right direction". The conservative opposition to the reforms used banners with the text "Rhodesia voted yes – vote no!" reflecting on the transformation to majority rule inRhodesia.[1]
The response of Coloured, Indian and black leaders were mixed. The new constitution was rejected by most Bantustan leaders and the Urban Councils Association of South Africa (representing the black township administrations) because it did not provide for black representation. Coloured and Indian parties that intended to participate in the Tricameral Parliament but also insisted on extending representation to the black majority.[2]
TheUnited Democratic Front (UDF) was launched as a non-racial coalition to oppose the referendum and the subsequent elections for the coloured and Indian chambers in parliament.
Are you in favour of the implementation of the Constitution Act, 1983, as approved by Parliament?
Is U ten gunste van die inwerkingtreding van die Grondwet, 1983, soos deur die Parlement goedgekeur?[3]
| Choice | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| For | 1,360,223 | 66.29 | |
| Against | 691,577 | 33.71 | |
| Total | 2,051,800 | 100.00 | |
| Valid votes | 2,051,800 | 99.48 | |
| Invalid/blank votes | 10,669 | 0.52 | |
| Total votes | 2,062,469 | 100.00 | |
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,713,000 | 76.02 | |
| Source: Direct Democracy[4] | |||
For counting purposes the provinces of South Africa were divided into various referendum areas. The following table shows the results in each area.[5]
| Area | Valid votes | Invalid votes | Total votes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Votes | % | Votes | % | ||||
| Cape | |||||||
| Beaufort West | 22,502 | 74.42 | 7,733 | 25.58 | 30,235 | 93 | 30,328 |
| Cape Town | 221,511 | 75.61 | 71,456 | 24.39 | 292,967 | 1,229 | 294,196 |
| East London | 53,202 | 77.91 | 15,087 | 22.09 | 68,289 | 255 | 68,544 |
| George | 31,256 | 73.23 | 11,426 | 26.77 | 42,682 | 141 | 42,823 |
| Kimberley | 34,815 | 66.05 | 17,898 | 33.95 | 52,713 | 110 | 52,823 |
| Port Elizabeth | 60,661 | 70.08 | 25,901 | 29.92 | 86,562 | 208 | 86,770 |
| Total | 423,947 | 73.93 | 149,501 | 26.07 | 573,448 | 2,036 | 575,484 |
| Natal | |||||||
| Durban | 123,783 | 73.58 | 44,442 | 26.42 | 168,225 | 750 | 168,975 |
| Pietermaritzburg | 50,519 | 71.58 | 20,060 | 28.42 | 70,579 | 366 | 70,945 |
| Total | 174,302 | 72.99 | 64,502 | 27.01 | 238,804 | 1,116 | 239,920 |
| Orange Free State | |||||||
| Bloemfontein | 52,019 | 65.86 | 26,960 | 34.14 | 78,979 | 331 | 79,310 |
| Kroonstad | 55,486 | 63.19 | 32,321 | 36.81 | 87,807 | 189 | 87,996 |
| Total | 107,505 | 64.46 | 59,281 | 35.54 | 166,786 | 520 | 167,306 |
| Transvaal | |||||||
| Germiston | 113,600 | 65.35 | 60,241 | 34.65 | 173,841 | 900 | 174,741 |
| Johannesburg | 194,396 | 69.44 | 85,554 | 30.56 | 279,950 | 3,906 | 283,856 |
| Pietersburg | 31,403 | 47.42 | 34,827 | 52.58 | 66,230 | 247 | 66,477 |
| Pretoria | 209,763 | 57.13 | 157,433 | 42.87 | 367,196 | 1,035 | 368,231 |
| Roodepoort | 105,307 | 56.76 | 80,238 | 43.24 | 185,545 | 909 | 186,454 |
| Total | 654,469 | 61.01 | 418,293 | 38.99 | 1,072,762 | 6,997 | 1,079,759 |
| South Africa | |||||||
| Total | 1,360,223 | 66.29 | 691,577 | 33.71 | 2,051,800 | 10,669 | 2,062,469 |
Those with unbendable prejudices (the most furiously racist of them being post-UDI immigrants) began to leave for South Africa. There they spread horror stories about Zimbabwe and, in the recent South African referendum on giving Coloureds and Indians the vote, flocked to vote for the right-wing parties behind such banners as 'Rhodesia voted yes – vote no!'